Sunday, November 17, 2024
HomeNews Reports'5 years later someone may challenge provisions prohibiting incest' – SG Mehta argues in...

‘5 years later someone may challenge provisions prohibiting incest’ – SG Mehta argues in same-sex marriage case in Supreme Court

SG Mehta said that hypothetically, someone may get attracted to a family member and claim autonomy in engaging in such relationships in private.

On Thursday, April 27, the arguments in the matter related to same-sex marriage continued in the Supreme Court. During the hearing, Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta argued against the petitioners’ claim to have the right to choose their sexual orientation.

Giving a hypothetical situation, SG Mehta questioned what would happen if, five years down the line, someone approached the court and challenged provisions prohibiting incest. SG Mehta, who is representing the central government in the case, said if unbridled personal autonomy is permitted in terms of sexual orientation, someone may use it to challenge the provisions prohibiting incest in the future.

SG Mehta said that hypothetically, someone may get attracted to a family member and claim autonomy in engaging in such relationships in private. He argued that if sexual orientation is considered a valid reason for autonomy, prohibition on incest might be challenged.

He said, “Please visualise a situation five years down the line. I am attracted to someone in the prohibited (degree of) relationship. Incest is not uncommon across the world, and it is prohibited. Someone is attracted to their sister, claims autonomy, and does something in the private domain. Now cannot this (provisions against incest) be challenged saying, ‘How can this be prohibited’?”

Replying to SG Mehta, CJI clarified that petitioners have argued that sexual orientation is not “a matter of choice” but an “innate characteristic”. CJI called the scenario presented by SG “far-fetched”. He added that sexual orientation could not be exercised in all aspects of the marriage. Furthermore, “It cannot be argued that sexual orientation is so strong that incest be allowed,” CJI added.

SG further talked about full-blood and half-blood relations. He said two persons are related by full blood when they are descendants from a common ancestor by the same wife and half blood when common ancestor but have different wives. Such provisions cannot happen in the case of homosexual couples. “Merely making man and woman as persons will completely make this provision redundant,” he said.

Furthermore, SG questioned, in the case of homosexual couples, who will be deemed as a wife and who will become a husband in case the couple gets a divorce. He said, “We cannot just say decide the issue and leave individual cases for future adjudication. Issues will arise all across the country. Who will be the wife in a gay marriage and who will be the wife in a lesbian marriage where rights are granted to her? For maintenance, when the wife can establish she has no means to maintain herself, then the husband has to provide maintenance pendente lite. In gay marriage who will be the wife.” Listening to his arguments, the bench discussed but before muting the mic, Justice Narasimha was heard saying “That will be an impossible thing to do”.

The next date of hearing in the same-sex marriage has been set for May 3, 2023.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -