Friday, November 8, 2024
HomeNews ReportsReal-life Jolly LLB: Judge tells Somnath Bharti that his petition against Bansuri Swaraj is...

Real-life Jolly LLB: Judge tells Somnath Bharti that his petition against Bansuri Swaraj is full of typos, cant understand what the petition says

The Delhi High Court judge pointed out that the petition filed by Somnath Bharti had made references to Respondent No.4 although there was none in the memo of parties.

In an embarrassing development on Monday (22nd July), the Delhi High Court came down heavily on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Somnath Bharti after he filed an error-ridden petition against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj.

Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora of the Delhi High Court noted, “Your petition is full of typographical errors. I can’t issue notice because I don’t understand anything.”

He pointed out that the petition filed by Somnath Bharti had made references to Respondent No.4 although there was none in the memo of parties.

Before adjourning the matter to 13th August this year, the Delhi High Court ruled, “It is full of mistakes. There are too many mistakes. You will have to correct the petition first. I can’t issue notice because I can’t understand… I will adjourn and you file a corrected petition.”

For the unversed, Somnath Bharti had filed a petition against Bansuri Swaraj after losing by a margin of 78,370 votes from the New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency. He had alleged election malpractice and levelled corruption charges against the BJP MP.

Bharti claimed that a politician named Raaj Anand Kumar, who was fielded by the BSP from the New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency, was working on the behest of the BJP and against AAP.

The embarrassing development in the Delhi High Court today is reminiscent of the 2013 film ‘Jolly LLB’ wherein Judge Sundar Lal Tripathy reprimanded advocate Jagdish Tyagi for filing a typo-ridden Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

“You have written appeal as ‘apple’ in this PIL. Not only that, you have written ‘prosecution’ as prostitution. There are at least 5 mistakes in each line. (You did not do due diligence) and just filed a PIL,” the iconic dialogue of the movie reads.

In a similar fashion, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora of the Delhi High Court rapped petitioner Somnath Bharati, who coincidentally happens to be a lawyer by occupation, for filing a petition riddled with typos.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

‘Minority status of AMU not lost due to statute’: SC overrules 1967 verdict, new bench to decide AMU’s minority status

In his dissenting judgement, Justice Surya Kant stated that a minority can establish an institute under Article 30, but it must be recognised by law as well as by the University Grants Commission, a statutory authority within the Education Ministry.

TISS study reveals that Illegal Muslims from Bangladesh, Myanmar are influencing politics in Maharashtra, here’s how Muslims plan to mobilize for upcoming elections

Amid the ongoing campaign for the upcoming elections scheduled on 20th November in the state, around 180 NGOs are working on the ground among the Muslim community to raise 'awareness' and increase the community’s voter turnout, the strategy that helped MVA during the Lok Sabha elections.

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -