Tuesday, November 19, 2024
Home Blog Page 6801

Cases of Shaktiman and ‘Ganga’: Barbarism that masquerades as Secularism

0

It is painful to be writing this, especially in the context of our country, India. Nevertheless, it must be written.

A 5,000 year old civilization that many would argue represents the pinnacle of human potential is being relentlessly bludgeoned to its knees. A value system, societal fabric, culture, religion and multitude of peacefully coexisting yet incompatible philosophies, no doubt with many deficiencies, that had together expanded the circle of empathy, love and respect to embrace the entirety of universe – all living beings, the whole of nature – is today suffering the relentless onslaught of an ugly, contorted outlook that is, best guessed, born out of mercenary motivations.

So much so that even the voiceless, innocent animals are not being spared in a quest to ostentatiously establish liberal right to choice of food but, to covertly reinforce secularism credentials. In a country that values life in any and all forms, the larger section of the opposition has allowed the discourse to be dirtied to a nauseating extent.

In March-April 2016, a heartbreaking news had shocked many in the country. Shaktiman, a police horse, had died after having been allegedly assaulted by a BJP MLA, even though visuals showed he had not hit the horse. The country, media shed tears, while teams of doctors, caretakers, police personnel were deployed to take care of the hapless animal. A prosthetic limb was flown in from the US to help Shaktiman. Unfortunately, Shaktiman could not be saved. She died despite care, treatment and many wishes from animal lovers. People across the country were sad and indignant at the news.

Animal lovers worldwide expressed grief and indignation. Once the news was out, it is reported experts from the world over offered their assistance to help Shaktiman. The then Chief Minister Harish Rawat paid his tributes to Shaktiman after his death. Union Minister Menaka Gandhi expressed strong sentiments at the incident and asked for the expulsion of the MLA. Even the MLA, Ganesh Joshi himself saidI am very sad. I was not at fault…if I am found guilty, then cut my leg.

A little more than a year later, while a debate on animal slaughter is underway, the government is introducing regulations in the industry. Recently, an inhuman, barbaric act was carried out – this time by Youth Congress workers in Kannur, in the communist ruled state of Kerala, where appeasement and anti-Hindu politics has been the norm of many decades. In a public gathering, a cow was slaughtered in broad daylight in a market in Kannur, cooked and served. She was slaughtered, cut into pieces while a group of workers barbarically sloganeered. And the incident was filmed.

Unfortunately, she does not get the same liberal, urban love and sympathy. She does not deserve a name like Shaktiman did. Unfortunately for her, she is a ‘Hindu animal’ – thus, deserving condescension of atheists, liberals and progressives alike. She could be trampled on and even animal lovers would keep quiet. For she is worse than an animal – a commodity which did not qualify for human sympathy.

The token tweets of condemnation by a few were more about politics than compassion. And, the saddest part of the entire episode was that it happened just for the sake of politics.

Paul McCartney of the Beatles fame had once said:

If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be a vegetarian.

Shockingly, for this group, it does not appear true. The extent of remorselessness demonstrated by that political crowd of Kannur is scary and unnerving. If a cold, unflinching butchering of an innocent, voiceless animal in full public view could only evoke brute political sloganeering and not a shred of remorse, or sympathy, then today, we must realise we stand directly challenged by a thought strand which represents the absolute nadir of human potential. A thought strand that subscribes to only political opportunism.

The media, on the other hand, co-conspired by their conspicuously dubious covering. One TV anchor worded his question to a BJP participant with the phrase: ‘mummy in one state, yummy in another’ referring to BJP’s approach to beef consumption in states like Goa or North East, displaying a pathetic insensitivity to the incident. Politics is all they could see. The cow was dead and gone.

And, animal lovers are deafeningly quiet.

These two incidents over the last 14 months have been meted out disturbingly dissimilar and biased treatments. The fact is that a grotesque, and even savage political opportunism is operating, pathetically masquerading as freedom loving secular-liberalism. Even if one were to forget secularism and all other isms, that fact is that any thought strand whose actions manifest as what has happened in this Kannur market is inhuman.

Much beyond being a product of modern animal rights movements, value of all life, not just human, and love, respect for animals, plants and nature is ingrained in the Indian psyche. Liberalism that finds satiation in meat dripping with fresh blood as remarked by a well known journalist is not just alien but, antithetical to Indianness. However, today, in order to further a variety of vested interests, politics has killed the value of life and a large mercenary media has helped by concealing this ‘crime’ against nature.

Should we allow the poor calf that was cut into pieces by warped appeasement politics to be unnamed? Unlike Shaktiman, she symbolises that grotesque political ideology and opportunism that knows no respect for life, culture or civilization. She is Ganga for she has brought before us all the opportunity to cleanse ourselves of a hypocritical thought stream through her life. Even though she died knowing only the basest form of human brutality, our prayers are with Ganga in her afterlife.

Find out why so many people on Twitter are turning terrorists

Twitter, the micro-blogging website has always been a platform for people to openly express their opinion and humorously roast anyone and everyone who manages to create horrendous gaffes whenever the opportunity arises. The mainstream media and the celebrity journalists have been very liberal in providing such opportunities.

Yesterday the security forces killed Hizbul Mujahideen commander Sabzar Ahmad Bhat, who was the infamous successor of terrorist Burhan Wani. He was gunned down by security forces in South Kashmir’s Pulwama district.

As the nation was busy congratulating the army for eliminating one more wanted terrorist some sections of the mainstream media decided to come up with peculiar headlines with regards to the slain terrorist.

Earlier, after Burhan Wani was killed by the security forces, controversial journalist Barkha Dutt had introduced him as ‘son of poor headmaster’. HuffPost and Times of India, possibly inspired by it, decided to introduce the soft side of the terrorist we did not know.

They carried news stories which claimed that a spurned love affair was the reason behind Sabzar turning into a Hizbul terrorist:

Both these articles [1][2] portrayed that Sabzar had decided to become a terrorist after a girl he loved had decided to spurn his marriage proposal. The headlines might give out the feeling that Sabzar was just another boy next door who was just a normal guy, until the time the girl rejected him after which his head suddenly turned.

But as reported by TOI itself, Sabzar was always a crook and a drug addict who had dropped out of school after failing his Class X exams, who then decided to indulge in criminal activities like drug peddling, thefts, robberies and kidnappings. Marriage was just one of the things he tried and failed.

People on Twitter though were baffled by the very weak “failed love affair” excuse for becoming a terrorist, as the headlines suggested.

The twitter users then, inspired by it, proceeded to trend #ITurnedTerrorist in order to put out equally amusing excuses for people to turn into terrorists:


One had a very valid reason:


One even used this Hashtag to troll Sachin Tendulkar who has been going the extra mile (to say the least) for promoting his movie:

Three years of Modi government: 10 big policy initiatives taken forward

The Modi government has completed three years in office on 26 May. In these three years, Narendra Modi-led NDA government took several landmark policy initiatives that have lifted the mood of the nation which had witnessed ten years of policy paralysis under the Congress-led UPA.

An imprint of Modi’s sheet anchor for governance – ‘Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas‘ (Together with all, development for all) and ‘Minimum Government and Maximum Governance’  — are seen in these policy initiatives. The following are the list of 10 big policy initiates that the Modi government implemented in the last three years.

  1. GST: Of all the policy initiatives taken by the Modi government, the Goods and Services Tax is the most transformative and impactful. GST, the biggest tax reform since Independence, aims at making India a common market with common tax rates. The GST Council, comprising of state finance ministers and headed by the Union Finance Minister, has finalised a four-slab structure – 5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent and 28 per cent. The lowest slab of 5 per cent is meant for the items of common consumption, there would be two standard rates of 12 per cent and 18 per cent for fast-moving consumer goods and the highest slab of 28 per cent is meant for luxury goods. The GST is scheduled for a 1st July roll out.
  2. Make in India: Another major policy initiative undertaken by the Modi government is Make in India. This aims at making India a global manufacturing hub. Make in India initiative encourages both multinational as well as domestic companies to manufacture their products in India. It targets 25 sectors of the economy ranging from manufacturing, infrastructure , automobile to Information Technology (IT) and Business Process Management (BPM). The initiative seeks to drive foreign direct investment, facilitate job creation, foster innovation, enhance skill development, build best-in-class manufacturing infrastructure and protect intellectual property. ‘Make in India’ has changed the way the Government interacts with industry for the economic development of the country.
  3. Skill India: This wants to make India a skilled country. Under the scheme, the government has set the target of providing skill development training to over 500 million youth by the year 2022. The scheme includes four initiatives –National Skill Development Mission, National Policy for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) and Skill Loan scheme. The National Skill Development Mission consists of a three-tier structure – a Governing Council for policy guidance chaired by the Prime Minister, a Steering Committee and a Mission Directorate. The National Skill Development Mission was developed to create convergence across sectors and states in terms of skill training activities. The National Policy for Skill Development and Entrepreneurship is the country’s first integrated national policy for developing skills and promoting innovation-based entrepreneurship on a large scale. PMKVY incentivises skill training by providing financial rewards to candidates who successfully complete approved skill training programmes. Under the Skill Loan scheme, loans ranging from Rs 5,000 to Rs 1.5 lakh are made available to 34 lakh youth seeking to attend skill development programmes.
  4. Digital India: The flagship Digital India programme aims at transforming India into a digitally empowered society and knowledge economy by bringing in digital infrastructure, creating digital empowerment and delivering governance and services through digital means. Digital India has drawn investments to the tune of Rs 4.5 lakh crore in the technology space. It claims to create 18 lakh jobs.
  5. Start-up India, Stand-up India: The scheme was launched to give a boost to entrepreneurship and job creation. The policy initiative promotes bank financing for start-up ventures. The government has increased the overall age limit for start-ups from five years to seven years and 10 years for biotechnology firms. In a block of seven years, eligible start-ups can avail income tax exemption for three years.
  6. Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY):  Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana is national mission for financial inclusion which aims at providing banking services to each and every household of the country. The mission also envisages extension of Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) under various government schemes through bank accounts of the recipients. The scheme offers free zero-balance bank account with a debit card, a Rs 1 lakh accident insurance policy and Rs 30,000 free medical insurance cover for the poor. The Jan Dhan Yojana has made it to the Guinness Book of World Records.
  7. Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana (PMMY): Under the scheme, the government provides funds to Micro-Finance Institutions (MFIs). The scheme provides loans ranging from Rs 50,000 to Rs 10 lakh to the MFIs. The government has set up a new institution called Micro Units Development and Refinance Agency (MUDRA) Bank which acts as a regulator for the purpose. The bank, set up with a corpus of Rs 20,000 crore, caters to 5.77 crore small business units that are spread all across India. The MUDRA Bank nurtures small businesses through three stages of growth –Shishu, Kishor and Tarun. Under the Shishu, Kishore and Tarun schemes, the MUDRA bank allows loans up Rs 50,000, Rs 50,000 to Rs 5 lakh and Rs 5 lakh to Rs 10 lakh respectively. It could be noted that under the Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana, more than 7.45 crore small entrepreneurs received loans worth around Rs 3.17 lakh crore. Of this, 70 per cent of the beneficiaries are women.
  8. Aadhar: Aadhaar is a 12 digit unique-identity number issued to the Indian residents based on their biometric and demographic data. The data is collected by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. With over 1.133 billion enrolled members as of 31 March, 2017, Aadhaar is the world’s largest biometric ID system. 
  9. Ujjwala and PaHaL: Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana is an ambitious social welfare scheme which aims to provide five crore LPG connections to women from BPL households. So far more than 2 crore women from BPL families have received LPG connections under the scheme. The scheme stresses on safeguarding the health of women and children by providing them with clean cooking fuel. PaHaL is a direct benefit transfer scheme for LPG subsidy to BPL families. The scheme aims at providing LPG subsidy to 14.62 crore BPL households. PaHaL scheme has been acknowledged by the Guinness Book of World Records for being the largest cash transfer program.
  10. UDAY: Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojna is a path breaking reform initiative aims at realising Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision for affordable and accessible Power for All by reforming the power sector. The scheme provides a revival package for electricity distribution companies (DISCOMs) with an intent to rescue them from the mounting debt and massive losses. The scheme allows the state governments to take over 75 per cent of the debt of their respective discoms. The state governments then issue ‘UDAY bonds’ to banks and other financial institutions to raise money. The DISCOMS are expected to issue bonds for the remaining 25 per cent of their debt. UDAY is a shining example of cooperative and competitive federalism. Till now 29 states and Union Teritories have joined the scheme which is optional for the states to join. The performances of several DISCOMS have seen a drastic improvement since they signed up for UDAY. According to reports, UDAY has saved a whopping Rs 7,900cr for DISCOMS in FY17.

Security forces gun down Burhan Wani’s successor Sabzar Bhat, 7 other terrorists

In a major victory for the security forces, Hizbul Mujahideen commander Sabzar Ahmad Bhat, on Saturday, was killed along with another terrorist in an encounter at Tral area of Pulwama district in South Kashmir.

Sabzar Ahmad Bhat and one other terrorist were killed in the encounter in Soimoh area of Tral on Saturday morning, SP Vaid, Director General of Jammu & Kashmir Police was quoted as saying.

Sabzar Bhat is successor to Burhan Wani, who was killed in an encounter by the security forces on 8 July, 2016 in south Kashmir. Wani’s killing had sparked months-long protests in the Valley. After his death, the Hizbal had named Mehmood Gaznavi as the new commander for Kashmir. It could be noted that in 2015, Jammu & Kashmir police announced a cash reward on a group of terrorists that included Sabzar.

Security forces launched a cordon and search operation in Soimoh village of Tral following information about presence of Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists. The operation was launched after terrorists opened firing on an Army patrol in Tral area on Friday night.

Reports suggest that soon after the killings of the terrorists, stone-pelting and protests have started at several places in Pulwama, Khanabal and Anamtnag districts. The security forces are on the job to chase away the protestors.

According to intelligence estimate, 250 terrorists are currently active in Jammu & Kashmir. South Kashmir is turning into the hotbed of home-grown militancy with around 100 terrorists reportedly operate in the area.

Six other terrorists were killed in the Rampur sector of the Kathua district of the valley as the security forces foiled yet another infiltration bid.

According to a statement from Army’s Northern Command, the encounters were a result of “relentless operations” by security forces to “defeat desperate attempts by Pakistan and Pak-sponsored agents to spread terror in the state in the run up to the holy month of Ramzan”.


On Friday, the Army had killed two terrorists of Pakistan’s Border Action Team (BAT) in Uri sector following an attack on Indian Army’s patrolling team.

Funds allocated for AAP’s Mohalla Sabhas mysteriously disappear: India Today

When the Aam Aamdi Party was launched in 2012, its founding members had come up with various novel ideas in order to breathe in a bit of fresh air into Indian politics. One such idea was the Mohalla Sabha.

Going by the press releases put out by the AAP, Mohalla Sabha is a means to proactively engage the citizens of a constituency into making policy decisions. That is, via the Mohalla Sabhas, people could decide how the local MLA should spend the funds that are allocated to him, coordinate with various agencies to track developmental works, and identify beneficiaries for various social welfare schemes among others.

Even though it looks like a good example of taking governance to the masses, not just would engaging all the constituents be a cumbersome process, it could also result in complete chaos due to the sheer number of minds involved.

However, the AAP Government in Delhi decided to go ahead with its promise and approved about 2,972 Mohalla Sabhas in 70 constituencies of Delhi. According to the reports, developmental works to the tune of Rs 350 crores could be decided via these sabhas. A developmental allocation was also made in 2015 for starting some Mohalla Sabhas on a pilot basis and their feedback is far from pretty.

Now an India Today investigation has claimed that there are certain gross irregularities when it comes to the funds that were allocated in 2015. According to the report, the AAP government had allocated about about Rs 20 crores to be used up for Mohalla Sabhas in 12 assembly seats. This amounted to about Rs 55 lakh for each Mohalla sabhas to use for various developmental activities of its choice.

Even though the amount was allocated back then, as it turns out, nobody knows where the money has gone. Neither do the AAP ministers or legislators know where the money is, nor has any developmental work been carried out via the funds.

According to a former Mohalla Sabha coordinator, they had identified as many as 12 developmental works after the consensus of local MLA, SDM and residents. A list was made but only a few metal gates were constructed till.

The coordinator also claims that they had planned to construct toilets, libraries, drains etc but their construction never started. The coordinator though is pretty sure that Rs 55 lakh was allocated for the projects and the money should have been there.

The stakeholders have regularly been pressing the local MLAs, Deputy CM Sisodia for information but have got no response in return.

The reporters had visited various constituencies like Kirai, Patparganj and Chhatarpur but the story was same everywhere. For example Rs 1.10 crore was allocated for the construction of roads in Sanjay Colony at Bhati Mines in Chhatarpur assembly but nothing happened, in Kirari constituency funds were allocated for 40 sanitation workers to clean the drains to stop the spread of deadly diseases like dengue and chikungunya but nothing happened.

This raises the question as to if the existing implementation of the Mohalla Sabhas was in shambles then on what basis was this scheme expanded?

This isn’t the only pilot scheme of the AAP which has come under scrutiny. We had reported that the Mohalla clinics which attempted to provide affordable and standard healthcare for the masses were also a possible scam in the making.

There were possible cases of doctors spending just 27 seconds in checking up a patient, creating fake patients on paper and also giving bogus medicines to the real patients so that they would have to come back. Doctors were undertaking such measures as they earned a per-patient fee from the Delhi Government.

The God of false things : How Arundhati Roy creates fake news and gets away with it

Arundhati Roy is a very lucky person. Right before her book release, it just so happens that somebody starts planting fake news stories about her, putting Ms. Roy at the heart of controversy. Everybody knows there is no such thing as bad publicity.

The episode put ‘fake news’ in focus again with hilarious results. The mainstream media, which is the leading manufacturer of fake news, decided to hold debates and shows on ‘fake news’. Or maybe they are right, after all they have the expertise.

But not just the mainstream media, even Arundhati Roy seems to have the expertise. I’ll illustrate this  by telling you how Arundhati Roy creates fake news, sustains it, and how she actually uses it to further advantage even when caught.

You kids take notes. Watch and learn from the legend herself.

(1) It happened to a friend of a friend…

The year was 2002. A fiery Arundhati Roy was determined to shake the conscience of the nation like she always does. Here she is, writing in the Outlook:

fake news by Arundhati Roy

Shocking beyond words, no?

Soon after, Balbir Punj (then a BJP MP) decided to follow up on this horrific incident to try and get justice for Sayeeda. Only to find out this:

fake news by Arundhati Roy

Not only was Sayeeda brutally murdered, the friends of her friends didn’t even want to help with identifying her or her killers.

Key takeaways:

a. Never take direct responsibility for a claim. Always refer to a “friend from Baroda”.

b. When pressed for details, exercise your legal right to remain silent.

(2) Use the fact that foreign audiences don’t know a lot about India

Are you facing a foreign audience that knows little about our internal political affairs? Excellent! Here is your chance to retell India’s history any way you want by moving events around freely in all dimensions of time and space. There’s no fear of getting caught.

So here is Arundhati Roy unplugged at Northwestern Law School in Chicago (see here for full speech)

She goes: “A train full of pilgrims coming back from the destruction of this Ayodhya mosque which was disputed. The train caught fire; nobody knows who set fire to the train…

Yes, why not slide the Babri demolition along the time dimension from 1992 to 2002 so that the karsevaks who died in Godhra can be accused of destroying it? The American audience probably won’t realize this. So, lie away…

Not to mention that she shoved in another lie into that quote. Nobody knows who set fire to the train? Really? A court of law has actually sentenced the accused, many of them to death.

But then, liberal media is such that I suspect most Indians don’t know about the conviction of the perpetrators of Godhra. This is likely because the sentencing in the Godhra carnage was not followed by screaming headlines of “Justice for Godhra victims“. How would Americans know?

Key takeaways:

a. Assume your audience to be ignorant, or choose an ignorant audience to propagate fake news.

b. Throw in a smaller lie along with a big lie so that people focus on the bigger lie and the smaller lie is assumed to be the truth.

(3) Genuine Errors do not alter the substance of what is being said

In the same Outlook article that I mentioned above, Arundhati Roy speaks thus on the Gulberg Society case.

fake news by Arundhati Roy

Stripped his daughters and burned them alive? It turns out that Ehsan Jaffri had only one daughter (not daughters) and that she is very much alive. In fact, she was actually in the US (and thank god that she is safe and sound) on the day this attack happened. As Ehsan Jaffri’s son pointed out in an interview to The Asian Age on May 2:

Among my brothers and sisters, I am the only one living in India. And I am the eldest in the family. My sister and brother live in the US. I am 40 years old.

This time Arundhati Roy had broken her own standard operating procedure and forgotten to blame a “friend from Baroda”. And so it happened that she actually had to publish an apology, in which her justification achieves the gold standard of hypocrisy:

In a situation like the one that prevails in Gujarat, when the police are reluctant to register firs, when the administration is openly hostile to those trying to gather facts, and when the killings go on unabated—then panic, fear and rumour play a pivotal role. People who have disappeared are presumed dead, people who have been dismembered and burnt cannot be identified, and people who are distraught and traumatised are incoherent…. This and other genuine errors in recounting the details of the violence in Gujarat in no way alters the substance of what journalists, fact-finding missions, or writers like myself are saying.

Did you catch that? When you are caught peddling fake news, don’t retreat. Instead blame the other side for creating a situation which led you to fall for the rumors! So what if rumors are playing a “pivotal role” in Arundhati Roy’s reporting? It is actually the fault of the Gujarat government that Arundhati Roy did not check her facts. And then there is the amazing assertion that “genuine errors in recounting details” in no way alter the substance of what is being said!

The errors in recounting details (i.e. the facts) don’t matter. Only the substance of what is being said (i.e. the narrative) matters. Mahaul over data, as was recently argued to claim ‘rising intolerance’.

Key takeaways:

a. Facts are not sacrosanct if you can write in a flowery language. Invent facts and pray you are not caught.

b. If you are caught, go back to your flowery language and invent circumstances that leads to justifiable invention of facts.

Has anyone ever expressed the motto of fake news so crisply and clearly? 

You kids take notes. Learn from Arundhati Roy how fake news is done right.

The apologia for terrorism – an industry of unending distress

0

8 yrs old Saffie Rose Roussos is no more. Is she someone important, you wonder? Yes, absolutely. For her parents, friends and family as long as she was alive. And more so, now, for the many milestones she did not live to see. This child left for her heavenly abode in such an untimely manner, for, we, the grown-ups believe that a deranged group of fanatics shall somehow disappear through hash-tagged prayers.

Has living real lives virtually done this to us? That we believe that Facebook solidarity, Twitter sympathy and Instagrammed grief will make it all vanish. Expression online and silence in the real world is not going to make it go. It cannot. We have centuries of History, in all its genocidal details, vouching for it . Of what use is our empathy if we do not substantiate it with our courage of conviction? What good is the seeming resilience in Life goes on?

Have we become so inured to the regular mayhem and terror that we find pride in going on even when the spectre of terror simply refuses to go? Life should not, must not go on! Things should be at a standstill. What they killed in Manchester or elsewhere is, perhaps, not just innocent lives but something more. Our sensitivity has been stunned to death by these repeat attacks.

And in a bizarre state of warped logic, sensitivity is seen in Ostriching our way out of each event, as it unfolds, one bloodier than the other. Let me emphatically state that calling everyone, who highlights the obvious, an Islamophobe is not being sensitive. Let me also, even more emphatically, state that painting all Muslims as terrorists is reprehensible.

However, it is an established fact that a substantial chunk of global terrorism emanates from one or the other sect of the followers of Islam. So why is the world so apologetic? If a sect of people believing in the Religion of Peace has no qualms in blowing away little children to pieces, why is creating innovative excuses the world’s immediate concern after every terror attack?

We will have another cycle of apologists repeating verses from the Quran, written in the early days of the Islamic movement, to substantiate the peace factor. These people will avoid  informing the world that such verses, despite being a part of the Holy Book, stand abrogated by later verses that preach the believers the very opposite of what is showcased. Nobody will highlight that one Verse of the Sword cancels or replaces 124 verses that call for tolerance and patience .

It is high time that the Doctrine of Abrogation is highlighted and the stance of the peaceful majority made clear. Many non-Muslims do not know that in situations wherein verses contradict one another, the early verses are overridden by the latter verses. According to one of Islam’s classical reference books “al-Nasikh wal-Mansoukh” (The Abrogator and the Abrogated), authored by the revered Muslim scholar Abil-Kasim Hibat-Allah Ibn-Salama Abi-Nasr, out of 114 Surahs (chapters), there are only 43 Surahs that remain unaffected. The majority of its chapters cannot be taken at face value. The cancelled verses are mixed in with the authoritative verses and only schooled Islamist know which is which.

Now, if even the followers cannot discern the real meaning, the misinterpretation excuse is clearly long past its expiry date. Using it, time and again, does nothing to calm our fraying nerves as we lose fellow human beings, in one attack after another. How can the peaceful majority leave their religion in the hands of few schooled Islamists when they have seen what a PhD in Islamic Studies is doing to the world?

It is not that we mistrust or misjudge Muslims. I, for example, have grown up being persecuted for my faith by some Muslim fundamentalists. I have no empathy for anyone who perpetrates violence and bloodshed in the name of his religion. I consider such people to be the worst forms of life. At the same time, some of my good friends are Muslims from various parts of India- one who believes in Yog, another who works on his Chakras and yet another who is happily married to the love of his life from my faith.  Am sure the violence in the name of Islam makes most Muslims squirm. Nobody is accusing them of being inherently violent towards fellow human beings.

By covering up for those who give Islam a bad name through their actions, the apologists, including the left liberals, insult all those people who actually believe Islam to be a religion of peace. The people who must surely be embarrassed by the heinous deeds of their co-religionists. This cover-up indirectly indicates that the apologists have no faith in their faith and that they blame all Muslims.

Do we? Most definitely not! It is just that we are aware of the fact that devout Muslim parents, all over the world, ensure that their kids read, memorise and learn the Quran, either in Madarsas or at home. We cannot fault these children for looking at the world differently from us, once they grow up. With the population of Muslims being substantial, political correctness is certainly not going to help.

It is natural for the rest of the world to wonder if the real believers are aware, concerned or complicit. The rest of the world would definitely need some reassurance. So will the real believers please stand up? Stand with Humanity and against these Barbarians, for, the time for subtle gestures is over. The world is craving for visible overtures for reform, for a denouncement of those actions stemming from explicit verses, which even when used to spread the faith in the initial stage, were as unacceptable then, as these are now. By repeatedly saying that more Muslims get killed in terrorist incidents, the message that we receive is that there is some hesitation from their end. It indicates an unwillingness towards reform, spiritual cleansing or long-lasting and sustainable peace. And this causes discomfort among non Muslims.

The debate is not about misinterpretation – then or now. Common sense and logic suggests that the message that can be interpreted only by a limited set of scholars, for more than a billion people, is bound to create havoc, especially, when allegiance to the faith is expected to trump any other allegiance, Nationality, for instance.

I have personally seen it happen in the last twenty-seven years – in the region I inhabit, the country I inhabit and the world I inhabit. Keeping mum, even as I am concerned, worried, scared and agitated, is not a viable proposition any more. I am not an immortal. This is, therefore, not about me or my remaining years in this world. It is about the world – the present and the future. Do we wish to leave humanity better than we found it or not?

If yes, then let us start with being honest. We want our Muslim brethren, who truly believe in peace, to take charge and lead the spiritual rinsing and cleansing. Can they assure the world, through their words and deeds, that their worldview does not support the division of the world into believers and Kafirs; that even if they believe that there is only one God for them, it is OK for the rest to have their own beliefs; that it is not their religious or spiritual aim to make the rest of us come round to what they believe – through persuasion or persecution and that a Sharia compliant world is not what they seek.

The world wants them to open-mindedly see and accept that their faith was preceded by many other faiths and beliefs. Hence, any insistence on only their faith being right is akin to a teenager insisting on being considered older and more experienced than his forefathers. It can’t happen, won’t happen, for, it is not correct. The world wants the true believers of the religion of peace to start a dialog, work zealously on reform, and stand up for peace in the real world.

We belong to one species. It is perfectly alright to have diversity of race, religion, region and more. But it is just not alright to lose sight of our core values. Before being a true believer (be it in a book or an individual), you need to believe in humanity, equality, peace, compassion and mutual respect. Do You?

Three years of Modi govt: What India has achieved on foreign policy front

The Narendra Modi government in the last three years has successfully transformed India’s foreign policy. There has been a major shift in India’s external affairs. Gone are the UPA days when India used to play a second fiddle at international stage. Today, with Modi at the helm, the world is looking at India with renewed respect and immense enthusiasm. India has successfully shifted its gear from role-taker to rule-maker.

“India’s transformation is not separated from its external context. Our economic growth, employment opportunities for our youth, our access to capital, technology, markets and resources and security of our nation are all deeply impacted by developments in the world. But, the reverse is also true. The world needs India’s sustained rise as much as India needs the world.”

This is what Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said in his address to India’s flagship geo-political conference Raisina Dialogue in January. “India represents a global opportunity of great significance. It is a force for peace, a factor for stability and an engine for global prosperity,” the PM had said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s signature foreign policy is guided by the ancient Indian principle – Vaasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the entire world is our family).

In an effective pursuit in India’s might in global foara, Modi had made a strong pitch for reforms in United Nations. “We must reform the United Nations and the Security Council. This is essential so that the institutions have greater credibility and legitimacy. With a broad-based representation, we will be more effective in achieving our goals,” Modi had said in his speech at the UN summit in September 2015.

Under Narendra Modi’s leadership, India has become an indispensible player in the international forum. Modi has captured the centre-stage just when the world was looking for a leader.

But amid all these, there are challenges remain. Despite the backing of the US, India could not join the NSG non-proliferation, thanks to China which nixed our entry into the NSG. And India’s quest for permanent membership of the UNSC is still miles away.

In these three years, India-US relationship has seen a renewed momentum. Modi has swiftly positioned India as a world power at par with the US and sold the idea that India and the US are “equal partners” having “shared interests”.

“A strong India-US partnership can anchor peace, prosperity and stability from Asia to Africa and from Indian Ocean to the Pacific,” PM Modi had said addressing the joint sitting of the US Congress in June, 2016. Modi, who made four trips to the US since he took over as the Prime Minister, was the sixth Indian Prime Minister to address a joint session of the US Congress.

Since 9/11, the US has emerged as the toughest interrogator of Pakistan on terrorism. At the US stage, PM Modi has named and shamed Pakistan, the epicentre of global terrorism.

As far as Pakistan is concerned, India has shoot down the syrupy track-II diplomacy, proposed by the fifth column, which was used by the previous UPA dispensation. India had paid back the September, 2016 terror attack on its Army camp at Uri with surgical strikes against terror launch pads in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

In a first move by any Indian Prime Minister, Modi raked up PoK, Gilgit-Baltistan and Balochistan during his Independence Day address last year. This has set the tone for new liberation moments in these three provinces, illegally occupied by Pakistan, where human rights violations are rampant.

At the same time, Modi has forged India’s close links with Afghanistan and Iran by building a strategically significant transport corridor from Kandla Port in India, through Afghanistan, to Iran’s Chabahar Port which is located a heartbeat away from Balochistan’s Gwadar.

In a clean break from our early stance, India has publicly confronted China under Modi’s leadership. The Modi government allowed the Dalai Lama to visit Arunachal Pradesh last month. Contrary to India’s traditional reluctance of openly confronting China’s hegemonic ambitions, India’s has strongly opposed One Belt, One Road (OBOR) and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) on the basis of sovereignty, thanks to Prime Minister Modi. India has skipped the opening ceremony of China’s Belt and Road Forum (BRF) registering its protest in this regard.

Modi’s foreign policy is also packed with economic diplomacy. Never before any Indian Prime Minister visited so many countries as Modi did. Apart from boosting the bilateral relations between India and respective countries, Modi’s foreign visit have opened up floodgates of Foreign Direct Investment inflows. Interestingly, the downhill ties with China could not affect the India-China bilateral relationship on economic front as China has emerged as one of the fastest-growing sources of FDI into India. India’s ties with Britain, Australia, France and Germany have gone from strength to strength in the last three years.

Yet another important feature in India’s external affairs under Modi is adding cultural symbolism to the foreign policy diplomacy. During his visit to Japan, China, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Mongolia, PM Modi have successfully revived the thousands of years of civilisational connect of these countries with India.

In its clasp on neighborhood outreach, India has been building stronger ties with its South Asian neighbourhood with a focus on regional stability, peace and prosperity. India has structured the SAARC grouping, sans Pakistan. Our might in SAARC was visible when the 19th SAARC Summit, scheduled to be held in Islamabad, was cancelled after India’s boycott. India’s relationships with Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Bhutan and Maldives are at their best. In a priceless gift to its South Asian neighbours, India has launched GSAT-9 satellite to provide communication and help in disaster management to South Asian countries.

India has significantly improved its relations with the Arab countries overcoming the hesitations of history. It is pertinent to mention that Saudi Arabia had welcomed Modi with red carpet when the Indian Prime Minister visited the country last year. This has certainly unnerved Pakistan.

It is not just Arab, Modi in the past three years have engaged with a number of countries which were never visited by an Indian Prime Minister earlier.

“Engaging with unengaged is the hallmark of Narendra Modi’s foreign policy,” said Anirban Ganguly, Director of the Syama Prasad Mookerjee Foundation, who co-edited the book ‘Modi Doctrine’ while speaking to Opindia.com.

Engaging with the Indian diaspora is yet another key feature of three years of Modi government. PM Modi is involving Indian diaspora, which contributes significantly towards India’s foreign exchange reserves, in India’s development agenda.

Amarendra Khatua, Director of Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), who has worked as ambassadors to several countries told Opindia.com, “India first, India aggressive is the theme song of this government’s foreign policy. India is pursuing foreign policy bit aggressively. With emergence of India as a new economic power, India the country draws more attention from the world audience.”

The Modi government’s foreign policy in the last three years has ticked all the important silos – counter terrorism, climate change, trade and technological cooperation and energy security.

In a mirror effect of India’s cultural clout in the world, yoga has gone international with the entire world along with the United Nations celebrated International Yoga Day on 21 June. After yoga, Modi wants to make khadi an international brand also.

Congress leader wants Major Gogoi punished for tying stone-pelter to Army jeep

Senior Congress leader Saifuddin Soz, who hails from Kashmir, has courted a controversy after he reportedly questioned the National Human Rights Commission as to why it did not act against Major Littul Gogoi of the 53 Rashtriya Rifles for tying a protester to his jeep.

Saifuddin Soz has in the past held posts of Union Minister of Water Resources and Union Minister of Environment and Forests.

On 9th April, Major Gogoi had come into the limelight after it was reported how he had come up with a novel idea to tie a protester to the bonnet of his jeep in order to escape an attack by hundreds of stone pelters while he was returning with poll officials in Budgam, Kashmir.

This action of Major Gogoi was hailed by many as a stroke of genius as any escalation between Army and stone pelters could have caused more fatalities. According to Major Gogoi, he and his troops were faced by a huge mob of about 1200 protesters, which initially was pelting stones but then took it to the next level by starting to hurl petrol bombs at the army.

According to him, if he had not tied the protester to the jeep to prevent the attacks, he would have had to open fire which would have resulted in the deaths of many people. The man who was tied to the jeep was also no saint. According to Major Gogoi, he was the one who was instigating the huge crowd.

This action also seems to have been recognized by the Indian Army, which has proceeded to reward Major Gogoi for his contribution to counter insurgency operations despite this “controversy” dogging him.

However, all this doesn’t seem to have cut ice with Senior Congress leader Saifuddin Soz. He reportedly approached the NHRC on 24th May in order to ask them as to what action they took against Major Gogoi with regards to the Major’s “gross violation” of human rights.

The Congress leader further stated that the head of the NHRC should either assert his position or resign from his post after failing to anything in regards to the Major getting a reward.

Saifuddin Soz has recently too been in the news for the wrong reasons. In April he was quoted to have said that “current problem in Kashmir is created by India not by Pakistan”.

This isn’t the only time Congress leaders have been seen touting the separatist line when it comes to Kashmir. Only yesterday it was reported that Congress Leader Mani Shankar Aiyar had met with seperatist Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Shah Geelani at the latter’s residence.

After he was questioned regarding this absurd act, rather than providing a possible explanation he had proceeded to called the news channel as anti-national:


Concessional lands to Patanjali – How Reuters used conjectures and half truths to build a narrative

0

Baba Ramdev is a favourite topic for media and so is his brand Patanjali, though most of the times they are in the news after media decides to either spin or lie about them. In February this year, we had seen how some in the media lied about the FMCG business of Patanjali being tax free, when it was not. Now something similar seems to have happened.

On 23 May 2017, Reuters published a special report on how Baba Ramdev and Patanjali’s fortunes have soared in the last 3 years i.e. after Narendra Modi led NDA government came to power.

The report begins with the authors talking about 2014 Lok Sabha election – how Baba Ramdev endorsed Narendra Modi and how BJP led by Modi swept to power. This seems innocuous at first glance, however upon reading further it becomes clear that this is an attempt to insinuate some sort of quid pro quo between Ramdev and Modi.

For example, a few sentences from the report are quoted below –

Ramdev’s business has boomed since the BJP took power. Revenues at his consumer goods enterprise are soaring – from about $156 million in the financial year ending March 2013 to more than $322 million in the year to March 2015, according to financial filings. In early May, Ramdev said revenues in the financial year just ended had jumped to about $1.6 billion.

and

Since Modi came to power, Ramdev’s company has received more than an estimated $46 million in discounts for land acquisitions in states controlled by the BJP, according to a Reuters review of state government documents, interviews with officials and real estate estimates.

further

In the BJP-controlled states, Patanjali received a discount on the land purchased of 77 percent off market prices, according to state government documents, interviews with officials and land values provided by local real estate agents.

Whoa! So is Narendra Modi guilty of showering favours worth $46 million, thus misusing his powers? This is as bad as coal scam under Manmohan Singh’s watch, suggested some alleged economists and “liberals”.

But unfortunately for them and fortunately for India, this is far from truth. While Patanjali Ayurved (the consumer goods company) did get land at concessional rates, there is no apparent impropriety or quid pro quo as insinuated by Reuters and sundry commentators.

Let’s go into the specific allegations/insinuations –

1) Patanjali received a discount of more than $10 million, or 88 percent, on a 40-acre plot in the BJP state of Madhya Pradesh last year

In September 2016, Madhya Pradesh Government allotted a 40 acre plot in Pithampur industrial area at Rs. 10 crore to Patanjali Ayurved to set up a food processing plant. Reuters claims that Patanjali Ayurved got a discount of 88%, meaning that the actual price of the 40 acre plot was around Rs. 83 crore. This translates to Rs. 5127 per sq m. If Reuters had done a little research, they would have found out that –

  1. For large scale industries, land in Pithampur industrial area is available at a premium of Rs. 1253 per sq m for a 40 acre plot, significantly lower than the rate claimed by Reuters. (Source – MP Trade and Investment Facilitation Corp. Limited website)
  2. It is a common practice for state governments to offer land at concessional rates in order to attract investments. MP government has been providing industrial land at concessional rates at least since 2004. It is clearly mentioned in their Industrial Promotion Policy of 2014 [pdf] and the concessional rate of 25% premium has been mentioned in the Industrial Promotion Policies of 2004 [pdf] and 2010 [pdf].
  3. Patanjali Ayurved is not the only beneficiary of concessional land rates. In the same year, MP government also allotted land to Micromax at the same concessional rate of Rs. 25 lakh per acre. Reliance Group was also allotted land at the concessional rate of 25% premium to set up its defense and aerospace park.

Thus it is clear that Patanjali Ayurved did not receive any special favours from MP Government because of Ramdev’s proximity to BJP. Reuters report says that the PMO did not respond to its queries about this allotment. Why Reuters sent their queries about MP government’s decision to the PMO is unfathomable.

2) Patanjali had paid some 590 million rupees (about $9.1 million at current rates) for the 234-acre land in Maharashtra’s Nagpur. The land abuts a special economic zone (SEZ) promoted by the state and its market price was more than 2.6 billion rupees (about $40.5 million)

Again, Reuters insinuates that Patanjali Ayurved got undue favours in getting the land cheaply for its food park. The facts are as below –

  1. In early 2016, Patanjali Ayurved made a proposal to Maharashtra Airport Development Company (the agency responsible for development of MIHAN area) to purchase the land. However, MADC went for global open tenders as the rates offered by Patanjali were very low. The reserve price in the tender was fixed at Rs. 25 lakh per acre.
  2. In the first round, only two players (including Patanjali) submitted technical bids. In the two subsequent rounds, Patanjali Ayurved was the sole bidder. The conditions called for having minimum three bidders.
  3. As MADC failed to get more bidders even after the third round, the matter was put up before the board of directors of MADC and Patanjali Ayurved was declared as the successful bidder.

Above facts were reported here and here. This proves that Maharashtra government too did not grant any undue favours to Patanjali Ayurved in the allotment of land.

The Reuters report also suggests basis a video that Nitin Gadkari, who was present at the stone laying ceremony of the food park decided to convert a road into national highway to benefit Patanjali’s food park. This decision was likely a part of a much bigger plan to convert more than 15,000 km of state roads into national highways and was taken much before Patanjali Ayurved won the bid for MIHAN land. Interestingly, the video which Reuters report refers to also shows Gadkari laying out the above facts about the tendering process. However, Reuters seems to have ignored this part.

3) The largest transaction was a transfer of some 1,200 acres of undeveloped land in the eastern state of Assam in October and December 2014. According to state legislature documents reviewed by Reuters, the land was “allotted without cost” – given free of charge – to Patanjali Yogpeeth, a trust controlled by Patanjali Managing Director Balkrishna and Ramdev

The said tract of land was allotted by the Bodoland Territorial Council, which is the administrative authority for four Bodoland districts of Assam. The said land was unused according to reports, primarily due to frequent floods caused by a nearby river.

An important thing to note here is that the land was NOT allotted to Patanjali Ayurved, the company which manufactures and sells Patanjali brand of consumer products. It was allotted to Patanjali Yogpeeth, which is a charitable trust and thus cannot use that land for commercial purposes. Hence it is wrong to suggest that the consumer goods business of Patanjali benefited from this agreement.

Reuters further tries to mislead readers by confusing Patanjali Ayurved with Patanjali Yogpeeth, which is apparent from another sentence in their report –

The Ministry of Finance in 2015 defined yoga as a “charitable purpose,” reducing the associated tax burden. That particularly benefits corporations such as Patanjali that have espoused support for the kind of Hindu nation envisaged by the ruling party.

This statement is factually incorrect. Patanjali Yogpeeth is a public charitable trust that does not have any legal connection to the consumer goods business. Patanjali Ayurved, which owns the consumer business, is a public company registered with the RoC and is subject to the same regulations under which other FMCG companies like Unilever, ITC, etc. are taxed.

Throughout the Reuters report, authors repeatedly mention that they have reviewed several documents to prove their claims. But the only documents they have provided along with the report are some inconsequential ‘oaths’ signed by BJP leaders before the Lok Sabha election. One can guess why the authors didn’t provide any other legal document to prove their claim – because doing so would have presented the complete picture to the readers, not half truths which the authors seemingly wanted to peddle to build a narrative.

As expected, the report was reproduced/quoted by news portal Huffpost India, leftist propaganda blog Scroll, British tabloid Daily Mail, Congress mouthpiece National Herald and Marathi daily Loksatta. However, none of them bothered to verify Reuters’ claims.

(With inputs from Raju Das and Muglikar)