Sunday, November 17, 2024
Home Blog Page 6819

Sports-persons come out in support of Armed forces in Kashmir in midst of ‘video-wars’

Recently citizens were shocked after a video dated 9th April surfaced in which Kashmiri youths were seen assaulting CRPF Jawans who showed extreme restraint and did not react to their constant badgering. This had prompted various sportspersons like Virendra Sehwag, Gautam Gambhir and Mohammad Kaif to come out and show solidarity with the paramilitary forces.

This though didn’t go down well with some, which resulted in Gambhir getting attacked by trolls and Sehwag getting his words twisted by a media house.

A few days after the incident with the paramilitary forces, the army came up with a novel way of dealing with stone pelters and other protesters when it proceeded to tie up a pelter in front of its jeep to discourage others from throwing stones.

This innovative measure by the Army received flak from some commentators from the left but also received the support of the various sports-persons who gave a thumbs up to the Army’s actions.

Wrestler Babita Phogat and Yogeshwar Dutt made statements:


Even ex-army person and athlete Surendra Poonia also made a strong statement:


The support by the above sportspersons is also commendable for another reason. Recently during the Gurmehar Kaur fiasco, both Yogeshwar Dutt and Babita Phogat were targeted for protesting against anti-Indian statements. But the high pitched ridicule and abuse doesn’t seem to have deterred them and they haven’t held back from taking the so-called politically incorrect line. Let’s hope the “hardly literate” athletes don’t earn the wrath of Javed Akhtar again.

When a common user’s suggestion for BHIM app was adopted by NPCI

The bold move of demonetization by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was aimed at multiple goals. Increasing digital transactions is considered as one of the most important goal among many other goals like curbing black money and stopping crime financing.

On the front of digital transactions or the aim to move towards Cashless India, the government has come up with a couple of schemes like Lucky Grahak Yojna and Digi-dhan Vyapar Yojna. These two schemes were just like any other referral schemes to market a product. However, the government didn’t stop here they went a step ahead and launched BHIM app (Bharat Interface for Money) to enable fast, reliable, secure and easy to use cashless payments system through any smartphone.

BHIM app is also a tribute to Baba Saheb Ambedkar, who was a sharp economist apart from a political thinker. The best part of this, it also works with a feature phone by entering the USSD *99#. The USSD has almost all the features of that of BHIM app.

Here’s how to set up a BHIM account:

A user needs to have a smartphone, internet access along with UPI enabled bank account. The user should also have a valid debit card with his mobile number linked to the bank account. If you are ready with all this, then you are ready to go.

During the registration, the app will send an SMS from your phone to verify your number (this typically costs Rs.1.50 or even less based on your mobile service provider). BHIM is available both on Android and iOS. One important thing to note at the time of registration is – the mobile number which is linked to the bank account should be present in the same phone as that of BHIM app because it will auto-verify the mobile number, unlike by sending an OTP that is used by other players.

BHIM uses VPA (Virtual Payment Address) of the form xyz@upi or 9014949xxx@upi to send and receive money.

Requirements for usig BHIM app

There are three reasons why you should use BHIM:

  1. BHIM is quite different from Payment wallets like PayTm or FreeCharge. Wallets deduct money from your bank account and credit them into their wallets before making a transaction. There is no mediator like a wallet in BHIM app, transactions take place directly from the bank accounts and refunds also will be credited into the bank accounts directly.
  2. No more waiting for an OTP before doing a successful transaction because BHIM uses predefined PIN to make transactions. It is the easiest way to transact and takes less than a minute for a successful transaction. So, goodbye to those annoying 4-6 digit OTPs that sometime never arrive.
  3. Third and the final reason is security. It has two step verification. First is the “passcode” to open the app and the next is “Pin” to make the payment. Presently, both passcode and pin can be same for some banks but this will change in near future.

My Experience:

I have been using this app since January 2017 and have easily transacted more than 50 times. It is very fast and also works on 2G networks. There were some issues with the payments to the merchant sometimes but the money deducted was refunded instantly.

It is supported by wallets like PayTM and FreeCharge also. Presently, I am using this for every transaction that it supports. Out of excitement I even asked many of friends to try it out and guess what we pay money for each other with this app currently. The fact that money gets transferred instantly unlike NEFT & RTGS makes it unique from others. I request you people reading this to try it out and I’m sure you will love it.

Suggestions forwarded to the NPCI team:

Even though the app is very good, it can have some improvements. I sent three of them to the NITI Aayog CEO Amitabh Kant who in turn forwarded the email to the team of BHIM. Following are the suggestions I have written to the development team of BHIM:

Email sent to NITI Ayog CEO regarding BHIM

This was on 20th February, Mr. Kant was quick to respond and forward it to the team of NPCI (National Payments Corporation of India, the non-profit umbrella organisation currently with 10 promoter banks including government-owned and private banks):

Response to my email on BHIM app

CEO of NPCI AP Hota too replied positively to my query:

NPCI CEO responds to user query about BHIM

After one and half months of wait, BHIM has been updated to version 1.3 with one my suggestion as the main update i.e. address book integration! COO of NPCI Dilip Abse confirmed this on twitter:



I can’t tell you how happy I was to see my suggestion becoming a reality! I request you all to try out the app because it is high time to ditch One Time Passwords!

Digvijay Singh just proved on Twitter why EVMs can’t be hacked

0

Chief Conspiracy Officer (unofficial) of the Congress party and former Chief Minister (official) of Madhya Pradesh, Digvijay Singh today sent out a series of tweets where he pitched in with his views on the possibility of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) being hacked or tampered with.

The tweets came at a time when leaders in Congress party are attacking each other over the EVM hack theory, with many senior leaders not happy with the party espousing this theory. Being a senior leader, Digvijay Singh tried to take a middle path in his tweets:


As one can see, Digvijay Singh tried not to make baseless allegations but use some logic and facts, which must be welcomed as it is so unlike him. With facts and logic increasingly not finding a place in the mainstream media and in political arguments, this step by Mr. Singh is indeed commendable.

Now coming to the three tweets, first of all Digvijay Singh virtually concedes that tampering of EVMs post manufacturing is not possible, as all the stages – from deployment of EVMs to counting the votes – are supervised by the representatives of political parties. Even the team of engineers that had claimed back in 2009 about the possibility of EVM tampering had conceded that only physical tampering with EVMs could manipulate the results.

This is exactly what Election Commission (EC) had clarified in detail to both Mayawati and Arvind Kejriwal’s parties i.e. how any attempt of hacking, which is possible only through physical tampering, can be spotted by political parties at various stages of the electoral process.

Now that leaves the stage prior to deployment i.e. manufacturing and writing the software code in the chip. Digvijay Singh makes the same point by saying that EVMs can be “pre-tampered” i.e. a malicious software code is written at the time of manufacturing, and he asks EC to have a political representative even at the time of coding the software.

Let’s examine this possibility and whether it is possible.

First of all, as EC had also clarified, the software code in EVMs are not re-programmable. “The software in the ECI-EVM chip is one time programmable (OTP) and burnt into the chip at the time of manufacture. Nothing can be written on the chip after manufacture. Thus, the ECI-EVMs are fundamentally different from the voting machines and processes adopted in various foreign countries.” ECI had said (pdf).

Let’s assume for argument’s sake that this software has a malicious code burnt into the chip at the time of manufacture.

Firstly, an overwhelming proportion of EVMs are being re-used in various elections, as the average life of an EVM is considered to be 15 years. Since they are only one time programmable, every single election in which they were used for the last 10-15 years must be considered “rigged” if the software had a malicious code. Will Digvijay Singh and others like Kejriwal accept it? Further, this also means that Congress wrote that malicious code as Modi government came to power only in 2014.

Secondly, how exactly will this malicious code work? As EC had clarified, randomly selected EVMs are made to go through a mock-poll with 1000 votes in presence of representatives of political parties. If this malicious code has to escape being caught during this mock-poll, it must get activated only after 1000 votes are polled. Now a polling booth on average has less than 1500 voters. For this malicious code to get activated, you must have a voter turnout of more than 70%. How helpful is that really in rigging elections?

But the biggest question is, how will this malicious code know which button (political party) to transfer the votes to? EVMs are sent to different constituencies and polling booths through a randomized process, and this randomization is also done in the presence of representatives of political parties. So a button number 3 could be assigned to Congress in one machine while it could be assigned to BJP elsewhere and BSP somewhere else. This is just too risky for any political party to inject such a code, as it can benefit anyone.

These issues simply mean that EVMs can’t be tampered with at the time of manufacture, while the subsequent stages are supervised by political parties to prevent any physical tampering. So it’s impossible to hack the EVMs.

And we must thank Digvijay Singh for pointing this out.

Congress leaders attack each other over party’s stand against the EVMs

Ever since the Assembly Elections in 5 states concluded, an effort has been made by political parties to blame the EVMs (Electronic Voting Machines) for their poor performance in the polls.

On 11th March, as the election results were being declared, Mayawati was the first politician who had come out and blamed the EVMs for BJP’s victory. Slowly, other political parties too started raking up the EVM issue and AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal took it to the next level after spreading an outright lie about the machines that were equipped with the VVPAT system.

The resultant controversy forced the Election Commission to take stock of the issue and explain in detail why EVMs can’t be hacked.

However, the parties pushing this paranoia and propaganda are not giving up. Congress too is a part of it as it was their leaders, and a section of media, who had created the controversy about EVMs in Bhind, Madhya Pradesh. Not just local leaders, even senior leaders have started pushing this propaganda. Congress even demanded an immediate ban on the EVMs in Rajya Sabha. Leader of Opposition Ghulam Nabi Azad had stated:

EVM should be stopped right now. In the upcoming civic polls of Delhi, assembly polls in Gujarat and other states EVMs should not be used.

Later, the Congress joined a group of 16 opposition parties that petitioned the Election Commission to express no confidence in the EVM and called for ballot papers to be brought back. Ghulam Nabi Azad told the reporters that they had lost confidence in the EVMs after the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand elections. He though didn’t mention anything about the Punjab elections.

This embarrassing stand of the Congress party, which flaunts about introducing computers and technology in India, has prompted Senior Congress leader Veerappa Moily to come out and slam the party.

Moily in his statement backed the EVMs and stated that there was no question of going back to the manual methods (ballot papers). He slammed the party for joining the chorus against the EVMs and called it a defeatist mindset.

Moily also expressed his dismay against the way Congress had come under the influence of regional outfits who were only looking for excuses for their defeats.

He further stated that the EVMs were introduced when he was the union Law Minister and claimed that they had tested the EVMs during that period. He also claimed that many leaders weren’t consulted about the Congress’ decision to petition the EC.

Not just Moily, senior Congress leader and former Chief Minister of Delhi, Sheila Dikshit too has indirectly criticized the stand of the Congress. In an interview published on 9th April, Sheila Dikshit was asked about her view about Kejriwal’s allegations against the EVM. She said that EVM tampering was a perception which was created by losers.

She stated that the shift to the EVMs was made because it was a modern system, and that accusing the Election Commission straightaway only because the party had lost was not right.

Joining this league of senior leaders not happy with EVM hacking theory is Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh, who too trashed such conspiracy theories. “If EVMs were tampered with, Akalis, not me, would be sitting here,” he was reported as saying.

But looks like Congress is in no mood to sound logical. Moily was summoned by the party top brass for his comments, while party spokesperson Manish Tewari attacked Captain with heavy words, accusing him of making a u-turn:


Did Snapchat CEO say he didn’t want to expand to poor countries like India?

People found a reason to be aggravated today after reports started coming out that claimed that Evan Spiegel, the CEO of popular mobile app Snapchat, wasn’t very keen on an expansion to India and Spain as they were poor countries. The said information was tweeted by News18:



Even The Economic Times put out a report titled:

Snapchat CEO says India “too poor” to consider expansion

This soon attracted people’s attention and they started tweeting about it:


So what’s the truth did he really say something like that which might seriously jeopardize the company’s goodwill in this country?

Well maybe but certainly not in a way the reports suggest. As it turns out, the quote didn’t directly come from Spiegel but is part of a lawsuit by an ex-employee Anthony Pampliano, who alleged that Spiegel had said so in a meeting.

The lawsuit claims that in the meeting, Anthony Pampliano, who had joined Snapchat from Facebook, had expressed concerns about the App not taking off overseas. As he was presenting ways to rectify the issue, he was allegedly cut off by Spiegel who stated that the App was for rich people and that he didn’t want to expand into poor countries like India and Spain. Pampliano lasted at Snapchat only for three weeks.

The lawsuit was filed in January but the contents of the complaint were only released earlier this week. The principle issue of the lawsuit was about Snapchat allegedly misleading investors by exaggerating  its user data and that top executives were completely misinformed about key metrics. The lawsuit was filed just as Snapchat was planning to go for an IPO and concerns were raised that it might dampen the spirits. But that wasn’t the case and the shares were 12 times oversubscribed.

Even though Snapchat has come out to state that it has nothing to hide when it comes to inflated growth metrics, it hasn’t responded to the India comment possibly because there are other more serious allegations which it has to fend off.

Though having said all that nothing justifies misleading headlines which attributed a quote to a person based on pure allegation.

Why the AAP government’s electricity subsidy in Delhi doesn’t make sense

When the AAP government came to power in Delhi one of its major poll planks was cheaper electricity. The party claimed that not only the electricity companies were overcharging, even the meters were running faulty. AAP demanded audit of companies and replacement of the meters, which they said will be effective in bringing the electricity bills down.

However, to achieve that promise, the AAP government decided to take the easiest route and provide an outright subsidy, which essentially meant that the government would pay substantial part of the consumer’s bills to the same companies they suspected of committing fraud.

As per the subsidy plan, if any household consumes less than 400 units of electricity per month, it would be eligible for 50% of subsidy on its bills. In the past year, the total amount of money allocated for the subsidy is reported to be around 1600 crore rupees.

Whenever one hears the word subsidy, one assumes that it is being used to help the poor and the marginalized, but the 400 unit limit is so high that on an average 80% of the households are eligible for the subsidy, and in some months the number rises to as many as 95% households. As this article argues, the current subsidy design is benefiting the rich more than the poor as Delhi is decently urbanized.

Also, though the rate of subsidy offered is a flat 50% whether you use 1 unit of electricity or 400 units of electricity, the cost of electricity in Delhi is not uniform. If one consumes up to 200 units of electricity, the rate charged is Rs 4 per unit, but for units ranging from 201 to 400, the rate applicable is around Rs 6 per unit. This also works to benefit those who are comparatively better placed in terms of cost of living standards as their subsidy amount is higher.

Plus another reason the 400 unit limit is too high is the fact that according to a 2015 report by the Center for Science and Environment, the average energy consumption in Delhi was just 181 units and about 2/5th of the households consumed less than 100 KWh per month. The report quotes the 68th Nation Sample Survey of Household Consumption, which suggests that a good portion of the population could still have benefited if the limit was lower.

An electricity bill subsidy of Rs 1600 crores in a year might also be hampering Delhi’s development work. As the this article says, this subsidy was more than 8 times the amount allocated for the Smart City project, more than 1/3rd of the total budget allocated for public medical health services and about 20% of what the government had allocated for education.

As per a study published [pdf] by think-tank Brooks India, this novel subsidy model by the AAP might actually be anti-poor. According to the study, the middle class enjoys more benefit of the subsidy as compared to the poor. It claims that the poor on average get under 33 per cent net billing subsidy, while those consuming near about 400 units get over 40 per cent net subsidy.

According to the study, the amount of subsidy provided can be easily reduced without really reducing the number of households covered, thereby making it more efficient. The study claims that reducing the eligibility from 400 units to 300 might lead to savings of 30% but would just reduce the coverage rate by 13%. Also if the subsidy limit was reduced to 200 units which supposedly is the average power consumption in Delhi, there can be total savings of Rs 1000 crores, while about 50% of the population would still be eligible to avail it. The amount saved can be used to undertake other development works.

Mahila Congress official accuses Ajay Maken and others of mental harassment and criminal intimidation

0

Rachna Sachdeva, who is the District President of the Delhi Pradesh Mahila Congress, has made grave allegations against senior Congress leaders accusing them of harassing and threatening her. In a complaint filed at the Tughlak Road police station dated 12th April, she has named Ajay Maken, the President of Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee, Shobha Oza, who is the President of All India Mahila Congress, and Netta D’Souza, who is the General Secretary of the All India Mahila Congress.

Sachdeva has alleged that the various acts by the trio has resulted in mental harassment, criminal intimidation and even a threat to her life.

He complaint states that the entire thing started when she, with around hundred supporters, protested in front of Rahul Gandhi’s house on 26th March this year, after being fed up of Ajay Maken allegedly demanding huge sums of money from his cohorts for the upcoming MCD elections. Rahul Gandhi heard her grievances and asked her to come the next day with proof, her complaint informs.

She claims to have handed over the proof to office personnel the next day, and further states that while she was waiting outside Rahul Gandhi’s residence, Maken arrived and asked for her mobile number which she gave. He then allegedly threatened her and even said ”I will see you after the elections”.

After the accused returned to the party headquarters in Delhi, she alleged that she was stopped by Shobha Oza and Netta D’Souza. She further alleged that they made her sit alone and then proceeded to abuse and threaten her. She alleged that the harassment didn’t end there and since that day she has been receiving phone calls from random numbers which made threats against her and her family’s life.

Now as a remedy, she has requested the Station house officer of the Tughlaq road police station to lodge an FIR against the accused under sections 503, 504 and 506 of the IPC which deal with criminal intimidation. As she feels there’s a threat to her life, she has also asked for police protection.

As per a report, there has bee no response from Ajay Maken regarding the allegations but Shobha Oza called it a conspiracy against the Congress ahead of the MCD polls.

You can read the whole complaint here[1][2]

Parrikar slams media for misquoting him on reason for leaving Delhi

0

Former Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, who is now the Chief Minister of Goa, took to twitter to slam media reports which claimed that he had quit the post of Defence Minister because he could not cope with the pressure of dealing with issues like Kashmir:


The tweets came after media reports that made claim that this was the “real reason” which led to him quitting. One example of such reports is the report by DNA based on PTI, which was titled as: “Couldn’t handle pressure of issues like Kashmir: Parrikar reveals real reason he came back to Goa”

In the above screenshot itself, one can see how DNA played with words. In the headline they scream that this was the “real reason”. But the byline itself said that the Goa CM stated that this was “one of the reasons”.

In the same article, if one digs deeper, one can see that DNA “quotes” him as saying this:

Even if one takes this “quote” to be correct, It may be considered a stretch to directly link the statement of “pressure” with that of Kashmir. Subsequently numerous media reports emerged with the same reporting, all claiming to be sourced via PTI. [1], [2], [3]

Further, in the limited video clipping put out by ABP News, Parrikar is seen saying most of the above, but he does no utter the magical words of “I quit because of this reason”:

Further, as Parrikar said in his tweet, it appears The Hindu had got the quote right. This is what The Hindu had reported:

The above report was filed by a local Goan correspondent so the chances of the meaning getting lost in translation are minimal, and which is why perhaps Parrikar felt this was the most correct report. It also broadly agrees with the video in the ABP News bulletin and makes no mention of the “this is why I left” quote, which wasn’t seen in the video clipping as well.

4 MLAs now! What does the Rajouri Garden win mean for the BJP in Delhi?

The results of the by-polls were declared yesterday and the BJP managed to convincingly win the Rajouri Garden seat while AAP lost its deposit and came a distant 3rd. After the win the BJP has added one more MLA to increase its tally to four MLAs.

In this great piece of journalism, we examine as to what difference would that make:

  • Four people are so much better for playing sports than three people. The MLAs either during their work or in their free time can play Tennis or Badminton doubles or tug of war. They can also team up and play a 2 vs 2 game of football. Also playing cricket would make some sense as there can now be a batsman, bowler, wicket keeper and fielder.
  • When they go to restaurants they can easily ask the waiter for 2/4 soup instead of the rather twisted 2/3 order.
  • While travelling in cabs together they can pay less per person as cabs allow four people to travel and they can split the bill 4 ways instead of the existing three.
  • Also whenever the MLAs decide to go boating in one of these boats, the boat can now stay evenly balanced with 4 people on board and not get lopsided causing a risk of capsizing which might have happened if three were sitting.

  • The 4 MLAs can also become a force in morality as whenever the Kejriwal government is thinking of doing something controversial its advisers can chide them by reminding, that “Char log kya kahene“.
  • They can now create a proper musical band with a lead singer, drummer, guitarist and a base guitarist and not put added pressure on the lead singer to also play the guitar.
  • There are certain disadvantages too, now they won’t be able to use auto-rickshaws or those Sholay styled motorbikes with sidecar to ride around.

the article was inspired by this tweet

The truth about Yogi government removing reservations in private medical colleges

Recently a news has been doing rounds that the Yogi Adityanath led state government has announced that it was doing away with caste based reservations in private Medical and Dental colleges of Uttar Pradesh. Some hailed it as progressive step that guards rights of private institutes, others found it an attack on the reservation policy.

Things were further muddled by this vague tweet by India Today, which suggested as if reservations in private medical and dental colleges were being removed nationwide:


Reservation policy has always been a delicate issue and all political parties claim to be in its favour. BJP too has clarified many times, including through statements made by top leaders such as Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself, that reservation policy was here to stay. So is there a re-think over reservation policy vis a vis private bodies?

Apparently not. It turns out that reservations in private medical and dental colleges may never have existed in the first place. Latest media reports quote the Director General of Medical Education, who claimed that the Yogi government had made no changes to the existing policy, and that there was no provision for reservations for any caste or community in the private colleges even earlier.

The concerned government order was issued on 10th March, when the Samajwadi Party government led by Akhilesh Yadav was in office, and it contained admission policy on the basis of National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), in which the Clause 7 stated that in the private medical and dental colleges there won’t be any provision of reservation for students belonging to the SC, ST and OBC categories.

To understand the issue better, we need to get a bit of historical context. In 2006, an ordinance was passed by the then state government led by Mulayam Singh Yadav that had ordered reservations in private educational institutes. However, that order was struck down in 2011 by the Allahabad High Court, which ruled that unaided private educational institutes were not bound to follow the reservation rules as it would violate the basic structure of the constitution of India.

In October 2015, the Uttar Pradesh State Backward Class Commission (UPSBCC) had requested the then Akhilesh government implement reservation for OBC students in private medical colleges. This further confirms that private medical colleges had no reservation policy until recently. These two incidents corroborate the latest news reports quoting government officials that there was no reservation policy in private medical and dental colleges to begin with.

Question then arises as to what was then the need for that March 10 order by the Akhilesh government? A possible explanation to this might be the fact that the admission to these medical colleges would be based on the NEET score for the first time and not based on the UP-CPMT exam, which used to be conducted by the state. So maybe as there was a change in the procedure, the state government had to frame a new admission policy which was based on NEET, in which the existing clause of no-reservation in private colleges might have been added.

The media houses though after reading the 10th March order might have found that particular clause ‘interesting’ and hastily concluded that reservation in private institution was abolished, triggering speculations and sensationalist headlines.