Sunday, November 17, 2024
Home Blog Page 6824

Kejriwal’s legal expenses case: Jethmalani’s bills to Punjab and Delhi vary hugely

The latest controversy about the AAP govt making the Delhi taxpayers pay Kejriwal’s legal fees doesn’t seem to be waning.

To recount, Arun Jaitley had filed a defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal, which had prompted him to seek the legal services of noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani, who ended up billing him about 3.6 crores after initial media reports suggested he was fighting the case for free. This prompted Kejriwal to find a way to pay Jethmalani from the public exchequer for a case, which he was arguably fighting in his personal capacity and not as the Delhi CM.

As if all this wasn’t enough, this story has now developed another angle regarding the amount of money billed by Ram Jethmalani. Arvind Kejriwal was to pay him 1 crore as a retainer fee and 22 lakhs rupees as appearance fees for every trial.

Now reports have emerged that suggest that the Delhi Govt will end up paying Jethmalani a staggering 567% higher than what the Punjab Govt is paying the noted lawyer for his services. As reported, the newly formed Punjab Govt led by Capt. Amrinder Singh has also retained Jethmalani to represent the govt in the apex court and various courts outside Chandigarh. But the amount paid is surprisingly lower.

As compared to charging Kejriwal 22 lakh per appearance, the Punjab govt will only be paying Jethmalani 3.3 lakh.

The article attributes such a disparity in fees to poor negotiation by Kejriwal. This raises the questions over financial prudence of the Delhi government; whether they didn’t even bother to negotiate as they were going to make the people pay the amount?

Ram Jetjmalani though has a completely different outlook to the whole affair. Jethmalani has claimed that he didn’t charge Kejriwal more but he had actually given him a discount!

He stated that the 1 crore retainer fees which he has charged Kejriwal is actually lower than what he charges other clients. Plus he claims he hasn’t charged Kejriwal anything for the ‘elaborate’ conferences before a trial. Jetjmalani though would be earning  2.2 lakh for conference and drafting of petitions from the Punjab govt.

So if Ram Jethmalani claims that the rates charged to Kejriwal are actually lower, while he is billing Punjab Govt even less, should one conclude that this is because Kejriwal is being charged in individual capacity and thus Jethmalani is comparing his rates to other non-governmental clients?

AAP asked YouTube to delete their funny videos. Meet ‘Super Londay’

Have you seen Delhi Chief Minister and AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal singing “Ae Dil Hai Mushkil”? There is high chance that you’ve seen it after it was shared by one of your friends on social media or you had received the video clip on WhatsApp. If you don’t remember, here it is:



This video clip – made after mixing publicly available video and audio files in a funny but meticulous way to match the lip movements – has been created by guys who call themselves “Super Londay”. Many of such ‘fun cuts’ created by them have gone viral over last few months, even though not many people knew about the origin of these funny videos.

As time passed and people started realising that it’s the same set of guys who come up with these funny videos, they started following the social media accounts of Super Londay on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. Currently they have attracted over 6000 followers on Twitter, 11,300 subscribers on YouTube, and 30,300 likes on Facebook.

But they have also attracted the attention of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which doesn’t find their videos funny. Many of the videos created by Super Londay have Arvind Kejriwal in them, so much so, that they started appearing as top search suggestions along with Kejriwal on Google:


This clearly didn’t humour AAP, and a person named Akshay Malhotra, who is affiliated to the party and allegedly even working for the Delhi government, complained to YouTube and got four of their videos removed. Not only that, because the complaint was about “copyright infringement”, the YouTube account of Super Londay now risks being disabled in a week:


This clearly left the guys at Super Londay surprised and shocked because they heavily edit the videos and such edits should come under “fair use” policy of YouTube. They have written to YouTube protesting this decision, but are not sure if they will get a fair treatment given they have rubbed a political party with substantial online clout the wrong way.

The Super Londay
Himanshu and Sandeep

However, this has not disheartened Himanshu and Sandeep – the guys behind Super Londay – who have said that they will not quit making videos even if their account is disabled by YouTube.

They have put the back up of their videos – unfortunately only two of the four could be backed up – on their website and have said that they will start a new YouTube channel if the current one is disabled by YouTube.

Speaking to OpIndia.com, Himanshu said that he was disappointed that someone related to AAP went to this extent to muzzle something that was at best satirical and at worst just random fun cut.

“During Anna days, a cartoonist named Aseem Trivedi was arrested by the then Congress government and people, who are now part of AAP, had called it an attack on freedom of expression. Looks like the same ideology that arrested a cartoonist has now been adopted by AAP,” Himanshu said.

Himanshu further pointed out that Arvind Kejriwal himself shares and re-tweets many messages making fun of others including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, but AAP is unable to tolerate a few funny videos of Kejriwal. He maintains that the complaint of copyright infringement was unfair and disabling their account is unjust. He wonders why YouTube agreed with the complainant.

“Even NDTV had complained against our channel after we had created a fun cut of Barkha Dutt’s interview with Arvind Kejriwal, but YouTube didn’t find that a case of copyright infringement. They allowed NDTV to monetise the video but didn’t delete the video. However, they have deleted the videos that were complained against by that AAP guy,” he informed.

Himanshu further informs that he and Sandeep, his college friend and partner in crime, were anyway planning to cut down on fun cut videos and focus on creating original content, but this move by AAP has left them with a bitter taste.

“Perhaps they just needed to ignore us. Creative people don’t like doing same thing again and again – unlike the politicians – and we might have stopped making Kejriwal videos, but they appear to be impatient lot,” the Super Londay co-founder said.

Himanshu and Sandeep had founded Super Londay on 1st May last year, and they might have to start afresh on 1st May this year if YouTube refuses to hear their case favourably. But they are not complaining. They are Londay with Superpowers apparently!

Ajmer Dargah’s diwan ‘sacked’ and declared non-Muslim for opposing cow slaughter

Syed Zainul Abedin Ali Khan, the diwan (spiritual head) of the Ajmer Dargah, the famous Sufi Shrine of Rajasthan, has been removed from his post by his own brother, who thought that this views on cow slaughter and beef eating was against Islam.

A couple of days back, Syed Zainul Abedin had not only supported ban on cow slaughter but had appealed to Muslims to give up beef eating to respect the sentiments of their Hindu brethren. He had also spoken against triple talaq.

“My family and I have taken a pledge on this day that we will never have beef for the rest of our lives,” he is reported to have said on Monday.

But now it appears that this family is in no mood to support his beliefs.

He has apparently been “sacked” from the post of diwan by his younger brother Syed Alaudin Alimi, who not only declared himself the new diwan but also declared Syed Zainul Abedin as a “non-Muslim” for his views on cow slaughter and beef.

Alaudin Alimi claims that he has the support of the family, who are supposed to be the direct descendants of Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti, in whose honour the dargah has been made.

Alimi says that he discussed his brother’s views with some clerics who apparently told him that Zainul Abedin had become an ‘apostate’ because he had spoken in violation of Islamic laws. He further claims to have called a meeting of the family (Chisti clan) and declared himself the diwan.

“He (Zainul Abedin) has lost the right to continue as the diwan of Ajmer Dargah because one needs to be a Sunni and Hanfi Muslim for that,” Alimi is reported to have said, justifying his deeds.

However, Syed Zainul Abedin claims that his brother has no right to remove him as the dargah is governed by a committee as per the provisions of the Durgah Khawaja Saheb Act, 1955. The post of diwan has no management control but gets a salary from the committee, which is appointed by the government.

Although the post of diwan is hereditary and Alaudin Alimi is claiming support of the entire clan and clerics, he will have to move court as the committee is in support of Zainul Abedin.

DMK leader MK Stalin ko gussa kyun aata hai?

DMK leader M.K. Stalin, who is the son of DMK supremo Karunanidhi, is currently the working president of the party. Although not popular yet on the microblogging site, Stalin is present on Twitter and has notched about 1700 tweets. Apart from tweeting, he also seems to have developed a habit which annoys every Twitter user.

SG Suryah is one such Twitter user. Suryah is an attorney, columnist and is also the Vice President of Tamil Nadu’s BJP youth wing. On Saturday, he wrote an article that debunked the allegations which were being spread by Stalin to create an anti-Hindi debate in the state. These allegations by Stalin were perpetrated in a detailed statement released on March 30th.

Some of the allegations which Surya debunked were:

  • The Modi govt was imposing Hindi as it was introducing Sanskrit/Hindi as a third language in place of German. (response: This is applicable in Kendriya Vidyalays only but Tamil Nadu and Puducherry are exempted from following the three-language formula. German was removed as it was introduced by the UPA government without following rules)
  • Sanskrit Week was being forced upon schools. (response: There is no force; Sanskrit Week has not been made mandatory)
  • Sanskrit was imposed due to the introduction of half-hour Sanskrit news bulletin in Doordarshan. (response: Doordarshan was already having a 5 minutes bulletin which was expanded. Further, how is it any imposition – no one is forced to follow the bulletin – or how does it compromise Tamil?)
  • Modi government was forcing government officers and Departments to use Hindi as a communication language. (response: it was a decision taken by the UPA government and it is compulsory only in Hindi speaking states, not in Tamil Nadu)

Surya also shared the same on his Twitter account and tagged Stalin:


Apparently Stalin either didn’t like Surya’s criticism or the fact that he was tagged by Surya and reportedly proceeded to block him:


What made matters worse was that, Surya was actually followed by Stalin before he decided to block him:


This tendency of eminent personalities to block people who haven’t abused or trolled them, has long irked many on twitter. Twitter does have a mute feature by which people automatically can escape seeing mentions or replies from unwanted accounts. What’s more peculiar in this case is the fact that Stain followed Surya.

So technically as Surya is associated with the BJP, Stalin was already getting some content critical of either him or the DMK on his timeline. But he neither unfollowed him or blocked him for the following criticism:



Intolerance anyone? Or rather “असहिष्णुता”?

Kerala pastor wants short skirts banned in Church, asks followers to give their kids ‘Christian names’

In a letter published in Idukki diocese bulletin in Kerala, a bishop named Mar Mathew Anikuzhikattil has urged girls to not wear outfits which end above the knee when they are inside the church. He also wished the women churchgoers to wear ‘special’ clothes during prayers and rituals.

Apart from this, he also gave other advice like asking parents to give Christian names to their kids, asking them to restrict their kids’ social media use, and also asked them (parents) not to blame the priest and nuns in front of their kids, which might affect the kids inclination towards divinity.

Even though the Bishop is well within his rights to put out his guidelines, it remains to be seen whether the usual suspects profess their outrage in this matter. As is the norm, even though our country conditionally allows free speech, its usage is usually exclusively reserved when it comes to criticizing Hindu institutions.

In December 2015, Justice S. Vaidyanathan of the Madras HC had prescribed a dress code for entry into temples, supposedly to to enhance the spiritual ambiance among devotees. This had drawn the ire of various groups and appeals were filed which had ensured a temporary stay on the order. According to one of the petitions, such an order was against the fundamental rights, particularly of women and children.

The petitions by two women’s association and the State government ensured that the order was ultimately set aside. It remains to be seen if similar groups now file cases against this Kerala pastor for making a statement, which going by the earlier logic, infringes women’s fundamental rights.

This isn’t the only time the Church fraternity in Kerala has been in the news for the wrong reasons. Just recently we had reported how a Kerala pastor had wanted women wearing Jeans and T-shirts to drown into the sea. He also claimed how such dresses aroused men and boys who then slipped into sin.

There also has been a serious child abuse scandal associated with the Kerala catholic church when a minor was reportedly raped by the vicar of a church and various people associated with the church then tried to shield him.

4 governance obstacles Mr. Modi needs to cross to seal the 2019 hurdle race

0

With the highest number of MLAs of any party in 24 years and UP firmly in the bag, the NDA under Prime Minister Narendra Modi is well on its way to match the political might of the old Congress under Nehru and Indira. With the dark days of political instability behind us and a decisive leader, India has a chance to finally take the big leap forward on the economic front and claim its rightful place on the world map.

But to get there, Modi administration will have to deftly tackle these 4 big challenges we face:

  1. Universal healthcare
  2. Universal primary education
  3. Universal social security & shelter
  4. Personal freedom, liberty, law & justice

In this article, based on my own experience I propose how the Modi administration could go about tackling these issues.

Universal healthcare

Often, when I travel in the so-called advanced economy countries and find people living in remote areas seemingly away from civilization, my first thought is – what do they do when there is a medical emergency? I find that they can get access to the nearest hospital (which may be many miles away) – by one simple phone call. A chopper would be there in minutes and shift the patient in real time for medical help.

I was involved in a major car crash in USA and saw the emergency response first hand. I was trapped inside my car for a short while and by the time I crawled out on my own (without any injury) I found that the police and ambulance had arrived and the fire engine was on its way. They were there in maybe under 10 minutes. I was driven to the nearest hospital and medical tests were done on priority. I also saw at the front entrance, a chopper land ferrying a pregnant woman in an advanced state of labour.

On the other hand, in India you read of accident victims lying on the road bleeding to death, ambulances stuck in traffic, emergency patients denied access to a road or a hospital because a VVIP visit and you begin to get a sense of how badly we have failed.

It will take time to change the system and culture, but two main areas (amongst many) which can be fixed without too much effort are Insurance and Primary Healthcare.

Insurance:

We need to have very rigorous health insurance system where even the poorest of poor get access to quality healthcare. These schemes must cover the plethora of private hospitals and these hospitals must come under a common law wherein they cannot turn away patients and the fundamental target must be to save lives, provide emergency care and treatment.

Citizens can take their own insurance covers also for added benefit. Cashless treatment in hospitals must be the norm and covered under either the universal or individual insurance schemes. Today this is missing and while the current government has started a health insurance scheme for the poor and marginalized (Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana), it is still linked to a bank account.

Also, it is my considered opinion that it has not been given sufficient publicity, focus or attention. This could be due to lack of rigorous systems in place or the propensity of the administration to consider this an avoidable effort. But this needs to be pursued aggressively by the govt, implemented and demonstrated to the citizens that it works. The dividends of such an effort would be humungous.

Primary healthcare:

In some states, doctors by law are supposed to serve in rural areas, but very few do so. We don’t need laws making rural service compulsory, instead, it is critical to understand that doctors posted in remote, rural areas find themselves losing the opportunity to expand their knowledge, have no access to education, housing, infrastructure or medicines in such locations and unless an individual is being idealistic, 99% of the people will find a way to avoid this posting.

The government can learn from the milk dairy industry, which since 4 decades is providing quality healthcare to cows/buffaloes in even the remotest of villages and the veterinary doctors enjoy the postings. So how did they do it?

Even in the eighties, all the doctors were posted at the nearest district headquarters. Each had a car equipped with a radio and their movement monitored by a central control room. Each doctor/car would traverse a prefixed route every day covering a set of villages on a weekly basis and they dispensed medical care and medicines to the cows. The village knew on what day the doctor would come and would be ready. If, however, there was an emergency, a separate car/doctor would drive down to that village on the other days and a special charge would be levied to discourage people from misusing the facility. If the emergency was dire, the control room would know which car/doctor was driving anywhere nearest to that village and ask them to take a detour.

This system ensured that the doctors stayed in urban habitation, had access to education, housing/infra for their families and returned home each night. Many grateful villagers would often bestow upon the doctor freebies like some fresh vegetables, fruits or such as a mark of gratitude, friendship, affection. Today with sophisticated communication technology and automobiles there is no reason why such a system cannot be implemented across the country. This is a necessity and can be a huge vote-puller for any party/Govt which implements this.

Universal primary education

In the case of Universal education, the Government passed an RTE law and dusted its hands off on a job well done. Problem solved. But has it? Primary education is left to the private sector and most of the government(municipal) schools have fared poorly. The private schools charge obscene fees, have many bored wives of corporate honchos and officers as teachers to protect themselves against government action & once again it is a business not treated as an essential service in nation building.

Given the geographies and challenges of our infra and safety of children, the government must open smaller primary schools in each locality which are accessible even by walk if required in an emergency, hire the women in that locality and train them. Admission and transfers must be made easy so that even the children of construction workers and such who live in that area can study.

The government can invite corporates to sponsor and manage these education initiatives under CSR funds and if needed give tax breaks. There is a 1.1% education cess on imports alone and in 2015-2016 total imports were $379,596 M, this translates to about $4176 M or INR 28,811 Crores. The budget states a figure of INR 29,407 Crores. Given that the under-14 population of India is 35 Crores, it is entirely possible to provide this access.

What gets measured, gets improved and so to improve the quality of these Gov run schools, the schools must be made more transparent and their performance should be measured and be open for public scrutiny. Financial and social Incentives of the staff should be linked to the qualitative and quantitative performance of the school.

Universal social security

It will always remain a dream to have 100% employment, and often global incidents or health related issues or physical debilitation create a mass of people who lose the ability to earn a living.

If we believe in human dignity, then there must be a universal fund and infrastructure that can take care of the most in need and support them. Again one may not be able to provide the best but society, corporate must be encouraged to create systems that can provide the basic minimum every citizen deserves. There can be night shelters for the homeless (especially during winter), community soup kitchens to feed the destitute. And insurance schemes which the employed can subscribe to whereby if they lose their job or a limb, they can still earn a living wage.

Personal freedom, liberty, law & justice

One cannot grow and expand his horizons unless she has freedom. Often, many say that we have too much democracy. Maybe true in a way, but what we probably have is selective freedom and discretionary democracy. This must change. Laws must be changed to protect every thought, every idea to flourish and the 18th-century notions of sedition and blasphemy must go. This freedom of expression or speech must be absolute and not limited to who is powerful and has muscle power and thus they think they are right.  If a left wing opinion must be respected, then equal respect must be given to a right wing view. The law cannot differentiate between the two.

The law must be framed such that this freedom is protected and there are clear limitations by way of discipline and conduct to protect the sovereignty and security of the country. When these are transgressed, the law must take its own course in a swift and firm manner.

Even after 70 years of independence, justice system remains in the grips of the rich and powerful. Every citizen must have the confidence that they can seek protection by the justice system. Today, often policemen refuse to even file FIRs, or act in a partisan manner, get influenced by political and money power. Cases that go to court get dragged for decades. Justice must not only be timely but also seen to be delivered. Punishment must be equally swift. The pathetic state of our police systems and judiciary can be gauged by the fact that rarely does a citizen wants to seek the help of the law.

Here again, the government understands the challenge but the system (including the police, judges and judicial system) itself opposes changes, since they have become units dispensing favours and wielding power. Unless there are radical changes in police and judiciary – India, however democratic, can never occupy the high seat of being truly called an advanced nation.

***

Social Media, 2014 election and the current government has brought in a huge change when it comes to citizen involvement in issues. Quite often, this manifests itself as angst and impatience; it’s imperative to channelize this engagement into positive nation building activity and not become private battles over trivial issues. India today is at the cross roads of change and the road we take will determine our future.

Making taxpayers pay Kejriwal’s legal expenses, all you need to know

Even though the Delhi Government led by AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal rules over one of the smaller territories in the country, it hasn’t prevented them from creating large controversies at almost regular intervals.

Only last week we had reported how they were put in the dock by Delhi’s LG (Lieutenant Governor) for misusing the Delhi taxpayers’ money while putting out advertisements. Now there is a new controversy of misusing taxpayers’ money.

As reported by news portal KhabarE, Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal wants the Delhi taxpayers to pay the legal expenses incurred by him, arguably in a personal capacity, for fighting the defamation case filed by BJP leader and Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.

In case, you haven’t followed the controversy, here is a summary:

Q: What is this whole issue about?

Ans: BJP leader Arun Jaitley, in December 2015, had filed a defamation case against Kejriwal and 5 others for what he claimed were false allegations regarding his alleged role in certain irregularities in the DDCA (Delhi & District Cricket Association). Jaitley sought compensation of 10 crore rupees due to damages caused by alleged defamatory statements by Kejriwal.

In the court, Kejriwal was represented by noted lawyer Ram Jethmalani. Jethmalani, in some media interviews, had claimed that he will fight the case for free, charging a token money of just one rupee, even though his professional fees are pretty high.

However, documents available with some in media reveal that so far Jethmalani has billed Kejriwal a whopping Rs 3.42 crores. Out of these, Rs 1.22 crores have been directed to be paid from the exchequer of Delhi government:


Q: So what is wrong in it?

Ans: Arun Jaitley had filed the defamation against Kejriwal in a personal capacity and thus many experts argue that Kejriwal should defend the case in personal capacity too, because the case has been filed against the individual and not the Delhi Chief Minister. Kejriwal is understood to have issued those statements in capacity of a politician, not as a public officer.

Though having said that, legal experts believe that invoking section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code would have allowed Kejriwal to turn this into a matter involving the Delhi CM, which he didn’t do.

Documents with the media further suggest that on 21st December 2016, Manish Sisodia, the Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, had directed the General Administration Dept led by Gopal Rai to pay the legal bills as and when Ram Jethmalani sent them. Curiously in the letter, Sisodia also mentioned that this concerned file need not be sent to the LG for approval. This is being interpreted as a fear that the LG might have rejected the proposal as they were in contravention of rules.

Q: Why had Jaitley filed a defamation case against Kejriwal?

Ans: Kejriwal and his fellow party members had alleged that for the 13 years, when Jaitley was the chief of the DDCA, the body was involved in irregularities. Jaitley was accused by AAP leaders of directly or indirectly giving consent to massive corruption in the cricket body.

They alleged that additional expenditure of Rs 90 crore was incurred on renovating the Feroz Shah Kotla stadium and that fake companies were setup by DDCA officials to siphon off money. They also alleged that there were irregularities even in team selection by the DDCA like forging age certificates and that players selected were of Jaitley’s personal choice. Jaitley had received support from cricketers like Gautam Gambhir, Virender Sehwag, and Virat Kohli at that time, however Kejriwal continued to claim corruption and irregularities.

All this irked Jaitley, and Kejriwal and others were put on trial on 25th March this year in a criminal defamation case. Ram Jethmalani had asked some rather ridiculous questions to Arun Jaitley as part of the proceedings, about which we had earlier reported.

Q: What is Ram Jethmalani’s response to this controversy?

Ans: Ram Jethmalani had claimed that he only charges the rich and works for free for the poor, though he had also claimed that he will be working pro-bono for Kejriwal. He doesn’t appear to have clarified when did his plan of offering his services free of cost change (leading him to send the bills to Kejriwal), but now he is saying that he can still offer his services free of cost:


Interestingly as Jethmalani says he will ‘appear’ for free it raises the question about what will happen to his retainer fees of 1 crore rupees. Does it mean that he expects at least one crore to be paid?

Q: If Arvind Kejriwal loses the cases and he has to pay Jaitey 10 crores, would he make the Delhi taxpayers pay it too?

Ans: Very good question. Maybe yes, given how the Delhi government is justifying paying the current legal fee from the state exchequer.

What the right-wing in India can learn from Arvind Kejriwal’s debacle

0

Arvind Kejriwal and his journey should be seen in two parts. The first part is when he rode on the anti-corruption sentiment as a saviour of the republic and won handsomely. However insignificant it might appear to be (just one small half-state like Delhi), but he won a fair electoral victory.

Part II is Arvind Kejriwal in his role as the Chief Minister of Delhi. This is where it all started falling apart and still is.

Why is it that someone who promised so much, appeared to make all the right noises, attracted some very good professionals, has failed so spectacularly. One can attribute all this to his overreaching obsession to become the Prime Minister in a very short time. So let’s say he becomes the Prime Minister tomorrow. What next? What will he do? Does he have a plan?

Arvind Kejriwal has failed in his second innings because of one and only one reason – he does not have an agenda.

His is a typical leftist problem – exploit dissatisfaction against the establishment to win power but when in power they are woefully out of implementable ideas. ‘Peace’, ‘Equality’ sounds melodious but how exactly does one implement Peace and Equality? By manipulating history textbooks?

However, there is a lesson for the ‘right-wing’ in this short story about Arvind Kejriwal.

Let’s assume tomorrow BJP wins each and every seat in the country – this includes all local, state and central elections. The party has captured absolute power. All illegal abattoirs will be closed, cow slaughter will be banned and maybe even RTE will be repealed, what next? Ask this simple question to yourself – what exactly are the long-term changes that you want to make?

A part of the RW (right-wing) anger is merely prejudiced, but the other part is a genuine perception of injustice gathered over the years. How can we distinguish between the two? Does the right-wing have a soundly articulated agenda and a plan to implement the same?

Let me explain it with an example:

Our education sector is compromised. Okay. So what are the required changes and how to implement those? There are ideas which one comes across once in a while. But how can we achieve coherence in those scattered ideas? And more importantly how can we sensitize the general public as to why there is a need to reform the system? Is there a sound argument which we can build for the same? Replacing left-wing prejudices with right-wing prejudices will be a poor strategy.

Most right-wingers are amateurs who, unlike the left elites, do not have enough clout to lobby for their ideas. There are ideas which come up on the social media and various blogs and websites. But many of these ideas are contributed by part-timers who do not have resources to follow up on them.

What we need today is a formal forum where status quo can be challenged. A platform where participants can highlight concern areas, contribute ideas and propose solutions. Moderators can select concepts from various areas and shape them into implementable solutions. These should be thoroughly debated over and passed on to the power centres for consideration.

A concept like this will have multiple benefits. RW will not be exposed when in power. Good ideas will receive the attention they deserve. We will be heard. Disproportionate amount of narrative is controlled by the Left. It is important to grab the narrative and discuss issues which really matter and in a way which makes an impact. Such a system will also be a protective hedge to prevent governments from falling in the Lutyen’s blackhole.

One of the major reasons why the 1857 uprising failed is that it was an unorganized effort. Rebels lacked an ideology or programme that could be implemented in captured areas. None of them knew what to do after the capture of a region. Arvind Kejriwal, if you observe closely has suffered due to the same effect. It is the coherence of ideas which transforms individual efforts into a movement, the lack of which reduces the same to an uprising.

Lutyen’s is waiting for today’s uprising to fail so that their movement can resume. After the failure of 1857, it took another 90 years for Bharat to achieve Independence.

****

Post Script: Filling infrastructural gaps, Swachchh Bharat, GST and other attempted reforms are the basics that every right minded government should have done. That we are left to cheer even the basics only tells us how much our previous governments have failed but make no mistake – this is in no way visionary, we are merely playing catch up.

MP EVM controversy mostly a result of low IQ journalists and vile politicians

We had earlier reported how a light-hearted banter by the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Madhya Pradesh was reported as ‘threat to journalists’ by certain media organisations. The CEO had thrown that banter during a public demonstration of an EVM with VVPAT system in Bhind ahead of an assembly bye-election.

Not only that, the mainstream media showed its bias or incompetence by picking up a particular report by Dainik Bhaskar where it was claimed that different buttons on EVMs returned BJP symbols, and repeated it thousand times, even though reports by other two newspapers – Nai Duniya and Patrika – didn’t claim so and even a report by Dainik Bhaskar itself, which was changed later, had claimed that the EVM buttons were working fine. You can read our report on the above incident here.

Conflicting reports by different newspapers could be an example of deliberate mischief by journalists, which can’t be ruled out, but we will give benefit of doubt to the local journalists and assume that they were inadequately educated or not skilled enough to understand what was going on.

One can even argue that the local journalists were egomaniac enough not to take the light-hearted banter by the CEO lightly, and decided to ‘teach her a lesson’ by claiming that she was serious. However, we’d again give benefit of doubt and assume that they didn’t get the humour or sarcasm of the CEO and didn’t misreport about her conduct out of any ill-will.

Now a journalist who can’t understand a sarcastic comment by the Chief Electoral Officer can be credited to be clumsy enough to not understand how VVPAT (voter verified paper audit trail) system works.

To repeat yet again, VVPAT is a system where a machine (not the EVM, but a different machine attached to the EVM) prints a paper slip after a voter presses any button on the EVM. The voter physically verifies if the paper slip has the name and symbol of the same party (and candidate) he had voted for, as he can see the slip, which later gets dropped in a ballot box (drop box). If he claims that wrong symbol was printed, he has to sign a declaration saying so.

This lack of awareness or skill to understand how the VVPAT system works was highlighted again today when many journalists confused a VVPAT’s printing machine with the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM). Equipped with the confidence that they can never be wrong, the journalists went on to write stories like:

‘Faulty’ Bhind EVM was last used in Kanpur polls, says EC team

The above report in the Times of India quoted officials from the Election Commission of India and claimed that the EVM, which allegedly printed only BJP symbols regardless of the buttons pressed, was last used in Uttar Pradesh elections.

Firstly, the report repeated the unverified claims of Dainik Bhaskar, and secondly it gave further fodder to Congress and AAP leaders, who not only used it as “proof” that elections were rigged in Uttar Pradesh, but further asked why was the EVM transferred even though they are mandated not to be taken out till 45 days are over since the time of declaration of results of the elections where they were last used.

Now it appears that the EC team had told them about VVPAT’s printing machine, but the clueless journalists reported them as EVMs. The printing machines of VVPAT system are not mandated to be frozen for 45 days, hence they were brought to Bhind as such machines are not in abundance. Only the print outs from those machines are to be stored for 45 days along with the EVMs.

The same was clarified in a press release issued by the Election Commission of India:

Press release by election commission over Bhind EVM controversy

Press release by election commission over Bhind EVM controversy - 2

The press release by the Election Commission also clarified that the VVPAT’s printing machine was not reset during the demonstration and hence there could have been some confusion over what names or symbols were getting printed. This perhaps also explains the original confusion, which was later blown out of proportion by a clueless media and some vile politicians.

Since the demonstration was made without resetting the earlier symbols and undertaking what is known as First Level Checking, the Election Commission replaced the District Election Officer as disciplinary action. This too is being wrongly claimed as a “proof” – that disciplinary action was taken because EVMs were faulty – whereas disciplinary action was taken because standard procedures were not followed.

Nonetheless, the Election Commission has declared that it will still look into the allegations of multiple buttons printing the symbol of the same political party, and the findings will be made public soon.

Repeating this popular story about Maharishi Valmiki can land you in jail

It is one of the most repeated stories and chances are that you might have also either heard it or have used it at some point of time, most certainly approvingly. And the story is: Maharishi Valmiki was a dacoit, and was known as Ratnakar, before he became a sage and wrote Ramayana.

According to legend, Ratnakar, supposed to be born in a so-called low-caste, was rechristened as Valmiki and given the status of Maharishi (great sage) and a great Brahmin by Narada Muni after Ratnakar performed tapasya (deep meditation).

However, the Valmiki community, especially those living in Punjab, don’t like that part of the story that says that Maharishi Valmiki was any dacoit at any point in his earlier life.

If you repeat this part of the story, even approvingly without meaning disrespect to Maharishi Valmiki, and especially at a mass media platform, you will attract the wrath of some activists belonging to the community.

The same has happened to TV actress and host Rakhi Sawant, who could be arrested for calling Maharishi Valmiki a murderer (well, she sensationalized, out of habit, and turned the ‘dacoit’ part of the story into a ‘murderer’). She repeated this story to make a point about how someone indulged in criminal activities came become a great sage, and thus people should be given second chances in their lives, but ended up offending members of the Valmiki community.

She was repeating the story on some TV channel in July last year to make a point that just like Valmiki (Ratnakar) can become a sage, Mika Singh – the Bollywood singer who had once forcibly kissed her and who uses abusive language on Twitter – can also change and become a better person.

Shatabdi stopped by Valmiki community
Train stopped to protest against Rakhi Sawant in July 2016

Members of the Valmiki community were reportedly offended over her referring to Maharishi Valmiki’s past as criminal (and not over the comparisons with Mika Singh, which we thought was more ridiculous). A case was registered against Rakhi Sawant under IPC 295 for offending religious sentiments. Protesters had even stopped a train in Punjab demanding her arrest.

According to latest reports, a team of Punjab Police has now left for Mumbai to arrest Rakhi Sawant, against whom an arrest warrant was issued by a local court in Ludhiana. The warrant was issued after the actress couldn’t attend hearings at the court even after repeated summons.

However, this is not the for the first time that Valmiki community has taken to courts against people who repeat this story. Way back in 2009, a case was registered against TV channel Star Plus and producers of a serial Bidai, where this story was repeated, even though approvingly.

The case is still going on and the activists vow to take it to logical conclusion. Last year, even the Supreme Court refused to give relief to the TV channel and producers. While hearing the same case, the High Court had observed that there was no credible evidence to suggest that Maharishi Valmiki was a dacoit in his earlier life.

“From Vedic literature, up to 9th century AD, there is no reference as such that Maharishi Valmiki led a life of a dacoit or highwayman,” the judge is reported to have to have said, which arguably has now become a precedent and the activists of Valmiki community don’t take lightly any reference to the same.

Apart from cases against the Star Plus and Rakhi Sawant, Valmiki community protesters had got the Arshad Warsi starrer The Legend of Michael Mishra banned in Punjab as the movie too had a dialogue that repeated the story about Maharishi Valmiki being a dacoit once.