Monday, November 18, 2024
Home Blog Page 6890

UP Government keeps villagers of Nagla Fatela, general public and Central Government in Dark

0

There has been much ado over a little known village of Hathras district of Western Uttar Pradesh, Nagla Fatela. The Prime Minister in his Independence Day speech, mentioned it as one of the 10,000 odd villages that have been electrified under the much-celebrated rural electrification drive of the NDA government. Enterprising media outlets made a visit to the village to verify the claims and all hell broke loose since then.

“The village was already electrified”; “the village was not electrified”; “infrastructure was not created”; “only infrastructure was created and power was not provided”; “the scheme is a waste” etc. – these were some of the discussions on social media based on news reports. In this melee, the real villain of the piece – the Samajwadi Party led State Government was conveniently forgotten, both by partisan media outlets looking to break the Modi headwind in Uttar Pradesh and online activists who specialise in trolling political leaders.

The Modi government came to power with the burden of extraordinary expectations. That Power (electricity) is a concurrent subject under the Constitution is another reality check. That the Samajwadi Party cannot even be remotely associated with the loosest definition of governance is another widely accepted fact, given their poor track-record. So any Central Government scheme, must work through the filter of a State’s delivery mechanism and all the baggage associated with it. Add to this the score of 73 MPs of NDA from Uttar Pradesh and there is an atmosphere not exactly conducive for the implementation of Central schemes.

So what happened in Nagla Fatela? Under the Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY), through which, the rural electrification drive is being pursued, the Central Government allots funds on the basis of State Government reports. Being a concurrent subject the Centre cannot provide electricity or infrastructure on its own. Nor is it recommended that the Centre try to reach the 6-lakh odd villages of the country. Besides the federal structure argument, it is a recipe for disaster in practical terms of implementation.

As per documents released by the Central Government, the UP State Government added Nagla Fatela village to a list of unelectrified villages on the basis of which, funds would be allocated. A high-power committee comprising not only the State’s senior most electricity department authorities but also the senior most official of Uttar Pradesh, the Chief Secretary, sent this list. They claimed that this list was prepared after field surveys.

UP Govt's own documents
UP Govt’s own documents

Worse, the State Government themselves claimed that this village had zero houses electrified and that the transmission line had zero load. They also proposed the power infrastructure that would be built. Under the terms of DDUGJY, this was a fit case for electrification.

Zero Electrification
Zero Electrification

On the basis of this data, the Central government released funds and work was carried out. On 30th October 2015, the State DISCOM verified that it had completed the work.

The Infrastructure Verification Document provides details of the power infrastructure (transformers, poles, connections etc.). The central government released details of the electrification work of the village on its GARV app to ensure that the public was kept in the loop.

Electrification verified
Electrification verified (Last serial number)

However, V S Gangwar, Chief Engineer at DVVNL’s Aligarh division claimed to the media that the village had been electrified since 1985! So how can DVVNL first say that there, in writing, that the village was not electrified, and later claim that it was electrified since 1985?

The answer is simply this:  Around 150 houses have power since 1985 through the transformer meant for tubewells, via illegal “katia” connections. This has been admitted by the same Mr Gangwar above. So is a DVVNL staffer admitting that people are drawing illegal connections, from tubewell and agricultural pump lines for which, the state government gives subsidised rates? Is this a legal means or did someone in the UP Government benefit from this elaborate facility? Did the Samajwadi Party government turn a blind eye to this? Worse, did they later tell the Central Government in writing that the village had not power, and to add to it, not even bother to provide electricity through the new infrastructure?

From this episode it is clear that the Samajwadi Party has been trying to defeat the very purpose of this scheme. With an eye around elections, the Samajwadi Party has been creating much ruckus in parliament under the vocal leadership of Naresh Agarwal (of ‘a teaseller cannot become a Prime Minister’ fame). It has been demanding additional funds for Uttar Pradesh. The question that needs asking is funds to create ghost infrastructure or non-existent infrastructure.

Clearly, the UP government has much to answer. The NDA government has now used its implementing agency, the Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) to seek details from the Uttar Pradesh government on this village. It has also uploaded all the relevant documents, many of which have been quoted above, on its website.

As more details come to light, the opposition will realise that in reality they have added credence to BJP claims that the UP government is not co-operating with the Centre. Public opinion is already poor of the State Government. With this it will add weight to the belief that Modi’s intentions are good but the system does not support him. Elections are round the corner and these developments could not have come at a more “August” time for the BJP.

Dear Supreme Court, tell me how to celebrate Hindu festivals

0

Recently the Supreme Court was seen passing decisions on how Dahi Handi, a Hindu festival, should be celebrated. On the pretext that the human pyramids were dangerous, SC went on to prescribe the maximum height of the pyramid, and even proposed a condition which was impossible to ensure compliance with: restricting participation by people below the age of 18.

Considering how wide an ambit today’s Supreme Court has, and being a law abiding citizen, I wish that I worship My Lords in the sky without breaking any laws, hence I make this appeal to My Lords on earth:

A shriphal’s total height,

The lumens in a diya,

Is the kalash alright?

Tell me, oh SC dear!

 

How much pushp should I use?

Which genera and species?

I am extremely obtuse,

Oh SC, tell me please!

 

The greenness of a betel,

And radius of its nut,

How should agarbathi smell?

Oh SC, tell me that!

 

Powderiness of haldi,

And roundness of laddoo,

What viscosity of ghee?

SC, please give a clue!

 

The distance from the murti,

That I can stand and pray!

What Kelvin should be aarti?

Would SC deign to say?

 

If apples are expensive,

Will bananas suffice?

I hope it’s not offensive,

SC, what’s your advice?

 

When enjoying (dry) Holi,

What RGBs to use?

During (silent) Diwali,

What dB is abuse?

 

Those daandiyas, by the way

What is their legal size?

How much, in grams, should they weigh?

Oh SC, make me wise!

 

Without going to and fro,

Let me ask you outright,

As a Hindu can I grow,

To more than 5 feet height?

Comedian uses dark humor to talk about liberal hypocrisy on the Kashmir issue

0

Nitin Gupta, who is famous on social media as Rivaldo, has been using different genre of humor to discuss various social and political issues of India. For past few years, Rivaldo is creating many videos around the political scene of India. His video on IPS Durga Nagpal was received very positively.

Recently, Rivaldo has created a video on the Kashmir issue. Unlike his previous videos, this time he has kept his video as a dark-humor genre monologue. The video is a sarcastic suggestion to PM Narendra Modi, asking him to focus on secular balance of the valley for becoming a statesman like Nehru.

Author is a Stand Up comedian. You can follow him on twitter at Rivlado, and on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rivaldo.nitin

How Hindustan Times’ headlines hide more than they reveal: Here is the truth

In today’s milieu of crisp sound-bites, news-break- a-minute and short attention spans, the struggle to capture eyeballs and mind space of readers and viewers has become fiercely competitive. We, as consumers of news, have become increasingly laid back and lazy, preferring our brains to be spoon-fed thoughts and ideas the anchors or journalists find fit to feed us. On the other side of the fence, newspapers and television journalists have become more and more imaginative to ensure survival. They have also, alarmingly, shifted the definition of their own role from reporting news to ‘shaping opinions’ – as this tweet indicates.


I call this trend alarming for, if the reporters, anchors and editors are seeing themselves in such a role, who is to decide WHAT that opinion should be on a particular issue. And to what extent does such a role affect the judicious reporting of facts without giving it a subtle (or not so subtle) slant to suit the side towards which opinion is sought to be shaped. Of course, it’s not really possible to lie or fabricate facts to achieve this, without leaving themselves open to legal action. So the next best option is to ‘twist’ them. Instead of ‘the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth’, we get half-truths, opinions dressed up as facts, and their biggest weapon of all – misleading headlines. Capitalising on the tendency of the average news consumer to restrict their reading to the headlines, the message purported to be conveyed is cleverly crafted into it. That the rest of the story may not really bear it out completely doesn’t matter. It’s never going to be read most of the times anyway.

As a test case, I took up a random page from the newspaper I subscribe to, the Hindustan Times (New Delhi Edition, Page 14, 14 August), to examine the headlines and see how far the stories bear them out.

“Experts punch holes in Modi’s PoK plan” as per the first headline under the by-line of @jayanthjacob He starts by telling the readers that the idea is not new and previous governments have been down this path earlier (therefore all this praise that the PM is receiving for it is misplaced and unfounded). He then goes on to quote the experts who, as per the headline have allegedly perforated the plan into a sieve. Maybe Jacob and I have a different understanding of what it means to punch holes into something, but I couldn’t find a single expert quoted list a single flaw in the plan per se. All I found them doing is agreeing that it’s a bold move, and the challenge lies in now putting it into action. To my mind, any plan has challenges in implementation, and when it comes to a foreign policy initiative of such complexity, this is no great revelation. But nor does it construe trashing the plan itself.

The second headline tells us, “Centre, state govt staff may soon have to wear khadi once a week to office”. The story by @meetuttam and Moushumi Das Gupta would possibly like to have us believe what an autocratic dictatorship that this government is turning out to be (we told you so) by passing such a diktat, which, obviously, the hapless government servants have no option but to comply with. It goes so well with the narrative of this government telling people what to eat, wear and do. That is the impression such a headline would leave someone who doesn’t bother to read the story with. Which is what, I suspect, 90% of the readers would do. Though if you do bother to do so, you will find that the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC) has written a letter to the central and state governments with this suggestion. Several state governments, including Uttar Pradesh, have liked the idea and have passed it on to their employees, it has NOT been made mandatory by any of them.

Next, piece by @smritikak tells us “RSS to mark Akhand Bharat Diwas Today”. While you may be pardoned for giving in to images of jingoistic celebrations exhorting people to undo the partition and reclaim the whole of Bharatvarsha if you are one of the few who does bother to read beyond the headlines you might feel let down. “We don’t believe in the merging of states, but there should be a meeting of people”, a senior functionary is quoted. Isn’t that also what the much hailed ‘Aman ki Asha’ talks about, as do people who want Pakistani artistes to perform in India and vice versa?

Lastly, a headline goes, “Cong legacy doesn’t figure in Govt’s I-Day celebration plan”. It’s difficult to figure out whether this particular gem is deliberately misleading, or simply a result of lazy reporting without even basic research. It goes on to inform us that Union Minister Narendra Singh Tomar would be travelling to Allahabad to pay tributes to Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya. Ministers would also be travelling to the birthplaces of other leaders, including Jayaprakash Narain, K Kamraj and the poet Subramania Bharati to pay homage to them. All these had been active members of the Indian National Congress during the independence movement, and in fact, Pandit Malviya and Kamraj have been presidents of the party. So how can the headline be justified? Unless the newspaper or its reporter are restricting Congress legacy to the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty, which actually doesn’t figure in the plans. Considering that in the past so many years it was completely the other way around, one wonders how many articles were written in the past about the Congress leaders mentioned above being ignored.

As educated, discerning consumers of news, we must, therefore, make it a point to look beyond the headlines to avoid being led like sheep by whichever school of thought your newspaper or TV channel subscribe to, our opinions ‘shaped’ like mindless minions that we are possibly imagined to be.

This post first appeared on my blog swordarm.in

Journalist’s lies about Leonardo De Caprio at RSS event get exposed

0

India Today Group’s DailyO has fast earned a reputation as a safe haven for the publishing unsubstantiated ramblings. What is positioned as a vehicle to carry opinion pieces has become a platform to print completely fictional garbage. Last year we had the unintentionally hilarious piece by Rana Ayyub, in the backdrop of the rape of a Nun in Kolkata. This was at the height of the fake “Christians under Attack” narrative and Ace Detective Rana Ayyub deduced that RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and his aides were responsible for the crime on the nun. Too bad for her, some Bangladeshi nationals were the real criminals. No wonder nobody touched her book on Gujarat with a barge pole.

Coming back to DailyO,  another “journalist” recently published another news report recently, again targeting the RSS. Rabid abuser and journalist Swati Chaturvedi used DailyO’s platform to publish this on 22nd June 2016:

Exclusive

The post was called an “Exclusive” by DailyO and that probably was the only truthful part in its promotion: It was an “exclusive” because such yarns cannot be spun by all and sundry.

The post was as usual peppered with unflattering comments on RSS, but that is not the point here. The big “exclusive” here was the source-based claim that Leonardo DiCaprio, Sir David Attenborough and Richard Branson would be attending an RSS event:

…a gallery of celebrities are set to grace the event and usher in the new uber power and remote control of India. The stars include Sir Richard Branson, adding a virgin touch perhaps with an eye to growing his global empire, English broadcaster and naturalist Sir David Attenborough, and Hollywood superstar Leonardo DiCaprio who will reinforcing the virtues of a beef ban. I have been told that DiCaprio and Branson’s messages have already been received and are on song. DiCaprio is vegan and is expected to provide a touch of stardust to Bhagwat’s anti-beef message. (Perhaps the only thing the two men share in common.) Branson is also vegan and has announced plans to launch a vegan airline. This “cowspiracy” is what the RSS adores about both men and is likely to open doors for Virgin in India.

As usual, mainstream media lapped up this claim and reported it as gospel truth. Every single report in mainstream media was based solely on this “journalistic” report which for some reason was placed on the opinion’s portal of a news broadcasting behemoth. May be even the India Today group knows where to place the unavoidable unsubstantiated trash.

RSS on its part was late to react. Almost 2 weeks later, RSS and the organisers of the event HSS, quashed all such reports as “rumours”:

No Bollywood or Hollywood stars have been invited for the Mahashibir. The reports about some film stars attending the HSS event are not true. We don’t know where they (rumours) originated.

As expected, the Sanskriti Mahashibir (mega cultural camp) went on as planned from 29th to 31st July. There were numerous news reports which covered the event,  but there was not a single news report which reported any of Swati Chaturvedi’s “exclusive” claims. There was no Di Caprio, no Branson, no Attenborough.

Even “DiCaprio and Branson’s messages” which had “already been received” found no mention. Naturally if such huge international stars had attended such a meet, every news portal worth their salt would have reported this news, but nothing of this sort happened. Neither did the Chaturvedi blow her own trumpet claiming that her “exclusive” was eventually found to be true. Either the stars were wearing invisibility cloaks, or the original “exclusive” was completely baseless.

All this begs one simple question: who were these sources who exclusively told utter lies to an upright yet abusive journalist Swati Chaturvedi? Did someone play a dirty trick on her? Or does she suffer from schizophrenia and other such mental disorders, which led her to cook up a completely imaginary story which has not even a iota of truth? In the first case, Chaturvedi must file a case of cheating on this source. In the second case, Chaturvedi must immediately retire from public life and seek medication for her problems, in which we wish her a speedy recovery. Until then, Chaturvedi will continue making herself and the media sites which giver her space, an object of lampooning and ridicule, if she continues to call her concocted flights of fantasies “reports”.

P.S.: If at all DailyO does want to continue their charity with her, maybe they should start a separate satire section for all of her posts. Get well soon Swati.

(Thanks to @shaitaankhopdi for the tip-off)

Why the Indian journalists are the modern ‘manuvadis’ of the intellectual caste system

0

After recent attacks on dalits, India’s caste system and the problems surrounding it are again under focus. Most of the socio-cultural problems of India are being traced to caste inequalities. Not just problems, anything about the society or social structure is being pinned to caste. In fact, even Olympics! (see image below):

Casteist tweet about Olympics
Apparently it’s a Brahmin team, despite most players being non-Brahmins.

Interestingly, such Twitter handles are actively promoted by many Indian journalists. This is in line with sudden journalistic focus on atrocities against dalits – some valid and some invented.

So is it some inherent and ever-lasting concern for equality among journalists that drive this focus? You wouldn’t say so if you just checked the upper echelons of media, which are devoid of any dalit representation. It makes their case worse when you see how dalit journalists are treated by their fraternity.

Given all this, it is intriguing that the journalists lead the fight for dalits. This is even more ironic when you consider that journalists of today are much like the oppressive members of the caste-system, often termed as “manuvadis”. And this is especially true for the “Lutyens Journalists” – the English speaking, metro residing, wining and dining connoisseurs.

For years, these set of elite people have been revered by the Indian society as a superior, high class, learned, cultured and sophisticated lot. And many of these privileges have been passed on to the next generation. So many modern Indian journalists who have reached the upper strata are either second generation journalists or have connections with journalists of yester-years.

Just like the upper castes, demographically this community constitutes a small fraction of the Indian population. However, they enjoy disproportionate dominance, power and wealth. Members of this community have been directly or indirectly wielding influence on administrative, judicial and legislative powers of India. The community members have been intimately involved with academia, business and politics.

The institution which brags about equality, fairness and impartiality has not only practised segmentation based on languages and pedigrees, but it also ensured that such structure remains intact. The bourgeois class of journalists have always maintained an apathy towards the proletariat class of journalists. Last year, OpIndia.com wrote an article highlighting silence of celeb journalists over killing of a less-known journalist. Jagendra Singh was burnt alive in Uttar Pradesh, but sadly, most of the top journalists who are vocal about even a tweet against them, didn’t lose their sleep over it.

Most of these upper-class journalists flaunt their modus vivendi while target others for their accent and attire (paisa aaya per class nahi aaya). Their power is often rooted in “access” – being able to participate in Lutyen’s cocktail parties and be close to some people – something others are denied. These parties are closed societies are the modern temples where the “untouchables” are not allowed.

Of late, when social media started challenging the autonomy of media honchos, the elite Lutyens’ journalism community was seen rattled. The following tweet captures how they do not want the untouchables to touch them:


You can’t raise voice against them. Nobody, not even the law of the land, is above them. They don’t want police complaints. Remember those movies where a Thakur, the zamindaar, used to got infuriated if some villager raised his voice or went to the police station against him?

So while we are seeing every social inequality from the lens of caste, why leave out our elite journalists? As this article shows, their tribe and behaviour is so much similar to the oppressive caste-system.

They are privileged, they have connections, they have clout, they have closed societies, they have power, and they don’t like being questioned. Isn’t it something which reminds you of the “manuvadis”?

When will this oppressive upper-caste of India be dismantled?

Times of India defames Chief Justice of India, blames it on “TV”

0

Indian judiciary has in the recent past earned a penchant for interfering with Governance issues. Courts have been passing orders which dictate policy matters, which should ideally be left to the Governments. Added to this, the Chief Justice of India TS Thakur is also known for his plain-speak, which is often contrary to Government of India’s views. Just as PM Modi finished his Independence Day address, CJI Thakur took a dig at the PM saying that he expected the PM to speak on the judicial appointments issue.

Along with the above, another news report was circulating on social media on Independence Day, which was attributed to CJI Thakur. PM Modi had landed a powerful punch to Pakistan by addressing the atrocities in Balochistan by Pakistan. This comment had found support from most, except the rabidly anti-Modi brigade such as Rajdeep Sardesai and Sagarika Ghose, who almost seemed to echo Pakistan’s stance. It was in contex of this news item, that Times of India tweeted the following:

Times of India’s tweet

According to the above tweet, CJI Thakur had not only stepped beyond his jurisdiction as the Chief Justice, but also embarrassed the Government of India and the PM, by taking a contrarian stance. Understandably there was considerable outrage on Twitter:



Even Delhi CM Kejriwal who was caught yawning during PM Modi’s speech, took no time to add his support to the CJI’s statement:

Overall, for the entire morning and more, CJI Thakur was pummelled by social media users for his alleged comments. But by afternoon, Times of India had mysteriously deleted the tweet. Many users were not aware of this as screenshots of the tweet were still circulating. So what happened?

Apparently, the CJI had never made such comments on PM Modi’s Balochistan remarks. It is possible that Times of India had mixed up Congress leader Salman Khurshid’s comments with the CJI’s remarks. It was only in the evening that Times of India admitted their grave error:

Even in the admission of guilt, they chose to pass on the buck to an unnamed TV channel, from which they claimed to have picked up this news. Considering Times of India’s track record, this is almost certainly a poor excuse to avoid outrage. Does a media house of the size and reach of Times of India just pick up news from “TV” without verification? If they indeed picked up the news from TV, why not name he TV channel?

The question now is this: Barkha Dutt doesn’t want the media to be “tried”. Supposed media watch-dog Newslaundry’s Madhu Trehan is also batting for saving the media in such situations. But here is India’s most popular media house committing a very grave error by attributing completely unrelated comments to a the highest judicial authority in India. Not only has his reputation been tarnished, it will continue to get further impacted as although Times of India has retracted, the screenshot of the tweet has gone viral.

Will the CJI let Times of India go scot-free? It is hard for politicians to take on the media as they have a love-hate relationship, and media can always cry political vendetta. Hence it appears the CJI is in a great position to take Times of India to task. But will he? 

How the hateful Left tried to attack General Bakshi over ‘nationalism’

0

General Gagandeep Singh Bakshi, a highly decorated retired officer from the Jammu and Kashmir Rifles, a veteran of many battles and skirmishes on the LoC, a Vishisht Seva Medal winner who led a battalion during the Kargil War, is now a regular on TV panels, where he has developed a reputation for his emotional and unabashedly nationalist views. Gen Bakshi recently addressed a gathering of IIT Madras students.

Once again, as we have seen repeatedly in the recent past, a bunch of radical leftist students along with some Kashmiris objected to General Bakshi’s speech for suggesting that the only way peace could be brought to Kashmir was to divide Pakistan into 4 parts. These miscreants then tried to raise slogans against him and stop him from speaking. This falls into a set pattern as was noted in JNU where leftists along with Kashmiris raised anti-India slogans like “Bharat Tere Tukde Honge Inshallah Inshallah” in the name of free speech. Only this time, they could not get away with it so easily as other students out-shouted this leftist lobby and did not let them disrupt Gen Bakshi’s speech.

Earlier this year, we had seen a similar episode where self-proclaimed proponents of “free speech”from JNU, who belonged to the Left ideology opposed a talk by Baba Ramdev on their campus.

“Left” with no other recourse due to failure of strong-arm tactics on campus, a student wrote a letter supposedly to the Director of IIT-M but in reality addressed to a wider audience through compliant media houses ever eager to give space to such nefarious elements, labelling Gen Bakshi’s talk a “hate speech” and “controversial”. General Bakshi retorted in style on Facebook and called out the bluff, pointing out that the alleged students were in fact Leftists of Ambedkar-Periyar group who had no popular support and that the majority of IIT students who were present there jeered and booed the Ambedkar-Periyar group into silence. He stood completely by his statements and again pointed out that Pakistan’s constant provocations on J&K were dangerous and that India needed to hit back.

Gen Bakshi on Facebook
Gen Bakshi on Facebook

Two other students Deepak Ojha and Chirag Khalde who were present at the talk also wrote in defence of Gen Bakshi and pointed out numerous factual inaccuracies in the claims made by Abhinav in his letter.

And thus began a massive assault on Gen Bakshi by alleged journalists, AAP and Congress politicians and hidden and actual spokespersons of the party. Mihir Sharma, a journalist whose political preferences and depths of thuggery aren’t exactly a secret, called Gen Bakshi’s talk “pretty deranged“. I’m sure many in the audience would’ve retorted that a person making such remarks is more likely to be the one who is pretty deranged. Priyanka Chaturvedi of Congress went so far as to say that a “there is no bigger war monger than him“. Attacks on Gen Bakshi are not a new obsession for Congress people: another former Congress spokesman Tehseen Poonawalla had called Gen Bakshi an “idiot” and compared him to Javed Miandad of Pakistan!

A well known Congress supporter pretending to be a neutral person, Sanjay Hegde, tried to mock Gen Bakshi for saying that Dehradun derived its name from Dronacharya and was originally called Dehra Dron.


Unfortunately for Sanjay Hegde and his supporters, this is mentioned in books on Uttarakhand and it is so well known, in fact, that several prominent educational institutions in Dehradun are named after Dronacharya. Moreover, Gen Bakshi taught at IMA Dehradun for three years, and obviously knows the place much better than most. Yet, for the sake of furthering an agenda, everything is fair game, and facts don’t matter at all.

Another alleged journalist whose political preferences are pretty obvious through his social media feed, Salil Tripathi, openly abused Gen Bakshi, calling him a “poorly educated 56-inch mucchiwala“.


The general of course, is a highly intelligent man and a prolific writer, having published 35 books and authored over 200 papers in leading research journals – probably much more than Tripathi may have done in his lifetime. But our ill-informed alleged journalists, blinded by agenda and hate, actively try to show their monopoly right over education. Ordinary citizens who feel for the country are labelled “hyper-nationalists” by this cabal. It took another common citizen to retort with a very appropriate label for the cabal – “hypo”-nationalists” – who have a deficiency of patriotism and love for their own nation that leads them to run down anyone who doesn’t.

The sapling of anti-nationalism in the form of leftists installed by Indira Gandhi in our premier institutions is now producing its poisonous fruit that threatens the very integrity of India and bemoans calls for destruction of our notorious neighbour which constantly sponsors attacks against Indian civilians and armed forces. It has spread to journalism, politics, education, history, literature, social service and every field one can think of.

Yet, Congress supporters and alleged “journalists” continue to back these poisonous elements against the very people protecting them from being killed – our armed forces. We have seen the same people lead movements against use of “pellets” on stone-pelters and acid-bombers attacking the armed forces in the valley following the death of one of the poster-boys of terrorism, Burhan Wani – who was called “son of school headmaster” by NDTV journalist Barkha Dutt.

A pointed question on whether he was a terrorist or not, asked to Ms Dutt by a columnist, went unanswered. The threat to our nation from these developments, from the consistent refusal to recognise the enemy and blame our protectors for oppression, is now becoming more and more obvious, and increasingly, people are realising this and calling it out on the only medium they can: Social Media.

It is heartening that the ordinary citizens of our nation are now fighting back against this distorted narrative of the “hypo”-nationalists and those who are responsible for creating it, and this fills me with immense hope and happiness. The narrative is being changed by the citizens of India who have the country’s interests at heart. This must now develop into a full blown movement to kill the poisonous tree and liberate India’s elite educational institutions from the grip of leftist anti-nationals who teach our children to hate our nation.

To paraphrase Roosevelt: “We can. We will, We must”. Let’s do it.

My first hand experience on how the Indian media reports imaginary things

0

Recently, I was lucky to be a part of a gathering of interesting people from various walks of life, who were invited for a two day conference by India Foundation, rather embarrassingly titled ‘Young Thinkers Meet’. India Foundation is a self-described ‘independent research center focused on the issues, challenges and opportunities of the Indian polity’.

The foundation’s board of directors comprises of many prominent figures, some of them union ministers in the current government, based on which one could make a fair assessment of their ideological and political leanings. This diverse bunch of participants from all over the country, consisting of students, entrepreneurs, scholars, professors and artists many of whom met each other for the first time, exchanged ideas around the general theme laid out by the conveners.

Most of the sessions were focused on the government’s policy initiatives and the unique challenges in implementation of the same. Interestingly, media discourse was another prominent theme and how to prevent distortion in the flow of information from the government to the public was also debated, without great success, I must confess.

Now, this conference, in which I participated for the first time, is an annual affair whose venue changes every year. This year, it happened to be held at Patnitop, Jammu and Kashmir and the choice of venue was the only thing about the conference that had anything to do with the word ‘Kashmir’.

I received the invitation on May 3, 2016, long before there was any inkling of Burhan Wani related trouble in the valley. So, the only way that the organizers could’ve included the present crisis in Kashmir in the program would be through an act of clairvoyance or by actually instigating the cycle of violence themselves so that it could eventually be discussed.

However, minor things such as facts cannot be allowed to discourage the media from influencing public opinion in a way they think appropriate.

Ram Madhav, one of the board members at India Foundation, who was also present at the conclave, tweeted at the end of the conference:

Ram Madhav's tweet
Ram Madhav’s tweet

As is their wont, the media did precisely what they were warned against and while “flying their kites” also showed off the various techniques employed in the sport. Here are eight of them:

1. Conclave of pro-BJP think-tank discusses Kashmir, other issues [The Indian Express | India Today]

According to this account by PTI, there were many issues discussed and one of them was Kashmir. It says, “The sources said the role of security forces in dealing with the situation and how the ongoing unrest was being instigated and backed by Pakistan also figured during the deliberations”. If my memory serves me right, the only time that there was a mention of security was when the security of the complex was tightened just before the arrival of Mrs. Smriti Irani for her brief session on “Challenges in the education sector” based on her two year stint as HRD Minister.

2. Kashmir discussed at pro-BJP think tank meet? Ram Madhav says no [Hindustan Times]

Again, you have an important politician unambiguously denying any link of the conference with the Kashmir issue. But obviously for the reporters concerned (Toufiq Rashid and Ravi Krishnan Khajuria), the word of a politician must be always proved wrong, even if it is by inventing facts, which in this case is the claim that Union Minister MJ Akbar attended the function. It looks like I was so mesmerized by Patnitop’s ethereal beauty that Mr Akbar had arrived, delivered his lecture and gone back, without me even noticing.

3. Kashmir unrest: At Patnitop conclave, BJP-RSS leaders mull option of including Hurriyat in peace process [India.com]

Mohammed Uzair Shaikh informs us that “the agenda was to restore normalcy in Kashmir valley, and integrate the Muslim dominated region with the rest of India” and that “the right-leaning politicians did not show aversive attitude towards the suggestion of including secessionist forces in the talks.” As clarified earlier, there was simply no discussion on Kashmir, which is a good thing because if the government were to frame its policy on Kashmir based on the views of participants in this conference, many of whom had just discovered that Jammu is 12 hours away from Srinagar, it would be very bad news for the country.

4. BJP’s Ram Madhav in search for J&K ‘solution’ [The Asian Age]

This statement, written on August 8, after the conference was over, refers to it in the future tense for some inexplicable reason. It also says that “The national security adviser is also likely to take part in the deliberations at some stage.” Now, although it is reasonable for a father to keep a tab on the activities of an adolescent son, Doval junior is not exactly a teenager. Mr Ajit Doval, just because he is the NSA of India, has no business to gatecrash into a professional event organized by an organization his son is part of and thankfully, good sense did prevail over him. What sounds more probable is that he never planned on coming.

5. Ram Madhav holds meet in Kashmir; intellectuals, civil society attend [Deccan Chronicle]

According to this report, “a special conclave, led by Mr Madhav, has brought together around 80 intellectuals, members of the civil society and some senior ministers – in what is seen as an unofficial, new outreach by the government to the Kashmiri people.” It beats me as to how 80 people sitting in a room talking about random things helps the government reach out to Kashmiris. If that were the case, the near full house in parliament debating the GST bill would be far more of an outreach to the people of the valley. In any case, this story by Deccan Chronicle is based on a report by NDTV. Enough said.

6. Meeting at Patnitop ‘maps out’ troubled areas of state [The Tribune] (again!)

This one is really good because the correspondent goes beyond the call of duty by not just speculating on the agenda but also the outcome. Dinesh Manhotra informs us, “Although consensus eluded the meet on how to reach out to different groups of the turbulent Valley, the troubled areas of the state were mapped out, both geographically and demographically, during deliberations so as to devise a comprehensive strategy to set agenda for the future course of action.” What does mapping out the troubled areas actually mean? If Indians are still figuring out on the map where the valley is located, then we surely deserve the hatred of the people inhabiting it.

7. Pro-BJP think tank ‘India Foundation’ meets in hill resort amid Kashmir unrest [DNA]

Right next to the suggestive headline, the DNA correspondent artfully places Ram Madhav’s denial, demonstrating how politicians can lie with a straight face, except that in this case the politician is only telling the truth and thoroughly enjoying the ensuing media circus, I presume. The rest of the report follows the same pattern as others.

8. New Kashmir Outreach? Ram Madhav, Ministers Brainstorm with Civil Society [NDTV]

When it comes to Kashmir, the red dot of NDTV is where the buck always stops. Barkha Dutt, the author of this report, deserves a compliment for setting the ball rolling on Patnitop by indulging in “speculation of an unofficial track-two initiative” after “the killing of Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani.”  Having been a part of many such multi track initiatives in the past, it is a pity that she fails to inform her readers that Wani is not just a terrorist but also the son of a school headmaster. So much for switching tracks!

Those of us who use social media as a source of news and views would be aware of the nose-diving credibility of the mainstream news media (MSM) in this age of the internet. It cannot be said enough that to depend exclusively on MSM for informing one’s political views would be akin to chopping off the umbilical chord that connects us with reality, a travesty of objectivity. On TV debates, we often find a carefully chosen panel of ‘experts’ waxing eloquent on issues that millions of people are invested in, emotionally and materially, and which they themselves have only a quasi-intellectual grasp of.

One can still cut some slack for the media for giving a certain slant to the reportage if the issue is overly sensitive, say a rape or an act of racism. But it is alarming that even a trivial, largely inconsequential affair like the above-mentioned conference is made to fit a narrative that the media is desperately trying to spin.

To me personally, the reporting on the Patnitop event has been an eye-opener and it has gravely undermined whatever semblance of credibility the mainstream media had in my assessment. I mean, if the reporters and their editors can resort to such blatant forgery in reporting a harmless brainstorming session, what do we make of their broadcasts on complex matters as foreign policy or internal security?

In my view, journalism has ceased to be investigative and journalists are now always seen to be “flying kites”. The question is how long before the thread of the kite starts inflicting cuts on the hand that holds it.

Trump or Clinton? Should India care?

0

With the US elections entering the decisive phase, after the conventions, the outcome is up in the air. Either candidate can win this. Going by the way campaigns are run and by the way conventions were managed, Hillary Clinton definitely seems to have an edge.

Under Barack Obama and Narendra Modi’s stewardship, one can definitely say that the Indo-US relationship has moved a notch up. It is no mean achievement for India that Obama hasn’t visited Pakistan, after visiting India – as was the norm earlier. However, what direction this will take, in a way, will determine PM Modi’s success in the economic and foreign policy fronts. This isn’t a conventional Republican and Democratic way of dealing with India. The candidates come with too much of a baggage to substantially alter the direction or give fillip to the relationship.

It is increasingly becoming clear that if Donald Trump wins this November, we have to expect the unconventional in the foreign policy front. Trump will not look at India (or for that matter any country) through the GOP lens. The way he has embraced Russia and the way he is belittling NATO allies, India needs a lot to think about.

Yes, Trump has mentioned on occasions that Pakistan is where the terror begins. But does it really mean he will favour India? Most of Trump’s understanding has been business like. As John Allen said during the Democratic convention, Trump sees foreign policy as a business transaction. What can India offer Trump to win him over? Will Trump keep his word?

On the economic front, Trump is running a campaign against immigrants. With the Republic party also aligning with him on this tough immigration policy, one can expect difficult times for IT vendors. The impact on the number of H1B/L1 visas will likely have a negative impact on the IT industry.  Also, PM Modi’s “Make in India” will have a serious challenge, if the American companies (like Boeing, etc) back away from their decision to set up a facility in India.

Continuing on the economic front, Trump’s plan are expected to increase deficit in US. How will this have a follow-on effect across the world, is anybody’s guess. Will India continue to enjoy FDI inflows? What are the fall-back options for India?

Hope Indian policy makers are actively working out alternate plans, if faced with such a scenario.

On the other hand, Hillary Clinton offers much more predictable relationship. I am not judging if that will be a favourable one or not. That depends on various factors. One thing is given: based on Modi’s record, he will go out of his way to get her to India’s side. Will that be enough?

Simply from a political point of view, there is merit for Clinton to continue with Obama’s policies. Both coming from the same party, many of the advisers are likely to continue. Also, Clinton would do well not to negate a major success in Obama’s foreign policy legacy. Also, Indian-Americans have, in the 2012 elections, voted decisively in favour of democrats. If this continues in 2016, one can expect PM Modi to leverage some of this towards India.

Historically, it is perceived that Clinton will be softer on Pakistan. Will she continue or follow President Obama’s lead? It is important to remember that Clinton had backed the mission to kill Osama Bin Laden. Has this changed her views on Pakistan’s trustworthiness as a reliable partner?

And then, there is the issue of Clinton’s proximity to various NGOs. With Modi government, rightly, going after the crooks – will Hillary feel the heat?

USA and India now have a common issue to deal with – the South China Sea. Obama and Modi have spoken in one voice opposing China’s moves. It is fair to assume that, on this one, Clinton will follow Obama. However, how influential can Modi be? What more can India do to thwart China’s moves there?

Unlike Trump, Clinton is unlikely to be a shock to world business. She is more of a status-quo candidate. Which is probably what the market will prefer, when confronted with the other option.

Hopefully, the next 100 days will give us some answers.