Tuesday, November 19, 2024
Home Blog Page 5341

Congress comes back with farm loan waiver promise- A comprehensive report on how they fared at implementing it in Congress ruled states

Even after all the failed promises of farm loan waiver and the disasters which sprung from Congress’ hollow affiances, the grand old party has expectantly once again included this artifice in its manifesto for the upcoming Haryana assembly polls.

Describing its manifesto for the upcoming assembly elections as ‘Sankalp Patra’, Congress party has promised to waive farm loans within the first 24 hours if voted to power. Amongst other things, the party has promised to give free rides to all women passengers on Haryana roadways buses and an allowance of Rs 3,500 per month for pregnant women till the birth of each child. The party also promised a 50 per cent reservation for women in Panchayati Raj institution, municipality corporations and city councils.

Even before publishing the manifesto, Haryana Congress has been promising farm loan waiver for last several months. In December last year, the party had promised to waive farm loans in Haryana. Former CM of the state Bhupinder Singh Hooda had said that his party will waive farm loans within six hours of forming the government in the Haryana.

To woo voters Congress has assured one job per family as per the qualifications. Also, an allowance of Rs 7,000 will be given to graduates and Rs 10,000 for a post-graduate until they secure a job, according to the manifesto.

The party has promised free health care services for poor and needy people. In its manifesto, the Congress has also promised the formation of Special Task Force to fight drug abuse in Haryana and drug rehabilitation centres will be opened in each village.

The Congress party which was on a high in last December after winning three major heartland states, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, plunged into deep crisis ever since it started faltering in fulfilling the extensive promises it made on waiving loans of farmers to garner votes for itself. Despite Rahul Gandhi’s bravado, it appears that farmers are suffering immensely in Congress regimes.

Let us analyse Congress’ misadventures and the politics of farm loan waivers in its ruling states.

Karnataka:

The Congress party led by Rahul Gandhi who had claimed to ‘waive-off farmers loans in 10 days’ in Karnataka as soon as it came to power in the state, had been exposed after farmers in the state had been slapped with recovery notices by banks immediately after he Congress-JDS coalition government took the reigns of Karnataka in its hands.

Nearly twenty farmers of Ganajalkhed village, Kalaburgi district had received recovery notice from Andhra Bank on November 28, 2018, for the repayment of farm loans.

Speaking at an election rally in Jaisalmer district’s Pokhran constituency last year, Rahul Gandhi had made tall claims. He had said, “You may call and ask any farmer in Punjab and Karnataka and check whether their loans have been waived or not by the Congress party. I do not make false promises.”

Shockingly, it was found that the claim of the Congress was yet another lie as the farmers from Kalaburgi, one of the poorest regions of the state, were then asked to appear before Permanent Lok Adalat for final disposal of the petition filed by the bank.

Also Read:- Fact-Check: Are Rahul Gandhi’s claims of farmer loans being waived in Karnataka completely true?

While nationalised banks had initiated recovery suits, some private banks had even started criminal proceedings against defaulting farmers. Moreover, a series of farmer suicides were occurring in the state due to the failure of the state government to waive-off these farm loans.

A 56-year-old farmer named Hampanna Hoogar belonging to the district Bagalkot had been found dead after the debt-ridden farmer committed suicide. Soon after, Rajesh, a 42-year-old debt-ridden farmer had committed suicide after consuming pesticide at his farm in Basavalingangodi village of Maddur taluk, Mandya. Several farmers had also been issued notices after they failed to repay farm loans taken in various banks.

Following these unfortunate incidents, it was reported in January 2019, that farm loan burden had driven a family of six to commit suicide in Congress-ruled Karnataka. This incident had taken the farmer suicide toll to eight in Karnataka in a span of weeks.

Moreover, the Karnataka Congress-JDS coalition government were a part of a huge controversy after it took away the loan-waiver deposits from the account of the beneficiaries which were deposited before the elections. This move came after the Congress-JDS coalition lost in the Lok Sabha elections.

Nearly 13,988 farmers across Karnataka were shocked to find that the money which was earlier deposited in their accounts towards the loan waiver had been withdrawn after the JDS-Congress coalition government lost in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

The farmers who had been allegedly cheated were up in arms, saying that the Congress-JDS state government deposited the money to lure them at the time of the elections and withdrew it after they lost it.

Punjab:

Despite the Congress President’s professed love for farmers, it appeared farmers have not been doing very well in Congress-ruled Punjab either. Days after Congress leaders boasted of clearing farm loans in Punjab, it was reported on January 5, 2019, that a 55-year old farmer has reportedly committed suicide in Bathinda, Punjab after he was unable to clear a debt of Rs 3.5 lakhs.

This was one of the many incidents which preceded in Congress-ruled Punjab as well. Days after the above incident, a debt-ridden farmer committed suicide on January 9, 2019, as his loan did not meet Congress government’s loan waiver criteria. Gurmel Singh allegedly committed suicide after he was unable to repay the farm loans. In his suicide note, the victim cited mounting debts as the reason and also stated that the state government did not provide any relief.

In fact, on January 27, 2019, Bhartiya Kisan Union (Ugrahan) had released new data stating that nearly 430 small and marginal farmers and farm labourers in Punjab had committed suicide in one year after the state government launched the third phase of the loan waiver scheme. The Congress government in Punjab had launched the third phase of loan waiver scheme for small farmers having land up to two hectares (5 acres). In the first two phases, the government had claimed to write-off loans of marginal farmers holding land up to one hectare.

Moreover, adding salt to the injuries of poor farmers, banks in Punjab had in February 2019, started filing criminal cases against farmers for non-repayment of loans. The farmers, on the other hand, claim that they were made to sign on blank cheques. An unnamed public sector banker was mentioned in the report admitting to the practice of obtaining blank cheques as security for farm loans. He blamed it on the loan waiver scheme of the Punjab government and its decision to ban the auction of mortgaged land to recover loans.

Madhya Pradesh:

In Madhya Pradesh as well, the loan waiver promised by the Congress party had numerous terms and conditions which made many farmers ineligible for it. Reportedly, a massive loan-waive scam has also been brewing in the state of Madhya Pradesh after reports emerged that various beneficiaries listed by the government eligible for farmer loan waiver did not even exist in reality.

Many discrepancies and irregularities were unearthed in the loan waiver schemes. Moreover, there were reports of incidents where farmers had gotten a loan waiver of as little as 13 rupees against a loan of Rs. 24000 and Rs. 25-30 against loans of Rs. 1 lakh or more.

Also Read: Farm loan waiver not possible, Rahul Gandhi should not have promised it: Digvijay Singh’s brother Lakshman Singh

For this reason, the Congress government in Madhya Pradesh have been facing severe outrage from the farmers weeks after forming the government in the state. The farmers in Congress-ruled states have continued to commit suicide despite the farmer loan waiver scheme in place. In fact, within days after Congress government in MP waived off the loan, a farmer had committed suicide because he wasn’t eligible. In less than three weeks, as many as three farmers had committed suicide in Madhya Pradesh.

Amidst severe outrage, farmers had threatened ‘mass suicide’ over fake loans in Madhya Pradesh. Rahul Gandhi in December 2018 had boasted that the Congress government has succeeded in waiving loans of all farmers. However, the false promises of loan-waivers have created a stir amongst the poor farmers in the state.

Recently, Kamal Nath, the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh had interestingly admitted that Congress does not have a magic wand and cannot waive loans within 10 days.

Rajasthan:

The Congress government is clearly finding it hard to implement his party’s poll promises made by Congress President Rahul Gandhi during his election campaigning. After the broken promises of loan-waivers consumed lives in Congress-ruled Madhya Pradesh, the neighbouring state of Rajasthan has been facing similar farmer suicides on account of dubious promises of farm loan waiver made by the Congress-ruled government.

A 45-year-old farmer ended his life at Thakri village in Rajasthan’s Sri Ganganagar district on June 25, 2019, leaving behind a farewell video and a two-page note accusing the Ashok Gehlot government of failing to deliver its pre-poll promise of waiving bank loans.

After failing to waive-off farm loans in the Rajasthan, the Congress had come up with a way to blame the previous BJP regime for leaving the state in massive debt. Chief Minister Gehlot had said that the farm loan waiver involving cooperative banks would amount to Rs 18,000 crore at a time when the state was caught in debt of Rs 3 lakh crore left by the former BJP government.

In addition to this, a farm loan waiver scam appeared to be brewing in the state of Rajasthan after non-existent names appeared on the list surfaced in Rajasthan after the Congress government initiated the loan waiver scheme. Scores of names appeared in the list of beneficiaries for the farm loan waiver scheme who had no loans against their names raising suspicion on the intention of the farm loan waiver scheme by the Congress government.

Chhattisgarh:

The ruling Congress in Chhattisgarh, like Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan is betting big on its farm debt-waiver schemes but its unfulfilled promises will end up hurting the grand old party. The Congress was elected to power late last year after promising to write-off loans of 35 lakh farmers in the state.

But cultivators were now in a dilemma as they were not getting loan clearance certificates from banks. In the absence of these certificates, they were not getting fresh loans for the ongoing farming activities.

Due to this, the farmers are feeling cheated by the Congress government and resentment has been brewing amongst them. BJP which is at the opposition in Chhattisgarh claimed that a farmer, Mohan Ram Nirala, of Charaidand village under the Duldula police station area in Jashpur district committed suicide in June 2019, after his farm loans were not waived.

Rahul Gandhi had claimed that the Congress governments in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan had waived off the loans of farmers in “2 days”. What he did not mention was the complete sham the loan waiver was. For all these months the Congress Government has been playing on the poor farmer’s sentiments to garner votes from themselves. It has repeatedly targeted the BJP about farm loan waiver issue and conflated the meaning of ‘loan waiver’ and ‘loan write off’. However, the tactical plans now lie exposed as its own loyalists have started surrendering to the fact that Rahul Gandhi’ promise is nothing but a mere lie.

Pakistanis join Congress in trending ‘#GoBackModi’ as Chinese President Xi Jinping visits India

The visit of the Chinese state premier Xi Jinping to India has ruffled a few feathers, not just in India but across the border in Pakistan as well. Scores of Pakistanis today extended their support to Congress in trending #GoBackModi.

The Chinese president Xi Jinping’s 2-days visit to Chennai is hailed as India’s diplomatic success. However, this did not sit well with the Congress party which tried to belittle India’s diplomatic accomplishment by running a Twitter hashtag against PM Modi. Before long, assorted Pakistanis, for whom China remains one of the last remaining benefactors, joined Congress supporters in criticising Modi since censuring Xi Jinping would have invited China’s wrath.

Read: Indians protesting against PM Modi in front of Chinese President is disgraceful behaviour aimed at making India look bad

Raksha Ramaiah, the social media in-charge of Youth Congress posted a tweet with #GoBackModi alleging that the BJP government has not released the necessary funds required to remedy Karnataka floods disaster.


Another Congress functionary, secretary of Uttar Pradesh Congress, Sachin Chaudhary participated in promulgating #GoBackModi propaganda and stated that #GoBackYogi campaign should also be run as the law and order situation has utterly collapsed in Uttar Pradesh.

The official Kerala Youth Congress handle also participated in propagating party’s #GoBackModi propaganda.


Several Pakistanis joined in tweeting their Kashmir propaganda with hashtag #GoBackModi.


Another Pakistani user joins in with hashtag #GoBackModi, tweeting a photo of a completely intact missile and claiming that the Indian forces have killed a 10-year-old innocent Faizan Khan in Kashmir.


Congress has long been accused of blowing Pakistan’s trumpet. However, this time around, the Pakistani propaganda machine seemed to have lent itself to further Congress’ propaganda against PM Modi.

The Prince Estate slams Donald Trump for playing Purple Rain at campaign event despite promising not to do so

0

The representatives of the late musician Prince have issued a statement where they have called out US President Donald Trump for using one of his songs, Purple Rain, at a campaign event. The Prince Estate released a letter from the campaign team where it assured that Prince’s music will not be used at his events.


“The Prince Estate will never give permission to President Donald Trump to use Prince’s songs,” their official Twitter account said in a statement. The song was played at Trump’s campaign event at Minneapolis.

Prince’s estate is among a long list of artists who have asked Trump to stop using their music at his events, including Neil Young, Pharrell Williams and the Rolling Stones. More recently, Rihanna demanded that the president stop playing her hit track “Don’t Stop the Music” at his “tragic rallies.”

Donald Trump has a fancy taste in music and nobody could accuse him of having a poor taste. Not too long, he made an entrance at one of his events at the White House with ‘Enter Sandman’ by Metallica playing in the background.


As part of the inauguration celebrations, after he became President, Donald Trump chose Frank Sinatra’s iconic rendition of the song ‘My Way‘ for his dance with first lady Melania Trump.

Jilting a lover, abhorrent as it may seem, not a punishable offence under IPC: Delhi High Court

0

The Delhi High Court has ruled that an intimate relationship involving sexual activity over a significant duration of time cannot be said to be induced by the promise of marriage merely because it was asserted that the other party had expressed their intention of getting married.

The Court was hearing an appeal against an order of acquittal passed by an Additional Sessions Judge in a rape case. The Court after taking into account the evidence at hand concluded that the claim made by the accuser that she had relented to having a sexual relationship only due to a promise of marriage was difficult to accept as the first alleged incident of rape occurred two years after the promise was allegedly made. The Court also observed inherent inconsistencies in the testimony of the accuser’s father. Thus, the Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal.

The single-judge bench of Vibhu Bakru also asserted that a sexual relationship between two consenting adults cannot be considered a crime. He said, “It is important to bear in mind that two consenting adults establishing a physical relationship, is not a crime. Jilting a lover, however, abhorrent that it may seem to some, is also not an offence punishable under the IPC.”

The Court added, “In so far as consent to engage in a sexual act is concerned; the campaign ‘no means no’, that was initiated in the 1990s, embodies a universally accepted rule: a verbal ‘no’ is a definite indication of not giving consent to engage in a sexual act. There is now wide acceptance to move ahead from the rule of ‘no means no’ to ‘yes means yes’. Thus, unless there is an affirmative, conscious and voluntary consent to engage in sex; the same would constitute an offence.”

The Court, however, observed that in certain cases the promise to marry may lead a woman to consent even though the woman may not have been initially willing. But the justification cannot be made in case of a continuous intimate relationship.

“Such inducement in a given moment may elicit consent, even though the concerned party may want to say no. Such false inducement given with the intention to exploit the other party would constitute an offence. However, it is difficult to accept that continuing with an intimate relationship, which also involves engaging in sexual activity, over a significant period of time, is induced and involuntary, merely on the assertion that the other party has expressed its intention to get married,” the judge said.

‘Fascist Modi’ or ‘Over Tolerant Modi’: When Modi pardoned Muslim men for sending him threatening letters

The Central Government led by Prime Minister Modi was recently being wrongly blamed for an act of a trial court judge. 49 people had written a letter to the Prime Minister of India a few days ago. An FIR has been lodged against them on the charge of sedition. The FIR, registered by the police in Muzaffarpur in Bihar was an order of a local court in response to a private prosecution against those 49 people. The petitioner requested the lower court to charge them with sedition.

In my personal opinion, the decision of the court was ridiculous. However, as Swapan Dasgupta says, alternatively, it is possible that there are hidden facts about which most people — observing the matter from a distance — are unaware of. Bihar police had subsequently dismissed the FIR against the 49 individuals but the ‘fascist Modi’ never ended.

The Government had nothing to do with it. And yet, there was unfair criticism of the Modi Government, as if it filed the charge of ‘sedition’.

While Prime Minister Modi is being called a ‘fascist’ and someone who takes exception to ‘dissent’, one must recall that in April 2003 the Congress Government of Rajasthan filed a case of sedition- waging war on the country, on the then VHP leader Dr Pravin Togadia. There was absolutely nothing done at that time which could possibly justify filing a case of sedition on Togadia. [This writer has always disagreed with his language, style of speaking, contents of speech and now Togadia has been removed by his own former organization VHP, but filing charges of sedition?] All those liberals implying that the Modi Government filed a case of sedition of these 49 individuals were stunningly silent when the Congress Government of Rajasthan actually did this in 2003. In their hearts, perhaps they were glad that this was done so since Togadia was always their opponent. Perhaps democratic rights and liberties exist only for them, nothing matters when liberties are violated in case of their opponents.

Is the Modi Government intolerant or is it too over tolerant? PM Narendra Modi was slandered for several things. But the dirtiest slander with gutter-level politics was the accusation of he being a stalker, keeping surveillance over a woman. Home Minister Amit Shah and Prime Minister Modi were falsely accused of stalking a woman architect in the ‘Snoopgate’ case which was in reality security provided to her on her own request and not stalking. The woman and her father in a petition to the SC in May 2014 said: “The petitioners have remained thankful for the timely, appropriate and adequate safety measures taken by the State Government considering the circumstances prevailing then [in 2009]”.

And this security was from a man who was a hero of the ‘secular’ brigade, Pradeep Sharma. Urging that she be “left alone” and the episode “be not used for political mileage”, the woman said in her May 2014 petition that the chapter should have been closed after she and her husband appeared before the Gujarat State Women’s Commission on December 1, 2013, and said the surveillance and protection was at their request and that they had not made any complaint about intrusion of their privacy.

Despite this, Congress and friendly media slandered Modi and Shah in 2013-14 on this ground. No one asked, why this issue of 2009 is being brought out in late 2013-14 by Tehelka’s Ashish Khetan camouflaging under names of unknown websites Gulail and Cobrapost? They did not really care about the truth or the privacy of the woman and inconvenience caused to her by these fake charges against Modi, they simply wanted to slander Narendra Modi and Amit Shah and call them as ‘stalkers’. Yet Modi and Shah did not take any action against those who first made this fake charge ie. Gulail and Cobrapost, nor on any political leaders who repeated this slander. 

Gulail and Cobrapost were just different names under which one man had made that slander, namely Ashish Khetan, formerly of Tehelka and Aam Aadmi Party. He had heaped such slander against Modi in the 2002 Gujarat riots case and in 2007 as well. Yet, absolutely no action was taken against him or those portals by the Narendra Modi Government. Liars like Rana Ayub (in her book Gujarat Files) and Pratik Sinha and his father the late Mukul Sinha named that woman and repeated this slander. Congress put posters in Delhi before the Assembly elections when Narendra Modi came for campaigning for 2 days, saying “Women in Delhi beware, ‘Saheb’ is in town, the anti-stalking number is this.”

That woman architect had to change her house 4 times in 1 year after this nonstop coverage by media in 2013-14 which was harassment to her as well. No lesser leaders than the First Family of the Congress, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Vadra had raised the Snoopgate matter in their campaign speeches over one week in April 2014. Congress leaders like Shaktisinh Gohil, Arjun Modhvadhia made malicious false charges like Modi reimbursing her fuel, phone, food expenses, etc. Finally, the matter settled in October 2014 when the Gujarat HC scrapped the 2 member commission set up by the Gujarat Government to probe the issue, on a petition filed by the woman’s father. Modi did not even file a defamation suit against all those who did this, not to talk of taking any ‘vindictive action’ against such people despite having a full majority in the Lok Sabha.

When the truth came out, no one bothered to apologize to Amit Shah and Narendra Modi for calling them stalkers, and also to the woman concerned for the harassment caused to her. Even a non-vindictive but assertive man would have sued all those who made these charges and also filed cases against those who published that woman architect’s real name on a charge of harassment, not to talk of any dictator who would want to ‘stifle dissent’.

Modi does not want anyone’s prosecution for criticism. In 2012-13 a fanatic Muslim in my Facebook friends list [he was my 1 year junior in Engineering college] wrote on Facebook saying: “Modi should be cut into 2500 pieces and his pieces forcibly fed to his supporters.” I have a screenshot of this. He posted many such posts many times. I gave a screenshot of this to a BJP leader and asked her to file a complaint against that guy. And she said to me “Modi doesn’t want to prosecute such people who write like this.”

In 2002 December Narendra Modi pardoned a Muslim youth who sent him a threatening email. Had he not pardoned, that man would have been prosecuted and imprisoned for at least 5 years. Rediff.com reported: “Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday asked the state government to “drop all charges” against Razzak Nazir Qasim, who was arrested by the Anti-Terrorist Squad for allegedly sending a “threatening” e-mail to him from Mumbai in October this year…The chief minister said the investigating agency had “adequate” proof to put Razzak behind bars for five years and impose Rs 100,000 fine for this cybercrime, the first of its kind in the state. “However, this would have ruined his life and considering that the threat was to my life, I decided to pardon him and give him a new lease of life,” Modi said…Razzak, a project leader in a private IT firm in Andheri in Mumbai, was remanded to judicial custody for 15 days after he was arrested by the ATS in October. Modi has also reportedly asked the private firm to reinstate Razzak in the job.” The threat issued to him by the youth was of death.

This was not the only case. In January 2006, in another such case too Modi pardoned another Muslim man who sent him a threatening email.

They have tolerated slander for years and never hit back at those who did the slander when in power, not even prosecuted those who gave them death threats.

The media and the Congress, largely riding on the shoulders of diehard Leftist portals like The Wire and The Caravan have also slandered Amit Shah, and his son Jay Shah by levelling false and baseless charges, exposed brilliantly by OpIndia. The Wire lied horribly on Jay Shah’s business, trying to imply that he made a massive profit while he had made a loss of nearly Rs 1.5 crore. These lies were meant to have a multiplier effect, they were meant to be used by political rivals like Rahul Gandhi, gain publicity in the mainstream media, and get others to talk on them [and they did]. Several anti-BJP ordinary people in my Facebook friends list have shared posts alleging that Jay Shah made a profit of more than 16,000 times due to ‘Golden touch’. Facts hardly matter for them that he made a loss of 1.5 crores and that revenue rising from a mere Rs 50,000 to Rs 80 crore is perfectly normal if orders are got. No action was taken against The Wire except a personal defamation suit by Jay Shah. Not even others who repeated this lie, like Rahul Gandhi were sued by him.

The same trick was tried in the false charges over Judge Loya’s death. These lies were started by The Caravan a good 3 years after his death when he was in Nagpur along with at least 3 other judges with him, and Amit Shah was nowhere close to the city. The lies implied that Amit Shah got him killed, there was such a trend on Twitter one day too, all done for the sake of the multiplier effect. The desired multiplier effect was got here too, with Rahul Gandhi lying that there were ‘mysterious deaths of judges’ whereas there was absolutely nothing mysterious in this. There was further slander when Judge’s Loya’s son made it clear in a press conference that he did not suspect any foul play in his father’s death (attempts were made to imply that he was forced to say this by Amit Shah), plain lies were made that Amit Shah organized his press conference. The charge was horrific, but Amit Shah did not even sue The Caravan, leave alone the Government doing anything.

Besides, Amit Shah was slandered repeatedly in case of the Sohrabuddin encounter, despite his acquittal in December 2014, and tried to be framed even in the Ishrat Jahan case, whether the Lashkar-e-Toiba itself admitted that she was its operative.

Lies on Modi on 2002 Gujarat riots are many. But he never hit back at anyone, never took any action against malicious liars. Far from being intolerant, Modi & Shah have shown to be over tolerant. Had there been any other person in their place similarly demonized and slandered with lies, he would have at least sued the concerned liars.

But none of this matters to those who want to accuse the government of trying to prosecute its opponents. When the agenda is to blame, facts hardly matter to those who want to blame and slander. It is, therefore, necessary to bring out the reality, which is that Modi and Shah are over tolerant, not intolerant.

(The writer is the author of book “Gujarat Riots: The True Story” which gives all details about the 2002 riots- Godhra and after, one of the admins of www.gujaratriots.com)

Case filed against actress Payal Rohatgi for allegedly insulting Nehru family: Read details of what she had said about Motilal Nehru

A case has been registered against actress Payal Rohatgi under sections 66 and 67 of the Information Technology Act for allegedly insulting the family of Motilal Nehru. The case was registered by Rajasthan police on a complaint filed by Rajasthan Youth Congress leader Charmesh Sharma.


The actress and reality TV performer is very active on social media, and she regularly posts comments and videos on various matters of politics and current affairs. Her Twitter handle is named as Payal Rohatgi & Team- Bhagwan Ram Bhakts. A few weeks ago, she had posted several tweets and a video on the personal life of freedom fighter Motilal Nehru, the father of first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru.


In the video along with the tweets, Payal had alleged that Motilal Nehru had 5 wives. She had made this claim quoting a biography of M.O. Mathai written by Edina Ramakrishna. Mathai was an Indian Civil Service officer and had served as the Private Secretary of Jawaharlal Nehru.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pggWxSAWyzs]

In the video, Payal had quoted the book saying that although Swaroop Rani was the legal wife of Motilal Nehru, he had four other wives. The others were Thussu Rahman Bai, Mrs. Manjari, one Iranian woman, and a Housemaid, she had claimed. She also said that Motilal had a son named Muhammad Ali Jinnah from the Iranian woman, while also claiming that Jawaharlal Nehru was actually the son of Thussu Rahman Bai from her former husband.

Also Read: Mumbai Police blocks Payal Rohatgi on Twitter. Here is why is it in poor taste

It may be noted that M.O. Mathai had written two memoirs narrating his time with Jawaharlal Nehru, titled Reminiscences of The Nehru Age and My Days with Nehru. But there is no record of any biography of Mathai written by someone named Edina Ramkrishna. In his books, Mathai has not mentioned the alleged facts about Motilal Nehru as quoted by Payal, although the books do contain several other controversial claims about the Nehru family.

Moreover, the claims made by Payal Rohatgi about the Nehru family keep appearing on Social Media, and they have no basis as they are fake claims. Other than various social media platforms, some websites are also spreading this fake news. But actually there is no book making these claims.

Read about Abiy Ahmed, the Ethiopian PM who just won the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize

0

Abiy Ahmed, the prime minister of Ethiopia has won the prestigious 2019 Nobel peace prize for his efforts to resolve his country’s conflict with its neighbouring enemy Eritrea, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced on Friday.

“Abiy was awarded for his efforts to achieve peace and international cooperation, and in particular his decisive initiative to resolve the border conflict with neighbouring Eritrea,” said Berit Reiss-Andersen, the committee’s chairperson of the committee.


Abiy who got elected in April last year was successful in securing a peace deal with bitter foe Eritrea, released dissidents from jail, apologised for state brutality and welcomed home exiled armed groups who were branded terrorists by his predecessors. He signed a peace deal with Eritrea in July last year, which ended a nearly 20-year military stalemate with its neighbouring country following their 1998-2000 border war.

The 20-year-old war had killed more than 80,000 people and displaced thousands of others. Abiy had crossed into Eritrean border in July 2018 to meet and hug the Eritrean president Isaias Afwerki. Together they had announced the end of the war. Ethiopia had agreed to hand over the disputed territories to Eritrea, including the border town of Badme.

Abiy has also pushed through reforms at home and abroad, appointing former dissidents to senior roles. His public denunciation of past abuses done by his predecessors has earned him praises at home and abroad.

The 43-year Abiy became one of Africa’s youngest leaders when he was appointed as the prime minister of Ethiopia in March 2018. He soon took to implement a number of economic and political reforms aimed at opening up the economy to increased foreign investment and freeing up the political space for opposition parties.

“When Abiy Ahmed became prime minister, he made it clear he wished to resume peace talks with Eritrea. In close cooperation with the president of Eritrea, he quickly worked out the principles for a peace agreement,” the committee said.

The Nobel Prize committee further added, “The committee hopes that the Nobel peace prize will strengthen prime minister Abiy in his important work for peace and reconciliation. A peaceful, stable and successful Ethiopia will have many positive side-effects, and will help to strengthen fraternity among nations and peoples in the region.”

There were speculations that 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, or Hong Kong activists could win this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. The New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern, Greek PM Alexis Tsipras, and Zoran Zaev, the prime ministers North Macedonia were also being considered.

Last year, the Nobel Peace Prize was award to two champions fighting sexual violence, the Congolese gynaecologist Denis Mukwege and the Yazidi activist Nadia Murad. They were awarded a gold medal, a diploma and Swedish Krona 9 million (£728,000).

Indians protesting against PM Modi in front of Chinese President is disgraceful behavior aimed at making India look bad

For some months now, there has been an ugly tradition created by trolls: whenever PM Modi goes somewhere south, especially Tamil Nadu, the social media trend “GoBackModi” takes off. This coincides with a day of crazy, pointless rage at the Prime Minister.

The BJP has never been in power in Tamil Nadu. You could say the BJP has never even been in opposition in Tamil Nadu. In fact, BJP does not have a single MP nor a single MLA from Tamil Nadu. One can rest assured that whatever problem happens in the state, the BJP surely could not have caused it. No rational person could believe otherwise.

Obviously then, the aim of this #GoBackModi “protest” is not to express dissent, but to sow division between the people of Tamil Nadu (and Kerala) and the rest of the country. Once upon a time, this trick was tried on all Southern states. Similar things were tried by the extreme left in the North East and in West Bengal, the objective is to play up every possible fissure in Indian society. Bharat ke tukde, remember?

But then, BJP became the single largest party representing Southern states in the Lok Sabha. The party also became the sole voice of the North East and caught the fancy of everyone in Bengal.

Of course, one should never imply that one has to be with the BJP to be seen as a true nationalist. But the political pitch of the left was so formatted, with BJP accused of being a “North Indian” party of “upper” castes, that the left-wing narrative fell off the rails when BJP started winning elections all across India.

And now this left-wing narrative is constrained to just two states: Tamil Nadu and Kerala.

And as the left-wing narrative has lost its geographical reach, it has become only more shrill, more ugly and more disgraceful.

A line was definitely crossed today. Insulting India’s Prime Minister when he is visiting for a summit with the Chinese President. This should have been a day for Indians to present themselves as united and speaking in one voice. But alas.

The separatist undertones of this “protest” are quite obvious and so is the fact that it is underwritten by the “soul harvesters.” You know them, the ones who are most concerned about the environment. So concerned that they welcomed a Rs 20,000 crore loss to the Indian economy.

Untitled.png

A Rs 20,000 crore loss to the economy along with a loss of thousands of jobs. Now, who gains if an industrialized state like Tamil Nadu is forced into poverty? Who is waiting in the wings to put the newly poor on a drip of “aid” from overseas donors? Easy to answer.

One more thing should be pointed out: at the moment, the Congress Party, which has no future stakes in India, maybe happy to go with anyone who is against BJP. But it must be remembered that the vested interests who are arrayed against PM Modi today were just as hateful towards the Congress when they used to run the country. Remember how these same vested interests fought against a nuclear plant of national significance at Koodankulam? In so far as these vested interests are concerned, it is India which is on target, not necessarily BJP or Congress.

So it’s not about dissent at all. It is about making India look bad. The whole of India and every Indian: from Kashmir to Kanyakumari.

Read: Chinese President Xi Jinping to arrive in India for the informal summit: Here is the significance of summit being held at Mamallapuram

Right now, the poisoned rhetoric being pumped into Tamil Nadu by enemies of India ranges from the ugly to the outright absurd. Have you heard of “Lemuria”? There are enemies of India telling Tamils that they began as a distinct race from a lost continent called Lemuria! Of course, plate tectonics and modern earth science have shown no evidence that any such thing ever existed, but it doesn’t matter. In any case, when you are telling Tamil Nadu that BJP is responsible for any problems in the state, why would you care about science? You have chosen to be willfully irrational anyway.

As with delaying the Koodankulam project, closing down Sterlite Copper or embarrassing us in front of the Chinese President, this propaganda has been doing immense short term damage to India. Of course, in the long term, this propaganda and its patrons have no future. And they probably know it too. This photo should be seen by everyone who wants to create a divide between North and South in India.

Untitled.png

That’s Mr P T Venkatraman and his wife Sujatha who have travelled to Pakistan occupied Kashmir to offer puja at Sharada Peeth. They are the first Hindus in 72 years to do so. Take that.

Chinese President Xi Jinping and cartoon character Winnie the Pooh: Here’s why the fictional teddy bear was banned in China

The President of China, Xi Jinping, is on a visit to India where he will meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi in an informal summit at Mamallapuram. China, at the moment, is embroiled in a trade war against the USA and they managed to enrage the USA further during the NBA controversy.

China is a country that is fanatical in its desire to be taken seriously. Its antics borders on unhinged behaviour sometimes as they are already taken seriously by everyone in the international arena and everyone is pretty scared of ticking them the wrong way. However, their insistence on not being mocked or ridiculed sometimes ends up making them look utterly ridiculous.

For instance, there was the time when Winnie the Pooh, a popular cartoon character, was banned in China after Xi Jinping was compared to the teddy bear. In all fairness, President Xi does bear some uncanny resemblance to the cartoon character. Apparently, it all began during Xi’s visit to the US in 2013 when a picture of him and then US President Barack Obama drew comparisons with Pooh and Tigger.

Image result for winnie the pooh xi jinping

Then, in 2014, during Xi’s meeting with the Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, another image started doing the rounds where Xi was compared to Pooh and Abe was portrayed as the pessimistic donkey, Eeyore.

Image result for winnie the pooh xi jinping

It didn’t stop there. Soon, in another meme, Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam became a piglet beside Pooh PingPing.

Image result for winnie the pooh xi jinping

As these memes became popular, Chinese censors started banning them on the internet. Even HBO was banned in China after comedian John Oliver mocked the Chinese regime’s sensitivity to the cartoon. As China’s conduct over the years has revealed, its regime is very serious about being taken seriously by everyone and one of the most meaningful ways to show the world how serious you are is by banning cartoons mocking the regime or its leaders.

Also Read: China orders halal restaurants and food stalls to remove Arabic script and symbols associated with Islam from their signages

However, the fact that China can afford to indulge in such ‘harsh’ measures without suffering any consequences does say a lot about the country. When a country has a strong economy and wields enough power on the international scene, it can get away with literally anything, even the imprisonment of millions of Muslims in concentration camps and censoring Winnie the Pooh.

As the recent NBA controversy has demonstrated, if the regime is strong, stable and powerful enough, it can even make the biggest purveyors of ‘Woke Capitalism’ obediently fellate the Supreme Leader and make them express their profound gratitude to the authoritarian regime for granting them the opportunity.

There’s another aspect to the whole affair. President Xi Jinping may look like Winnie the Pooh, however, he does fancy himself as the Emperor of China. And a regime that is obsessed with showing people their might, as is very necessary sometimes, it cannot and will not tolerate someone reminding them of the startling likeness between a cartoon and their emperor.

Mohan Bhagwat was right when he said ‘Lynching’ is a Western concept and here is why the Left is so outraged

One of the most critical factors which define lynching is the state’s connivance in the mob murder of an individual. Unless the formal complicity of the state and the majority of civil society is established in the act of mob-murder, it does not qualify as lynching in common, modern parlance. If one were to use the term lightly, every crime, every killing in a riot, will be qualified to be termed as lynching.

This possibly explains the extensive misuse of the term since 2014. It serves the singular purpose of attacking the dual-target which the left and the Congress loves to attack, namely, the Narendra Modi government and the Hindu majority. When you term a mob-crime into lynching, it not only finds resonance in the West, it also, by definition, implicates the majority civil society of India, read Hindus and the Government of the day.

This explains why the term ‘lynching’ was not quite in fashion during 1984 riots when as per some allegations, voter lists were provided by the administration to mark the Sikh houses under instructions of the party in power, Congress and the state actively participated in the mass murders which left around 7000 Sikhs dead within a period of three days. In fact, the 1984 Sikh riots under the Congress was the closest thing that India saw, which resembled lynching, in the strictest sense. There were dead people, the state was a party, majority formed the mob, judiciary watched in stony silence.

Apart from implicitly targeting the Government and the Hindu-majority as the conniving criminals in these random and stray acts of violence, it offered the Leftist intellectual mobs a word which finds great resonance in the West. Therefore since 2014, there has been a sustained campaign to demonize the Hindu majority of India and the Government of India led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi by the left-leaning intellectual mob and the most-common words we find have been “fascism”, “Nazi” and “Lynching”.

While the history of World war, mass-killing by poor Jews by a racist Nazi government, explains the west’s known antipathy to anything even falsely termed Nazi, lynching too was a clever move. No one cares whether the random crimes, in a large nation with colonial-era policing, actually qualified to be called Lynching or not. In an agrarian economy like that of India, where cattle-raising is a big part of the economy as well as the majority religion, intellectuals offered cover to illegal cow slaughter and cattle smuggling. In most of the Indian states, cow slaughter is banned since long (was banned by Congress under Indira) as per directive principles of Indian constitution. Lack of faith in the police and the fear of the smugglers themselves has often forced mob violence. This gave another opportunity to the leftists to attach Hindus for their faith.

Some propagandists, like the Congress supporter and related to the first family of the Congress, Tahseen Poonawala even called some minor scuffle involving his driver as Lynching. As there was never any Government sanction or tacit support to this murderous crime, when they really happened, they did not qualify to be termed as lynching. Most of these deaths, unfortunate as they are, were only a representation of weaker law and order machinery. Selective outrages on the cases where victims were uniformly of one religion, while suppressing the equal or even higher number of cases involving Hindu victims from Dr Narang, Riya Gautam, Chandan, Kundan, Dhruv Tyagi, Mangru Pahan, Ankit, poor little child named Dimple, brutally raped and killed, so on and so forth (names hidden away from the global audience), helped creating an image for the west of a crime supported by civil majority and by implication a Hindu nationalist government (a term made popular by the vested interests in the West).

Read: National Commission for Minorities member says no mob lynching case filed with them, Govt says no common pattern of mob lynching

This would then perfectly fit in the lynching narrative which vilifies the democratically elected government and people who elected it both in a swift, singular brush of darkness. I always maintain, for the ChisIslamic left in India, it is more of a civilizational war rather than a political battle. Therefore there is always a violent and disproportionate reaction to any argument which tries to poke holes in this carefully-crafted narrative defining the land historically known as benign, benevolent and accepting as a land of cruel and crazy bigots.

It takes hard work for the opposition to go to the grounds, to the poor people, to fight for them and regain the faith of the people. The easier way for them to fight and win the battle somehow in the international arena by discrediting the people and government of India alike. Recently a lawyer from Congress cell also released a video, claiming that ‘in some of the cases of lynching’ people even died. As a lawyer of some prominence, she would know that it is termed as lynching only if there is a loss of life involved. When RSS chief, Shri Mohan Bhagwat termed lynching a non-Indian concept, and urged everyone to stop it, no wonder, instead of being appreciated, it caused outrage. It was like forcing the left to disarm in the middle of a battle. If you take away from the left the terms which the west understand and can be motivated to rally against, how do they create antipathy against a democratically elected government and a non-violent race?

Shri Mohan Bhagwat could be both right and wrong, depending on where we begin reading our history. But if we consider four defining factors for a lynching- a corpse, a complicit civil majority, socially-approved criminal action outside the purview of the legal framework and a conniving state- Mr Bhagwat was largely right. Sikh Gurus and their kins were lynched by Islamist Mughal rulers, so Corpse and a conniving state were there but a complicit civil majority probably was not there. Also, there was legality involved since those murders were carried out under the explicit instruction of the state, the Mughals at that time. Freedom fighter, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was lynched in the pre-independence era in Kanpur by rioting Muslims when he went their neighbourhood trying to pacify people. But it was neither sanctioned by British state nor was extra-judicial sentencing. It was a crime committed by a rioting mob.

West has its own haunting history of Mob lynching and therefore appropriating the term for an act of crime is likely to cause global outrage. The term ‘Lynching’ originated in the US, during the American Revolution, and as a part of Racist, anti-negro pogrom. The term derives its name, in all likelihood from Virginia’s Charles Lynch (1736 to 1796) who allowed the extra-judicial killing of the negroes. The extra-judicial killings authorized by Charles Lynch were legitimized by the Virginia General Assembly in 1782, as Lynch’s Law.

In the US, between 1881 and 1968, as per the data compiled by the Tuskegee Institute, 4,743 people were lynched, 3,446 of the victims being blacks. They happened in the knowledge of the authorities and supported by the majority. In his biography in 1899, WEB du Bois wrote an eye-witness account, detailing that, “the knuckles of the victim were on display at a local store on Mitchell Street in Atlanta and that a piece of the man’s heart and liver was presented to the state’s governor.

As we see here all the four defining features of a crime to be termed as lynching is met, much unlike crimes in India, random and sporadic, referring to few deaths across six years in a country of 130 Crore people and a shabbily armed, politicized, under-provisioned and understaffed police force. To some extent, the killings in Jan Adalats of Naxals and that of Kashmir Dy. Superintendent of Police, Ayuub Pandit could slightly come close to be qualified as a lynching, given the subtle support of the Mufti government and mass-approval of the majority civil population around at the time of brutal murder of the poor officer.

To understand the touchiness of the West, particularly the Americans with the term, let us look at the description of a lynching from 1921 mentioned in a pamphlet by Harry Haywood and Milton Howard- “More than 500 persons stood and looked on while the Negro was slowly burned to a crisp. A few women were scattered among the crowd of Arkansas planters..with the Negro chained to a log, members of the mob placed a small pile of leaves around his feet. Gasoline was then poured on the leaves and the carrying out of the death sentence was under way.- Memphis Press, Jan, 27th, 1921”

When one look at the degree of crude violence contained in this small passage, one understands and appreciates how any American with humanity at heart will look at any crime, even falsely claimed to be a lynching. This is the psychological angle that the left plays on. Indians neither had the tendency nor the stomach for such a crime. It is not that the leftist-intellectuals who use the term so loosely do not understand the difference between the mob-violence and lynching. They do. But they know that for the propaganda to win, it needs to provoke. So they provoke the collective guilt of Western society, by creating a mass hysteria against India which did not elect them to power.

They will claim to be anti-Nazi but are guided by the doctrine of Nazi propagandist, Philip Joseph Goebbels who wrote, “Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths.”

They are not bothered by the facts. Their conscience is not troubled with the hypocrisy when they refuse to drop a tear when the victim is not suitable to their political narrative. The video which I mentioned at the beginning of this piece, mentions four victims of mob-violence, all belonging to one community. It is important for India and the world, at large, to understand their nefarious designs to malign a peaceful and pacifist community.

As time has progressed, across last six years, like the victims from other communities increasingly turned out to be more in the number than the left’s most loved second-largest majority community in India, possibly because they constitute a huge amount of foot soldiers to the depleting leftist forces, people are noticing their lies, hypocrisy and are getting bored with them. Why do they continue to stick to the chosen words, apart from the historical reference explained above? This again is explained by Goebbels, in another of his quote, where he writes, “It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is, in fact, a circle.”Have you noticed how often on debates about the economy and even about smart cities, they will go back to the irrelevant utterances about lynching?