Saturday, November 16, 2024
Home Blog Page 5376

Advocate rubbishes news of law student who accused Chinmayanand being detained by police in extortion case

0

Update: The law student’s lawyer has rubbished claims that she was detained in the extortion case. He said, “We had filed an anticipatory bail application in the Court. After elaborate discussion Court allowed my application. Court has fixed September 26 as next date for the hearing. Reports of the victim’s arrest is wrong. Till now we have neither received any notice nor any action has been taken against us”.


In the latest development in the Chinmayanand case, the law student from Shahjahanpur, who has accused former minister Swami Chinmayanand of raping and physically exploiting her has been allegedly detained by the SIT for questioning in the extortion case. Her detention comes a day after she was denied anticipatory bail by the Allahabad High Court.

The SIT probing the case has said that they have video evidence of the girl discussing extortion strategy with her friends involved in demanding a ransom from Swami Chinmayanand.

The SIT has taken two others accused, Sachin and Vikram on remand for further investigation in the case. SIT has been granted 95 hours to keep the two accused under remand.


The Allahabad High Court had turned down the law student’s petition seeking a stay on arrest in the extortion case filed by Swami Chinmayanand against her, saying that it has no jurisdiction to pass the order. BJP leader Swami Chinmayanand who is accused of raping the girl had later on filed an extortion case against her.

The law student from Shahjahanpur, who has accused former Union Minister Swami Chinmayanand of raping and physically exploiting her, was on September 20 (Friday) charged with extortion in a case filed by Chinmayanand, even as the SIT probing the case arrested him.

The SIT had also arrested her friend, Sanjay Singh along with two others, who had allegedly sent a WhatsApp message demanding the ransom of Rs 5 crore from Chinmayanand on September 20. According to the SIT chief Naveen Arora, the three had accepted their involvement in the case although the law student had denied the charges.

They have been booked under Indian Penal Code sections 385 (extortion), 506 (criminal intimidation), 201(disappearance of evidence), 35 (criminal act done with a criminal knowledge or intention) and 67 of the Information Technology Act.

SIT chief Naveen Arora said the former BJP MP had confessed to “almost all” the allegations made against him, barring rape. Despite the student’s complaint, Chinmayanand was not charged with rape but was arrested under Section 376 C of the IPC, which pertains to misusing authority to seduce or induce a woman to have sexual intercourse.

The SC had expressed satisfaction over the SIT status report in a sexual assault case filed by a postgraduate student against former Union minister and BJP leader Swami Chinmayanand.

UAE’s first astronaut gets ‘Islamic guidelines’ on how and when to do Namaz while in space

0

Hazzaa Al Mansouri – the first-ever astronaut from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been issued with a set of Islamic guidelines which tell him how to practise his faith in the space, reports Dailymail.

Reportedly, Dubai’s Islamic Affairs Authority has issued a set of Islamic guidelines to the UAE astronaut, who will be now praying and fasting in the International Space Station.

Mansouri is set to take off for space on Wednesday from Kazakhstan. Once in space, he will be witnessing sunrise and sunset 16 times a day, making it difficult for him to do Namaz as Muslims are bound to fast and pray according to the time of the day.

To help the astronaut, the Islamic Affairs Authority has advised him to do Namaz by matching the time of the day as per Mecca in Saudi Arabia, which is considered to be the holiest place for Muslims on Earth.

Muslims are expected to face towards Mecca when they pray, posing another difficulty for astronauts in zero gravity who are rapidly orbiting the Earth. However, the UAE astronaut has been advised to face Earth if he can while he prays instead of turning towards Mecca.

The guidelines issued also preach that Mansouri must clean himself before each of the prayers and if there is a scarcity of water at the ISS then he should use a grain of sand or stone.

Al Mansouri will be spending eight days in space. Al Mansouri will join Russian cosmonaut Oleg Skripochka and US astronaut Jessica Meir on the ISS when the rocket launches from Kazakhstan on Wednesday. The UAE astronaut will return on October 3 while his two colleagues will return in spring next year, according to NASA.

The Left has lost its moral compass and using Greta Thunberg to further their narrative is just proof of that

On Monday, Greta Thunberg, a 16-year-old climate activist, delivered a speech at the United Nations on the threat of climate change. Video clips of her speech went viral on social media and they drew rather polarizing reactions, to put it mildly.


The speech she made is, quite frankly, unwatchable. It’s not so much the content of her speech that makes it unbearable but the manner in which she says it, although the content did play a significant part. While people of a leftwing political orientation would froth in their mouth and demonize us if we said the obvious but the obvious does need to be said. It was awful and cringe-worthy and very difficult to watch. I could not listen to the entirety of it without closing my eyes. My face twisted into a grimace almost involuntarily.

US President Donald Trump, who trolled his way into the White House, spoke for a lot of people when he made a sarcastic comment on it. And if you were looking for a reason as to why Trump got elected, this is it. He has the guts to say the obvious when there’s immense backlash for daring to speak the truth.


There’s a reason why Greta Thunberg, who suffers from Aspergers, is the new face of Climate Change activism. She is a 16-year-old with an obvious health issue. Therefore, she can get away with a lot of things that people older than she can’t. And if anyone dares to criticize her, they could then demonize them for ‘attacking’ a little girl. It’s quite malicious if you ask me.

Using children for propaganda is one of the vilest things anyone could do. It’s done with the full knowledge that no adult feels good about being rude to a child or saying harsh things about them. It’s done to shut down debate and silence the opposition into submission. There’s literally no way you could be a grown-up and be rude to an unhealthy child without looking like a complete and utter moron. The Left understands that and takes advantage of it. Their moral depravity knows no bounds.

However, the truth does need to be said. Thus, at the risk of coming across as a heartless moron, I would say that Greta Thunberg came across as an entitled spoilt brat who has absolutely no clue about anything, like most 16-year-olds. She began her speech with the words, “My message is that we’ll be watching you. This is all wrong. I shouldn’t be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you!”

She should have stopped right when she finished that third sentence. She was right, she shouldn’t have been up there and she should have been back at school. She is perhaps the only person in the history of human civilization who has made a career out of skipping classes. I am not too sure about the Nobel Peace Prize but she does deserve to go into the Guinness Book of World Records for that.

“How dare you?” The manner in which she said is just bad. That’s just no way to talk to elders. Sure, they are world leaders and some of them do deserve some spite and much worse, however, there are norms of civility that need to be observed. Being rude to people you know can’t be rude to you without suffering significant damage to their reputation is just deplorable. It’s just not fair.

I do not believe world leaders need to be exposed to such insults, they sure could take, they have thick skins, but it’s not fair. Okay, maybe Imran Khan deserves it and Angela Merkel, maybe Xi Jinping and a few others but certainly not all of them. It just doesn’t seem right. All of us know that we can’t talk that way to world leaders without major consequences, therefore, some people are enjoying it immensely merely because the leaders are being tortured by someone they can’t be rude to. It’s quite sadistic.

Greta Thunberg then accused them of stealing her dreams and childhood. She said, “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones.” The truth is, no world leader stole her dreams and childhood. Her parents did. In a sane world, her parents would be tried for child abuse. She is being treated as a commodity to make some money and earn some fame.

She has obvious health issues. And I do feel sorry for her. It’s not something that I would want my little cousin sisters and brothers to be put through. She suffers from Asperger’s syndrome, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and selective mutism. The least her parents and everyone around her could do is make her life easier, not more difficult. Sure, the world may need heroes, a lot of them, we have not reached a point where we need to make children with health issues suffer even more than they already are in order to save the world.

Her dreams and childhood were stolen but they weren’t stolen by world leaders. They were stolen by her own parents and guardians. They were stolen by every single individual who cheered for her and encourages her to carry on when she was obviously suffering. Greta Thunberg had her chance at having a better life destroyed by the very people whose duty it was to protect her and raise her.

The Greta phenomenon is little more than a manifestation of the Christian world’s desire to have another Messiah. They desperately need another person they can nail to the cross, they want another person willing to die for their sins, they want another human sacrifice so that the world could be saved from its sins. The Left may believe they have nothing to do with Christianity but every act of theirs reveals their Christian roots.

Greta then said, “For more than 30 years, the science has been crystal clear. How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you’re doing enough when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight.” Well, the only thing we can be sure of at the moment is that climate alarmists have been spectacularly wrong about their predictions regularly.

One ‘Arctic Expert’ in 2012 predicted that sea ice in the Arctic region would collapse within four years. Nothing remotely close to that has happened. In 2009, the then Prime Minister of Britain predicted that we had only 50 days to save the planet. A decade has passed since then. In 2007, UN scientists predicted that “we only had as little as eight years left to avoid a dangerous global average temperature rise of 2°C or more.” Needless to say, it was another failed prediction. Such predictions did not start in the 2000s, it started as far back as 1989.

The San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989, that a senior environmental officer at the UN says that “entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000.” 19 years have passed since then and yet, there haven’t been consequences to that end. The alarmist predictions have been wrong consistently for 30 years and yet, activists like Greta use that to further their narrative.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the new Leftist Queen in America, argued passionately that the world will end in 12 years if climate change is not addressed. We can be pretty sure that her prediction will be proven false as well but that won’t prevent her or Greta from making such predictions in the future. Because such alarmist predictions are not based on reason, the basis for them is faith. And faith, as is obvious from religiosity, is remarkably persistent. As I have said before, Climate Change is the Leftist version of the core Christian Apocalypse meme.

Moreover, the frequently made Leftist claim that 97% of scientists agree that humans are the driving force behind Climate Change is demonstrably false and particularly misleading. Most importantly, Science is not driven by consensus. It’s settled by observations and facts. It only takes one Einstein or Newton to fundamentally alter our knowledge of the Universe. Despite what Greta might argue, the Science on Climate Change is by no means settled.

Throughout the decades, scientists have come up with doomsday theories. In the 1970s, it was Global Cooling, then there was the Ozone Layer Depletion which hardly anyone talks about now, then there was Global Warming and suddenly now it is Climate Change. It is indeed intriguing how the term Global Warming suddenly went out of fashion and was replaced with Climate Change, a term that is much vaguer.

Now, Climate Change may well be real. But when I see people who have been constantly wrong for the past three decades issue more dire sermons, it just makes me feel very suspicious. Especially when they are using a 16-year-old girl with health issues to make their point. They may be right but I find them increasingly difficult to take them seriously. Moreover, ‘experts’ who issue such sermons more often than not believe gender is a social construct and all the garbage that comes along with it, I just don’t know if I can trust them anymore on anything at all. On top of it, when they use a 16-year old girl with health issues to further their agenda, it makes me even more suspicious of the claims.

Having said that, I do believe there’s an urgent need to address pollution and environmental concerns. Pollution is destroying the beauty of our world. There are many things that we could do to make our cities more livable, oceans cleaner, and our way of life, less polluting. I do believe we need to address that. However, in the midst of all this cacophony of an impending apocalypse, urgent concerns are lost in the noise.

Moreover, the people who are most concerned about Climate Change are the ones who most often get in the way of actually making our cities less polluting. The protests over Aarey are evidence of it. The metro project will no doubt make Mumbai safer, less polluting and more livable. And yet, it is these environmentalists who are getting in the way. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis deserves much credit for refusing to bow down to this mob.

Greta ended her speech with more threats. She said, “You are failing us. But young people are starting to understand your betrayal. The eyes of all future generations are upon you. And if you choose to fail us, I say: We will never forgive you. We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.”

The threats are quite amusing since Greta Thunberg was able to make that speech at the UN only because the world leaders were kind enough to accommodate her. We can safely say that she won’t be able to offer such sermons from Beijing. The Chinese are not fond of being lectured by anyone, much less 16-year olds. The least she could have done is be a little bit more courteous. She was not looking to have a discussion, she merely wanted to beat someone with the stick in her hand. And the elders in the room were kind enough to allow her to amuse herself.

The theatrics that we saw at the UN summit from Greta Thunberg only does a great disservice to those who believe in Climate Change. It was all an act, everyone knows it was all an act. She was reading every single word from a piece of paper and trying very hard to put some emotions into it. By such repulsive acts, these activists are putting people off who otherwise might have been sympathetic to their interests. It wouldn’t even surprise me if hers was an elaborate act to discredit the entire idea of Climate Change activism itself by the billionaires who fund her.

The Left has truly lost its moral compass. Greta Thunberg is further evidence of the fact that they don’t honest discussion or debate. They want to shame and humiliate people and force them into submission. She needs help, not more misery. The burden to ‘Save the World’ should not be forced upon the shoulders of a 16-year-old with health issues who don’t know any better.

Boost from Centre: Union Territory of Ladakh to get a government medical college soon

In a major boost to health and medical education sector in the Himalayan region, the Central government on Monday announced its decision to build a new medical college in the Leh district of Ladakh region, reports ANI.


According to the reports, the Jammu and Kashmir Health and Medical Education Department has prepared a detailed project report (DPR) and technical report for construction of the government medical college as per the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare for the opening of 75 new medical colleges throughout the country.

The department is in consultation with the Leh Deputy Commissioner. The Ladakh Hill Development Council has identified 201 kanals of land at Shey Sindhu Ghat village for the college. The DPR for establishing the college will be submitted within three days to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

“The new medical college in this hilly region shall go a long way not only in the healthcare sector but also for strengthening the engine of development in the region,” said the statement.

Reportedly, the officials stated that the centre is likely to allocate Rs 325 crore to build the medical college. Out of the total funds, Rs 115 crore will be spent on college, Rs 80 crore on hostel and homes for students and faculty, Rs 70 crore on medical equipment and Rs 60 crore on up-gradation of a teaching hospital.

Govt enhances family pension for families of employees who die within 7 years of joining service

On 19th September the Central Government amended the rules of family pension for central government employees, ensuring enhanced pension for families of employees who die before completion of seven years of service. This amendment will benefit the families of those central government employees who die with 7 years of joining job, especially the widows of central armed forces personnel.

According to the rule 54, sub-rule 2, clause (iii) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, when a government employee dies, the family of the deceased is entitled to family pension at a uniform rate of 30% of the basic pay.

But the sub-rule 3 had provided for enhanced pension at the rate of 50%, if the employee dies after completing seven years of service. Now with a notification issued in the Gazette of India by the Department of Pension and Pensioners’ Welfare under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, this sub rule 3 has been amended and the requirement of completing seven years of service has been omitted for granting family pension at the enhanced rate of 50%.

The new rule will be applicable from 1st October 2019. This rule will also apply for cases where a government employee died without completing seven years of services within ten years prior to 1st October.

The government has also specified that for all cases where a family of a deceased employee becomes eligible for family mention, the amount of family pension and the period for which it is payable will be determined within one month from the receipt of intimation of the date of death. This will ensure faster processing of family pension.

The government has also modified the rules of gratuity payable on the death of employees. It says, “If the entire service rendered by the deceased Government servant is not capable of being verified and accepted, the amount of death gratuity shall be provisionally determined in accordance with clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 50 on the basis of the length of qualifying service which is verified and accepted immediately preceding the date of death of the Government servant and the amount of death gratuity, so determined shall be authorised to the beneficiaries on provisional basis within one month from the date of receipt of intimation of date of death of the Government servant.”

The amendment also specifies that the final amount of death gratuity will be determined by the Head of Office on the acceptance and verification of the entire spell of service by him within a period of six months from the date on which the authority for the payment of provisional death gratuity was issued and the balance, if any, becoming payable as a result of determination of the final amount of death gratuity shall then be authorised to the beneficiaries.”

Supreme Court judgments have led to 23 lakh job losses in the mining sector, says Federation of Indian Mining Industries

After senior jurist Harish Salve held Supreme Court responsible for the current economic slowdown of the country, the Federation of Indian Mining Industries (FIMI) on Monday has echoed the same sentiments stating that some judgments of the Apex Court have led to around job loss for 23 lakh people, both direct and indirect, in the mining sector, excluding petroleum and natural gas.

Reportedly, RK Sharma, secretary-general of FIMI said, in 2011-12 the mining sector employed 23.23 lakh people and due to various judgments, including bans and restrictions on mining placed by the Supreme Court, there was a significant drop in employment in the mining sector.

Sharma further added that due to bans and restrictions imposed by the court, around 80,000 direct employee lost their jobs in Karnataka. According to him, the number of job losses due to SC intervention was higher in Goa numbering nearly one lakh. Addition to that, the huge penalties imposed by the apex court in 2017 on 102 iron and manganese ore leases in Odisha has also led to around 50,000 direct job loss.

On the pretext of illegal mining, in 2011, the Supreme Court had banned mining in 188 leases in Karnataka. Subsequently, it allowed mining in 115 leases. However, in 2012, the Supreme Court had suspended all mining leases in Goa, but in 2014 granted renewals of leases with an annual production cap of 20 million tonnes. However, with effect from March last year, it cancelled the renewal of 88 mining, putting a blanket ban on the mining operation in the state.

“The closure or limitation of production has crippled the mining industry and adversely impacted both direct and indirect employment. Many mines are finding it difficult to operate and closing down one by one, further creating a slump and increasing the unemployment rate in remote and tribal regions,” Sharma added.

The mining sector is the third-largest in terms of generating job per unit increase in the sectoral GDP with an employment elasticity of 0.52%, next only to construction and finance & real estate. This implies that for every 1% growth in the mining sector’s GDP, employment in the sector increases by 0.52%.

Reportedly, nearly 2,60,000 people are in danger of job loss, direct and indirect, because of the lapsing of merchant mines by March next year. The validity 329 mining leases will end by March 31, causing job losses for 2,64,000. On the list of the lapsing mines are 48 operative leases, whose shutdown will lead to a deficit of around 60 million tonnes (mt) in raw material suppliers, mainly iron ore.

Recently, distinguished lawyer Harish Salve had also blamed the Supreme Court of India for the economic slowdown the country is currently experiencing. In an interview, Salve held the apex court responsible for the slump in the economy stating that the slowdown was triggered by the court’s verdict in the 2G spectrum case in 2012.

Salve had asserted that the top court’s order on 2G and coal allocation triggered foreign investors to exit from the Indian markets. In 2012, the Supreme Court had invalidated the 122 spectrum licences granted to eight companies. Salve contended that a blanket cancellation of allocation that happened in accordance with the rules set by the then government had a negative impact on the foreign investors who had to bear the brunt of the malfeasance of government authorities.

OpIndia Exclusive: Pakistani Hindu refugees unceremoniously removed from Delhi govt school after being given admission

Pakistani Hindu refugees who escaped the atrocities in the neighbouring country where minorities are constantly on the receiving end of persecution are now being denied admission in schools run by Delhi government in the national capital.

On 14th May this year, Gulsher, with his three children came to India from Sukkur, Sindh in Pakistan. They are currently living at Bhatti Mines Hindu refugee camp in Chhatarpur area of New Delhi. Gulsher’s three children, Moona Kumari (18 years), Sanjina Bai (16 years) and Ravi Kumar (17 years) were unceremoniously removed after giving admission in a government school in Delhi because ‘they were too old’.

After coming to India from Pakistan on 14th July, the children were given admission to Delhi government school on 5th July and were given permission to attend classes from 8th July. However, on 14th September, they were told they are ‘too old’ to attend these classes and were unceremoniously removed.

They are to get admission in class 9 and 10, but according to school authorities, they are ‘too old’ to get admission in these classes. These children also have the school leaving certificates as well as enrolment cards of Pakistani school.

Annual exam admission slip of Ravi Kumar from Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan

Speaking to OpIndia, Gulsher said that Delhi government’s education department officers had first assured him that the children will be admitted to the school. Gulsher even claimed that he had already submitted the transfer certificate obtained from Pakistan school to the Delhi government school.

School leaving certificate of Moona Kumar from Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan

According to Gulsher, after agreeing to admit the children, Delhi government school officials said that they cannot admit them because they were ‘too old’. The kids are currently not going to any school and wasting the precious months. He has met politicians including the Chhatarpur MLA and Aam Aadmi Party leader Kartar Singh Tanwar, but no help has come through. Gulsher claims that instead of helping him, the officers asked him to meet Delhi Deputy Chief Minister and Education Minister Manish Sisodia. However, despite many attempts, he has not been able to meet Sisodia.

School leaving certificate of Sanjina Bai from Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan

“We are tired. School management keeps on stalling. We have purchased school uniforms and books and everything but now school says they cannot study there. Not only I but even my kids are mentally disturbed now,” Gulsher told OpIndia.

Gulsher now hopes that the Supreme Court lawyer Ashok Agarwal, who is President of All India Parents Association (AIPA), may be able to help him. Agarwal has written to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and appealed to him to help out Gulsher.

Letter written by Ashok Agarwal, President, All India Parents Association to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

In his letter dated 23rd September, Agarwal apprises the Delhi CM about the atrocities carried out on minorities in Pakistan, owing to which many of them have sought refuse in India. He further added that the Central Government is contemplating granting them citizenship as well. “These Hindu families migrated from Pakistan to India have a large number of school age children required to be admitted in government school so to enable them to continue their further education,” the letter reads.

Letter written by Ashok Agarwal, President, All India Parents Association to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

The letter further talks about a similar incident where a Hindu refugee from Pakistan, Madhu, who had no educational documents had requested for admission in class 9 in government school in Bhatti Mines, Chhatarpur. The then External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj had intervened and now Madhu studies in class 12 in the same government school.

Advocate Agarwal has write to Delhi CM about Article 14 and 21 of Indian Constitution which gives these children a fundamental right to education and such denial or removal is violation of their fundamental and human right to education. He further requests the Chief Minister to intervene and help these children.

Heard very aggressive statements from PM Modi in Howdy Modi event: President Trump in press conference with Imran Khan

0

With Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan sitting beside him, US President Donald Trump showered praise on PM Narendra Modi and the historic community event ‘Howdy, Modi!’ that he addressed along with the PM.

Addressing the media after meeting Imran Khan, Trump praised the ‘Howdy, Modi’ mega rally in presence of Khan and said PM Modi made “very aggressive statements” on the issue of terrorism at the Houston event. He added that the statements were received well by the crowd of Indian-Americans present at the event.

Donald Trump cited PM Modi’s aggressive pitch to combat terror, especially from Pakistan, as a reason for his willingness to mediate between two countries only if both the parties agreed to it.


During the “Howdy, Modi!”, Prime Minister Modi had used the opportunity to expose the nefarious terror policy of Pakistan as he launched a full-frontal attack on the terror-state without even mentioning them. With US President Donald Trump seated in front of him, Prime Minister Narendra Modi accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism in India and across the world, telling the world that the time has come for a decisive battle against terrorism.

Even, US President had acknowledged the threat that emanates from Islamic terrorism and had outlined that both India and the United States are committed to protecting innocent civilians from “Radical Islamic terrorism”. He received a standing ovation from the crowd, which also included Prime Minister Narendra Modi in whose honour the event was held.

A day after the spectacular ‘Howdy, Modi!” event, President Donald Trump had met Imran Khan on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly session in New York.

In yet another embarrassing incident which left Pakistan and its Prime Minister Imran Khan left red-faced, US President Donald Trump mocked one of the journalists of the country during a meet on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York.

During the press meet, a Pakistani journalist kept on asking questions to Donald Trump while trying to get a response from him. The questions were heavily slanted towards the Pakistani narrative on Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 by India. The Pakistani journalist asked Trump about the situation in Kashmir while describing India as an aggressor.

A visibly irritated Donald Trump took a dig at the Pakistani journalist, mockingly said to PM Imran Khan that “this is the kind of reporter” he liked. “Are you from his (Imran Khan) team? You are making a statement, not asking a question,” Trump asked the Pakistani reporter.

“Where do you find reporters like these? These guys are fantastic,” Donald Trump asked Pakistan PM Imran Khan as he snubbed another Pakistani journalist who tried to push his Kashmir rhetoric during the joint press conference.


Further, demolishing Pakistan’s hope of the USA inserting itself unilaterally in the Kashmir issue, Donald Trump while addressing questions on whether he was still willing to mediate on Kashmir, said that he is willing to mediate on Kashmir issue only if both India and Pakistan agree for it, giving a virtual veto to India on the issue of Kashmir.


“I am ready, willing and able. It’s a complex issue. It’s been going on for a long time. But if both want it, I will be ready to do it,” Trump said.

He added, “You have to have two parties that want to agree … At some point, India may come. I have a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi. I have a very good relationship with Prime Minister Khan, and if at any time they say, you know, we have some points that we can, maybe, iron out, I think I’d be an extremely good arbitrator.”

While Trump has time and again offered to mediate in the Kashmir matter, India has maintained that Kashmir was a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan with no scope for third party mediation.

However, within hours after Donald Trump had offered to mediate between India and Pakistan, he deleted a tweet quoting news agency ANI where he had said that he ‘hoped’ that India and Pakistan will resolve the Kashmir issue ‘quickly’.

While President Donald Trump rolled the red carpet for Prime Minister Modi, the response to Pakistan can only be considered luke-warn. The USA has long had a policy of balancing its relations with India and Pakistan. While India has been a strong trade and defence partner, Pakistan has been given alms to ensure that it helps America since the days of the Cold War. However, with Trump slashing down aid to Pakistan and putting Pakistan on warning for harbouring and aiding terrorists, the policy has shifted after Trump became the President.

Tripura Congress president resigns from his post, writes about being free of ‘backstabbing colleagues and high-command’s order’

0

Kirit Pradyot Manikya DebBarma, the head of the erstwhile reigning dynasty of Tripura and the president of Tripura Congress has resigned from his post.

Taking to Twitter, Pradyot shared a note where he wrote that he is looking forward to spending his days without listening to criminals, back-stabbing colleagues and without having to take the High-command’s order to accommodate corrupt people in high positions.

Pradyot DebBarma’s note, via twitter


The 41-year-old leader has replied to many tweets and querries by his party colleagues and well-wishers. He has, however, clarified that he is not joining the BJP and has emphasised that he has left the Congress after fighting till the last and losing.

He has also stated that there is no space for him in the party anymore. His note speaks about differences with colleagues and the corrupt practice of getting people into a high position on the high command’s order. He has stated that his health and life were being affected in Congress.

It is notable here that Pradyot reportedly had differences with Congress’ secretary in-charge of Northeastern states Luizinho Faleiro over NRC update in Tripura. While Pradyot had supported a petition over NRC update in Tripura, filed in Supreme Court by INPT & Tripura People’s Front (TPF), Luizinho Faleiro has reportedly been against Pradyot’s support. In the last week, there were speculations that Pradyot may soon leave the party.

The petition has requested an Assam-like NRC update to be implemented in Tripura. Many in Congress have been opposed to Pradyot’s support for it. A week ago, Pradyot had tweeted that he had tried his best to put a stop to corrupt practices in Tripura Congress and has always opposed to criminals running the party.