Tuesday, September 24, 2024
Home Blog Page 5437

Arnab Goswami remotely ‘hacks’ into the press conference of ‘achievers and celebrities’, questions them on their hypocrisy

Yesterday, around 49 celebrities across all platforms in the likes of Bollywood, theatres, historians and artists wrote a letter to PM Narendra Modi, claiming intolerance in the country under the BJP regime.

In a live TV confrontation today, Republic TV’s editor-in-chief, Arnab Goswami ‘haked’ into the press conference to pose questions at these lobbyists who alleged the rise of hate crimes across the country.


When Aparna Sen was addressing a press conference and answering questions of reporters present their, Arnab Goswami started asking her questions from Republic studios over phone. A reporter from Republic TV was also present at the venue, and apparently, Arnab’s telephonic questions were blasted via loudspeaker during the press conference.

Ironically, the filmmaker, Aparna Sen, who was very much an integral part of this particular lobby of celebrities creating an unnecessary brouhaha and indulging in fearmongering over intolerance in the country under BJP’s governance, not only evaded the questions posed to her but looked visibly irked as Arnab shot a series of questions at her.

Some questions Arnab Goswami asked the filmmaker:

  • Why were you silent when Muslim fanatics were attacking Zaira Wasim?
  • Where were you when Ayub Pandith was being lynched?
  • Where were you when Muslim clerics asked minorities to pick up arms?
  • Why are you selective about raising your voice?
  • When Congress govt charge-sheeted Pehlu Khan where were you?
  • When Mamata Banerjee arrested a girl Priyanka Sharma on the meme, where were you?
  • Where were you when a man was attacked for saying Jai Shri Ram?
  • Where were you when 7-year-old was attacked for chanting Jai Shri Ram?
  • Where were you when the temple was attacked in Delhi?
  • Jignesh Mevani said there should be armed-conflict, where were you then?
  • Did you speak on Kashmiri Pandits and victims of terrorism in Kashmir?
  • Where were you when critics of Kumaraswamy was arrested in Karnataka?

In response, Sen, as expected, not only eluded every single question but also made hand gestures and simmered at the editor-in-chief, Arnab Goswami.

She was seen saying, “Hi Arnab, you have started your whatabouteries, I am not going to answer any of your whatabouteries. Please address the issue. You are not going to succeed in shouting, I’m done. I refuse to answer”.


Though Arnab stood firm, trying to expose the hypocrisy of these so-called intellectuals, Aparna Sen chose to evade the questions by saying things like “I don’t want to dignify questions like this with an answer, it is so ridiculous”. She furthered that “people have become so politicised these days, so polarised these days that they can’t understand simple humanitarian concerns”.

Meanwhile, in the letter dated to 23rd July 2019, 49 celebrities, including filmmakers like Anurag Kashyap, Konkana Sen Sharma, Mani Ratnam, Aparna Sen and many others, wrote to PM Narendra Modi, stating that they are ‘deeply concerned’ about a number of tragic events that have been happening in the country in recent times. The letter said claimed that ‘Jai Shri Ram is now a provocative ‘War-cry’. One of the signatories to the letter is a convicted Naxalite, Binayak Sen.

Explaining their stance further, the letter claims that the lynching of Muslims, Dalits and other minorities must be stopped immediately and that they were ‘shocked’ to learn that there have been no less than 840 instances of atrocities against Dalits in the year 2016 and that there has been a definite decline in the percentage of convictions.

Claiming that there is no democracy without dissent, the celebrities expressed that no certain individual should be branded as ‘anti-national’ or ‘Urban Naxal’ because of the dissent against the government.

While speaking to Republic TV, filmmaker Anurag Kashyap confirmed the authenticity of the letter and stated that it was ‘self-explanatory’.

Rajasthan Mahila Congress leader launches personal attack on PM Modi for sharing playful pics with his “special friend”

In line with her party tradition, Reena Mimrot, State General Secretary of Rajasthan Mahila Congress targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Twitter for sharing playful pictures with his “special friend” who visited him in his office yesterday.

Mimrot tweeted, “Modji samay par ghar jaate to aaj doosare ke bachche nahin khilaane padate.” This roughly translates as “Had Modiji settled down on time in life, he would not have to play with other’s kids.”


This is a direct attack on personal choice of Narendra Modi he has made about his life. Just because someone is bachelor, it does not mean they are not allowed to play with kids. Congress leaders keeps attacking the prime minister on his personal life, which is very unfortunate.

PM Modi had set the internet on fire on Tuesday when he had posted few pictures of him playing with a kid on his official Instagram handle. In no time, the pictures became a hot topic of discussion on social media arousing the curiosity of the netizens to learn about the identity of the baby.

Modi had captioned the pictures as “A very special friend came to meet me in Parliament today.”

It was later revealed the little kid playing with the PM was the grandaughter of BJP MP Satyanarayan Jatiya.

While it was not the first time when the PM was photographed with kids. However, his reference to him as a “special friend” sent the internet into a tizzy.

 

India jumps 5 places to Rank 52 on the list of Global Innovation Index 2019

India has risen by 5 positions from its last year’s rank 57 to 52 in the recently published list of Global Innovation Index (GII). The Global Innovation Index (GII) is an annual ranking of countries by their capacity for, and success in, innovation and provides a subjective and objective analysis of data derived from several sources, including the International Telecommunication Union, the World Bank and the World Economic Forum. It is published by Cornell University, INSEAD, and the World Intellectual Property Organisation, in partnership with other organisations and institutions. 

India has topped the list of innovative economies in central and southern Asia. Switzerland leads the innovation index of countries followed by Sweden and the US. India’s north-eastern neighbour, China is ranked at 14. However, other neighbours such as Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh are at 105, 109 and 116 respectively. The entire report can be read here.

(Source: GII)

One of the most pertinent findings of the GII is the rise of middle-income countries such as India in strengthening the global innovation landscape. Applauding India for its remarkable improvement in its innovation index, the report states that India continues to be the most innovative economy in Central & Southern Asia—a distinction held since 2011. India is consistently among the top in the world in innovation drivers such as ICT services exports, Graduates in science & engineering, the quality of universities, Gross capital formation—a measure of economy-wide investments—and Creative goods exports.

India also stands out in the GII ranking of the world’s top science and technology clusters with Bengaluru, Mumbai, and New Delhi featuring prominently among the global top 100 clusters. Being upbeat about India’s steady progress, the report says that if progress is upheld—India will make a true impact on global innovation in the years to come.

Technology Clusters (Source: GII)

Though the geography of innovation is rapidly shifting from high-income economies to middle-income economies, the report draws attention to the great innovation divide that persists as innovation inputs and outputs remain concentrated in very few economies. In terms of continuous innovation improvement, only Asia is improving while the rest of the world is still struggling to catch up with North America, Europe, South East Asia and Oceania.

3 Indian institutes have made into the top 10 universities in the middle-income group. Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay (IIT-B), Indian Institute of Science (Bengaluru) and Indian Institute of Technology-Delhi (IIT-D) have featured in the top 10 universities/ colleges list prepared by the GII.v

Russia unable to find any document on Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose in their archive: Government in Lok Sabha

On Wednesday, the government informed the Lok Sabha that the Russian government was unable to find any documents in Russian archives pertaining to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose.


In a written reply to a question asked by Badruddin Ajmal, Minister of State for External Affairs V Muraleedharan said that India had requested Russia several times since 2014 seeking information on Netaji. The Russian government has said that it was unable to find any documents despite carrying out additional investigations.

India sought information on Netaji such as to whether he was in Russia anytime before or after August 1945 and whether he escaped to Russia in August 1945 or thereafter as reported by some researchers.

Netaji is believed to have died in an air crash in Taiwan on August 18, 1945. He had founded the Indian National Army also known as the Azad Hind Fauj. As his last days remain a mystery, there are several theories about his whereabouts and actually what happened to him. Some people have claimed that Netaji Bose was in Russia till at least 1968. BJP leader Subramanian Swamy had even claimed said that Stalin was instrumental in “murdering” Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, who didn’t die in 1945 in a plane crash. He had also said that Bose was kept in a Russian prison before his murder, and PM Jawaharlal Nehru was aware of this.

Due to such claims, India had asked Russia to find if they have any information regarding Bose.

The Judicial Commission constituted in 2016 to probe the identity of ‘Gumnami Baba’, widely believed to be Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose in disguise, has reportedly concluded that it could not arrive at a definitive conclusion.

PM Modi has undertaken various measures to immortalise the legacy of Netaji and the INA. In January this year, PM Modi had inaugurated a museum of  Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose at the Red fort.

PM Modi renamed three Island of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands, on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of Bose had hoisted the national flag at Port Blair. The Ross Island was renamed to Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Island, Neil Island to Shahid Dweep and Havelock Island to Swaraj Dweep. A Rs 75 commemorative coin was also released to mark the 75th anniversary.

Under-achiever Bhayanak Sen writes to PM Modi, talks about rising ‘achiever-thought-terrorism’

Under-achiever Bhayanak Sen today wrote a letter to Prime Minister Modi talking about the rising ‘achiever-thought-terrorism‘ that has been gripping the nation since 16th May 2014. OpIndia has an exclusive copy of the letter which has been reduced below verbatim.

24th July 2019,

To,

Shri Narendra Damodardas Modi,

Honourable Prime Minister of India

Dear Prime Minister,

I am a peace loving and proud Indian and deeply concerned about a number of tragic events that have been happening in recent times in our beloved country.

Our Constitution, which originally described India as a ‘sovereign democratic republic’ but became ‘secular’ and ‘socialist’ during the Emergency, where all religions, ethnicities, gender and castes are equal. Hence, to ensure that every citizen enjoys the rights given to him/her by the constitution, my submission is:

    1. The rising cases of ‘fake hate crimes‘ must be stopped immediately. I was shocked to learn that Muslim men these days say that they were beaten up because they refused to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ to be applauded in the community. What happened to destroying the temples to win accolades?Speaking of temples, a temple in the heart of national capital was destroyed by a Muslim mob. Media houses, whitewashed and downplayed the desecration of the Hindu temple. The ‘fact-checkers’ who also run ‘hate crime tracker’ as parallel business so that they can be quoted by ‘achievers’ and ‘intellectuals’ and foreign publications, made the people who destroyed the temple as victims.When will this propaganda stop? The ‘achievers’ and the ‘intellectuals’ keep talking about the Dalit-Muslim unity and how the communities are suppressed by the Hindu majoritarian government of yours. When will the people of both these communities as well as the ‘achievers’ and ‘intellectuals’ wake up and smell the coffee that this narrative is nothing but a farce?You have criticised the genuine cases in the Parliament, and rightly so, Mr. Prime Minister, but that is not enough! What action has been taken against the ones who are spreading falsehood? I strongly feel that they should be taken to task because kab tak narrative ko counter karte rahoge?Regrettably, ‘Jai Shri Ram’ is being referred to as a war-cry and petty criminals are faking it that they were beaten up because they didn’t chant the slogan. We are threatened with ‘unprecedented action’ by the Imam if Hindu boys are not arrested. That too over an incident that never took place. If life imprisonment without parole can be the sentence in cases of murder, why not for people who are trying to disturb the communal harmony of the nation for their vested interests, which is even more heinous? No citizen should have to live in fear in his/her own country! As the highest Executive in this country, you must put a stop to the name of Ram being defiled in this manner.

      Have you heard about the Dara Hua Musalman? Of course, you have, you get the letters by the ‘achievers’ and ‘intellectuals’ all the time talking about how the pious Muslims are scared and live in fear under your government. But how come no one talks about the toxic fundamentalism that gets broadcasted through speakers and runs riot?

    2. There is no democracy without dissent. A Hindu woman should not be forced to distribute Quran by an order of the court just because of a Facebook post. It is as condemnable as forcing a Muslim man to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’. Of course, the assorted ‘achievers’ and ‘intellectuals’ will never ask you why should a Hindu girl be forced to distribute Quran. Dissent is democratic only if emerges from the other end of political spectrum.Criticising the ‘achievers’, ‘intellectuals’ and seasonal dissenters does not imply one is a bigot. Referring to oneself as ‘intellectual’ does not make one ‘intelligent’ and above criticism. They are only a part of the country. Hence, anti-‘achiever’ stand cannot be equated with bigotry. An open environment where dissent is not ridiculed, only helps an ‘intellectual’ become ‘intelligent’.

I hope my suggestions are taken in spirit they are meant – as average Indian genuinely concerned with ‘achiever-thought-terrorism’ who think they are the only ones who know how democracy works.

With best regards,

Yours sincerely,

Bhayanak Sen

An under-achiever

“When will he learn to place country over politics?” Tejasvi Surya slams Rahul Gandhi for his attack on PM Modi over Trump’s comment

After over twelve hours had passed since the controversy erupted over Trump’s Kashmir statement, former Congress President Rahul Gandhi had finally taken to Twitter yesterday, to react on US President Donald Trump’s gaffe on the issue of third party mediation in Jammu and Kashmir.

Now, reacting sharply to the Gandhi scions Tweet, in which he claimed that PM Modi has betrayed the interest of the country and the 1972 Shimla Agreement, the Bangalore South MP Tejasvi Surya slammed the Congress ex-president saying, “A categorical rejection is never enough for the newly elected MP from Wayanad, be it from the people of Amethi or from a Cabinet rank Minister! It almost feels like RG’s only objective here is to strain Indo-US friendship! When will he learn to place country over politics?!”


Rahul Gandhi expressing trust in Donald Trump over the Indian Prime Minister had also rejected the clarification given by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in the Rajya Sabha, terming the denial “weak”.

This deliberate attack the Gandhi scion came even as Union External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar issued a statement in both Houses of Parliament wherein he categorically mentioned that Prime Minister Modi had not requested Trump for any mediation on Kashmir issue. He asserted that Kashmir is a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan and there would be no involvement of any third party.

“I assure the House categorically that no such request has been made by PM to the US President. I also reiterate that it has been India’s consistent position that all outstanding issues with Pakistan are discussed bilaterally. Any engagement with Pakistan would require an end to cross-border terrorism,” said Jaishankar.

“The Shimla Agreement and the Lahore declaration provide the basis to resolve all issues between India and Pakistan bilaterally,” he added.

Yet, the regular hate mongers, which includes a section of trolls from the media and politics and the Congress, of course, jumped to this opportunity to train guns at PM Narendra Modi.

While the former was busy spreading falsehood regarding India’s stand despite clarification from the MEA, Congress treated this opportunity to attack PM Modi. Making full use of this opportunity, Congress, yesterday, also gave an adjournment motion notice in the Lok Sabha over Trump’s remarks.

Convicted Naxalite Binayak Sen signs ‘rising intolerance’ letter to PM Modi, calls self ‘peace loving proud Indian’

Prominent ‘achievers and celebrities’ have written a letter to Prime Minister Modi claiming that atrocities against ‘Muslims and Dalits’ have increased in India. The letter also claims that ‘Jai Shri Ram’ has become a ‘provocative warcry’ and this is helping the lynching incidents against Muslims and Dalit. Amidst the cacophony of the drama, a certain fact appears to have escaped people’s attention. One of the signatories to the letter is a convicted Naxalite, Binayak Sen.

It is ironic that a man convicted of sedition for helping Naxalites is taking the moral high ground in a letter that refers to the signatories as “peace-loving and proud Indians”.

The names in the letter

Binayak Sen was convicted in 2010 on charges of sedition for his links to Naxals and sentenced to life imprisonment under sections 124A and 120(B) of the IPC. He was also found guilty under section 8(1) of the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act. He was given bail by the Supreme Court in 2011. He is associated with the PUCL, an organization we have reported on extensively, that is closely linked with the arrested ‘Urban Naxals’.

Convicted for sedition and helping Naxalites to set up a network to fight the state of India, Binayak Sen was a Vice President of the PUCL even after his conviction by Raipur Sessions Court. The West Bengal unit of PUCL also published a book exonerating Sen of all his crimes and branded him a “victim of state atrocity”.

As it turns out, he was in the Committee for Police Reforms of the Aam Aadmi Party announced in 2014. Sen was in the committee for resolving the Naxalite question as well. Binayak Sen has links with the Congress party as well. Sen was named a member of the government’s Planning Commission on health in 2011. Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh, Raman Singh, had slammed the decision to include Sen in the panel and wrote to the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh deeming it “shocking and against all norms and propriety”.

Despite his conviction for sedition and associations with the PUCL, which has extensive links to separatists across the country from Kashmir to Manipur through the coordinating organization CDRO, Binaya Sen continues to enjoy the support of the intellectual fraternity. He has even been invited to TISS to deliver a keynote address at an event. It only goes ion to show the moral bankruptcy of the ‘intellectual’ fraternity that a convicted Naxalite is allowed to sign a letter that calls its signatories “peace-loving and proud Indians”.

‘Wax her testicles, transphobic bigot!’ Trans Activist who wants to force women to wax ‘her’ male genitalia in the dock for predatory behaviour

Jessica Yaniv, a transgender activist, has brought into the fore the inherent inconsistencies within 21st-century Feminism. He was born a man, claims to have transitioned to being a woman but still has male genitalia. Despite that, he wants to be treated as a woman by everyone around.

Yaniv found himself in the eye of a storm after it was revealed that he was suing 16 aestheticians, all of them female, for refusing to wax his male genitalia. According to him, the women are transphobic who were discriminating against him by refusing to extend their female-only services to him. Yaniv believes the women must be forced by the government to wax his testicles, or otherwise, he must be paid compensation. The incident is from Canada, a country where the prime minister wants to replace ‘mankind’ with ‘peoplekind’.

The reasons given by women are pretty ordinary. They are mostly immigrant women who believe it’s against their religious beliefs to touch the male private parts of someone apart from their husbands. People have also pointed out that it’s perfectly natural that the women have taken the decision considering the fact that their husbands will not be comfortable with their wives touching the genitalia of another man. That is another perfectly ordinary reason. Of course, there are women who provide this service, known as Boyzilian waxing, as opposed to more well known Brazilian waxing, but they have chosen to do so themselves and have acquired necessary training for this specialised and delicate service. The women targeted by Yaniv have said they are not trained to wax male genitalia, therefore they can’t provide this service.

There are other extremely troubling facts about Yaniv that has come to light. It has been revealed that Yaniv sent extremely disturbing texts to minor girls online which, on the face of it, does appear to be predatory behaviour. One of his alleged victims has also filed a child exploitation report with Canada’s tip line to report online exploitation of children. He was also organizing a “topless” pool party for girls aged 12+ where parents or guardians are prohibited from entering. It was further seen by people as evidence of his predatory inclinations.


As the obvious atrocious nature of the lawsuits generated public outcry, Yaniv appeared on certain shows to present his side of the story. And in doing so, he voiced extremely problematic opinions. For instance, he believes women should not be allowed to refuse to handle male genitalia just because they don’t want to, it’s not ‘fair’ according to him. He further states that the Human Rights Tribunal in Canada says that the women do not have the right to say ‘No’ because he belongs to one of the protected classes.


Yaniv even called Marcia Da Silva, a Brazillian immigrant who ran a salon from her home in Vancouver, a ‘Neo Nazi’ for refusing to wax his testicles. Da Silva was eventually forced to shut down her newly opened salon.

Alex Jones, the most banned individual in the era of big tech, invited Yaniv to Info Wars. On the show, Yaniv claimed that we should not be ‘policing’ people’s genders and if someone identified as a 12-year old girl, then the person would have been allowed entry to the pool party regardless of his actual age. Furthermore, Yaniv doesn’t appear to accept that women don’t want to surround themselves with the genitalia of strange men and thinks that they shouldn’t have a problem with that.


Thus, in short, we have a man here, who identifies as a woman, who wants to force women to wax his testicles using the government as his tool. In the past, he has sent lewd texts to minor girls and indulged in behaviour which appears to be predatory. The whole series of events involving Yaniv is a manifestation of the nightmare that every sensible person saw coming with the whole ‘Gender is a social construct’ narrative.

In any sane society, a man cross-dressing as woman forcing other natural-born women to touch his genitalia would be considered as sexual harassment and would be liable to be prosecuted, even if it was for grooming services and not for any pleasure. But in the world of woke insanity known as LGBT rights, logics have been twisted in such a way that if a man claims to be woman, the entire world has to agree, even if no sex reassignment procedures and surgeries are done. And the establishment and courts in such cultures allow such man to file serious cases of human rights violation against innocent women.

The postmodernist Left and the entire liberal political establishment had dismissed all these concerns as transphobic rants of deluded rightwingers. But everything that people feared has come to pass. And the liberal establishment is maintaining a pin-drop silence over the entire matter. Twitter, in fact, is banning people from the platform for questioning Yaniv’s conduct.

The LGBT community, too, is maintaining a strategic silence on Yaniv’s transgressions. One would have expected them to issue a statement condemning Yaniv, however, that hasn’t happened until now. Yaniv is proving every stereotype that sensible people have over this whole transgenderism fad to be true. Yet, the LGBT community doesn’t think it’s an important enough issue for them to comment on. In fact, people like Ricky Gervais, a comedian with obviously left-wing inclinations, who have come out in support of the women have been denounced as transphobic.

Only one transgender woman has commented on the matter thus far and she is someone who doesn’t identify herself with the LGBT community. According to Blaire White, Yaniv is a sexual predator who is using trans rhetoric to disguise his sexually predatory behaviour. She has also rued the fact that no prominent LGBT activist has raised his or her concern about the entire affair.

The affair perfectly captures the manner in which modern feminism fails women. Some of the women Yaniv has sued have lost their business and have been forced to shut their business. Things have reached a point where feminists no longer believe that women should have the right to refuse to touch male genitalia. Tech giants like Twitter will also have to reevaluate how they conduct their business as they have been silencing Yaniv’s critics. The manner in which society deals with this issue will have huge repercussions for the future.

Was Gumnami Baba really Netaji Bose? Can’t say for sure, says Judicial Commission report

The Judicial Commission constituted in 2016 to probe the identity of ‘Gumnami Baba’, widely believed to be Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose in disguise, has reportedly concluded that it could not arrive at a definitive conclusion. The Justice Vishnu Sahai Commission report which was submitted to the Governor in 2017 was tabled in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly on Tuesday.

The Commission was constituted by the Samajwadi Party government in 216 following orders from the Allahabad High Court. The HC order came in the wake of a PIL which claimed that Gumnami Baba was, in fact, Netaji Bose. Justice Vishnu Sahai had earlier told reporters that many he had interviewed had a preconceived notion that the mysterious Baba was Netaji Bose.

According to reports, those who are aware of the content of the Commission report believe that it largely eliminates the possibility that both these people were one and the same. The Hindustan Times was told, “The commission appears to have eliminated, to a large extent, the possibilities of Gumnami Baba being Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.”

The report, however, does mention several similarities between the two personalities. Both these personalities were fluent in English, Hindi and Bengali. In addition, books about Bose and authors he supposedly liked were recovered from the Baba as well. “As per the report, Gumnami Baba continued to stay in his Faizabad house till rumours of him being Subhas Chandra Bose surfaced, after which he left that place. The report also mentions Gumnami Baba’s love for music and cigars,” a source was quoted as saying.

The inquiry itself is the result of the efforts of Lalita Bose, a niece of Netaji. She had arrived in Faizabad years ago and conducted a personal inquiry into Gumnami Baba. She was convinced that he was indeed her famous uncle. She then tried to persuade Vir Bahadur Singh, the then Chief Minister of the state, to initiate a proper inquiry but was told that it was beyond his reach.

Lalita, with two other people, then filed a suit in the Allahabad High Court. The state government filed a counter-affidavit only 13 years later. Ultimately, in 2013, the order for an inquiry was finally delivered. Even after that, it took three years and some lobbying for the Akhilesh government to constitute a Commission for the inquiry.

AIMIM MLA Akbaruddin Owaisi repeats his ’15-minutes’ hate speech, says RSS yet to recover from his 2012 speech

On Tuesday, Akbaruddin Owaisi, controversial AIMIM MLA and brother of Asaduddin Owaisi resorted to hate speech after he repeated his ’15 minutes’ infamous speech against Hindus which he had made in 2012.

According to Republic TV, Akbaruddin Owaisi repeated his ‘15 minute’ provocative phrase which he had made in 2012 while addressing a crowd on Tuesday. In 2012, he had made a highly inflammatory speech asking to remove the police for 15 minutes so that he could finish off 100 crores Hindus.

While addressing a crowd Akbaruddin Owaisi resorted to fear-mongering and attempted to incite violence against Hindus by raking up the issues of alleged lynchings against minorities.


“No person from RSS or Bajrang Dal can even touch our hair and remember, remember, the world tries to scare the person who gets scared. And world fears the person who knows how to instil fear why do they hate Akbaruddin Owaisi? Why? A single blow of a blacksmith is equal to a hundred blows of a goldsmith. They (RSS) haven’t yet recovered from the ’15 minute’ blow,'” Akbaruddin Owaisi said, repeating this ’15 minutes’ threat.

Recently, in the run-up to elections, AIMIM leader Akbaruddin Owaisi had created a controversy after he had taken a jibe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi by referring him to ‘Chaiwala’.

Speaking at an election rally in Hyderabad, Akbaruddin Owaisi, four-time MLA from Telangana went on to advise the Prime Minister Narendra Modi not to behave like a ‘Chaiwala’ but to conduct himself like the Prime Minister of the country.