Saturday, November 16, 2024
Home Blog Page 5442

Why is UPSC producing people like Shah Faesal and Kannan Gopinathan: Structural problems that must be fixed

This is Kannan Gopinathan, the ex-IAS officer who quit his job recently to express his anger over what happened in Kashmir. Since then, he has had at least two appearances on The Wire and at least one on NDTV that I have seen. I think he made a second appearance with Ravish Kumar.

Untitled.png

In one of these appearances, he said, stunningly, that the Chinese government is allowing freedom of speech in HongKong but the Indian government is not! Seriously? He has been on like ten different Indian channels criticizing the Government of India and he still thinks there’s no free speech? Let’s see him go to Beijing and criticize Xi Jinping.

This is how they keep their agenda flag flying high. Remarks like those of Arund**ti Roy saying Pakistan has never used its military against its own people (forgetting what the Pakistan Army did in Bangladesh, in Balochistan, etc) don’t come out of nowhere. They are not incidental. They are not lying, I believe they don’t even care about the truth as long as they are making India look bad.

As we would say in Hindi, life set hai bas for Kannan Gopinathan. I guess he is already on the shortlist for the Ramon Magsaysay award at some point.

And then there is of course Shah Faesal, the other ex-IAS officer who has been in the news.

Source: OpIndia

How sinister is this guy? Said he was on his way to Harvard to complete his Master’s degree, but he had no student visa. Just a tourist visa. You have to wonder what he might have done if they had let him leave the country. We don’t know for sure, but probably some kind of spectacle in front of some international body.

The real question is: why is UPSC producing people like Shah Faesal or Kannan Gopinathan? At the very outset, I must admit that this sample of two people is laughably unscientific. Okay, let us make the sample bigger then by adding in Arvind Kejriwal. LOL.

He may be a pathetic clown-like figure today, but he did try. And while AAP still mattered, it was one of the most poisonous forces ever created in Indian politics.

While this is still (highly) anecdotal and we have no hard data about how our bureaucrats think, I believe there might be some structural problems here.

Let me insert another anecdote here. A few months ago, a young niece of mine who wanted to study to be a lawyer, joined up for a coaching institute to help her clear the CLAT (Common Law Admission Test). I was shocked to hear that the institute had asked her to read The Telegraph regularly to help her chances! I don’t think we can blame the private coaching institute. They know what kind of “information” is needed to answer the questions on the competitive exam.

This is a structural ecosystem problem. Questions in a wide variety of subjects like political science, current affairs, etc can be tilted towards a certain worldview. The UPSC even has an interview, which makes the subjectivity component at least 10 times worse. An officer doesn’t even need to do this deliberately, the bias can easily be unconscious. It is not even humanly possible to be unbiased. So the Congress worldview will dominate simply due to the fact that they have been in power for 6 decades. And I am sure there are going to be bad people within the system who will try to structure the process to suit candidates of their left-liberal worldview.

A Sangh Parivar education group recently pointed out that some 90% of UPSC qualifiers are from an English language background, which shows how absurdly unrepresentative the crop of IAS officers is. But the UPSC exam paper is provided in several languages, is it not? But the very fact that the paper is drafted in English and then translated puts non-English speaking candidates at a disadvantage. If this is possible, imagine how easily political bias can be sneaked into the system.

What is the solution to this? If you ask me, the ideal solution is quite drastic: simply get rid of the IAS.

In fact, I believe keeping the IAS was one of the worst decisions that independent India ever made. The Indian Civil Service was created by a colonial power with the express purpose of keeping people in check. In order to make sure that Indians don’t raise their heads too much.

While this may have worked splendidly for the Empire, it does not meet the needs nor the aspirations of a sovereign nation. To imagine that the same civil servants, with their same British protocols, will suddenly go from keeping people down to lifting them up, is ridiculous. Everyone in India knows that IAS officers are like “gods.” Which is a disaster?
An IAS officer does not create wealth. An IAS officer does not do anything innovative, nor come up with ideas to encourage innovation. An IAS officer merely enforces policy decisions from the top. But yeah, they do have the trappings of power: VIP cars, big mansions, many servants and many people begging them for favours.

At worst, we have a crummy old ecosystem that trudges on with loyalty to old Nehruvianism.

At best, we have produced a class of people drunk on power, who take one exam which demands zero creativity. And never forget about how many young people waste their energy trying to crack this exam and achieve elevated status. If the minds of these young people were freed up to do productive things, we could have achieved so much more as a nation.

I do see some hope. The Modi government has opened up lateral entry into civil service positions. I believe these are fixed-term appointments. It’s a small beginning. But you have to realize that for most hidebound bureaucrats, circumventing the holy UPSC exam is sacrilege. In the coming years, I hope to see this grow and grow until the IAS is effectively disbanded, rendered totally irrelevant.

Of course, you are going to have people who will say that such lateral entries will make civil service appointments seem political. Yeah and so what? The civil service was always political all these years. Because human beings are political. The only difference is that the politicization of the civil service was done by faceless elements embedded in an ecosystem under strict secrecy. In reality, we can only choose whether the civil service should be overtly political or covertly political. Which is better?

Adani, Kandla Ports on high alert after Pakistan trained commandos sneak into the Gulf of Kutch

The Adani and Kandla port in Gujarat are on high alert after intelligence input suggested that Pakistan trained commandos have sneaked into the Gulf of Kutch through the Harami Nala Creak Area. On Saturday, the BSF (Border Security Force) had found two Pakistani abandoned boats along the India-Pakistan border in Kutch in the Harami Nala area.

Adani Port issues security advisory (image: @khushiviews on Twitter)
Kandla Port issues security advisory (image: @pbhageria on Twitter)

Both the advisories mention that as per the intelligence inputs, the Pakistani commandos are believed to be trained with underwater attacks. “It is therefore directed to take utmost measures of security and prevent any untoward situation in Gujarat state,” the advisories read.

The advisories further instruct the shipping agents to inform their vessels and report any suspicious activity to marine control station.

Arundhati Roy’s ‘apology’ comes with terms and conditions and a shameless reiteration of her lies, bias and ignorance

Arundhati Roy, the undisputed queen of hate, has been the subject of conversation on social media for all the wrong reasons, as usual. After the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories – J&K and Ladakh, the self-proclaimed ‘liberals’ had a meltdown. Amidst the cacophony of lies and propaganda, a 2011 video of Arundhati Roy went viral, where she could, as usual, be seen deriding India. In the video, she said the Indian State has been at war with its own people and Pakistan has never deployed the military against its own people as India has. She has now issued an ‘apology’ after much outrage.

Her video was shared widely by Pakistanis.


While Pakistan rejoiced, Indians condemned. And condemned in droves. Apart from Indians, Balochistan Liberation Front leader Dr Allah Nazar issued a strong statement condemning Arundhati Roy. He said that Arundhati had displayed her ignorance. He went on to list Pakistan’s atrocities in Balochistan and said that her statements had deeply hurt the sentiments of the oppressed Baloch people. The Dhaka Tribune too published an opinion piece blasting to smithereens her defence of Pakistan.

After the widespread condemnation, Arundhati Roy issued an “apology”. Following is her statement in full as reported by various media outlets. Some interesting portions are being highlighted in red.

As tensions rise to dangerous levels between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, a nine-year-old video clip has surfaced on the social media, in which while speaking of the endless wars the Indian government has waged against its own people, I seem to be saying that Pakistan has never deployed its army against its “own” people the way India has. We all, at some point in our lives, might inadvertently say something thoughtless or stupid. This tiny clip of the video in no way represents what I believe, or indeed what I have written over the years. I am a writer, and what I commit to words is far more important than what I might say extempore in the course of a freewheeling talk. Still, It is a matter of enormous consequence and I apologize for any momentary confusion the clip may have caused.

My views on what the Government of Pakistan is doing in Balochistan and the genocide that the Pakistan Army committed in Bangladesh have never been ambiguous and have always been a part of my writing. Here, in order to keep it short, are two small examples.

In my novel The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, published in 2017, one of the main characters, an Indian Intelligence officer, Biplab Dasgupta aka Garson Hobart, who has served in Kashmir, says:

“It’s true we did—we do— some terrible things in Kashmir, but… I mean what the Pakistan Army did in East Pakistan—now that was a clear case of genocide. Open and shut. When the Indian Army liberated Bangladesh, the good old Kashmiris called it—still call it—the ‘Fall of Dhaka.’ They aren’t very good at other peoples’ pain. But then, who is? The Baloch, who are being buggered by Pakistan, don’t care about Kashmiris. The Bangladeshis who we liberated are hunting down Hindus. The good old communists call Stalin’s Gulag a ‘necessary part of revolution’. The Americans are currently lecturing the Vietnamese about human rights. What we have on our hands is a species problem. None of us is exempt.”

In an essay called Walking with the Comrades published in 2010 and republished in June 2019, I wrote:

When Charu Mazumdar famously said, “China’s Chairman is our Chairman and China’s Path is Our Path,” he was prepared to extend it to the point where the Naxalites remained silent while General Yahya Khan committed genocide in East Pakistan (Bangladesh), because, at the time, China was an ally of Pakistan. There was silence too, over the Khmer Rouge and its killing fields in Cambodia. There was silence over the egregious excesses of the Chinese and Russian revolutions. Silence over Tibet.

Given my views on what is happening in Kashmir now, it is not surprising that Hindu Nationalists are rushing to generate outrage over this exciting new/old canard they have dug up about my supposed denial of the genocide in Bangladesh and the deeds of the Pakistan Army in Pakistan. Anybody who has even a passing acquaintance with my writing, will not entertain this idea for even one second. I do not believe that the States of India, Pakistan or Bangladesh are in any way morally superior to one another. In India right now, the architecture of pure fascism is being put into place. Anybody who resists it risks being smeared, trolled, jailed, or beaten down. But it will be resisted.

The portions highlighted in red are the ones that give us a true window into her soul, and a glimpse into just how shrewd, useless, shameless and manipulative this “apology” really is.

First, she reiterates her point that the Indian State has waged a war against its own people. Let us be amply clear here. She has not apologised for her statement deriding the Indian State. She has not retracted her statement about India waging a war against its own people. Since we are on the subject of Kashmir, Roy would do well to remember that it was the Pakistan that sent barbarians knocking at Kashmir’s door in 1947. That Maharaja Hari Singh had famously muttered ‘we have lost Kashmir’ when he heard that Pakistani raiders were swarming in from across the border. It was his forces that had been slaughtered mercilessly, their women raped and killed, children orphaned when they were defeated in Muzaffarabad. In Baramullah, right before the Indian State sent its Army to defeat Pakistan, the barbarians were murdering, raping, plundering, slaughtering. The saga of atrocities began with Pakistan and ends with Pakistan.

Till date, Pakistan has spent money and resources in waging a war against India that bleeds with a thousand cuts. They send their Jihadis to slaughter innocents in the name of Jihad. When Arundhati Roy’s heart bleeds, one must ask, who does it bleed for? The stone-pelting mobs who are paid by Pakistan? The separatists who live in plush houses, send their kids abroad for an education but demand that poor mothers sacrifice their sons to Jihad in Kashmir? The terrorists who pick up weapons, weapons supplied by Pakistan? The Hizbul Mujahideen? Kashmir has a unique problem. Hoards of average Kashmiri citizens want a normal, peaceful life. However, in the areas where terrorists are stronger, they support the terrorists as a method of survival. Where the Indian Army is stronger, they support the Indian Army. When Roy speaks of the average Kashmir and glosses over the Pakistan sponsored terrorists, is it her measured contention that the average Kashmiri should forever side with Jihad? Live and die by the gun? What does Arundhati Roy want the Indian State to do, ultimately? Give up its head to save its limb?

Arundhati Roy is a writer and has the ability to dress her separatism up as intellectualism. What she truly wants is for India to roll over and perish. Her untruthfulness when dealing with the Kashmir issue itself proves it. India will not. Whether she retracts her statement or not.

Further, as Pakistan has reposed their faith in Arundhati Roy and Rahul Gandhi, Roy too takes her cue from Rahul and blames her shenanigans on the perils of a ‘freewheeling, extempore talk’. A sham excuse, to say the least. She has been spewing venom for decades and this video of hers was no different from her stated positions earlier.

Next, Arundhati Roy, to substantiate her lie that she has spoken against Pakistan government’s atrocities in the past, quotes a passage from her fiction book released in 2017. In that passage itself, the so-called Army officer first ‘admits’ to the Indian State doing ‘terrible things’ in Kashmir. Then, goes on to, as if to defend the supposed atrocities, cite how Pakistan committed genocide and the Bangladeshi Muslims are now killing Hindus.

What does it say about a political commentator and a self-proclaimed human rights activist if they can’t point towards one speech, one serious article, research paper, interview etc where they seriously and genuinely spoke of the thousands and millions being slaughtered by Pakistan in Balochistan? What does it say when the so-called activist has to rely on fiction, that too, a passage that seems like a fictitious Indian Army officer defending the supposed atrocities committed by the Indian State in Kashmir? Dr Allah Nazar, the chief of BLF has spoken to OpIndia in details about the atrocities committed by Pakistan in Balochistan. Pakistan has even used F16s in Balochistan. They have raped, plundered, looted, killed, abducted, slaughtered men, women and children. All Arundhati Roy could do, was point towards a passage, written against India, in a fiction book.

As the second example, she quotes an essay she had written in OutLook where she had defended Naxalites and Maoists and called them ‘Gandhian with guns’. In the one line that she has quoted that mentions the atrocities by Yahya Khan, what she doesn’t mention is that immediately after that, she also defends Charu Mazumdar as a flame that kept the ‘movement of revolution’ burning.

She writes:

And yet, despite these terrifying contradictions, Charu Mazumdar was a visionary in much of what he wrote and said. The party he founded (and its many splinter groups) has kept the dream of revolution real and present in India. Imagine a society without that dream. For that alone, we cannot judge him too harshly. Especially not while we swaddle ourselves with Gandhi’s pious humbug about the superiority of “the non-violent way” and his notion of trusteeship: “The rich man will be left in possession of his wealth, of which he will use what he reasonably requires for his personal needs and will act as a trustee for the remainder to be used for the good of society.” How strange it is, though, that the contemporary tsars of the Indian Establishment—the State that crushed the Naxalites so mercilessly—should now be saying what Charu Mazumdar said so long ago: China’s Path is Our Path. Upside Down. Inside Out.

Defending the violent, AK 47 bearing Left-Wing terrorists, Arundhati Roy writes in the same article:

At dawn, I say goodbye to Comrade Madhav and Joori, to young Mangtu and all the others. Comrade Chandu has gone to organise the bikes and will come with me to the main road. Comrade Raju isn’t coming (the climb would be hell on his knees). Comrade Niti (Most Wanted), Comrade Sukhdev, Kamla and five others will take me up the hill. As we start walking, Niti and Sukhdev casually but simultaneously unclick the safety catches of their AKs. It’s the first time I’ve seen them do that. We’re approaching the ‘Border’. “Do you know what to do if we come under fire?” Sukhdev asks casually, as though it was the most natural thing in the world. “Yes,” I said, “immediately declare an indefinite hunger strike.” He sat down on a rock and laughed. We climbed for about an hour. Just below the road, we sat in a rocky alcove, completely concealed, like an ambush party, listening for the sound of the bikes. When it comes, the farewell must be quick. Lal Salaam Comrades. When I looked back, they were still there. Waving. A little knot. People who live with their dreams, while the rest of the world lives with its nightmares. Every night I think of this journey. That night sky, those forest paths. I see Comrade Kamla’s heels in her scuffed chappals, lit by the light of my torch. I know she must be on the move. Marching, not just for herself, but to keep hope alive for us all. 

The word ‘Gandhian’ was used 5 times in the article where she sat, dined and praised her ‘comrades’ with AK 47s.

As an aside, it must be remembered that the Charu Mazumdar she heaps praise on in this article in a convicted Naxal. He was the founder of the violent, armed “struggle” against the Indian State. The romanticisation of the violent, blood-soaked Naxalbari ‘movement‘ has not stopped, and Arundhati Roy is one of the tools who furthers that propaganda.

Interestingly, while trying to defend herself and assert that she did indeed condemn Pakistan’s atrocities in Balochistan, she terms it, in her ‘apology’, as “Pakistan Army’s deeds in Pakistan’. Anyone who truly understands history or understands the struggle of the Baloch people know that they don’t consider themselves to be a part of Pakistan. They have, repeatedly, called the province “Occupied Balochistan”. Arundhati Roy does not acknowledge their struggle and that fact. In essence, the reference to Balochistan is hogwash and does not reflect what she truly believes.

She then spews her regular venom against ‘Hindu Nationalists’ and says that India has a fascist regime. Nothing new. This is the propaganda spread by hundreds and has been rebutted, time and again, to no avail. However, what she forgets to mention is that it is not the ‘Hindu Nationalists’ who used “dug up” the clip this time, it is Pakistan who is using her video to deride India. In her statement, the condemnation due to Pakistan is missing, obviously. She also forgets that several people from Congress itself have thrown her under the bus and are condemning her statements.

Arundhati Roy’s “apology” was a mockery of the Indian State and Indians. She reiterated her ignorance and prejudices, she reinforced her propaganda against India, Hindus, the Indian Army and re-proclaimed her love for Naxals, Pakistan and the section of Muslims that wield guns and bombs. While she proclaims her concern for Muslims, she obviously forgets an Aurangzeb who died at the hands of Pakistan terrorists and the scores of men of honour who have laid their lives down in the service of Bharat. All she does is propagate a violent theory that manically wants India to bleed.

India will not bleed. India will live on. We will survive. Regardless of elements like Arundhati Roy.

The Tirupati temple employment of non-Hindus controversy explained

Andhra Pradesh Chief Secretary L V Subramanyam recently announced that non-Hindu employees working in Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD), which manages the Sri Venkateswara temple atop Tirumala hill, one of the richest Hindu temples, will be sacked.

He added that those who had converted their religion while in employment, it is fine as it is their choice. However, they shall not be allowed to continue with their employment, he had added. Subramanyam had said that their continuing their employment will hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus. He even added that surprise inspections would be conducted at the residence of those working with TTD if needed. There have been reports suggesting that the vigilance wing of the TTD has already started identifying non-Hindu employees.

Last week, after facing severe flak from the Hindu pilgrims for the advertisements of Jerusalem and Hajj pilgrimage on Tirupati Bus tickets, the administration had withdrawn the tickets and ordered probe. Andhra Pradesh CM YSR Jaganmohan Reddy was on the receiving end of criticism and the fact that he is a Christian fuelled it further. The BJP in the state and other smaller organisations have criticised that when YSR Jaganmohan Reddy’s father was the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh between 2004 and 2009 over two terms, the Christian evangelists were given a free hand in Tirupati. Moreover, YS Reddy also used to go to Jerusalem for pilgrimage before election results. In fact, back in 2009, Andhra Pradesh had also announced subsidy for pilgrimage to Jerusalem.

However, this controversy is not new. In January 2018, a video had surfaced when a senior temple official was seen visiting a church. An inquiry was ordered which led to revelation that the lady officer who had visited the church was appointed in 1986 whereas the order banning recruitment of non-Hindus in temple administration was passed in 1989.

In 2007, another order also banned employment of non-Hindus in educational institutions run by the TTD. Despite the orders, there were reports that over 40 non-Hindus were appointed for managing the affairs of the temple.

In 2018, following the video controversy, 44 non-Hindu employees were identified and removed from religious duties. They were given non-religious profiles like that of gardener, driver, etc. This decision was challenged in the High Court and they secured a stay on the order in February 2018. The stay order is still in place.

It is believed that the new order by the Jaganmohan Reddy government seems to be a ‘damage control’ after the Jerusalem ads on bus tickets to Tirumala.

Kashmir updates: Mobile phone services restored in 5 districts of Jammu, CPI(M)’s Sitaram Yechury leaves for Srinagar

0

Mobile services, which have been cut off across Jammu and Kashmir since August 5 have been restored in five districts in Jammu: Doda, Kishtwar, Ramban, Rajouri and Poonch. The communication blockage was in place following the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu & Kashmir and subsequent bifurcation of the state into two union territories of Ladakh and Jammu & Kashmir.

CPIM leader Sitaram Yechury today morning left for Srinagar after the Supreme Court allowed him to visit Jammu & Kashmir, not as a party leader to do politics but to meet his party leader Yousuf Tarigami as a friend and not for any political purpose. The SC asked Yechury not to use the visit for political purpose and refrain from raising any issues other than the health and safety of Tarigami. He has also been asked to submit a report to the SC upon his return.

Yechury was also a part of the delegation of opposition leaders who had travelled to Srinagar and were sent back from the airport recently. On Saturday, former Congress President Rahul Gandhi led a delegation of opposition leaders to Srinagar. However, they were sent back from the airport due to restrictions being in place.

Amit Shah proposes National Police University, Forensic Science University, and undergraduate degree in Policing in affiliated colleges across India

Home Amit Shah has proposed to start an undergraduate degree program in policing, to groom future police forces properly. He has proposed setting up National Police University and Forensic Science University in the country, and their affiliated colleges in every state.

While addressing the 49th Foundation Day of Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPRD) as Chief Guest in New Delhi on August 28, the home minister revealed that a proposal for same will be soon tabled with the cabinet. He said that to bring changes to the internal security mechanism in the country, National Police University and Forensic Science University will set up at a national level. These universities will have affiliated colleges in all the states, which will offer undergraduate degree program in policing. Students who want to pursue a career in the police or any of the central armed forces will be able to join the bachelor degree courses in these colleges after the 12th class.

The Home Minister said that if a student decides to join security forces as a career, joining an art, commerce or science course does not benefit them much. Now such youths will be able to join the police courses at the undergraduate level.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGAgrl_EZWE]

Amit Shah informed that BPRD has prepared a proposal for police colleges, which will be presented before the cabinet soon and a decision on this will be taken by the government. He also said that BPRD also needs to work towards Forensic Science University and Forensic Science colleges at a fast pace. Amit Shah said that the current conviction rate for crimes in the country is very low, which is unsustainable. He said that to increase the conviction rate, the investigations much have the support of forensic science.

The Home Minister said that the government may decide to make use of forensic science in some crimes, for example in every crime having a punishment of 7 years jail term. Buy only making that rule will not be enough, we will need manpower, which is not available at present. So, first manpower will have to be created. Forensic Science University will be able to solve this problem by creating students and officers in the field of forensic science. He said no student who has completed courses in existing forensic science colleges are unemployed, which means there is enough demand for experts in the field.

Commenting on the changing role of police from British era to today, Amit Shah said that while earlier the primary function of police was to maintain the stability of the British empire, Sardar Patel brought forth a new paradigm for Indian police system after independence. Today the primary objective of police is to serve people and protect their rights.

Shah emphasized the need for police modernization in a changing era filled with new challenges. He also remembered the 34,800 police personnel who laid their lives in the line of duty to keep India safe from internal security threats.

The Home Minister also called for a countrywide consultative process to make changes in IPC and CrPC.

Union Cabinet gives nod to set up 75 new Medical Colleges, total seats in new medical colleges go up to 15,700

The Union Cabinet today gave its nod to set up additional 75 Government Medical Colleges across the country by the year 2021-22. The decision was taken in the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs meeting that was presided over by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.


These colleges will be established with existing district/referral hospitals under Phase-III of the ongoing Centrally Sponsored scheme.

The new medical colleges would be set up in under-served areas which have no medical college at present, and which have at least 200 bedded District Hospital. Preference will be given to Aspirational Districts and District Hospital having 300 beds.

Alongside the schemes that were approved in a bid to expand the accessibility of healthcare infrastructure and human resources, the Cabinet also approved an amount of Rs. 24,375 crore during the 15th Finance Commission period through the year 2021-22.

“The establishment of new Medical Colleges attached with existing District/Referral Hospitals, would lead to an increase in the availability of qualified health professionals, improve tertiary care in Government sector, utilize existing infrastructure of districts hospitals and promote affordable medical education in the country,” read the official government statement.

The government aims to set up the new medical colleges in under-served areas that have no medical college. The plan is to build at least 200 bedded District Hospital in such locations. The government will give preference to Aspirational Districts and District Hospital having 300 beds.

The government has its focus hinged on creating health care infrastructure and had earlier approved to set up 58 new Medical Colleges attached to existing district/referral hospitals under Phase-I and 24 under Phase-II. With the 75 proposes hospitals, the total 157 new hospitals will add at least 15,700 seats for medical students in the country.

Out of this, 39 medical colleges under Phase-I, have already started functioning, while the remaining 19 would be made functional by 2020-21. Under Phase-II, 18 new medical colleges have been approved.

Jammu and Kashmir: Investor summit scheduled to be held for the first time in October postponed to November

0

The Investor Summit which was to be held for the first time ever in Jammu and Kashmir in the month of October has now be postponed by a month. The summit which was supposed to happen on October 12-14, 2019, will now take place around November 8.

There is also a press conference expected by Governor Satya pal Malik shortly where he is expected to officially make this announcement.

The Modi-led government is trying to push a development drive in Jammu and Kashmir since it successfully revoked Article 370 in the valley. In its endeavour to do so, a special developmental plan for Jammu & Kashmir had been worked out which included the setting up of industries, state of the art educational institutes, healthcare facilities etc.

Keeping the development in J&K in mind, the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII) President, eminent banker Uday Kotak has announced an investor’s summit in J&K in October, in which major industrial groups are expected to participate and unveil concrete ideas for investment in sectors including hospitality, pharmaceuticals, agro-processing and healthcare.

The State Administrative Council (SAC) which met under the chairmanship of Jammu and Kashmir Governor Satya Pal Malik, accorded sanction to the holding of J&K Investor Summit, 2019. The event was to begin in Srinagar on 12 October. It was being told that more than 2000 investors would be invited to this program. The honour ceremony associated with this was to be held in Jammu on 14 October.

But, considering the present situation in the valley, the Government has decided to delay the summit by a month. Though normalcy has been steadily returning back to the valley, the Government probably wants to wait until conditions become absolutely normal in the valley.

At the beginning of the month, according to a statement by the Jammu district Deputy Magistrate Sushma Chauhan, Section 144 (against a gathering of more than 4 people) had been withdrawn from Jammu municipal limits. All school and colleges were set to open from August 10.

The section 144 was already relaxed in Udhampur district where schools opened on August 9 after remaining closed for 5 days. The markets were also opening from 11 AM to 5 PM, and the administration had informed that section 144 will be lifted gradually.

The people in the valley who were confined indoors during the first few days since Article 370 was repealed in the valley, gradually moved out of their houses and started normal daily life. Residents dwelling there had welcomed the audacious decision of the Narendra Modi government, which will transform the future of Jammu and Kashmir.

Maoists shot dead RSS Pracharak in Chattisgarh, leave pamphlet on the spot to terrorise villagers

Suspected Maoists have shot dead a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) activist Dadu Singh Koratiya in Konde village of Kanker district of Chattisgarh. Located about 200 kms from the state capital Raipur, Kanker, is one of the seven most affected districts of Bastar in the state.

As per the reports, police on Wednesday said that Singh, a RSS pracharak, was killed by suspected Maoists as a pamphlet was found at the crime scene. Singh was shot with a pistol and his body has been sent for post-mortem.

“We are investigating the actual motive behind the killing and whether the person killed was from RSS background”, K L Dhruv, SP Kanker said. Dhruv asserted that the left-wing terrorists have been pushed to the backfoot due to various successful operations against them in the past. He further added that this crime is their attempt to instil fear amongst the villagers.

The police have already launched a search operation in the area.

The pamphlet, which was found at the crime scene, was left by the North Bastar Divisional Committee (CPI, Maoist), wherein Koratiya has been referred to as an active RSS pracharak and an antagonist to the interests of Dalits and tribals.

“He was killed owing to his involvement in anti-tribal activities and we warn the senior leaders and workers of the BJP and the RSS to desist from such activities,” read the letter.

The police said that Koratiya was called outside his house wherein the Maoist shot him with a pistol from a close range. Last year, Koratiya had escaped an attack on his life by Maoists on the eve of Independence Day at the time he was visiting his farmland. This year, however, he succumbed to the left-wing extremism.

ED summons Congress leader Ahmed Patel’s son Faisal Patel in Sterling Biotech bank fraud case

The Enforcement Directorate has summoned Faisal Patel, son of senior Congress leader Ahmed Patel, in the Sterling Biotech money laundering case. Faisal Patel is being probed by the ED for his links with the Sandesara brothers, the owners of the pharmaceutical company, who are accused in a ₹5,000 crore fraud case.


The ED has asked Faisal Patel tor appear for questioning on Thursday.

On July 30 this year, the ED had also grilled Ahmed Patel’s son-in-law and advocate Irfan Siddiqui in connection with the case.

Sterling Biotech is under investigation as it had taken a loan worth Rs. 5,000 crores from a consortium of banks including Andhra Bank, but the loan has turned into a non-performing asset (NPA). According to ED, the Sandesara group allegedly cheated several banks and its total outstanding against banks and investors may go beyond Rs 10,000 crore.

As per the chargesheet filed in the case, owners of Sterling Group, Nitin Sandesara and Chetan Sandesara, had floated close to 300 shell companies to fraudulently move and layer the loan money abroad.

During the probe by ED, the group’s links with Ahmed Patel was revealed. Several persons questioned by ED in relation with the case had revealed the involvement of Ahmed Patel, his son, Faisal Patel, and his son-in-law, Irfan Siddiqui in the scam.

Sunil Yadav, an employee of the Sandesara group, had said that he had handed over cash to Faisal Patel’s chauffeur and that the cash was to be delivered to Ahmed Patel’s son on behalf of Chetan Sandesara.

The CBI had booked Sterling Biotech, its directors and senior officials, and some unidentified persons in connection with the alleged bank fraud case. The FIR alleged that the total pending dues of the group companies were Rs 5,383 crore as on December 31, 2016.