Thursday, November 14, 2024
Home Blog Page 5459

Human rights, vigilance cells: Defence Minister approves major decisions on reorganisation of Army headquarters

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Human rights, vigilance cells: Defence Minister approves major decisions on reorganisation of Army headquarters

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has given his approval to a series of decisions regarding the re-organisation of the Indian Army Headquarters. This approval will now promote major transformations in the administration of the Indian Army.


According to the Ministry of defence officials, these measures are part of four studies being undertaken by the Army for force restructuring and transformation.

The Indian Armed forces are the second-largest military force in the world in terms of size. Moreover, the Indian Armed Forces are considered to be the world’s fifth-most powerful military and have the world’s fourth-largest defence budget.

Though the Indian Army essentially remains a force largely organised, equipped and trained to fight wars, the current decisions have been taken to better prepare the forces to take on the security challenges of the future.

To meet the needs and challenges of the future our Army needs to continuously upgrade and replace its ageing inventory of weapons and equipment while also restructuring and right-sizing in a transformational way.

Keeping this in view, the Raksha Mantri office in a series of Tweets listed the various decision taken in regards to the re-organisation of Army headquarters.

  • A separate Vigilance Cell under COAS with Tri-Services representation has been planned. Until now, the vigilance function for the COAS is through multiple agencies and there is no single point interface.
  • An independent vigilance cell will be made functional under COAS. Accordingly, ADG (Vigilance) will be placed directly under the COAS for this purpose. It will have three Colonel-level officers (one each from the Indian Army, Indian Air Force, and Indian Navy).
  • An umbrella organisation under VCOAS for enhanced focus on human rights issues, to give high priority to the observance of human rights convention and values, it has been decided to set up a special Human Rights Section headed by ADG (Maj. Gen rank officer) directly under the VCOAS.
  • It will be the nodal point to examine any Human Rights violation reports. To enhance transparency and ensure that best of investigative expertise is available to the section, a Police officer of SSP/SP rank will be taken on deputation.
  • Re-location of 206 Army Officers from AHQ to Formations/Units of the Field Army – A total of 206 officers will be optimized from AHQ and these officers will be made available additionally to Formations/Units of the Field Army.

Similarly, understanding the need to modernise the Indian armed forces, PM Modi had on Independence Day announced the creation of a Chief of Defence Staff, the senior-most military officer. The Chief of Defence Staff will act as a single place defence advisor to the central government. The officer will be the head of the three services – the Army, Air Force and Navy, and it is reported that CDS will be a five-star military officer. The service chiefs are four-star officers.

At present, India is the only major country which does not have a chief of defence staff. The modalities of the creation of this post will be completed in the next 2-3 months. According to speculations in media, current Chief of Army Staff General Bipin Rawat could be appointed as the first Chief of Defence Staff of India.

One BSF jawan killed and another injured in clashes with cattle smugglers along Bangladesh border

OpIndia Staff
-
0
One BSF jawan killed and another injured in clashes with cattle smugglers along Bangladesh border

Two separate skirmishes between cattle smugglers and security forces along the Bangladesh border in Assam and West Bengal has led to the death of a BSF soldier and critical injury to another jawan respectively.

The incident along the Assam-Bangladesh border, in which a BSF jawan lost his life, took place on Sunday when Inspector Sanjay Kumar Sadhu fell into the Brahmaputra river in Dhubri while chasing cattle smugglers. Sadhu, 35, belonged to the sixth battalion of the Border Security Force. The inspector, native of Vadodara district in Gujarat, is survived by his wife, two daughters and a son, a senior official said. The wide Brahmaputra river in Dhubri district in Assam is a preferred route of smugglers and illegal immigrants. Although the river is patroled at the border, it is so wide that security forces are evaded by transpassers.

In another incident, where jawan was critically injured pertains to Gobardah border post in southern region of West Bengal. The incident happened on Tuesday where constable Anand Oran was attacked by a group of cattle smugglers while he was on the patrol. When the constable caught one of the smugglers, in the ensuing combat, the smuggler pressed the trigger of the pump action gun held by the jawan. The jawan, Oran, suffered pellet injuries in his stomach and collapsed. He belongs to the 153rd battalion.

The other members in the patrol team rescued Oran and caught the Bangladeshi smuggler, Minto Sardar of Satkhira district. Along with Sardar, 10 cattle heads were also seized in his possession. According to the officials, the constable is in a serious condition.

The porous border along Bangladesh is often used by cattle smugglers to illegally transport cattle from India to Bangladesh. Recently, the BSF discovered a new method adopted by smugglers to smuggle cattle across the border. Smugglers are using flooded rivers to send cattle to the other side. It is estimated that thousands of cattle are smuggled every year to Bangladesh through the 2216 KM long porous border.

CJI’s bench rises for the day, Chidambaram’s plea to be heard by SC on Friday

OpIndia Staff
-
0
CJI’s bench rises for the day, Chidambaram’s plea to be heard by SC on Friday

Former Union minister P Chidambaram’s plea at the SC against the Delhi HC order rejecting his appeal for interim protection from arrest will be heard by the apex court on Friday.


Earlier today, the SC has refused to pass an order over Chidambaram’s plea and has stated that the matter will be placed before CJI Ranjan Gogoi.

Chidambaram’s legal team had tried its best to list the matter today before CJI Gogoi’s bench as the CJI was busy hearing the Ram Janmabhoomi case. At 4.30 pm, CJI’s bench rose for the day without the Chidambaram’s legal counsel mentioning his petition.

Earlier today, Chidambaram’s legal team with prominent Congress leader Kapil Sibal and senior advocate Vivek Tankha had petitioned to justice NV Ramana for immediate relief to Chidambaram.

Justice NV Ramana had refused to list the matter and asked Chidambaram to mention the matter before Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi. Congress leader and senior advocate Kapil Sibal had rushed to the CJI court. Meanwhile, the Ayodhya case hearing had begun and there had been no mention of Chidambaram case till late afternoon.

Earlier today, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) had filed a caveat in the Supreme Court asking the court to keep them in the loop in response to a petition filed by P Chidambaram seeking protection from arrest. The Central Bureau of Investigation has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court which said, “Let nothing be done without notice to us.”

It has now been almost 24 hours since the former Union Finance and Home Minister has been absconding. The CBI and the ED have also issued a lookout circular against Chidambaram.

The Congress leader and former Union Minister is facing arrest for his alleged involvement in the INX Media scam.

Update: A bench of Justice R Banumathi and Justice AS Bopanna will hear the petition filed by P Chidambaram against the Delhi High Court order rejecting the anticipatory bail plea.

Granting illegal FIPB clearance to receive kickbacks paid through shell companies: Read about P Chidambaram’s modus operandi

K Bhattacharjee
-
0
Granting illegal FIPB clearance to receive kickbacks paid through shell companies: Read about P Chidambaram’s modus operandi

Former Union Minister for Home and Finance, P. Chidambaram, is in a tight spot. He has been running from pillar to post in order to secure bail, however, the Judiciary doesn’t appear to be in a mood to award him special privileges on this occasion.

Investigative authorities believe that they have a solid case against the senior Congress leader. He is an accused in the INX Media scam and faces allegations of corruption and money laundering. OpIndia.com has now learnt from government sources the details on proceedings against Chidambaram.

As per sources, Chidambaram’s modus operandi revolved around granting illegal FIPB clearances to receive kickbacks, often paid through various shell companies floated by his son Karti Chidambaram. There are several such cases, namely, Aircel Maxis, INX Media, Diageo Scotland, Katara Holdings against him. These cases are currently being investigated by the CBI and Enforcement Directorate.

During the course of the investigation, several shell companies of Karti Chidambaram, registered in India and abroad were identified. In one of these companies, deposits of more than Rs 300 crores were made. A shell company that belongs to Karti Chidambaram has also allegedly received huge payments from a company located in British Virgin Island which had figured in the Panama Papers as well.

The shareholders and directors of a shell company have made their Will of transferring entire their shareholding of the said company to the granddaughter of P. Chidambaram and the executor of the will, as per our sources, is his son, Karti Chidambaram.

Allegedly, the deposits in these shell companies have been used for meeting personal expenditure of the father-son duo, more than two dozen foreign bank accounts have been opened where the money was allegedly deposited and several properties in Malaysia, Spain, UK and other countries were purchased with the said money.

Even though several incriminating documents and emails were seized by the ED and CBI from their premises, P. Chidambaram and his son Karti Chidambaram have been constantly non-cooperative and withholding relevant information, we are told.

Read details of the case against P Chidambaram: Illegal FIPB clearance to six companies and laundering of kickback money

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Read details of the case against P Chidambaram: Illegal FIPB clearance to six companies and laundering of kickback money

Clearing the air over the cases being faced by senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, ED and CBI have said that the INX Media is not the only case that is being investigated by the probe agencies. In a statement, the ED and CBI have informed that P Chidambaram is being probed into illegal FIPB approval granted to several companies, and also money laundering of kickbacks received in return to those FIPB approvals.

The statement says that as a finance minister, P Chidambaram had granted illegal FIPB approval to several companies, which are Aircel Maxis, INX Media, Diageo Scotland Ltd., Katara Holdings, Essar Steel Ltd. and Elforge Ltd. The CBI is investigating the offences of illegal FIPB approvals given in lieu of kickback paid to various shell companies floated by Karti Chidambaram on the name of his employee and other business associates. While ED is probing the money laundering of the kickback and its investments in movable and immovable properties in India and foreign countries.

Refuting the contention of Chidambaram’s lawyers that investigations against P Chidambaram and his son have been completed and there is no need of custodial interrogation, the statement says that investigations are still going on. Chargesheet has been filed only in the Aircel Maxis case, but probe under PMLA under this case is also is not completed yet due to deliberate withholding of information by the Congress leader.

Making an explosive revelation, the statement says that both P Chidambaram and Karti Chidambaram are owners of several shell companies used to launder money and route foreign investments. It says that the official shareholders and directors of a main shell company have made Will of transferring entire shareholding of the shell company to both of them.

ED and CBI have said that money parked in the shell companies have used for the personal expenditure of the Chidambaram family, opening more than 2 dozen foreign bank accounts and depositing money in them, purchasing several immovable properties in different countries like Malaysia, UK, Spain etc.

The shell company of Sh. Karti P. Chidambaram has also received huge payments from a company located in the British Virgin Islands and this company is figured in Panama Papers.

The statement alleges that even though several incriminating document and emails were seized by ED ad CBI during search operation from the premises of P. Chidambaram and Karti P. Chidambaram, both the accused have not cooperated during interrogation and have deliberately refused to divulge any information about their investments in foreign bank account and immovable properties located in several other countries.

Noting that both of them are on anticipatory bail since the beginning of 2018, the probe agencies say that non-cooperation in providing information is delaying the completion of the investigation. They are not divulging required information despite having personal knowledge about the same, and therefore the agencies have to use a time-consuming process to gather data, by issuing LRs to several foreign jurisdictions.

Both CBI and ED could not get a chance to interrogate Sh. P. Chidambaram in their custody as permitted under the law due to anticipatory bails granted to the accused on multiple occasions, the statement adds.

Yesterday the Delhi High Court rejected anticipatory bail plea of P Chidambaram, and the Supreme Court also refused to urgently hear his requesting seeking interim protection from arrest, as the petition had defects, and the CJI was busy with the Ayodhya case hearing. He has been missing since yesterday while ED and CBI have issued lookout circulars for him.

After filing a new FIR in money laundering case, CBI conducts raids at NDTV’s former CEO Vikram Chandra house

OpIndia Staff
-
0
After filing a new FIR in money laundering case, CBI conducts raids at NDTV’s former CEO Vikram Chandra house

Trouble seems to be mounting for NDTV as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conducts search operation at NDTV’s former CEO Vikram Chandra house. Vikram Chandra along with NDTV founders, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy have been charged in a case related to money laundering. CBI alleged that the accused violated Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rules.


This development comes soon after CBI filed a new FIR on Wednesday against NDTV and its founders, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, apart from former CEO Vikram Chandra and unknown public servants for alleged criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption in a case of an alleged violation of FDI norms.

According to the FIR, accessed by OpIndia.com, it is a case of tax evasion and how certain income tax officers colluded with them to help them evade justice.

It is further alleged that the accused floated subsidiaries in tax haven destinations to route foreign funds to India through sham transactions. It is also alleged that the proceeds of corruption of unknown public servants were invested in NDTV.

The news channel has now issued a statement over it. In its statement, NDTV has again claimed that it is an attack on press freedom and called the charges “fabricated”. NDTV also claimed that investigative agencies have not found any evidence of corruption against them.

NDTV founders Prannoy Roy and his wife, Radhika Roy, were earlier prevented from leaving the country recently, the channel claims. In a statement published on its website, the channel has called it a ‘subversion of media freedom’.

While NDTV cries hoarse about ‘freedom of the press’ being curbed, the allegations of financial impropriety against Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the promoters of NDTV are extremely grave. More importantly, judicial bodies and statutory investigation agencies have found them in violation of major laws and in some cases held them guilty of fraud, manipulation and use of “deceptive financial instruments” to hide real ownership of NDTV. The full details of the NDTV-ICICI case can be read here. 

Not a satire: Parody country Pakistan has a ‘Ministry of Human Rights’, the ministry is now whining against Priyanka Chopra

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Not a satire: Parody country Pakistan has a ‘Ministry of Human Rights’, the ministry is now whining against Priyanka Chopra

Pakistan has reduced itself to an international joke after its juvenile rants and shameful tantrums failed to generate even an iota of international support. The country, its diplomats, and even its government have been continuously exposing their insecure, and the obsessive tendency of issuing empty threats and imaginary bravado after India stripped the Article 370 and bifurcated the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two UTs.

After exhausting their stock of whiny appeals and idiotic rants against India on social media, the sad excuse of a country is now attempting to vent its frustrations on an Indian actress who happens to be a UN goodwill ambassador.

Pakistan has a Ministry of Human rights. Surprising as it may sound, the concerned minister who has apparently been deaf and blind to all the human rights violations in their own country, has appealed to the UN and whined against Priyanka Chopra.


In a letter to the UNICEF chief Henrietta Forte, Pakistan’s Minister of Human Rights Shireen Mazari has alleged that the Indian government is carrying out a campaign of ethnic cleansing of Kashmiri Muslims and running ‘Nazi’ style detention centres in Assam. She has further taken words from her boss Imran Khan’s tweets and blamed the Modi government for things such as ‘genocide’, ‘fascism’ and ‘racism’.

Mazari has further claimed that Priyanka Chopra, the Bollywood actress who now lives mostly in the USA with her husband Nick Jonas, has been supporting all this and also has supported the ‘nuclear threat to Pakistan made by India’s defence minister. Mazari has further alleged that the UN allowing Priyanka to be a goodwill ambassador despite all this is undermining the credibility of the United Nations.

Mazari has urged the UNICEF chief to ‘denotify’ Chopra as a UN goodwill ambassador.

It is notable here that recently a Muslim woman of Pakistani origin had accused Priyanka Chopra of supporting a nuclear war against Pakistan at an event in the US.

The woman’s rant against Priyanka was also based on Priyanka’s tweet in support of Indian Armed Forces that said ‘Jai Hind’ after the Indian Air Force has bombed a terrorist camp inside Pakistan’s Balakot in February. She had also accused Priyanka of supporting a ‘nuclear war’ against Pakistan.


The Pakistani minister has now mixed the woman’s accusations against Priyanka and clubbed it with a recent statement of India’s defence minister Rajnath Singh where he had stated that India’s nuclear policy of ‘No First Use’ may be changed in future if the situation demands.

It is rather a sad spectacle that the Pakistani government has based their argument over a months-old tweet that said ‘Jai Hind’ praising the Indian Air Force and is now trying to pull its resources to oust an actress from the position of a UN goodwill ambassador.

It is not even the first time that the Pakistanis have tried to vent their frustrations on Priyanka Chopra. Back when she had tweeted in IAF’s support, there were also demands from Pakistan to oust her from the UN goodwill ambassador list.

Priyanka Chopra, whose earnings from movies and endorsement deals might as well be greater than Pakistan’s annual budget for many of its ministeries, is yet to issue any statement over the issue.

NDTV sings an old tune: Calls charges in new FIR ‘fabricated’, claims it’s not about NDTV but ‘larger battle’ of freedom of press

OpIndia Staff
-
0
NDTV sings an old tune: Calls charges in new FIR ‘fabricated’, claims it’s not about NDTV but ‘larger battle’ of freedom of press

CBI has filed a new FIR on Wednesday against NDTV and its founders, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, apart from former CEO Vikram Chandra and unknown public servants for alleged criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption in a case of an alleged violation of FDI norms.

The news channel has now issued a statement over it. In its statement, NDTV has again claimed that it is an attack on press freedom and called the charges “fabricated”. It said, “As part of the continued persecution of free press, a new CBI case has been filed about a $150 million investment in NDTV’s non-news business by NBCU, then owned by General Electric, a massive American conglomerate. The case makes the ludicrous charge that the transaction, declared to all relevant authorities in the US and India, laundered money for unknown public servants.”

NDTV also claimed that investigative agencies have not found any evidence of corruption against them. It said, “Despite a series of cases in which the investigation is deliberately stalled, agencies have found no evidence of any corruption by NDTV.”

The NDTV claims that the charges are not specifically about the accused but a larger moral battle between Good and Evil. It says, “Attempts to silence free and fair reportage through malicious and fabricated charges will not succeed. This is not about a company or individuals but about a larger battle to maintain the freedom of the press, something which India has always been renowned for.”

People have noted that somehow the media always wants ordinary citizens to believe that allegations of criminal conduct against ’eminent’ media personalities are always about a larger moral battle and never about the specific charges that have been labelled. The full details of the charges that have been labelled in the new FIR can be read here.

NDTV founders Prannoy Roy and his wife, Radhika Roy, were earlier prevented from leaving the country recently, the channel claims. In a statement published on its website, the channel has called it a ‘subversion of media freedom’. NDTV in a statement said that they had been stopped on the basis of a “fake and totally unsubstantiated corruption case” filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation about an ICICI Bank loan that their company, RRPR Holdings, had taken.

The brief statement reads, “They have been stopped from travelling abroad on the basis of a fake and wholly unsubstantiated corruption case initiated by the CBI that was filed two years ago and in which Radhika and Prannoy Roy have been fully cooperating. Today’s action is, along with events like raids on media owners, a warning to the media to fall in line – or else.”

While NDTV cries hoarse about ‘freedom of the press’ being curbed, the allegations of financial impropriety against Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the promoters of NDTV are extremely grave. More importantly, judicial bodies and statutory investigation agencies have found them in violation of major laws and in some cases held them guilty of fraud, manipulation and use of “deceptive financial instruments” to hide real ownership of NDTV. The full details of the NDTV-ICICI case can be read here. 

HC grants 4 weeks to Robert Vadra to file response to ED’s reply in plea to quash money laundering case

OpIndia Staff
-
0
HC grants 4 weeks to Robert Vadra to file response to ED’s reply in plea to quash money laundering case

Congress interim president Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law Robert Vadra has been given 4 weeks to file a response to the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) reply to his petition seeking quashing of certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) by the Delhi high court.

Vadra’s counsel, senior advocate KTS Tulsi sought time from the court to file the rejoinder to ED’s reply and reassured the court that the documents were all but ready. Denying ED’s allegations that Vadra suppressed material facts in the matter, advocate Tulsi said that no such suppression of facts was done by his client.

“They did not provide us with the ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) and then they accuse us of suppressing the facts. They provided me with the ECIR only after the court’s order. I have mentioned everything that was in my knowledge. There has been no suppression of facts on our part,” counsel Tulsi said.

A bench comprising of Justices Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal listed the matter for further hearing on November 18.

Vadra’s close aide Manish Arora has also sought cancelling charges of money laundering. The money laundering case against Manoj Arora was initiated after investigative agencies began probing arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari and confidential defence ministry documents were found in his possession. Following which, one email thread was found from Sanjay Bhandari’s computer, among Monoj Arora, Sanjay Bhandari and Robert Vadra. The email, according to ED, was regarding a London property worth Rs 1.9 million pounds.

As per the ED, Vadra was beneficially controlling the £ 1.9 million London property. Vadra had also allegedly executed renovation work for the same and arranged for funds. Absconding defence dealer Sanjay Bhandari, Vadra’s aide, allegedly purchased the property for £ 1.9 million and sold it to a Vadra-controlled firm for the same amount after allegedly spending £ 65,900 on renovating it. The ED maintained that Bhandari was not the actual owner of the property, but it was beneficially owned by Vadra and accused him of money laundering.

Read full details of new FIR filed by CBI: Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and Vikram Chandra accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Read full details of new FIR filed by CBI: Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and Vikram Chandra accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption

A new FIR has been filed by the CBI against Prannoy Roy, his wife, Radhika Roy, and former CEO of NDTV, Vikram Chandra in a case related to money laundering. It is alleged that the accused violated Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rules.

The FIR has been accessed by OpIndia.com. As per the FIR, it is a case of tax evasion and how certain income tax officers colluded with them to help them evade justice. It is further alleged that the accused floated subsidiaries in tax haven destinations to route foreign funds to India through sham transactions. It is also alleged that the proceeds of corruption of unknown public servants were invested in NDTV.

The FIR alleges that NDTV incorporated Network PLC (NNPLC) in London on 30.11.2006. The FIR states “M/s NNPLC raised fresh funds amounting to USD 100 million through M/s Jefferies lnternational by the issue of step-up coupon convertible bonds in May 2007. ln this transaction M/s Jefferies lnternational had received USD 5.5 Million as commission. M/s NNPLC transferred Rs. 193,98,44,3251- to various subsidiary companies of NDTV Group viz. NDTV imagine Ltd., NDTV LifeStyle Limited, NDTV Emerging Market BV, NDTV Convergence Ltd. & NDTV Labs Limited.”

In the Netherlands, NDTV allegedly floated a company called NDTV lnternational Holding BV on 10th April 2008 in order to raise funds to the tune of $150 million from NBCU, a subsidiary of General Electric (GE) the USA. By investing the said amount in NDTV International Holding, it is alleged that NBCU acquired a 26% indirect shareholding in NNPLC. It is further alleged, “The said amount was further transferred to subsidiaries of NDTV Ltd. incorporated in Mauritius & London & finally the said amount was received in subsidiaries of M/s NDTV such NDTV lmagine Ltd., NDTV Lifestyle, NDry Lab, NDTV convergence, NDTV NGEN and NDTV studio incorporated in India.”

Charges of criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption have been slapped on the accused. The FIR states, “M/s NDTV Ltd. through its promoters viz. Sh. Prannoy Roy and Mrs Radhika Roy, Sh. KVL Naryanan Rao (since expired), Sh. Vikramaditya Chandra had entered into a criminal conspiracy with unknown public servants with the object of bringing tainted money of unknown public servants through a web of complex transactions through the FDI route. The aforesaid acts of omission & commission on the part of Sh. Prannoy Roy, Smt. Radhika Roy, Sh. Vikramaditya Chandra & Sh. KVL Naryanan Rao and unknown public servants & others prima facie disclose the commission of cognizable offences under Indian Criminal Laws.”

The FIR states that NNPLC, London got approval from the FIPB board in violation of the existing FDI provisions. Furthermore, the said amount was invested in various subsidiaries of NDTV through a network of a complex transaction. A case has been registered against NDTV, Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and Vikram Chandra and unknown public servants under sections 120-B IPC r/w 420lPC and Sec 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of PC Act, 1988.

Recently, Prannoy and Radhika Roy were prevented from leaving the country. In a statement, NDTV had called it a subversion of press freedom. There are other grave allegations against the Roys, an FIR was filed against them in June 2017 in the ICICI Loan Fraud Case. The details of the case can be read here.

1...5,4585,4595,460...6,959Page 5,459 of 6,959

Contact: [email protected]

About us

News and opinion website that brings you reports and narrative from a perspective often ignored or suppressed by the mainstream media of India.

Follow us

© OpIndia.com