Friday, November 15, 2024
Home Blog Page 5463

After Delhi HC denied his anticipatory bail, Congress leader P Chidambaram goes into hiding, gives CBI the slip

0

After the Delhi High Court today rejected senior Congress leader P Chidambaram’s anticipatory bail plea, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrived at the former finance minister’s residence to arrest to him. However, the politician gave the investigative agency a slip to evade his arrest.


P Chidambaram is currently untraceable and his whereabouts unknown as the agencies go out looking for him. A 6-member CBI team arrived at Chidambaram’s Jorbagh residence only to find that he is missing. After CBI, the Enforcement Directorate has also reached Chidambaram’s defence colony residence.

Meanwhile. P Chidambaram swiftly moved the Supreme Court challenging the decision of the Delhi High Court which denied him the anticipatory bail. An urgent listing of the petition was sought. The apex court is scheduled to hear Chidambaram’s plea tomorrow afternoon at 3 PM.

Earlier today, the Delhi HC judge while denying P Chidambaram an anticipatory bail made scathing remarks about his role in the INX Media Scam. “Facts of the case prima facie reveal that the petitioner is the kingpin, that is, the key conspirator in this case,” the judge observed.

P Chidambaram is accused in the INX Media scam which involves charges of bribery and lobbying in granting foreign investments worth over Rs 300 crores to INX Media. INX Media was later known as NewsX, it was owned by Peter and Indrani Mukherjee of the sensational Sheena Bora murder case. Chidambaram is accused of misusing his power as the finance minister to grant INX Media an FIPB clearance.

Dear Mao-Lenin crossbreed left-liberal gang, had you done journalism properly, we wouldn’t exist

Yesterday, our editor, Nupur Sharma posted two tweets saying, “They (left-liberal gang) despise us because we wouldn’t exist if they were not incompetent. We are a living example of their failure. If YOU hadn’t sold your pen, we wouldn’t have to pick ours.” ‘What journalism is’, or ‘what it should be’, are the topics of debate in our times, but at the same time, we all know the sorry state of mainstream journalism in India.

Had journalism been good, not even ethical per se, we wouldn’t have to use prefixes like ‘mainstream’ and ‘social’ before ‘media’. Media has to be mainstream. But, social media was branded as such because mainstream was not doing its job. Whether it was a technological limitation, or something else, social media did take its time to flower, but it is this media that has democratised the information, and so the media, in true sense. Nowadays the stalwarts of journalism are being stripped on a daily basis because the Internet never forgets.

What happened post-2014, and what transpired before it, won’t just be a timeline for India’s political landscape, but the pre and post-Modi era will also be known as defining moments of the journalistic landscape of India. In the pre-Modi era, the media, which had sold its soul to Mephistopheles working for Lucifer like Congress, had never entertained the thought of a time when Congress will be out of power and that time will change everything.

That’s why around 2012-13 it was just the tone (of media) that had changed. The 2002 story was repeatedly spun on the golden gramophone. YouTube clip of Modi drinking water on Karan Thapar show was deemed enough to ridicule Modi. They thought the old ways of propaganda, lies and deceit, packaging of hate-filled programmes disguised as ‘political specials’ and anchors convening rallies from studios would be able to halt the inevitable. Modi came as the synonym of inevitable and he came with the numbers to nail the mouths shut.

It was then, in the mid-2014, that the gang of crossbreeds of Mao, Lenin and whatnot, realised just the change in tone won’t be enough, so they relied on Hitler’s ways of propaganda dissemination. It was this time when a new gang of shit-throwing, one-sided media houses, like Quint, Scroll, Wire etc were ejaculated on to prominence fertilising the big eggs from the likes of NDTV and BBC. No wonder they still suckle to their teats for nutrition.

Then the young ones followed the old ways of selling their soul. They hit the ground running with writing propaganda and fake news in English. Please feel free to check it on the ‘fact check’ section of our website. ‘Fake news’ is not merely spreading the wrong news on purpose, even the opinion pieces, columns and one-person’s motivated story fall under fake news where your agenda and the prejudices are used to blacken the pixels as it usually lacks facts and goes full-on false rhetoric.

Please remember how our nation became ‘intolerant’ overnight! Remember, how Rohit Vemula was used politically even when he never wanted to be a part of it as per his suicide note! Remember, what kind of coverage Modi received during both his elections and how the same media tried every way to sully India’s image again and again! Remember, how Kathua case became a talking point world over! Remember, how was the murder of Gauri Lankesh portrayed! Remember, how hard they tried to liken the chants of ‘Jai Sri Ram’ as that of some terror group!

Now, try remembering the gaurakshaks, the policemen who were mercilessly killed by cow smugglers and beef mafia. Try to remember why you don’t know the names of Dalit kids who committed suicide after Rohit Vemula. Try to remember the religious riots in Akhilesh’s UP and Mamata’s Bengal. Try to remember tens of girl children raped and molested by Maulvis inside mosques and Madarsas. Try to remember 22 journalists who were brutally killed before Gauri Lankesh but didn’t get even one tweet of anger from the peers. Try to remember 11 (and counting) instances of Muslims using ‘Jai Sri Ram’ narrative to get coverage but proven fake.

If the issues mentioned in the second of the two paragraphs above were reported rightly, factually, without any agenda, as was the case with issues in the first paragraph, then OpIndia and the likes of it wouldn’t even exist. We wouldn’t be writing on issues condemning every single journalist selling himself out on it. We would have chosen to write on something else, engage in some other debate. But in this waging war of arresting the narrative, people were forced to pick up pens. Had this venomous outrage not been encountered with equal intensity, India’s image along with its social fabric would have collapsed for good because every Muslim would be actually believing that Hindus are waiting outside his/her home to behead him/her!

Losing twice, and not ashamed

2019 made the wannabe sons of Mao realise that speaking in chaste English with elite words would take them nowhere. So, they tried to steer the narrative towards more viciousness. Earlier, they had thought Modi won’t come to power, then it changed to ‘if he comes, he won’t have majority’, then they relied on ministers doing scams, then they put their money on bad outcomes of some policy and reforms, then they left it to fate thinking it will all fall apart somehow, then it was ‘he won’t be able to win again’, then it was ‘if he comes, he won’t have majority’, then… you know the drill!

They kept waiting for their thoughts to materialise, but it didn’t. We can say that some policies of Modi government might not have brought expected results, but his intentions were focussed towards building the nation rather than consolidating image and funds for his party, as Congress and the gang. Yet, the left-liberal gang was persistently writing negatively about every single policy, dismissed every single reform as if Modi was some untouchable who, even if executing existing policies, was wrong in every possible way. This made people of India realise that these idiots in media had gone batshit crazy.

Their faith in Modi grew. At the same time, they stopped relying on words of NDTV, BBC, Quint, Scroll, Wire etc which were peddled as some sort of gospel truth. People kept them on their radars but just to know where they stand and how they operate with such venom for one person and an ideology that’s different from theirs.

When Modi was elected in 2014, this gang tried hard to make sure his image is tarnished. The whole focus of this media gang shifted towards personal attacks on Modi. Suddenly, the media’s business was not to comment on policy or governance, rather it was very much interested in whether Modi did his BA, why doesn’t he live with Jasoda Ben, why does he wear new cloths, what is the brand if his pen, what kind of mushroom he eats, why doesn’t he debate with Rahul Gandhi, why does he not go to NDTV for an interview… These were the issues of national importance for the last five years.

Unfortunately, social media boom, coupled with affordable internet plans and smartphones, ensured people had access to truth and alternative narrative. Those who were writing on Facebook, in a very informal way, without any formal knowledge of journalism, were given a platform and their voice was heard. Common people were now relying on the word of their own rather than the propaganda paddlers. At the same time, they made sure the walls of the agenda driven hate-mongers is occupied and owned by the people from the other side.

The short-‘cut’ to becoming a liberal

The absence of reports that can corroborate their propaganda has forced them to reply heavily on ‘opinion pieces’ or ‘columns’ by some self-declared social worker, activist or just any fancy thing you can come up with. The shortest way to get into the gang is to criticise, or even better, abuse Modi and you will be immediately circumcised in to becoming a liberal. They start yelling ‘this guy is a liberal’ and so be it! He/She doesn’t need to prove anything, no yardstick, just expose yourself and people will know you are a liberal, and of course, you have always been naked!

These keyboard warriors, social workers, activists, experts of shit-spinning, pseudo-feminists along with incompetent, frustrated and prejudiced people are asked to write on one issue, over and over again. Just see how they come in cohorts and write the same words, phrases and fake issues when one of their own drums it up. The conclusion is decided and the story is manufactured around it to prove how Modi-Shah will make India a Hindu Rashtra, how they are hunting Muslims, how press freedom is suppressed, ‘dar ka mahaul’, an undeclared emergency has come…

However, truth can’t be any farther! In the last five years, none of their agenda could be proven in the long run. It might trend on twitter, but factually couldn’t stand on its legs. No scams, no policy failure, no economic ruins, no riots under BJP, no minority is living a life of fear. They manufactured it on their whim and tried hard to make it last. It didn’t.

On the contrary, for every Akhlaq, there were tens of instances of Muslim mobs lynching, slicing, stabbing, murdering Hindus for their names. For every instance of a cow smuggler being beaten, there were people (including cops) who were brutally murdered by cow smuggling Muslims and beef mafia. They never hesitated to open fire on police or gaurakshaks chasing them. The ‘dara hua musalman’ kept pelting stones on Hindu kanwadiyas all around north India. The same scared Muslims kept vandalising temples, breaking statues of Hindu deities and peeing on them.

Every single of such agenda was countered with facts and better reporting from journalists like us. The result is the fact that those who read such propaganda from these portals are either ignorant or hard core idiots whose allegiance to this shitty ideology isn’t wavering even when truth stares them in the eyes. Once you start reading the comments on their social media posts you will realise the actual amount of faith people have in them.

The intolerance of the gang: Demean, despise, dismiss

When their ideological nudity was brought to light, they started to wail. They started telling our words were inappropriate, the style of journalism was not respectful. They cried saying we were abusive! It is like begging for mercy and wanting to be fondled softly. The only problem is fondling is what they do to their bosses, our style is a bit hard core and some times even painful on purpose.

They spew venom and try to sow seeds of hatred among people of different faith and class. Every article is laden with assumptions and innuendos where the future is bleak. This is done just to put fear in simple minds that some sinister plot is in works so that they start to look towards ISIS so that they can counter Hindus who have never been violent to another community unless pinned to the wall with a sword in hand. And yet they have the audacity to tell us what words we should use in our writings!

It doesn’t work that way. We don’t need lectures on journalistic style and choice of words from someone who has no legs to stand on. Words themselves don’t become ‘abuse’, it is the context that makes them abusive, satirical, ridiculous, or an adjective, if need be. So, please stop telling us what is the right way of doing things and mend your ways. Just because you write that Tabrez was lynched for not saying ‘Jai Shri Ram’, it doesn’t become as such. You pronounce judgments even before the police has a case, then you put religion, slogan, some connection from a BJP guy somewhere in the wild to blame it swiftly on an ideology and then you call it ground report!

We are past those days. Journalism will be based in facts and truth, not on the narrative. And, even if it’s narrative, it will be our narrative that will being the fact out that, although you tried to trend ‘Muslim youth beaten for not chanting Jai Shri Ram’ for two months, we will bring the hard facts telling the world it is fake news. We will slap your front and back with facts so that you don’t get an outlet to whine.

This won’t go on. But yes, your strip dance must go on. We benefit from it. We look at your headline and immediately know what slant you gave and why. We know where we need to look and in ten minutes we get the facts at our disposal that all you wanted was to demean the Hindus. So, please exist. Please keep compromising on the very fundamentals of your trade. You believe Mephistopheles is helping you out in the orders of Lucifer, but actually, he is helping us.

Your 24 years would come to an end. The clock will strike 7. You will panic and realise how hatred for one person and ideology has harmed you for good. At the midnight, devils will come to drag you to the hell of your deeds. You will cry, argue to do good from then on. But you won’t be spared. Your friends will find a body in the morning. That body will be as torn in pieces as was your journalism and its principles.

More embarrassment for Congress govt in MP: Power cut during press conference of Energy Minister

In a huge embarrassment for the Congress government in Madhya Pradesh, the press conference of State Energy Minister Priyavrat Singh at the party office in Bhopal suffered a power cut.


Ironically, the power tripped the moment the energy minister was saying that power cuts and trip faults have been stopped in the state. The press conference was organised to inform about the Congress government’s achievements in the power sector in the last eight months after coming to power. The interaction with the press was held at state Congress headquarters ‘Indira Bhawan’.

When asked about the cut, the minister alleged that it was a conspiracy, as the power was restored in a minute. He said that if it was a genuine power cut, it would not have come back so soon.

Incidentally, this isn’t the first time that a senior Minister in the Madhya Pradesh government had been left embarrassed due to power cuts. On a previous occasion, it was Chief Minister Kamal Nath himself. When he had gone to cast his vote in the Lok Sabha elections, the power supply had tripped and he along with his family had to cast their votes using flashlights of the mobile phones of the media persons.

Madhya Pradesh has been suffering from incessant power cuts and unscheduled power cuts ever since the Congress government came to power. Kamal Nath has been conveniently trying to shift blame to the erstwhile BJP government and various other things.

Kamal Nath had resorted to publishing advertisements in local newspapers indirectly blaming the BJP for creating problems which are leading to these power cuts. In June, officers in the Kamal Nath government had claimed that bats, the tiny flying mammals, were responsible for the state’s power supply crisis.

Is Shah Faesal Ajit Doval’s asset? Unlikely, Swati Chaturvedi may be unwittingly helping the central government

Ahead of abrogating Article 370 and Article 35A, the government had enforced strict restrictions to maintain peace in Jammu and Kashmir. Many political leaders from the state have been placed on detentions to prevent them from creating a ruckus. However, there are strange rumours emanating from Kashmir.

Abusive troll and alleged journalist, Swati Chaturvedi, said on Twitter that a certain ‘newbie’ in Kashmir politics is actually Ajit Doval’s man. According to her, he is part of the NSA’s bid to create a ‘managed opposition’.


People in their minds don’t take Chaturvedi seriously, given her track record, but similar sentiments have been echoed by others who are known to be more reasonable.


Chaturvedi didn’t take any names but Pandita did say that leaders such as Shah Faesal would be propped up by the Centre. Thus, it appears, and we are only speculating here, that the person Chaturvedi calls Doval’s asset is none other than the former IAS officer. Rahul Pandita says that these people want to remain in detention for now, as in future they will be able to tell that they were in jail for the sake of Kashmir and ask for votes. These people will be acceptable to the Left “intellectuals”, who will join BJP, thereby suggesting that it is a grand strategy of BJP.

Why Faesal could be a Doval asset

Before we dismiss these assertions as ramblings of a delusional mind, we must admit that there are certain merits to the argument. In the long run, the Indian government would need to engineer a new political mainstream in Jammu & Kashmir. The Abdullahs and the Muftis have been held responsible for the dire straits the state is in by the central government, as has been evident from the statements made by Home Minister Shah and others of the ruling dispensation.

The Indian State would want to ensure that the political careers of the two families which have ruled the state thus far are destroyed. However, that will create a vacuum and that vacuum has to be filled by someone or some people. It’s only natural that the Indian State would want to fill that vacuum with individuals who are conducive to their interests.

Shah Faesal appears to fit the bill quite nicely. He is educated, outspoken, easy on the eyes and is rather meek. He may be lacking in charisma but it’s not that big of an issue. It can be easily fixed. Moreover, he is a marked departure from the stone-pelter variety of young men that are found in abundance in the valley. In short, he comes across as the guy who can convince people that you can win a war against the state with words.

Most importantly, however, he is quite the antithesis to the Abdullahs and the Muftis. He hasn’t become popular due to his family, he is where he is due to his own efforts. Certain elements in the state machinery may have catapulted him far above where he deserves to be but nonetheless, it can’t be denied that he at least made some efforts.

Faesal’s public statements on the abrogation of Article 370 may be problematic but they are the sort of statements a newbie Kashmiri politician would be expected to make to garner public support during the initial phase of his career. Thus, if the decimation of the existing dynastic political order in Jammu & Kashmir was the objective, Faesal is a very potent bullet.

Reasons that make Faesal an unlikely candidate

As convenient as Faesal may be, there are very good arguments against this line of thought. For all the obvious stark differences between Faesal and the Abdullah-Mufti brand of politicians, making him the new political alternative in Jammu & Kashmir is still a soft-reset. And the actions of the government since the beginning of August have been anything but.

The MADmen trio (Modi-Amit Shah-Doval) has pressed the hard-reset button on J&K and pressed it hard. Henceforth, it appears unlikely that they will settle for Faesal whose brand of politics differs from his predecessors by only a few shades of grey after going through so much trouble.

Faesal’s statements, too, have been far too radical to allow for an easy climb down. If he does back away from them, it will be perceived by residents of the state as a betrayal of trust. Therefore, he may not be as viable a candidate going forward.

Furthermore, Faesal doesn’t come alone. Shehla Rashid comes along with him as part of a package deal. How Shehla could be possibly accommodated into the scene given her conduct thus far is anybody’s guess.

Even so, there is one way they could both be accommodated. Faesal takes upon the mantle of the Abdullahs, Shehla fills in the spot vacated by Mehbooba Mufti and both of them are locked in a rigged battle against each other orchestrated by the central government.

The only problem is, the larger goal of the MADmen here would be to eliminate separatist politics from the scene. Substituting the Abdullahs and the Muftis with Faesal and Shehla respectively will only eliminate the erstwhile dynasties, it will not alter the dynamics of the Kashmiri political order itself. For the lengths the MADmen have gone to, it appears extremely unlikely that they will be satisfied if the existing political order itself is not eliminated altogether.

A Possible Subterfuge

An integral feature of the MADmen Doctrine has been the manner in which they have kept the enemies of the nation guessing. Article 370 was abolished in a matter of 3 or 4 days flat. It was a blitzkrieg that no one expected. A mind-numbing Confusion was the predominant feeling among the enemy camp. Thus, it’s quite evident, with them at the helm, expect the unexpected.

Political leaders, in any democracy, serve as the focal point for public anguish. They are a rallying point behind which people gather to further their own agenda. It’s as true for Kashmir as it is for any other region in the country, or for that matter, the world. Since Narendra Modi assumed the seat of Prime Minister in 2014, the Indian government’s strategy in J&K has been very sharp.

The Indian Army has eliminated every top terrorist in the valley behind which people could organize. It is indeed a sad state of affairs that in Kashmir, terrorists are a rallying point for people. In that sense, they are political players too, albeit with a gun in their hands. Thus, since the moment the NDA government came to power, there has been a concerted attempt to eliminate the rallying points for the people in the state with separatist inclinations.

Therefore, it appears only likely that the central government’s approach to politicians in the Valley will be the same. Of course, since Abdullahs and the Muftis and the Faesals are not armed terrorists, they cannot be eliminated with a gun. They can be eliminated from the political scene only by eliminating the source of their power: The goodwill of the Kashmiri people.

It is safe to say that there’s no better way to destroy the political career of a Kashmiri politician than by giving people the impression that he or she is a stooge of the central government. It is undeniable that Mehbooba Mufti suffered a huge loss of public support by allying with the BJP. Looking back, if the BJP’s goal was to make Mufti unpopular among her constituents, allying with her was an extremely smart move.

It could be said with a fair bit of certainty that the political prospects of Abdullahs and Muftis were destroyed with the abrogation of Article 370. For a long time, they had promised their constituents the skies only for their hopes to be smashed on the rocks. Thus, there doesn’t appear to be any way for the erstwhile dynasties to recover from this.

However, Shah Faesal could have proven to be the new political focal point in the near future. He, along with Shehla Rashid, could have fed the people of the state new myths to sustain their grand delusions. If this is how it was to pan out, only the personalities would have changed. The political order would have survived. And as we have said before, by pushing the hard-reset button on J&K, the MADmen trio have indicated that they want to fundamentally reform the political order in the state.

For this reason, the political career of Faesal would need to be destroyed. How does the central government achieve it? By giving people the impression that Faesal, and by extension, Shehla, are stooges planted by Doval himself, the MADmen are essentially destroying their political careers even before it truly began. Thereby, eliminating rallying points of the residents of the state.

Why Subterfuge appears more likely

For a movement to be successful, it needs a face. The masses find it much easier to associate themselves with specific individuals rather than abstract ideals. It is exactly why Narendra Modi was essential for the success of the Hindutva movement in recent years. Abstract ideals could not unite Hindus of all castes and creed under a single banner, it needed Narendra Modi for it.

Hindutva is an abstract concept, a man is a concrete. You can see a man, hear him, he has a story that the masses can relate to, he is certainly more ‘real’ than abstract concepts. A man can make promises and fulfil them. A man is capable of action, abstract ideals can only make abstract promises. Secularism has failed spectacularly in India not because the idea itself has failed, it has failed because the people swearing by the word, from Jawaharlal Nehru to Rahul Gandhi, have been extraordinary charlatans.

Of course, secularism is a remarkably bad idea but a bad idea can still be sold if the salesmen are exceptionally gifted individuals. There are obviously numerous other factors involved but it’s a fair assessment based on a single metric. In short, a bad idea can still be sold and it takes hugely talented men to sell a bad idea but a good idea can be very well sold by ordinary individuals. The difference between a bad idea and good is that one requires a great deal of intellect to justify it while the other only requires common sense. However, that is a discussion for another time.

To cut to the heart of the matter, the Kashmiri separatist movement too requires able individuals for it to be successful. If there are no able individuals in the fray to lead the masses, the movement will wither away in due course of time. Therefore, it’s essential that leaders are not allowed to emerge at this moment in time for the MADmen doctrine to succeed in J&K.

The hard-reset would entail that at a certain point of time in the future, a new breed of politicians will emerge who will not toe the separatist line. The most they will demand is the restoration of J&K’s statehood. Depending on the prevailing circumstances, the central government could then decide on the matter. But for a new breed of politicians to emerge, who will essentially represent a new political order, the existing one needs to be destroyed in its entirety. And as such, the political careers of Faesal and Rashid needs to be destroyed as well.

Who is playing into the MADmen trio’s hands? Shah Faesal or Swati Chaturvedi?

At this moment in time, it does appear more likely that it is Swati Chaturvedi who is unwittingly playing into the MADmen trio’s hands. By sowing the seeds of division in the minds of the people of J&K regarding Faesal’s loyalty, Chaturvedi and others are helping destroy the goodwill Faesal supposedly enjoys in the state as of now. Swati Chaturvedi may be loathed to admit it but it does seem that she has been pwned.

Rattled by India’s decision to abrogate Article 370, Pakistanis dial CRPF’s ‘Madadgaar’ helpline number to abuse India

0

The Srinagar-based CRPF helpline ‘14411’ has been re-activated for people in Kashmir, who require help for their families, seeking to check their kin’s well-being and talk to them or are in distress, after the decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 in the valley.

However, few Pakistani’s who have been thrown completely off-balance after India’s bold decision to bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir and revoke Article 370 in the valley, have been using the ‘madadgaar’ helpline number to vent out their disgruntlement. According to reports, some Pakistani’s have been calling up the helpline number and hurling abuses at the CRPF personnel.

According to the Times of India, a total 7,071 calls have been received on CRPF’s ‘madadgaar’ helpline between August 11 and 16 to inquire about the well being of their kins based in Kashmir. Out of the total, 171 came from outside India and 2,700 from families of security personnel deployed in the state.

The maximum calls received were from Kashmiris living outside the state (2,448), while 1,752 calls were made by non-Kashmiris based outside Kashmir. Amongst these, as many as 45 calls were received from Saudi Arabia. While most calls were from family members seeking information about the well being of their families, few also requesting to talk to them, there were few Pakistani’s who also called.

While some Pakistanis inquired about their families members, few embittered ones abused the security personnel over the Kashmir issue.

Calls were received from 22 countries in all, including 39 from UAE; 12 from Kuwait; eight each from Israel and Malaysia; seven from Russia; six from the US (New York) and Turkey; five from Australia; four each from UK, Singapore and Bangladesh; three each from Canada, Bahrain, Germany, Philippines and Thailand; two each from Oman, France and Belgium; and one each from China and Qatar.

A senior official from the Jammu and Kashmir administration told the Times of India that he too had received calls from Pakistani numbers. Some genuinely inquired about the well being of their family members, but some called just to hurl abuses at the Indian authorities and armed forces.

Immediately after India’s historic move to strip Article 370, which granted a special status to Jammu and Kashmir and a subsequent bill aimed to bifurcate the state into two Union Territories, Pakistanis on Twitter couldn’t stop themselves from expressing the devastation that swept them following India’s audacious move.

A large number of Pakistanis, who had no idea what was transpiring back in India were taken aback by the government’s decision to do away with the partition relic of Article 370 and proceed in the direction of greater assimilation of the state with the Indian Union. Dejected Pakistanis took to Twitter to lament about India’s dare-devilry vis-a-vis Kashmir.

AAP’s ‘ration card minister’ Sandeep Kumar disqualified from the party for ‘defection’

In a flurry of disqualifications for the Aam Aadmi Party(AAP), today, AAP MLA Sandeep Kumar, infamous for the ration card sex scandal has been disqualified from the party for supporting BSP in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

The MLA from Sultanpur Majra constituency was accused of harming the prospects of the party in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections by supporting the BSP. A few weeks back, AAP leader Saurabh Bhardwaj had filed a petition seeking disqualification of Kumar. Following this, Speaker Ramnivas Goyal held Sandeep Kumar ineligible.

Former Delhi’s Social Welfare Minister Sandeep Kumar was earlier sacked by CM Arvind Kejriwal after receiving an ‘objectionable’ CD in which he was purportedly shown in a compromising position with a woman. Kejriwal had then stated that Kumar had betrayed the faith of AAP supporters and therefore deserved sacking. Kumar, in his defence, claimed that a plan was hatched up against him because he was a dalit.

It is noteworthy to mention that this is 4th disqualification in the past one month for AAP. Recently, rebel leader Kapil Mishra was earlier disqualified for sabotaging party’s prospects in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections by actively rallying behind Prime Minister Modi. Mishra joined the BJP a couple of days back.

Caveat filed in Supreme Court against Radha Kumar and Air Vice Marshal (Retd.) Kapil Kak’s petition challenging abrogation of Article 370

A leading Kashmiri Pandit organisation, ‘Roots in Kashmir’ has filed a caveat in Supreme Court today seeking that no order shall be passed in the petition challenging constitutional validity of abrogation of Article 370 without hearing the caveator. In a press release issued by the Kashmiri Pandit organisation, ‘Roots in Kashmir’ said that that majority of Kashmiri Pandit community has always demanded abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A.

“RIK believes that both these special provisions to a Muslim majority state were being misused to make J&K into an Islamic state. These articles were not only an impediment in the return of Kashmir Pandits, but also a hindrance in delivering justice to thousands of people who have been victim of terrorism,” read a statement issued by the organisation.

The statement further added that the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A “will now help the minority, women and the disadvantaged communities to be treated as equal in the new dispensation and help J&K be part of India’s economic growth and prosperity.”

Munish Jalali, Coordinator, Roots in Kashmir said, “RIK is now working with organisations across India to start a nation-wide awareness campaign to highlight the ills of these two articles and thwart every effort of restoring the unjust Article 370.”

On 17th August, ex-defence personnel and bureaucrats moved the Supreme Court over abrogation of Article 370 and termed the Presidential Order as ‘constitutionally invalid’. The petitioners included former Air Vice Marshal Kapil Kak and former member of the Home Ministry’s Group of Interlocutors for J&K, Radha Kumar.

Police Complaint filed against Anurag Kashyap for hurting religious sentiments in season 2 of Sacred Games

0

Delhi BJP spokesperson Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga has filed a police complaint against filmmaker Anurag Kashyap for allegedly insulting religious sentiments of the Sikh community in the second season of the web series ‘Sacred Games’ on Netflix.

In his complaint, Bagga has alleged that, “In the said Web-Series, the Accused has intentionally and deliberately depicted a Scene in which a character belonging to the Sikh community (played by Actor Saif Ali Khan) removes his Kada and throws it away in a disrespectful and insulting manner.”

He added, “The Accused abovenamed has deliberately and intentionally depicted the aforesaid Scene in his abovementioned Web-Series with the sole intention of insulting and outraging religious feelings of people belonging to the Sikh community, to promote disharmony, enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious groups, to provoke of peace by giving provocation and to severely insult the religious beliefs of Sikhs.”

Akali Dal MLA Manjinder S Sirsa has also objected to the scene, demanding it to be removed. He also has filed a criminal complaint against Anurag Kashyap for hurting religious sentiments and faiths of people and creating disharmony in the society is a criminal offence.


A Kada is a bangle which considered to be sacred by the Sikh community and is treated to be utmost respect. Bagga has urged the Police to register an FIR against Kashyap at the earlier under relevant sections of the IPC and “take most stringent penal action” against the Director.

Sunanda Pushkar case: Prosecution alleges Sunanda was a victim of domestic violence, seeks charges against Shashi Tharoor

In a court hearing in Delhi, the prosecution in the Sunanda Pushkar death case sought charges against Shashi Tharoor citing multiple injuries on Sunanda’s body.

The prosecution argued at Delhi’s Rose Avenue court that though Sunanda Pushkar died of poison, her post-mortem report mentioned that she borne injury marks on her body that were at least 12 hours to 4 days old.


The public prosecutor argued that the evidence in the case overwhelmingly suggested that Sunanda Pushkar may have been routinely subjected to violence. The advocated that mental trauma and physical cruelty being meted out to Sunanda forced her to take her own life. He stated that charges of abetment to suicide and domestic violence should be framed against Tharoor.

Referring to the medical report, the prosecutor alleged that there had been a scuffle between Pushkar and Tharoor in the last 4 days of Sunanda’s life, leading to her death.

In addition to this, the counsel said that Sunanda Pushkar and Shashi Tharoor were married for 3 years and 4 months and this was the third marriage of both parties. Citing IPC sections, the counsel asserted that unnatural death within 7 years of marriage is suspicious.

It is notable to mention that this is the first time the court is hearing the matter of framing of charges against Tharoor. Former Union minister Shashi Tharoor has been charged under Sections 498-A (husband or his relative subjecting a woman to cruelty) and 306 (abetment of suicide) of the IPC but has evaded arrested in the case so far.

On January 17, 2014, Sunanda Pushkar was found dead in a suite of a luxury hotel in New Delhi. The couple was staying in the hotel as Tharoor’s bungalow was undergoing renovation at the time.

You are a glorified broker who takes all the credit for our product: Restaurateur rips Zomato apart in an open letter

After facing severe backlash for delivering ‘moral science’ lectures to social media users instead of food, food aggregator Zomato seems to be fighting a losing battle against its customers and partners.

As their woes continue, a restaurateur and Indian School of Business alumnus, Raghunandan S Prasad has now written a stinging open letter to the Zomato founder and CEO Deepinder Goyal, who is now the newfound hero of Indian liberal-secular mafia.

In the scathing letter, Prasad has referred Zomato founder Deepinder Goyal as a “glorified broker” and accused him of taking credit for their product. A few days back, Deepinder Goyal had invited the anger of restaurant owners after he had called them a ‘bargain hunters’ while threatening them of consequences if they did not withdraw from a ‘movement’ of logging out from Zomato’s services. Restaurant owners across the country had started to delist from the Zomato Gold program saying that deep discount offered by the food delivery company is hurting their businesses.

In his letter, Prasad wrote, “I remember in your early days when you came on board and started getting people to rate my work. Imagine if I got the public to rate your CEO or your employees on how they did their job.”

“It’s nice that you got customers actively involved with performance improvements but that is largely an internal matter,” Prasad continued, “we have our own mechanisms to get their feedback and although customer satisfaction drives the industry you have no right to display the matter with so much scrutiny and bias to public eyes.”

Prasad said that he knew things would go wrong when Zomato changed their rating system a few years ago. Prasad said that he had sent an email then asking them to explain their new rating system. He accused Zomato of giving a vague response mentioning a percentile grade system with “complex algorithms” that were too intricate to explain to ‘lowly restaurateurs’.

“You were setting the rules for the industry. No one would take your app seriously if beloved places were given a lower rating. No one cares about a new place though. Customers can just write it off as a shitty place and not give a damn, and you can, in turn, make money from new restaurants who want to change that perspective by advertising with you,” added Raghunandan Prasad.

“Your response to the rating query was cold and indifferent. Much like the way you responded now, to the gold fiasco. Until yesterday you rubbished off our protest and when you found that we logged out, you sent a threatening mail to “partners” (mind you we are not your partners. We are your customers, you are a glorified broker who takes all the credit for our product which we so laboriously sell to our actual customers),” Prasad warned Deepinder Goyal for his infamous arrogance.

Prasad recalled the arrogance of Zomato, stating that while all other aggregators were apologizing and feeling guilty for hurting the restaurant fraternity, they tightened the rules of their delivery platform imposing huge penalties on customers/restaurants if they didn’t obey their rules. “All in the name of serving your customers? Sorry they never became your customers. You are merely a delivery agency. It is not your product. Just do your job and deliver the food. Try not to eat it on the way,” he advised referring to the recent controversy involving Zomato delivery guy who got caught after eating the food meant for a customer.

Questioning the ethics of Zomato and its CEO Deepinder Goyal, Prasad wrote, “You sent a cold and threatening mail about how there would be consequences for joining the movement, you said we had to give a 45 days notice. You ensured legal action against us for opposing you”.

Elaborating on how Zomato was brazening it out, Prasad said, “You called us out for cartelising? What about you? You created this whole price war and mess.”

“Despite your enormous funding you haven’t made a single buck in profit ever and you question us? Tell us how to run our business and ask us to reduce our operating costs?” Prasad asserted.

He added that they were customers of Zomato as they paid Zomato Rs.45,000 for the gold subscription. Continuing his ire, he said they should forget the fact that Zomato was providing them with a service.

Slamming Goyal for not honouring his word, Prasad revealed that Zomato had promised them Gold service would be a very exclusive service and would have a choice few customers and restaurants in the program, but the food delivery company did not comply with it.

“For the seller to be so contractually binding means only one thing. You need us way more than we need you. Today after your investors got wind of the shit storm, and ordered you to shut gold down or change it drastically you sent us all “personal mails” asking to reconcile.”

Prasad expressed his worry regarding Zomato’s next big scheme Infinity Dining which will hurt them even more.

“Zomato is a leech. Sucking the life of the industry, it needs to be deep-fried and dumped in the bin because we actually take our food seriously,” he thrashed Zomato.

“You are not fooling anyone. You are not dealing with sheep. We can smell a wolf from a mile away. A whole fraternity has been pissed off across the entire country! And you have the audacity to call us out for being inconsiderate to our customers?! Zomato has never waited a table in its life or cooked a meal for guests, we know what it means to serve and care for our guests.”

Prasad said, “We are generations old, we have given employment to millions. You on the other hand, throw your poor delivery boys under the bus when they ask for some basic rights. Mass fire employees for not meeting your targets.”

The remaining text of Prasad’s letter to Goyal read, “We don’t let our employees do anything they dont want to and take care of their interests and beliefs, something you dont seem to understand.” He seems to be referring to protests by Zomato’s Hindu and Muslim delivery persons refusing to carry beef and pork respectively in Kolkata.

“You say we have free choice but you have gamed the system with your ratings which make us compete with our neighbors and for a spot in your “collections” which we pay to get on to. You have pitted us against each other and manipulated an entire industry.”

“We have been around since your founders were in diapers”, Prasad added.

“We have grown a whole community and fed the people with love, not discounts. Your discount addiction schemes and promise of profits wont last.”

“You haven’t made any profits yet, we cannot take you seriously. You are not really here to help the industry.”

“The two things you are wealthy in, is data ( which we unwittingly feed you ) and borrowed money. All for you to burn. And you scare us with it. You push us to accept your terms because deep pockets and knowledge is powerful. But you abused it, made the very people who feed you fight against each other in the chase for better sales and jump through your rating hoops.”

Prasad ended the letter by saying, “Soon our customers too will see you for what you really are. Your angel investors might not be so generous after that.”