Monday, November 18, 2024
Home Blog Page 5915

Dateline Pulwama: India no longer hostage to Pakistan’s Nuclear blackmail

The Attack

14th February 2019. A huge convoy of Central Reserve Police Force is moving from Jammu to Srinagar for deployment. There are 78 vehicles and 2500 troops in the convoy travelling on the National Highway 44. The highway had been shut down for the past few days due to snowfall and urgent repairs. The 175 km of the highway which runs through the valley is used for both civilian and military movement. This was not always so. In the militancy-infested state of Jammu & Kashmir, during the 1990s and most of the 2000s, civilian traffic was not allowed on the highway during military movement. However, Mufti Mohammad Sayeed had pleaded for opening up the roads to civilian traffic to ‘win over the hearts & minds of the Kashmiri people’.

Around 3:15 PM, at Loatoomode in Avantipur, a speeding car laden with RDX and other explosives appears from a side road and rams into the CRPF convoy. A CRPF bus and its occupants are blown to smithereens while militants posted around the site, open fire on rest of the troops. When the carnage is over, over 40 CRPF men are believed killed. Their bodies are badly charred, burnt and mutilated due to the intensity of the blast. Some body parts are found as far as 80 metres from the blast site. Soon, the Pakistan based terrorist organization Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) claims responsibility for the audacious and barbaric attack. The JeM Chief Masood Azhar is safely ensconced in Pakistan and receives security from the Pakistan security agencies. The bomber is Adil Ahmad Dar, a radicalized Kashmiri Muslim youth.

In the last 5 years, prior to the Pulwama attack, there had been other major terrorist attacks on Indian Armed Forces in Kashmir. Chief amongst them were the 2018 Sunjuwan attack, 2016 attacks at Nagrota, Uri, Pampore and Pathankot. In these attacks, the AFs had lost scores of men. A Nuclear Power State with the world’s 2nd biggest Army and 4th biggest Air Force was held hostage by several hundred armed and trained terrorists from Pakistan. India had responded to the Uri attack by using its Special Forces to conduct a surgical strike against militant launch pads inside Pakistan Occupied Kashmir inflicting heavy casualties. However, it was a one-off action with no follow up to keep up the heat on Pakistan based militants and their mentors. A Bollywood movie inspired by the strike captured the imagination of the nation with government ministers and even the Prime Minister invoked the ‘How is the josh’ line from the movie script.

The Aftermath

A stunned India watched in disbelief as coffins draped in tricolour started rolling out to various cities across India. As the images of wailing widows, little kids and distraught families went viral across various news outlets, a wave of deep anger and frustration swept across millions of Indians. The nation as one wanted the killings to be avenged and demanded retribution from its elected leaders. The nationalist government of PM Modi, nearing the end of its 5-year term in office was left with no other option than to retaliate militarily against Pakistan.

The beleaguered PM looked towards its Armed Forces for a solution to the immediate crisis.

Successive governments had neglected the Armed Forces and even reduced the defence budget, forcing the AFs to cannibalize and even go for junkyard and warehouses shopping to maintain its equipment. Even the Kargil war, where the Indian Army Chief, General V.P.Malik was forced to say ‘We shall fight with whatever we have’ had borne no major reforms or acquisitions for the Armed Forces. Things continued to be drastic. The 10 years of UPA government had set back the Armed Forces by over a decade. The holier-than-thou Defence Minister A.K.Antony had ensured that under his watch practically no defence deal went through. From basic equipment like bulletproof jackets, assault rifles, night vision devices, machine guns to howitzers to batteries and torpedoes for the Naval ships; there existed a gaping hole in India’s defence preparedness.

Not to mention the fast depleting strength of Indian Air Force and its usage of 60’s vintage Mig’s. In 2014, Indian Navy Chief, Admiral D.K.Joshi had resigned following an explosion and sinking of the Kilo Class INS Sindhuratna off the coast of Mumbai which had killed several sailors. A distraught Admiral stated in a TV interview “The operating environment was dysfunctional and I felt being a service chief is not just about preening about on national TV, taking a salute on Republic Day. People tell you, ‘oh you looked so smart in your uniform’, in actual fact you are unable to get a set of batteries for your submarines and to my mind, that was a completely untenable situation for continuation as chief, it had been building up.”

India lives in a hostile neighbourhood and wars are not won by choking the Armed Forces of funds for modernization and upgrades. India’s allocation for funds for Military expenditure has consistently fallen over the past 10 years and does not address the threats it faces. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute ( SIPRI ), India’s Military expenditure (% of GDP) since 2010 is as the following:

Military Expenditure
SIPRI Data

That Indian Air Force is still using the ‘flying coffins’ or ‘widow makers’ Mig 21’s should be an eye-opener. For nearly 3 decades since Bofors were inducted in the Indian Army, no 155 mm Howitzer was acquired till the M177 was inducted last year. The scenario is equally alarming with the submarines. Clearly, lip service by our politicians is not enough for the Indian Armed Forces.

India’s covert ability to conduct intelligence-led operations in Pakistan also lay in tatters. It was on the insistence of PM I.K.Gujral in the 1990s that extensive human intelligence network was dismantled and the Pakistan special operations desk of R&AW shut down leading to a major gap in India’s intelligence capabilities.

Traditionally India had responded to any terrorist strike by snapping internet across major parts of the valley and by targeting & pounding Pakistan Army outposts by heavy artillery shelling and even by sending across soldiers to attack a particularly vulnerable enemy post.

However, it was clear that this time, the standard response was not enough to calm down public anger and avenge the horrific killings.

Suddenly the cupboard was bare when India was in the middle of an unprecedented crisis.

Indian Air Strike in Balakot

Around 3:30 AM on 26th February, a strike formation of Indian Air Force comprising of 12 Mirage 2000’s supported by four Sukhoi Su-30MKI, Netra, Phalcon airborne early warning and control aircraft, an IAI Heron UAV and 2 Ilyushin Il-78 aerial refuelling aircraft struck a JeM facility at Balakot in Pakistan’s north-western Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The Mirage’s used 1000 pound laser-guided bombs to pound the terrorist targets.

The air strike was the first strike launched across the LoC since the 1971 Indo-Pak war. Clearly, India had raised the ante in its fight against terrorism and had drawn a new red line.

Terming the strike as “non-military preemptive” strike, Indian Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale said

“Credible intel [intelligence] was received that JeM was planning more suicide attacks in India. In the face of imminent danger, a pre-emptive strike became absolutely necessary.” India also claimed that “a very large number” of JeM terrorists and their trainers were “eliminated”

As expected, Pakistan downplayed the air-strike and questioned its efficaciousness. Even some western media houses like the NYT, WaPo, Al Jazeera termed the casualty figures as grossly exaggerated.

Meanwhile, the Pakistan Army was fuming. Its air defence and response systems had been breached and it needed a strike of its own to maintain its credibility in the eyes of the people of Pakistan. Having a puppet PM like Imran Khan helped the cause.

Pakistan Strikes

On the morning of 27th February, a formation of Pakistan Air Force comprising of 8 F-16s, 4 Mirage-3 aircraft and 4 JF-17 struck positions in Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian Air Force intercepted using 4 Sukhoi 30 MKIs, 2 Mirage 2000s and 2 MiG 21 Bisons. In the ensuing dogfight, an Indian Mig 21 Bison and a PAF F16 were brought down. While the pilot of the PAF F16 was lynched by Pakistani villagers, the IAF pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan was captured by the Pakistan Army. On 1st March, under immense International pressure, Pakistan returned Wing Commander Abhinandan back to India.

International Reaction

Post the horrendous Pulwama attack, Pakistan suddenly felt isolated at the international stage, with nearly every country unequivocally condemning the attack and calling upon Pakistan to rein in the terrorist groups.

France, US & UK moved a proposal in the UN Security Council to designate Masood Azhar as a global terrorist. The UN Secretary-General, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the European Union and many countries around the world condemned the attack on the CRPF convoy in the strongest terms.

Pakistan’s ‘stronger than steel and sweeter than honey’friend, China was caught off guard by the strong world opinion and could not spring to its rescue.

India’s growing economic clout had ensured that India won this round of international opinion & support.

Attacks and Casualties continue to mount

As the armies locked horn at the LoC, business continued as usual in J&K. Cross border firing and terrorist encounters continued. On 28th February, a woman was killed & an Army jawan injured in the shelling from by Pakistan Army. On 1st March 3 members of a family were killed and 2 others injured in the shelling. On 3rd March, 2 militants and 5 security personnel were killed in an encounter in Kupwara.

As the body bags kept piling, it became apparent that a single surgical strike or even an air strike across the border was not having the desired results for the Indian security establishment.

Opportunities lost and the way forward

Pakistan is a rogue state that uses nuclear weapons as blackmail to propagate its use of terrorism as a state policy. It realizes that it can’t match the hugely superior Indian conventional forces. So it uses the word to hold the world to a ransom.

Declassified documents reveal how in 1981 and then in 1984, India in collaboration with Israel had planned to bomb Pakistan’s nuclear reactor at Kahuta. The attack would have severely crippled & delayed Pakistan’s effort to develop nuclear weapons. However, those operations were shelved and a golden opportunity lost.

Cold War strategist Herman Kahn who had coined the term ‘escalation dominance’had defined 44 “rungs” on a metaphorical ladder of escalating conflict. In 2011, Rodney Jones had drawn up 18 “rungs” on Nuclear Escalation Ladders in South Asia.

Rodney Jones Nuclear Escalation Matrix

However, Kargil war has amply demonstrated that a threshold exists for suboptimal limited war, short of full-fledged operations, without the risk of nuclear escalation.

Post the Indian and Pakistan air strikes, General V.P.Malik who had led Indian troops in Kargil & remains unconvinced by Pakistan’s nuclear bluff tweeted “Pakistan unwilling to take action against its terrorist assets. We should prepare ourselves for more preemptive strikes, proactive diplomacy & its economic squeeze. Silence those working for Pakistan in Kashmir. Strengthen our armed forces. Need continued political will & unity”

Meanwhile, General H.S.Panag PVSM, AVSM, ADC, who had formerly commanded the Northern Command urged Indians to not get disheartened by a few losses and stay on course for dealing effectively with the menace emanating from Pakistan. He tweeted “Friends war is a two-way street. There will be gains and there will be losses. These are just the opening rounds. No need to jump up in glee at success or be dismayed after setbacks. Indian Armed Forces have the capacity and capability. We shall prevail.”

India is in the middle of 4thGeneration Warfare as enumerated by William Lind & others in 1989 and expanded by Thomas Hammes in 2006. This will include mobilization of all the pressure points which will include Political, Economic, Social, and Military. It will also include psychological warfare and propaganda. Future conflicts are going to be characterized by these multi-models. This tactic was effectively used by China against India in the recent Dokalam crisis. India should similarly be prepared to deal with Pakistan.

The Indian air strike is clear proof of India losing patience with terrorism emanating from Pakistan soil. It is also a rare resolve by the political dispensation to order a strike across the LoC using air assets. India has also demonstrated to the world that its policy of ‘strategic restraint’with Pakistan is over now and that any Pakistani misadventure would invite punitive and even crippling Indian retaliation. This is a new and unexpected situation for the strategists in Rawalpindi who were convinced that their irrationality and threat of use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons (TNW) will prevent any tough Indian retaliation. If Pakistan were to breach the nuclear threshold, the stated Indian position of a massive second strike using nuclear weapons to take out entire cities will now give Pakistan sleepless nights. Pakistan can no longer count on international support to prevent its own self-destruction.

However, it would be naive to think that a single air strike by India can force a rethink in Pakistan and deter it from harbouring & supporting terrorists who strike India. India has historically let Pakistan off the hook while the heat is truly upon Pakistan. Pakistan, on the other hand, has adopted the ‘death by a thousand cuts’ policy towards India & is not going to mend its way anytime soon. India needs to respond to the terrorism emanating from Pakistan by employing the full spectrum of its capabilities. It would require a concerted effort by India which would call upon all elements of its statecraft to deal with a rogue neighbour. The Indian war strategy of Cold Start and the Tri-Service doctrine with integrated battle groups needs deployment. It would also require collective political will and national resolve to absorb some losses but continue to hit at the root of the terrorism in Pakistan. It is time to call Pakistan’s nuclear bluff & punish it for its active support to terrorism and thereby ensure a safe & peaceful existence for a billion strong Indians.

All you need to know about the ordinance for reverting a court order that had effectively ended reservation in College-University postings

According to reports, the union government is considering bringing an ordinance to nullify the effect of a recent Supreme Court judgement on reservation in higher educational institutions.

In January this year, the Supreme Court of India had dismissed a petition of central government challenging an Allahabad High Court order to calculate the number of reserved posts in SCs, STs, and OBCs in Universities department-wise, as opposed to the earlier method of calculating the same institution-wise. This order had the far-reaching impact of reducing the number of reserved posts in higher educational institutions by at least 50-60%, and upto 90-95% in many institutions.

The Allahabad High Court order, issued on 7th April 2017, had changed the formula to calculate the number of reserved posts from the earlier 200 point to roster to a 13 point roster system. The order had said that every department in a university or college has to be taken as a separate unit while calculating the number of reserved posts, instead of the earlier practice of taking the whole institution as a single unit. UGC had immediately implemented this order, which had resulted in a drastic reduction in the number of reserved posts in advertisements issued for vacancies in higher educational institutions. Therefore, the government had filed a curative petition in the apex court challenging the Allahabad High Court order. When the Supreme Court rejected the petition, the govt had prepared a bill to restore the original reservation formula, but could not table it in the parliament due to lack of time.

Let us see in detail how the court order reduces the number of reserved posts. As per the current reservation policy, there is 27% reservation for OBCs, 15% reservation for SCs and 7.5% reservation for STs. Now, if the number of reserved posts for any category does not reach at least 1, no reserved post is offered for that category. For example, if there is an advertisement for only 3 posts, there will be no reservation as the number of reserved posts for OBC becomes less than 1. There have to be minimum 4 posts for a 1 reserved post for OBC, minimum 7 posts for 1 reserved post for SCs, and minimum 14 posts for 1 reserved post for STs.

This is how reserved posts are allocated under the current 13 point roster:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
UR UR UR OBC UR UR SC OBC UR UR UR OBC UR ST

*UR=Unreserved

When the entire institution was taken as a unit, there was enough reservation for reserved categories as the number of total posts in an average university or college far exceeds the number of 14. But things change drastically when departments are taken as units, because in many departments in many institutions, the number of teachers may be less than 14. Several less popular departments in average colleges have 2-3 faculty positions, which means these departments don’t have any quota in the current system. Not just caste-based quota, this also affects the newly introduced 10% reservation for economically weaker sections, as if the number of posts in a department is less than 10, there will be no quota under this category.

The situation is worse for universities, because not just departments, even different categories of teaching positions like Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, etc, are taken as separate units in every department, which means that practically there is no reservation at all in universities under the new formula.

To see how gloomy the picture has become under the new formula, we can see this advertisement for 52 teaching positions issued in April last year by Indira Gandhi National Tribal University.

Recruitment advertisement of Indira Gandhi National Tribal University

Under the old system, there would have been 20 reserved posts as it would have been calculated on the total number of vacancies. But under the new formula, only 1 post for OBC is reserved, while the rest 51 posts are under the unserved category. It’s a big irony that this is the only central university dedicated to tribal studies, but probably there will never be a reserved post for STs if the current formula continues.

Recruitment advertisements issued by several institutions over the last several months tell a similar story, a drastic reduction in the number of reserved category positions. The following table, compiled by Economic and Political Weekly based on recruitment advertisement issued by various institutions, show the effect of the new formula.

Number of reserved posts in job advertisements issued by various educational institutions

The Ordinance to be issued by the government will revert the court order to restore the old 200-point roster for reservation. Human Resource Development minister Prakash Javedkar has said that the ordinance will be brought in two days. The Union Cabinet is expected to recommend the ordinance on Thursday.

March 7, 2019 update: The Union Cabinet today okayed the proposal for ordinance restoring 200-point roster in faculty jobs. 

Nirav Modi’s illegal Alibaug bungalow to be demolished by dynamite blasts this week

The trouble for the fugitive diamond merchant, Nirav Modi just seems to be escalating as his posh bungalow in Alibaug which could not be razed earlier due to the high-grade materials used for construction will now be demolished through controlled blasting technique on 8th March.

The Raigad district administration has started preparing for the demolition of the illegal sea-facing bungalow of fugitive businessman Nirav Modi which was constructed on a sprawling area of 1071 square meters on Kihim beach, which was 674 sq meters more than the permitted area.

Raigad collector Dr. Vijay Suryawanshi has tasked additional collector Bharat Shitole to execute the blasting. Shitole, who has until now, blasted 40 illegal buildings in Bhayander, has deployed an excavator to remove tiles and plaster to expose the pillar on Tuesday. Three drilling machines will make holes in the RCC pillars to insert dynamite sticks.

Shitole, known as a ‘Demolition Man through blasting’ among official circles, said, “Non-arrival of some machinery led to a delay in preparation on Tuesday”. The building was slated to be demolished earlier in January but could not be razed due to its high stability construction. Reports say that there were also valuable furniture and decorative pieces inside the building which have been taken out and will now be auctioned by the state government.

RTI activist Dilip Jog said the bungalow alone costs over Rs 25 crore at market rates. “High-grade cement was used, so the excavators failed to raze the bungalow,” he added.

On December 7, 2018, the state government had filed an affidavit in the HC claiming that the illegal bungalow belonging to Modi on Alibaug has been razed and demolition notices have been served to another 58 illegal properties in the area. The buildings were constructed in violation of the coastal zone norms in Maharashtra.

Though this action is not related to the Punjab National Bank fraud, in which Modi is the accused, it dates back to 2010, when he received the demolition notice. Modi was permitted 376 sq meters in Kihim, but he constructed on 1,071 sq meters instead, which was 674 sq meters more than the permitted area.

Earlier the government had written to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which has attached Nirav Modi’s bungalow as part of its probe into the PNB fraud, seeking permission for the demolition.

The absconding diamond tycoon has been facing troubles as the ED and the CBI has been in relentless pursuit of Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi after the 13,000 crore PNB scam was unearthed. Interpol has issued red corner notices for Nirav Modi, Mehul Choksi, Purvi Modi and Nishal Modi, Nirav’s sister and brother respectively.

In India too, the ED had in May moved the special court in Mumbai requesting permission for ‘immediate confiscation’ of about 7000 crores worth assets of designer diamond jeweler Nirav Modi under the recently annunciated ‘Fugitive Economic Offenders Ordinance’.

The department has since then attached several of Nirav Modi’s properties and bank accounts worth thousands of crores.

‘Will the Supreme Court also give directions on whether to go to war or negotiate for peace?’: AG while arguing Rafale case

After the Attorney General submitted in the supreme court that the Rafale documents produced in the court by petitioners were stolen from the defence ministry, the hearing in the review petitions on the Rafale deal resumed after lunch today.

In the beginning, the Supreme Court objected to certain statements made by Sanjay Singh against the Supreme Court and refused to hear him. CJI Ranjan Gogoi said that the bench is taking it very seriously and will take serious action against him. The court asked advocate Sanjay Hegde to inform the same to his client Sanjay Singh. The AAP leader is one of the persons who has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court on the Rafale deal.

Referring to Attorney General KK Venugopal telling the court that Rafale documents published by newspapers and used by petitioners were stolen from defence ministry and government is considering action for the same, petitioner Prashant Bhushan said that is an attempt to intimidate the petitioners and to stop them from bringing truth to the Court. He also said that it amounts to contempt of court.

The Attorney General than produced the RTI act and submitted that defence documents are exempted from disclosure under the act. He mentioned that documents published by Hindu are marked as “secret”, and they are not intended to be in the public domain. After the documents were published, huge damage has been done to India’s national security, KK Venugopal added.

Attorney General KK Venugopal also asked whether the Supreme Court will give directions to go to War or negotiate for peace. “Certain issues are outside the purview of judicial review. Do we have to come to the court to justify when we declare war, when we declare peace? Do we have to come and seek permission of the court every time?”, he said.

He then mentioned the need for Rafale jets for the country, but the bench asked him to stick to the review petition.

Disagreeing with the AG, Justice K M Joseph said that even stolen evidence can be looked into by the court as per the Evidence Act. He said that if some corruption has taken place, the government can’t take shelter under the Official Secrets Act. But the Attorney General disagreed and said that the source of documents is important. He asked how the petitioners got the classified documents of the defence ministry.

CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked AG, if an accused is having difficulty proving his innocence, steals a document and produced in court which clearly show that he is innocent, should the judge ignore the document just because it is stolen. To this, Venugopal has to disclose the source of the document.

The CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked AG to produce the authority that says the source of evidence is important. On this, AG produced a 2004 judgement by Supreme Court which had said that illegally obtained evidence cannot be relied upon. Justice Kaul also disagreed with the AG by saying that as documents have come to the court, he can’t say that the court should not look into them. He said that even if the AG is correct, some issues deserve to be heard if they “shock the conscience of the court”.

The Attorney General reiterated that the purchase of the Rafale jets are essential for the nation to survive against the enemies. He said that the issue has a political angle, and CAG has already submitted its report on the deal in Parliament, and the parliament will look into the issue. The AG also requested the court to exercise restraint in the limited are of defence matters, as anything said by the court is used by the opposition to target the government. He also said alleged that opposition is trying to destabilise the government using this case.


Prashant Bhushan rejected the arguments of AG, saying that even in 2G and Coalgate cases court had relied upon such documents. He said during those cases also the government had made similar arguments but those were dismissed by the court.

He also said that he has mentioned that the documents have been published by The Hindu and the Caravan Magazine, so it is wrong to say that he has not disclosed the source of his documents.

CJI Ranjan Gogoi said that if the court accepts the AG’s argument, then it will dismiss, else it will go ahead. To that Prashant Bhushan said that even if the documents are not accepted it won’t make significant difference to the case, as sources have been mentioned in most of the documents submitted by him.

The hearing in the case has been adjourned till 14th March.

‘Remote controlled CM did not send list of eligible farmers for PM Kisan Yojana to the Centre’: PM Modi in Kalburgi, Karnataka

Prime Minister Modi addressed a rally today at Kalburgi, Karnataka where he laid the foundation stone for various projects in the state.


During the address, Narendra Modi attacked the Congress-JD(S) government and remarked that the ‘remote controlled’ Chief Minister of Karnataka had not sent the list of farmers eligible for the benefits under PM-KISAN Yojana to the Centre. He said, “They are blocking the benefits of PM-KISAN to reach the farmers as there are no middlemen in our scheme and money directly reaches the farmers in their bank accounts.”

The NDA government led by PM Narendra Modi had announced the PM-KISAN scheme in the interim Budget 2019-20, under which Rs.6,000 per year will be given in three instalments to 12 crore small and marginal farmers holding cultivable land up to two hectares.

Modi also said that the Karnataka government had made false promises of farm-loan waiver in the state and had betrayed innocent farmers.


Taking a dig at the coalition government, Narendra Modi said that Karnataka has a ‘Majboor’ government. Laying emphasis on the necessity of having a strong government at the Centre, he said, “Sometimes we have to pay a heavy price for a small mistake. The people of Karnataka must be experiencing the same.”

With elections around the corner, campaigning has well and truly begun. The Congress party is facing quite a problem in securing an alliance with JD(S) in the state for the Lok Sabha elections. In the absence of one, the BJP could very well retain its tally from 2014 or even increase it by a couple of seats.

SC slams AAP MP Sanjay Singh for derogatory comments against the Court, refuses to hear his petition in Rafale case

In a big setback to Aam Aadmi Party, the Supreme Court has refused to give a hearing to the plea of AAP Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Singh after the top court found that the earlier statements made by Sanjay Singh against judiciary were derogatory.

According to reports, the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi along with Justice SK Kaul and Justice KM Joseph were hearing plea pertaining to the review petitions in connection with Rafale deal. While hearing the plea, the CJI took objection to certain statements made by AAP MP Sanjay Singh and refused to hear his appeal.

Chief Justice Gogoi informed Advocate Sanjay Hegde, the counsel of Sanjay Singh that the top Court has taken serious note of his comments against the judiciary and will initiate action against Sanjay Singh. “We will take actions against you after completion of these hearings and after giving you an opportunity to explain,” said CJI.

Sanjay Singh had questioned the neutrality of the Supreme Court after its split verdict on power-sharing in Delhi. Criticising the Supreme court judgment, Singh had tweeted in Hindi, “Does the Supreme Court not pronounce verdicts against the interests of Modiji? The central government lied in the court on corruption in Rafale (deal), but SC was silent. Did the SC give a verdict on CBI or was it a joke? Played with the emotion of crores of people of Delhi. Is this the Supreme Court or local court of Tehsil?”

via Twitter

In a separate tweet, he had criticised, “Has the Supreme Court lost its dignity? Delay in justice is not justice. The people consider a judge a God, but even God is unable to give justice.”

After Supreme Court had given a clean chit to the Narendra Modi government with regards to Rafale deal, Sanjay Singh had sought an open-court hearing on his review plea and initiation of contempt proceedings against persons those responsible for allegedly misleading the court on sharing of the price of the jet.

“The court was purposefully misled and made to believe, in order to establish the bonafide of the Respondent (Defence Ministry) before this Court, about the sharing of pricing details with the CAG and also the purported CAG report to the PAC, which are factually incorrect and all the respective officials have vehemently denied about such sharing of price,” he had said.

The Supreme Court is a hearing a batch of review petitions seeking a probe in the Rafale deal. While presenting his arguments, controversial lawyer Prashant Bhushan had alleged that there were several serious errors in documents provided by the government on which the court depended while passing the judgment rejecting the petitions in the deal earlier. As proof for his argument, Prashant Bhushan wanted to present an eight-page note, but Attorney General KK Venugopal strongly objected to that.

KK Venugopal had alleged that the files were stolen from the defense ministry, and a probe is being done on the matter. The Attorney General further has added that the presentation of the notes is a violation of the Official Secrets Act, and the government is going to take action against the newspapers that have published the defence ministry notes.

80% bombs hit targets proves dossier submitted by IAF to Modi govt, includes 12 pages of high resolution images: India Today

Ever since the Balakot airstrikes of 26th February where the Indian Airforce went deep inside Pakistan territory to flatted Jaish-e-Mohammad terror camps, the Congress party and vested interests have been questioning the authenticity of the airstrikes. Now, India Today reports that the Indian Airforce has submitted to the Modi government, 12 pages of high-resolution images and synthetic aperture radar imagery collected from an intelligence aircraft platform flying in Indian airspace as proof of the airstrikes conducted by the IAF.

Shiv Aroor of India Today reported that Indian Air Force Mirage 2000 fighter jets, which carried out the Balakot airstrike, dropped Israeli Spice 2000 precision bombs with “penetration warheads” during the raid.

These intelligent missiles reportedly pierced the roofs of the buildings targetted and exploded inside. Since the missiles exploded inside the camp, the damage would be more internal than external.

It is also being reported that according to the dossier submitted to the Narendra Modi government, the Indian Airforce struck 80% of its targets. Explaining to 20% missed targets, the source has told India Today that those 20% bombs were dropped to give the strikes a margin of probability.

On 14th February 2019, Pakistan sponsored terrorist group JeM had carried out a dastardly attack on a convoy of CRPF soldiers claiming the lives of 44 soldiers. Following the attack, India had carried out airstrikes deep inside Pakistani territory in Balakot, flattening JeM terror camps in the area. In response, Pakstan had used their F16 jets, penetrated the Indian airspace and tried to drop AMRAAM bombs on Indian military installations. They had also captured Indian Wing Commander Abhinandan who was then returned within 48 hours under the Vienna Convention rules due to the pressure build by the Modi government and the international community. Abhinandan was the pilot who had shot down Pakistan’s F16 jet with a MiG21, recording his name in the pages of history. The situation at the Line of Control still remains tense between India and Pakistan.

93% of rural households now have access to toilets, over 9 crore toilets built under Swachh Bharat Mission

Under the NDA government’s flagship scheme the ‘Swachh Bharat Abhiyan’ (clean India mission), over 93 percent of rural households in India now have access to toilets out of which around 96.5 percent households have used the facility.

Last year, 77% of rural Indian households had toilets. So this is a significant jump. According to a government-commissioned survey, 95.4 percent of the villages had minimal litter and stagnant water.

The open defecation free (ODF) status of 90.7 percent villages which were declared by various districts and states was also reconfirmed by the National Annual Rural Sanitation Survey (NARSS) 2018-19, conducted by an independent verification agency under the supervision of the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation.

“The survey was conducted between November 2018 and February 2019 and covered 92,040 households in 6,136 villages across States and Union Territories of India,” the drinking water and sanitation ministry said.

The findings of the survey were presented on Tuesday to an expert working group developed for the oversight of NARSS, comprising representatives from organisations including the World Bank, UNICEF, Water Aid, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, India Sanitation Coalition, Sulabh International, Knowledge Links, Niti Aayog, ministry of statistics and program implementation.


The Ministry’s own tracking system claims that 98.9 percent of households across the country have access to toilets, with only four states, namely, Goa, Odisha, Telangana, and West Bengal are falling short of 100 percent coverage. Ministry data shows that 5.54 lakh villages claim to be open defecation free or ODF. The new NARSS survey has found that 90.7% of these villages can be confirmed as ODF.

The government asserted that since its launch in October 2014, the Swachh Bharat Mission has changed the behavior of hundreds of millions of people with respect to toilet access and usage. “500 million people have stopped defecating in the open since the SBM began, down from 550 million at the beginning of the programme to less than 50 million today,” the ministry confirmed, furthering that “Over nine crore toilets have been built across rural India under the Mission. Over 5.5 lakh villages and 615 districts have been declared ODF, along with 30 ODF States and Union Territories.”

The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, a flagship initiative of Modi led NDA government had been termed as the ‘biggest sanitation movement’ in the world by the World Bank. This initiative has received several acclamations from organisations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.

Giving full credit to PM Modi for spearheading the Swachh Bharat mission, the vice president of the World Bank South-East Asia region, Hartwig Schafer, said in October 2018, that it is not just a sanitation programme. “It is a growth mission.”

Similarly, referring to Prime Minister’s ‘Swacch Bharat Abhiyan’ the UNICEF executive director, Henrietta Fore had in October last year said, “The prime minister invested political time and effort and what it meant was people began picking up that story. They want to do it for Mahatma Gandhi, for their country and they felt pride in it”.

The flagship cleanliness drive, launched by the prime minister in 2014, aims to clean up the streets, roads, and infrastructure of India’s cities, towns, and rural areas.

PM Modi, in September last year, while launching ‘Swachhta Hi Seva’ campaign had said the sanitation coverage in the country has increased from almost 40 percent to nearly 90 percent and asserted that the ‘Swachh Bharat Mission’ is playing a central role in creating a healthy India.

Pakistan’s FM uses Congress’ rants to discredit government of India and the Indian Army, yet again

The successful ‘non-military pre-emptive’ strikes at Jaish terror camps deep inside its territory has unnerved terror-state Pakistan, which has now resorted to false propaganda to wriggle out of international isolation. To substantiate its false narrative, Pakistan has now utilised India’s internal political situation aided by Congress party to discredit the airstrikes in an attempt to malign the Indian government.

BJP’s official twitter handle has shared a minute-long clip of clip of an interview of Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mohammad Qureshi. In the video, it can be seen that Qureshi while speaking to one of the mainstream Pakistani media outlets, shared the concerns of the Congress party and used it as a premise to create a false narrative about India’s airstrikes deep inside Pakistan territory.


Qureshi cites Congress party’s reluctance to believe the Indian Armed Forces and Indian government regarding the successful airstrikes inside Pakistan. Congress Party had questioned the intent of the strikes and asked for proof of strikes along with the number of casualties in the airstrikes despite Indian Air Force had issued a statement regarding the success of the operation. Indian Air Force had said that they had successfully hit the targets what they had intended to hit.

“Pakistan is united despite any political differences and declared that we are united for the cause of Pakistan. This has helped in presenting a strong case. On the Indian side, we can see a lot of political differences. Despite showing solidarity after Pulwama attacks, there is no unity today (after air strikes),” said Qureshi.

Referring to Congress’s refusal to accept the authenticity of strikes, Qureshi said, Congress is now questioning the claims of the government. Congress is asking for the proofs of attacks on terrorist camps and the government does not have an answer, unlike Pakistan, said Qureshi.

Congress party’s politicking of the airstrikes has now been utilised by the hostile Pakistani establishment to propagate a new narrative pertaining to the authenticity of the strikes. Congress party headed by Rahul Gandhi knowingly or unknowingly has played it to the hands of terror state Pakistan in terms of perception war.

Pakistan has been presented yet another opportunity to spin a narrative where it can posture itself to claim that there were neither attacks inside Pakistan nor it has any role in creating and supporting Jaish-e-Mohammad terror camps in its soil. Pakistan, with the help of Congress party’s statements, is now hoping to validate its own stand over India’s air strikes against terrorism.

Recently, Congress leader Digvijaya Singh had, in a series of tweets,  tried to downplay the Pulwama terror attack. Citing foreign media reports, he had attempted to create a doubt in people’s minds by questioning the authenticity of the terror attacks. Following the ghastly terror attack on the CRPF convoy which claimed the lives of 40 soldiers, A Goa Congress leader had asked for the proof of terror attack since the ‘body of the terrorist’ was not found. He had even gone on to say that the Pulwama attack was carried out by Prime Minister Modi.

Congress’ ‘achievement’ of being quoted and supported by Pakistan’s government to malign our own country was called out in social media.


It is also notable that earlier, the statements by the Congress-led opposition party meet were cited by Pakistani channels to further their agenda. Congress leader Kapil Sibal had yesterday attempted to peddle the ‘show proof’ narrative.

Congress aided abusive troll Sanjukta had also claimed that the Pulwama attack was an inside job. Congress President Rahul Gandhi himself was caught on camera dancing just hours after the Pulwama attack. Congress then deleted the video after it was pointed out.

Several other politicians and journalists too have been busy peddling the Pakistani version of claims and refusing to believe India’s claim of the successful air strikes on terror camps.

Madhya Pradesh: Congress minister backs Digvijaya Singh’s ‘accident’ remark on Pulwama terror attack

Madhya Pradesh Minister and Congress leader Govind Singh Kushwah has come out to defend senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh’s insensitive remark on Pulwama terror attack.


Govind Singh Kushwah has said that we may criticise Digvijaya Singh for whatever he says, but eventually what he says turns out to be the truth. Earlier, during the #MeToo movement in India, Govind Singh had said that women often make such complaints (against sexual abuse and harassment) “for money”.

Yesterday, in a series of tweets, Congress leader Digvijaya Singh had tried to downplay the Pulwama terror attack by calling it an ‘accident’. He had even cast aspersions on the air strikes carried out by the Indian Air Force and even tried to question the credibility of Indian Government.

Downplaying terror attacks or absolving the actual terrorists and pinning the blame on someone he doesn’t agree with politically is not something new for Singh. In 2010, months after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack, Digvijaya Singh, along with film maker Mahesh Bhatt and others had launched a book which claimed that the Mumbai terror attacks were an RSS conspiracy.