Monday, November 18, 2024
Home Blog Page 6001

‘Sexist man trapped in the body of a woke boy’, Miranda House students accuse JNU student of sexual misconduct

0

The Women’s Development Cell (WDC) of Miranda House, Delhi University, has issued a statement on social media where it has accused a postgraduate student from JNU, Aman Sinha, of “targeting and preying on women across different colleges in DU”.

The statement read, “An extremely creepy and perverted person, Aman Sinha has been targeting and preying on women across different colleges in DU. He claims to draw legitimacy from various Women collectives in the campus, by which he establishes contact with women to lure them into his trap. We have proofs of these allegations as many women have come out and spoken about his predatory behaviour.”

In the screenshots attached in the post, the Cell claims that Sinha was removed from AISA earlier due to ‘inappropriate behaviour’.

The statement says, “There have been multiple complaints against Aman Sinha from within Miranda in the past where women were so concerned about his predatory nature that a thread of messages was circulated warning women to stay away from him by the victims.” It adds, “Aman Sinha is a sexist man trapped in the body of a woke boy who gains social currency by repeatedly associating with prominent student leaders and going to every protest where he can find gullible women to impress. He especially preys on first years.”

The statement also mentions an occasion of a Pinjra Tod protest where he made many women “uncomfortable” with his presence there. In a conversation with a girl from Miranda, he is said to have called the women at the college “bitches” and a “kitty party”. He is also claimed to have said that he wasn’t wrong in using illegal substance at the protest. It says, “He responded by saying he smoked drugs with the organizers and what not, indicating the social capital he enjoys in order to intimidate his victims and completely ignoring why he was asked to leave.”

The post states further, “Aman Sinha is a mansplainer, is sexist and harasses women all under a garb of being an intellectual, student leader and the ultimate feminist.” The WDC also appealed to the “intellectual circles” to disassociate themselves from him due to his alleged inappropriate conduct. “it would be a matter of shame and complicity if they do not disassociate with him, and for once take a stand for all they preach.”

Speaking to TOI, Anoushka Parija, President of the WDC, said that the statement had been put out so that more students come forward with their complaints. She also said that the complaints will be sent to the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and they intend to seek legal recourse over the matter.

The accused student, for his part, has claimed that it is a case of vendetta against him by some people from the organization and that “many women have come out in my support”.

Interim Budget vs Full Budget: All you need to know

For the last several weeks, speculation was going on in media that Modi government is considering a full budget in the budget session of parliament that started today, instead of an interim budget. Yesterday, the Finance Ministry clarified that the finance minister will be presenting an interim budget in Lok Sabha on February 1, not a full budget. But what is the difference between an interim budget and full budget? Let’s find out.

The underlying principle of presenting a budget is to ascertain the legislative approval on the annual expenditure made by the executive led by the incumbent government. The government needs money for its functioning. Even though the government receives finances through various means, it needs approval from the legislature to spend the money in various heads.

Article 266 of the Constitution of India mandates that Parliamentary approval is required to draw money from the Consolidated Fund of India. Besides, Article 114 (3) of the Constitution specifies that no amount can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund without the enactment of a law i.e appropriation bill.

On February 1, NDA government at the centre is set to present its last Budget ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. Conventionally, a government at the end of its term presents an interim budget rather than a full Budget. There is a divided opinion on the issue as few experts are in favour of a full budget, others oppose it on the ground that in an election year the ruling government cannot present a full budget as it has already presented five full budgets in the previous years, and it does not have the mandate to rule the country for the whole year.

 

What is an interim budget?

An interim budget in all practical sense is a full budget but made by the government during the last year of its term i.e. just before an election. However, an Interim Budget is not the same as a ‘Vote on Account’. As ‘Vote on Account’ deals only with the expenditure side of the government’s budget, an Interim Budget is a complete set of accounts, including both expenditure and receipts. An Interim Budget gives the complete financial statement, very similar to a full Budget. It is also important to note that the interim budget and full budget are not official names, it is simply called union budget in official documents.

 

What is the difference between an interim budget and a full budget?

  • An interim budget is the budget of a government that is going through a period of transition while full budgets are not only an annual financial statement of the government but also present the direction of economic policies of the incumbent government. Conventionally, no major policy decisions are taken during the interim budget. However, several governments in the past, including the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance had made major policy announcements while presenting interim budgets just before 2009 and 2014 general elections.
  • Even though interim budgets are quite similar to a full-budget in terms of presentation of expenditure for the ongoing fiscal and projections for the upcoming fiscal year, the ruling government have traditionally opted to present a vote-on-account for a four-month period to incur the cost of administrative expenses and day-to-day running of the government.
  • The Union government can also introduce tax changes but during an election year, successive governments have avoided making any major changes in tax laws during an interim budget. The reasoning is that it would be the prerogative of the new government to signal its policy direction, which is often reflected in the budget it presents soon after the formation of the new government.

In simple terms, a full budget deals with revenues and expenses for the whole financial year, interim budget deals with revenues and expenses for the remaining time for which the incumbent government will be in power, and Vote on Account is only for expenses for the remaining term of the government.

 

Is it mandatory for the government to present vote-on-account instead of a full budget in an election year?

No, technically it is not mandatory for the government to present a vote-on-account and the constitution does not impose any such rules on the incumbent government from presenting a full-fledged budget instead of a vote-on-account. However, it has become a practice to avoid full budgets as it would be inappropriate to impose policies that may or may not be unacceptable to the incoming new government taking over in the same financial year.

Lucknow: ED conducts multiple raids in connection with Memorial Scam under Mayawati Govt in UP

As per reports, the Enforcement Directorate is conducting raids at multiple locations in Lucknow in connection with the Rs. 1400 crore Memorial Scam under the Mayawati Government in Uttar Pradesh.


In September last year, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court had ordered that no guilty be spared in the alleged scam. The Mayawati government had constructed statues of Dalit leaders across the state between 2002 and 2007 and it was alleged that crores and crores of money were syphoned off as a consequence of corruption.


As per reports, the raids were conducted on contractors and project engineers involved with the project. Earlier, the ED had registered a case of Rs. 111 crore loss to the state.


Earlier, it was reported that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is registered an FIR of money laundering in connection with illegal sand mining cases to probe the alleged roles of SP supremo Akhilesh Yadav and his former cabinet colleague Gayatri Prajapati.

The Opposition is expected to allege political vendetta following today’s raids by the ED in connection with an alleged scam that is linked to BSP supremo Mayawati. The SP and the BSP had recently announced their alliance in Uttar Pradesh for the 2019 General Elections. The alliance is expected to cause a significant dent BJP’s electoral prospects in the state.

Akhilesh, after raids were conducted in connection with the illegal mining case by the CBI, had warned the BJP that the ‘CBI raid culture’ the BJP has started will someday come to haunt them. CBI sources were reported as saying that during Akhilesh Yadav’s tenure as mining minister, 14 leases were granted in Hamirpur without e-tenders in violation of an Allahabad High Court order.

West Bengal government obstructing investigations in Saradha Chit Fund Scam: CBI

Central Bureau of Investigation has alleged the CM Mamta Banerjee government of West Bengal of impeding the investigations going on in the multi-crore Saradha ponzi scam. It has alleged that the “hostile” government is delaying the filing of the final charge sheet.

“The state government is hostile to the CBI and in the case of Saradha scam, the government machinery has damaged all the evidence.” A senior official of the CBI was quoted by reports. This is the reason, the official added, the filing of charge-sheet is getting delayed.

The reports further say that banking security fraud branch, special crime branch and the economic offender wings of the premier investigative agency has been rendered non-operational after West Bengal had withdrawn the general consent to CBI, last year.

“Only the Economic Offences IV (chit fund probe wing) is functioning in the state,” The official was quoted further.

Earlier this month, CBI had nabbed Chief of Shree Venkatesh Films, Shrikant Mohta, in connection to the Rose Valley Chit Fund scam. It is alleged that Mohta’s production house was paid Rs 25 crore by Rose Valley for producing 17 films.

The senior official from CBI alleged that officers from a police station had come to Mohta’s office, where CBI was conducting the interrogation, to intimidate the sleuths. Mohta is considered close to the ruling dispensation of West Bengal. CBI is probing Sardha Chit Fund Scam and Rose Valley Scam, simultaneously.

The Saradha Scam was brought to light in 2013. Many political leaders were connected with this Ponzi scheme that was run by a consortium of over 200 companies. The Saradha Group had reportedly collected more than 200 billion rupees from lakhs of small investors. The Group had collapsed in April 2013 and a year later, the Supreme Court of India had ordered the CBI to take over the investigation from the state SIT.

The CBI has also recently filed a charge sheet against Nalini Chidambaram, wife of former union minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram, in the Saradha chit fund scam.

CBI is not the only institution in West Bengal, which has alleged state government of non-compliance with it. Last year, an RTI had revealed that the West Bengal government was refusing to share details on schemes and e-procurement, to the Comptroller and Auditor General of India(CAG).

Fact-Check: Is this image, shared even by Congress, of Abdul Ghaffar Khan and Indira Gandhi

Today an old tweet posted by official Twitter handle of Congress party is doing the rounds on Twitter. On 27 October 2016, the party had tweeted a photo saying that it is Abdul Ghaffar Khan with a young Indira Gandhi. Ghaffar Khan was also known as Frontier Gandhi and Bacha Khan.


Reacting to the tweet, many Twitter users replied that it is not Indira Gandhi. Most people have pointed out that the girl in the photo does not look like Indira. Did the Congress party label someone else as former prime minister Indira Gandhi? We decided to find out.

The photo tweeted by the Congress official Twitter handle is a cropped version of the following photo.

When we did a reverse image search using this photo, we found a mixed result. While several websites say it is Indira Gandhi, many others simply say a girl, without any name.

Next, we tried to find out other childhood photos of Indira Gandhi. Several photos of Indira Gandhi from her childhood are available on the internet.

Indira Gandhi with Mahatma Gandhi in 1924

Looking at those photos, it makes it clear that the girl with Frontier Gandhi does not match with Indira Gandhi in her childhood. The facial features in the photos are very different, making it very unlikely that the girl in the photo is Indira Gandhi.

Another point to be noted is that Ghaffar Khan was born in the year 1890, and Indira Gandhi was born in 1917, meaning she was 27 years younger to him. But in the image, the age of Khan looks much older compared to the girl. In the photo, Khan looks like he is in his 50s or 60s, and by that time Indira Gandhi was already a grown-up woman.

In this photo from 1945, Khan is seen with Indira Gandhi standing beside him. The child he is holding is Rajiv Gandhi, who was born in 1944.

Therefore, it can be concluded the girl in the photo is not Indira Gandhi, but someone else. On Twitter, some people replied to the Congress tweet saying that it is Ela Gandhi, granddaughter of Mahatma Gandhi. Ela Gandhi was born in 1940, so the age difference matches with the photo, but when looked into that, we found that the girl does not match with young Ela Gandhi either. The website Gandhimedia.org has several photos of Khan with Ela Gandhi in her childhood, and she looks different in those photos from the photo posted by the Congress Twitter handle.

Therefore, the girl with Ghaffar Khan is someone else, and certainly not Indira Gandhi.

Fact-check: Was PM Modi wrong in claiming that culprits are being brought to justice within days?

Prime Minister, Narendra Modi was on his day-long visit to Gujarat to dedicate to the nation the National Salt Satyagraha Memorial at Dandi on Mahatma Gandhi’s death anniversary. While speaking with young professionals in a town-hall programme at the ‘New India Youth Conclave’ in Surat, Gujarat, amongst other things, he condemned crimes like rapes, which according to him, though still persists, but actions are being taken against the accused and government is trying to provide quick justice to the victims by speeding up the trials of the accused.

He in his speech mentioned that “culprits are hanged within 3 days, 7 days, 11 days and a month”.


The specific claim of culprits being hanged within days did not go down well with his political and ideological opponents, who have recently developed a penchant for furthering drivel without checking their facts.

One of the first people to react was Omar Abdullah, the former chief minister of Jammu and Kashmir. He wanted the Prime Minister’s Office to furnish the data and also said that he would “eat his hat” if even “one case fits PM sahib’s imaginary timeline”.


Interestingly, even the self-proclaimed fact-check was who was recently doxxing and harassing young boys by revealing their identity simply because he didn’t agree with their political views and has been caught lying several times himself, furthered this lie against the Prime Minister.

Tweet by AltNews founder Pratik Sinha

Evidently, for the self-proclaimed fact-checkers who make it a habit to lie regularly themselves, their hate for Modi trumps their supposed commitment to finding the truth.

In reality, what Prime Minister Modi claimed is not a “lie” as the leftists would have one believe. There have been various cases where justice has been delivered in a speedy manner.


In August 2018 itself, a local court in Madhya Pradesh had concluded a hearing in 3 days and handed over a life imprisonment sentence to a child rapist. Datia Additional Sessions Judge Hitendra Dwivedi awarded life sentence to Motilal Ahirwar (25) after convicting him under section 376 (A)(B) of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance 2018 introduced recently as well as provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act

Indian Express article

In July 2018 too, after a 5-day trial, a Madhya Pradesh court had pronounced the death penalty for a child rapist too.

Times of India article

In Karnataka, the trial was concluded in 22 days, with the Court handing over the death penalty for attempted rape and murder of a 15-year-old.

LiveLaw article

In Rajasthan, a man had been given the death penalty after a trial of only 22 days for raping his own daughter.

NDTV article

This is only the tip of the iceberg. There have been several such cases all across the country where the perpetrators have been bought to justice with short, swift trials.

While blinded liars like Omar Abdullah and AltNews founder Pratik Sinha could argue that the Prime Minister said that they were hanged within days instead of saying that the punishment was awarded to them, none of them bothered to mention the good work being done in delivering swift justice. That criticism would only be a technicality since from the time the punishment is awarded to the time a person is hanged, the convict by law has to exhaust all his appeal options.

The ones criticising this statement wanted to insinuate that the PM is incorrect in saying that justice in such heinous rape cases has not started being delivered swiftly. Clearly, as evidenced, their criticism was only borne out of hate and not factual.

BJP wins Jind seat, senior Congress leader Randeep Surjewala finishes third

BJP’s Krishna Middha has won the Jind by-polls in Haryana. In the final results that were declared a short while back, the BJP candidate was declared a winner by over 12,000 votes.

Congress’ senior leader Randeep Surjewala who was present there at the counting centre was far behind with over 22,000 votes. Jananayak Janata Party’s Digvijay Singh Chautala was the runner up with 0ver 37,000 votes.

In Jind, the Congress party has fielded its senior leader Randeep Surjewala while the BJP has fielded Krishna Middha. The JJP’s Digvijay Chautala and INLD’s Yash Singh are the other candidates in the fray.

In Rajasthan, the Congress party has secured a victory after its candidate Shafia Zubair garnered a total of 83311 votes. BJP’s Sukhwant Singh came second with 71083 votes. The BSP secured around 25,000 votes. With this victory, the Congress has 100 seats in the 200 seat Assembly.

The bypoll in Haryana was touted to be a referendum on the Manohar Lal Khattar government in the state and was regarded as a ‘semifinal’ ahead of the General Elections later this year. With the Congress at a distant third as of now, if trends hold, it will give the party leadership plenty to think about.

While for the BJP, in Rajasthan, the BSP appears to have eaten into its potential vote-base and thus, preventing its chances of winning the seat. Going into the General elections, it is sure to give the party leadership plenty of food for thought.

This is a developing story, we will update the article with relevant information.

Rahul Gandhi: The evil mind that works behind the dimpled face

“The worst part about being lied to is knowing that you weren’t worth the truth”- Jean-Paul Sartre

Rahul Gandhi met ex-Defense Minister of the Narendra Modi government, Mr Manohar Parikkar yesterday, in Goa. The minister, back from the union cabinet, in Goa as the CM of the state, suffering from ill-health and valiantly fighting against cancer, must have been surprised by the unannounced visit and against all his wisdom. He must have credited the visit to a rare human empathy which might have awoken in the shrewd, uncaring, cheap political mind of the out-of-power politician who is still seemingly nursing the grudge against the citizens of India for keeping him away from his presumed divine right to rule.

It hardly took him twenty-four hours to realize the evil mind that works behind that dimpled face, fast slipping into the worse side of middle-age with zero achievements to his credit, unless we consider folding up the Congress party as per the wishes of the Mahatma an achievement. Rahul Gandhi lied again. This time he lied about Manohar Parikkar claiming that he was kept in dark about the Rafale deal. Rahul Gandhi has been, of late, lying with such brazenness and such frequency that Rahul Gandhi speaking a lie is no longer a newsworthy thing. In fact, things have come to a stage that Rahul Gandhi speaking the truth will be headline material.

I have been thinking that Rahul Gandhi has been lying out of political necessity. That could be the reason for his lies, but that is not sufficient to explain the propensity with which he lies. I came across this quote of Sartre, which actually explains it much better. A liar lies mostly because he or she thinks so little about the recipient of his or her falsehoods- the electorate of this nation. The worst thing that the centuries of slavery did to us as a nation is that we began believing in the divine right of some people to rule over us and our divine duty to accept their lies, their curses, the humiliations they heaped over us but their blatant falsehoods.

This acceptance of political and intellectual zamindari by the masses emboldens men like Rahul Gandhi to lie to us with impunity. A wily politician like Rahul could not have thought that he would not be caught. He must have thought that it hardly mattered that he would be caught. His act of blatant lie does not demonstrate his political desperation, as I once believed. It barely exposes the derision with which he looks at the Indian people at large- uneducated, unsuspecting, idiots. From fake EVM expose, to the fake claim of meeting the Chinese (if it wasn’t fake, it was a security concern) and now quoting this discussion which never happened.

All Rahul Gandhi is concerned about is bombarding the masses with fake news, hoping some of it will stick someplace. Parikkar has written to Rahul Gandhi, a straight-forward man that he is, stating that in the five minutes impromptu meeting which they had, not a word about Rafale deal was spoken. Rahul knew he would be called out. Just as he knew that the fake EVM expose by a fake ex-ECIL employee will be called out. It did not matter to him. It was enough to create yet another Whatsapp video to circulate among the masses. He has learnt from the compromised media the art of lying on the front page and apologizing on the tiniest corner of the ninth page. He loses reputation, but that is of no consequence to him. He is the ruler and as a King or at least from the class of kings, he cares little about the opinion of his subjects.

His advisers know that fake news can make committed Modi voters hesitate and fumble. They know how fake news works. He has long used the conniving media to expand and propagate his political lies, sometimes yielding political dividends. The words of great satirist and writer Jonathan Swift plays in my mind as I look at the man-child leader of Congress, somersaulting from one lie to another, without even a trace of moral remorse on getting caught. Rahul Gandhi perfectly fits in the description of an uncouth politician who Swift claims to be most likely originator of a political lie when he writes in his famed essay “The Art of Political Lying”, “A political lie is sometimes borne out of a discarded statesman’s head, and thence delivered to be nursed and dandled by the mob.” The description so perfectly fits Rahul Gandhi and the Congress today.

It is not that we want a one-party democracy. At least, I do not want that kind of democracy. I want a decent opposition party, but decent is the key word here. We do need a strong opposition for a healthy democracy. But Rahul Gandhi, we deserve someone better than you. When Indira was in power, we had Vajpayee, Lohia and JP against her. They opposed her, but they respected their electorate, even when they were out of power. You can not deride the people you want to rule over with such blatant disregard for public probity and morality. Standing on his long feet of his lies, Rahul stakes claim at greatness, buoyed by his strange victories in recent polls, playing on the insecurity of the masses, leveraging the greed of the few. An obedient media, desperate and frustrated with his failures, claimed that Rahul has arrived. But in the end, we as citizen do know, to quote again from Swift, “The superiority of his genius consists in nothing else but an inexhaustible fund of political lies, which he plentifully distributes every minute he speaks, and by an unparalleled generosity forgets, and consequently contradicts, the next half hour.

We have had enough, Rahul Gandhi. Of course, he neither listens nor cares. The man is without a modicum of morality. It is now incumbent on us as a common citizen to be watchful and call him out every time he utters a lie. Let us remember as I close again with Swift, “If a lie be believed only for an hour, it hath done its work…Falsehood flies and truth comes limping after it.” Let us pledge not to give falsehood in public polity that one hour. Rahul Gandhi has now got his gloves off and is bereft of even a shred of empathy even for an ailing man, and we have a great nation to guard. The idea of India is too precious a dream to be surrendered to the greed of an immoral politician.

Union Minister Smriti Irani calls Rahul Gandhi a congenital liar, says it is dangerous to even maintain social contact with him

Union Minister for Textiles, Smriti Irani, took to Facebook today to write a scathing blog against Rahul Gandhi and Congress. Calling out the dynasty politics played by Congress, Irani pointed out that there is no place for merit, commitment and ability to deliver in a dynastic democracy.

Her blog, first published on Facebook, titled “Is the dynast a congenital liar – India’s first post truth politician” is reproduced below:

I have always believed that the perpetuation of dynasties negates the very concept of Democracy. Dynasties rely on a feudal mindset, personality cults, non-ideological positions and believe that only those belonging to a privileged family are entitled to rule. There is no place for merit, commitment and ability to deliver in a dynastic democracy.

The other danger about dynastic parties and dynastic rule is that the aberrations of different generations of a dynasty become a part of the ideological positions of that party.
The excessive regulated economy, the Kashmir blunder and the China war disaster during the Nehruvian era are historical events that the Congress would still defend. These aberrations have become a part of their ideology. The less glamorous and non-dynast Lal Bahadur Shastri’s successful leadership in 1965 war would always be played down by the Congress. Imposition of Emergency, the destruction of institutions, the disastrous 1984 during Indira Gandhi’s tenure would continue to be defended by the Congress. Rajiv Gandhi’s passionate weakness for his friends over the party, which led to the corrupt defence deals, witnessed the Congress throwing its weight behind corruption to defend the dynasty. However, the service rendered to India by the economic reforms enabled by the best ever Congress Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao would remain unrecognized in a dynastic party, even though the country would hail them.

Let us analyse a glaring aberration in the current representative of the dynasty. Unquestionably, he is a congenital liar. The political system is increasingly realizing that it is dangerous to even maintain social contact with him in terms of basic political courtesies.

“Deep concerns” led him to a courtesy visit the Goa Chief Minister Manohar Parrikar’s residence. He concocted a conversation where he alleged that Manohar Parrikar distanced himself from Rafale. Speaking in the Motion of No Confidence against the Government, he concocted a conversation between him and President Macron of France which the French Government promptly denied. Earlier he had concocted a pleasantry exchange between him and Sushma Swaraj as a conversation with a political slant. He had similarly, in the past, concocted a conversation with Arun Jaitley claiming that the Minister had told him that he knew very little about Jammu & Kashmir. Is he India’s first post truth politician? From an imaginary Rafale, to a loan waiver scam, he is now into hallucinating conversations.

What does one make out of this? Does he have a mindset of a college-level election contestant or is he a congenital liar? Yet those who depend on dynasties for their survival find themselves looking the other way even when the above aberrations may well be psychiatric in character. Ordinarily such psychiatric aberrations as hallucinating conversations would rule a person unfit for public life. Persons suffering from them need help and not political rewards.

This in no way deters those who believe that only dynasties in the 21st Century can save nations. They go on shamelessly. If one dynasty member cannot deliver, keep a back-up ready. That seems to be the current strategy.

The real strength of democracies surfaces only when persons of merit coming from humble background are able to demolish the myth of dynasties. This was the strength of both the Prime Ministers, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Shri Narendra Modi. They succeeded where others were reluctant to tread upon.

Piyush Goyal awarded The prestigious Carnot Prize by the Kleinman Centre for Energy Policy

Recognizing the outstanding service in the area of sustainable energy solutions, Kleinman Center for Energy Policy at the University of Pennsylvania has awarded the prestigious Carnot prize to Union Finance and Railways Minister Piyush Goyal on Wednesday.

According to reports, a team from the University of Pennsylvania had come to India to award the 4th Carnot prize to Minister Piyush Goyal for his distinguished policy contributions towards the area of sustainable energy solutions. Former Power Minister Goyal received the award for bringing in transformational changes in its power sector, including the fast-track electrification of nearly 18,000 villages in some of the most remote and inaccessible parts of the country.

Goyal shared a Tweet stating that he dedicates the award to PM Modi’s leadership and all workers in the energy sector.


Kleinman Center for Energy Policy presenting the honour to Piyush Goyal said that the award is in recognition of “the pathbreaking transformations in India’s energy sector” under the Modi government. Goyal, who was earlier the power minister had been awarded the prize in October 2018, however, had to skip the event because of the Amritsar train tragedy. The Kleinman Center for Energy Policy also acknowledged India’s “solid footing to reach a 40 per cent renewable mix by 2030”.

Carnot Prize, named in memory of French scientist Sadi Carnot, is considered as one of the most prestigious awards in the energy sector. The prize, which is given annually, recognises distinguished contributions to energy policy through scholarship or practice. Previously, the award has named Dr Daniel Yergin, Vice-chairman of IHS, Dr Fatih Birol, Director of International Energy Agency, Gina McCarthy, a career public servant in fields of energy and environment as winners.

Accepting the award Goyal stated that it was “both a personal honour and a tribute to the efforts of all involved in this great work throughout India to be recognised with the Carnot Prize by the University of Pennsylvania”.

“The nation has progressed from a period of energy shortage to a period of grappling with surplus power. I wonder whether I have myself to blame for this problem because but for the energy efficiency programme, which we rolled out in such a big way, possibly another 20-30 of these power plants would have been running very well,” Goyal said in his acceptance speech on Wednesday.

Goyal said the LED programme has reduced the price of energy-efficient bulbs by 87%. Attributing his success to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his team, Piyush Goyal said that PM Modi had advised him that such programmes can be effectively implemented if they are properly monitored, which prompted him to launch websites and phone apps that gave live updates on the status of the programme. “The entire spend to buy these LED bulbs was $2 billion, which is saving at least $7 billion in electricity bills every year,” he said.

Fatih Birol, the director of the International Energy Agency, who is one of the recipients of the award, has also reportedly praised Goyal for the LED bulbs distribution programme and for electrifying every village in the country.

Meanwhile, Piyush Goyal has stated that he will donate the award money of $25,000 to the International Solar Alliance to constitute the Diwakar Award which will every year recognise an outstanding organisation working for the betterment of special children and expanding the use of solar energy.