Thursday, November 14, 2024
Home Blog Page 6831

BBC shares old report about ‘EVM hacking’ a day after BJP sweeps elections

0

Have you suddenly discovered some people sharing a 2010 news story of BBC on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in India being vulnerable to be “hacked”? Do you think they dug that story up from the BBC website thanks to their sharp memories? Not exactly. BBC helped them.

A day after BSP supremo Mayawati made rather ridiculous allegation that EVMs were hacked that helped BJP win big in Uttar Pradesh, BBC News recycled an old news article that claimed that EVMs could be “hacked”. They shared the article on their Facebook page at around 9 PM on Sunday, but deleted it a couple of hours later.

What was dishonest was that while sharing it on Facebook, the article – titled “US scientists ‘hack’ India electronic voting machines” and originally published in May 2010 – BBC News didn’t clarify that they were sharing an old article. In absence of which, it appeared as if Mayawati’s ridiculous claims were now validated by “US scientists”.

The original article referred to an old controversy, which ironically was triggered after the BJP lost the 2009 general elections. Although senior BJP leaders didn’t officially support this ‘EVM hacking’ theory, there were concerns raised back then by various people after a techie named Hari K Prasad claimed that EVMs could be manipulated.

Hari Prasad had teamed up with a professor and couple of students of computer science at University of Michigan, who are referred to as “US scientists” in the BBC News headline. They had claimed that with some underhand hardware changes, the EVMs could be programmed to favour a particular candidate.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) had back then disputed the claims and issued a clarification (pdf link) reiterating that EVMs were safe. In fact, the Congress government had arrested Hari Prasad on charges of “stealing” an EVM – an act that was opposed by many including Telugu Desam Party President N Chandrababu Naidu.

ECI has since then maintained that enough precautions and security measures are taken to keep the EVMs safe from manipulation. Even going by the claims of Hari Prasad and his team, one needed to physically tamper the EVMs (to make minor hardware changes) to manipulate the results, which technically is not “hacking” as the term is typically used for software manipulation.

Even in their detailed response (pdf link) to the latest allegations by Mayawati, ECI has pointed out about the security measures and how every EVM has a seal signed by representatives of political parties. Therefore, any attempt to physically tamper the EVMs can be spotted by the representatives of such parties. The original complaint by the BSP (pdf link) doesn’t mention any proof of such tampering being observed by its representatives.

One expects that a ‘reputed’ media organisation like the BBC News would be aware of these facts and if at all it touches upon the story of EVM manipulation, they will highlight these aspects. However, like a cheap dishonest clickbait website, BBC News pushed out an old report, which can only help in pushing a propaganda currently being propagated by certain political parties.

This chicanery by BBC News was spotted by many of its readers, who bashed the news organisation on its Facebook page, after which BBC deleted the Facebook post. However, by then the article was shared over 2000 times, thus misleading thousands of people into potentially believing that Mayawati’s allegations were backed by some US scientists. Some are now sharing the old article of their own.

BBC’s intentions are suspect because while they deleted the old news from their Facebook page after users bashed them, an article on similar theme referring to the same 2010 incident was published on their Hindi website.

While ECI claims that the technology is foolproof and enough precautions are taken, to do away with concerns of manipulation, the Supreme Court of India had suggested having a paper trail along with the EVMs i.e. a voter will get a ‘receipt’ showing whom he had voted for, and the same receipt can then be submitted in a ballot box. In case of dispute over EVM numbers, the paper ballots can be counted. Such EVMs were tried, rather unsuccessfully, at a few places in the recently concluded Punjab assembly elections.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi too has encouraged this proposed system of having a paper trail along with the EVMs. Last year he had asked start-ups to come up with technologies that can help the Election Commission implement it successfully.

Myths which Modi and Shah duo shattered during the UP election

0

Elections in UP might have run just for a month, but the preparations period dragged for more than one and a half years. Parties started gearing up from early months of 2015, their processes picked huge momentum after the Bihar assembly election results were declared. For BJP it was important to prove itself after facing a massive defeat, and other political parties saw a great opportunity to crush the BJP wave which roared in 2014 Lok Sabha election. UP was also important because dominance in UP ensures dominance in the Hindi Heartland and it also carves the path for Lok Sabha elections. During this course of time, political parties applied all the Saam-Daam-Dand-Bhed to win the election.

Political pundits may be singing victory odes for Modi today, but only 3 days back, many of them were laughing at BJP’s chances of winning even 200 seats. UP election has busted many myths and doubts which were confidently served to public through various channels. Let us try to inspect some of such popular notions:

Demonetisation will poorly impact the votes of BJP

Political parties and political analysts overestimated the impact of demonetisation on assembly elections. While the public moved on from the discussions on demonetisation, media houses and political pundits carried the hangover till the last date of election. There is no denying about frustration and anger against inconvenience caused by demonetisation, but it was certainly overplayed and exaggerated, which is very evident from then results. Columnists, psephologists, journalists and analysts claimed that they have interacted with multiple samples of population and figured out that people are not going to vote for BJP because of demonetisation. Demonetisation was expected to harm, if not completely devastate, the chances of BJP in UP. Numbers don’t say so.

Priyanka Gandhi can revive Congress

After Rahul Gandhi got exposed into the public sphere, Congress leaders and supporters created huge hype of Priyanka Gandhi. Before UP election, Priyanka Gandhi was projected as the Ram Van. Sadly, Priyanka couldn’t enjoy the hype for long. Her Khaki sarees couldn’t impress people in towns and villagers and her speeches couldn’t convince people. Instead she got massively trolled when she tried to campaign for Rahul Gandhi. In the middle of election, the so perceived savior of Congress withdrew from campaigns.

The magic of Amit Shah and Narendra Modi is fading

The dismal performance of BJP in Bihar and Bengal was presumed as an attenuation of the Modi Wave. While BJP rivals gained confidence strength, BJP supporters became apprehensive of the future. By 2016, critics concluded that Modi Wave had faded and Amit Shah must be raplaced. The duo has once again silenced them all.

Road shows by Modi will have minimal impact on the voting pattern

One beautiful thing about India is that everyone is an expert here. When Modi was doing road shows, people said that a PM must not do such road shows or Modi is doing road shows because he is afraid of losing his hold in Varanasi. After the results, the it is not only hailed by all, but also acknowledged as the new-age politics. The quantitaive impact of road shows can’t be measured, but it with such results, it can’t be overruled too.

Media understands the pulse of public

Go through columns written by eminent journalists, watch their expert opinions on U.P elections, read tweets posted by anchors and opinion makers. Leave the Modi wave, since 2016 media was discussing that BJP will fall in U.P election. Truth is, BJP thrashed everyone, and there is no “post truth” to it.

Narrative makers think that they understand and control the political course of the nation, but they underestimate the Modi and Shah. Amit Shah has always proved that he can make phenomenal political moves before anyone notices it. He did a phenomenal ground level work in U.P , that too silently.

The election is over now. The craziness will halt at least for some time. It is a good time for political analysts to take a break and then retrospect.

How media and journalists got the UP elections all wrong

0

The Uttar Pradesh election results have caused many media folks to eat some humble pie. Most predictions about the UP elections have gone completely wrong. With the BJP winning an unprecedented number of seats, the punditry of many self-proclaimed experts now looks like trash.

One can argue that even the BJP supporters didn’t expect such a victory, but most of the supporters have a day job and they are not out in field to read the ‘pulse’ of the people. The puzzling thing is the so-called experts, the media persons, the journalists who were on the field, in the midst of the action, failed to get it right. Worse, they got it wrong by far too much.

By any count, this was a huge wave for BJP and PM Modi, but some journalists just didn’t see the ginormous wave that was right in front of them.

Here are some blasts from the past:

No Hawa
Absence of Lehar (wave)
No discernible BJP wave
No Wave only
No wave here

Forget a pan-UP wave, could our esteemed journalists at least get a single Lok Sabha seat of Varanasi right? PM Modi’s own seat of Varanasi was talked about by many in the media:

Can’t guarantee even one seat
Modi in trouble in Varanasi
BJP worried about Varanasi
Desperation?

In the end, BJP won all seats in Varanasi, and its alliance won almost 4/5th seats in Uttar Pradesh.

This is not the first time the experts and journalists have got it so wrong. In fact, it was repeat of 2014 general election predictions. Even then, we had published an article that captured how wrong the media and commentators were back then. And it has happened again.

Once is a mistake, twice is choice?

Dear Adarsh Liberals, look, First Past The Post system is not that bad after all

0

This article is written not to whine about First Past The Post (FPTP) election system that we have in India. I think the right wing is mature enough to take it on the chin. You win some and you lose some. However, if you are an Adarsh Liberal, this article is written to give you some solace.

I know you are distraught ever since you realized that the system under which “secular” parties had been winning for decades could also be used by non-idea of India forces to their own advantage. If this article is not enough to make you feel better, OpIndia has published a detailed manual to help you make the right choice of talking (whining) points on social and mainstream media.

Let’s start with the results from the 60 member assembly of Manipur.

Untitled

With 28 seats out of 60, the Congress party is in pole position, merely 3 short of a majority. The BJP on the other hand is at a mere 21 and needs to cover some ground to realize its dream of having a Chief Minister in Manipur. But look at vote-share pizza in this ECI (Election Commission of India) graph!

The BJP has actually polled 36.3% of the vote, more than a full percentage point above the 35.1% secured by the Congress. But hey… Manipur is a tiny state and these statistical aberrations can happen. After all, in terms of absolute numbers, the BJP polled only 20,000 or so votes more than the Congress. Didn’t I say you win some and you lose some? This is not enough balm for the wounds of Adarsh Liberals.

Umm… okay. Let’s move on then. To Punjab.

Untitled

What? The NDA (SAD+BJP) polled 30.6% of the votes, which is as much as 7% more than the AAP’s voteshare of 23.7%! In terms of absolute numbers, the NDA polled some 47 lakh votes, which is a massive 11 lakh votes more than AAP’s 36 lakh votes. Yet, the NDA trails the AAP with just 18 seats, while the AAP won 20 seats.

In fact, the SAD alone won nearly 3 lakh more votes than AAP, but it secured only 15 seats. The post of Leader of Opposition won’t go to SAD, but to AAP.

In terms of public perception, the headline seat numbers will make AAP appear like the principal challenger to Congress when it clearly isn’t. This perception will certainly affect NDA prospects in future elections in Punjab. And it all happened because of the inefficiencies of the FPTP system. Take heart, Adarsh Liberals.

Wait, there’s more. At least it was about 2nd and 3rd position in Punjab. Whether in votes or in seats, the NDA was losing in Punjab anyway. But here’s an absolute shocker for the BJP in Goa where its incumbent government has been “voted”  out.

Untitled

A clear lead of over 4% in vote share and still BJP ends up as the loser to Congress. A lead of 2-3% is generally enough to win a clear majority. A lead of 4-5% begins to push a party closer to the 2/3rd majority mark. Here the BJP won less than 1/3 of the seats despite having a 4.1% vote share lead. If the FPTP ever produced an absurd result, this is it!

It would be quite interesting to sift through India’s electoral history to find out if any other party has ever lost a state despite leading its nearest rival by over 4% of votes.

In contrast, the BJP won its victories in UP and Uttarakhand by massive margins. It had as much as an 11% lead over the SP+INC alliance in UP and a staggering 13% lead over the Congress in Uttarakhand. Nothing for the Congress to complain about over there.

In fact, thanks to the FPTP system, the scoreline from the 5 states reads 3-2 in favor of the Congress! Adarsh Liberals please take heart. FPTP can’t be all that bad. It’s won you numerous victories for over 6 decades.

Throughout this article, I have run with the theme of “you win some and you lose some”. I am okay with that. Perhaps because I am a supporter … even a Bhakt if you want … of a leader who began his life selling tea on a railway platform. As such, I understand the inherent randomness of life. I understand that sometimes life gives you lemons. You can try to make the best of the cards you have been dealt, but sometimes the lemonade just doesn’t sell. You shrug it off and keep working for a better tomorrow. And that tomorrow may never come, despite your best efforts.

I understand that this article may still be cold comfort for Adarsh Liberals. I understand that they and their Shehzada do not see life the same way we do. When success is presented as a birthright, rather than an outcome of talent, circumstance and hard work, failure can feel like an injustice. Perhaps like the result of some grand conspiracy involving space aliens and tampered EVM machines.

The various political combinations of Goa and why India may lose its Defence Minister

0

The next 24 to 48 hours will be extremely exciting in Goan Politics. The Goa elections threw up a fractured mandate, with Congress on 17, BJP on 13, MGP on 3, GFP on 3, NCP on 1 and Independents with 3 on their side. The message to the BJP was analysed here, but it seems the BJP is still keen on forming the Government. In fact, looking at the speed of the BJP, it would appear that they have got the majority and the Congress has been rejected by the voters. A few scenarios may play out:

Scenario 1: BJP led Government

For this BJP (13) is said to be talking to MGP (3), GFP (3) and 2 independents. Getting the NCP and one more independent would be a bonus.

The MGP most recently allied with BJP to be part of the Government from 2012-2016. Before that they had allied with the Congress. Thus, they can swing both ways, but in the present scenario, have expressed desire to go with BJP. There can be 2 reasons: Firstly, MGP realises that they can make merry only with the BJP, since the BJP at the centre will ensure a steady flow of funds. Secondly, Union Minister and Goa observer Gadkari, is close to the MGP honcho Dhavlikar.

The GFP is made up of Congress-men. GFP and Congress were on the verge of allying for the elections, but some last-minute treachery by the Congress meant the deal was off. The skullduggery was allegedly done by Goa Congress Chief Luizinho Faleiro, who has very bad relations with GFP chief Sardesai. This could be one reason why GFP doesn’t want to go with the Congress. But unlike MGP, for the last five years GFP has been a staunch critic of the BJP. This ideological clash is the only thing stopping a BJP-GFP combine. The BJP is planning to nullify this by offering plum ministerial berths to all of GFP’s MLAs. The Congress may not be able to match this, since it has many senior leaders in its 17 which need to be rewarded.

Further, since Faleiro lead the Congress to 17 seats, he is lobbying to become the CM. This is most certainly not acceptable to GFP due to the aforesaid unsavoury episode.

The NCP is in reality run by the lone MLA Alemao, who has been notorious for jumping parties every now and then. Hence, conflating the Goa NCP with the national NCP would not be wise, and it should be understood that the Goa NCP is effectively functioning like an independent MLA.

In the midst of all this, the Goa BJP has passed a resolution demanding that Defence Parrikar Manohar Parrikar be sent back to Goa as the CM. Media also reports that the potential allies have also stated that they would come together only under Parrikar as CM.

Social media is abuzz with conspiracy theories that this could be a plan by defence lobbyists to send back Mr Clean Parrikar so that they can run riot at the centre. But the truth maybe something very boring: For weeks, if not months, Goa has been rife with speculation that Parrikar himself wants to come back. The rumours only got stronger in the run up to the elections, following Parrikar’s cryptic statements. It is an open secret that when he left Goa, he wasn’t very happy to leave his term as a CM of Goa with full majority midway, and that he prefers to be in his home state. Thus, this just might be a ploy by him, to get the local parties to “pull” him back from Delhi.

The BJP on its part has made various statements that talks are on with smaller parties, and if all goes well, within 24 hours, Goa will get another BJP Government.

Scenario 2: Congress led Government

The Congress seems to be very slow of the blocks inspite of being the single largest party. They are still talking among themselves and if media reports are to be believed, they haven’t formally started talking with potential allies. The reason for this is very clear: The Congress is not as much as a united party, as it is a collection of political heavyweights.

Because of this, the Congress is struggling to elect a leader amongst itself. Congress state chief Faleiro led the Congress to this position of strength from a very bad situation. Thus, he naturally feels he should be the CM choice. This would have been fine, but the most likely ally of the Congress, the GFP clearly has no intentions of being part of a Faleiro led Government. They in turn have asked for Former CM Digambar Kamat, who is close to the GFP supremo, to be brought back as CM.

The Congress also has to consider Former CM Pratapsingh Rane as a contender. He himself has ruled himself out, but his ambitious MLA son has prodded his father’s name. Also in the mix is another former CM Ravi Naik, who has emerged victorious after a hiatus of 5 years. Only once the Congress sorts this inner battle, can it approach allies.

Inspite of the quick moves by BJP to woe MGP and GFP, the Congress may still have the last laugh. Characters like the GFP cannot be trusted to be loyal. Till now, the GFP has not made any statement officially, and it may well be a ploy by the GFP to use BJP as a bargaining chip in its deals with the Congress. It should not surprise anyone if the GFP swerves to the Congress at the very last minute.

The Congress has 17 MLAs, plus it has an independent it had backed. Add to this the 3 GFP MLAs and they cross the magic half way mark figure of 20. Thus, irrespective of what the BJP says, until its signed, sealed and delivered, one cannot rule out a Congress Government.

Plan C

Unlikely, but in the magical state of Goa, one cannot rule out some dirty tricks. The MGP was earlier controlled by the Dhavlikar brothers. This time around only one of the two has emerged victorious, with 2 new MLA faces. The BJP can engineer these 2 MLAs to split and merge into the BJP. Improbable, but something similar can be tried with GFP also.

All in all, the next few days will be exciting.

Uttar Pradesh: Lessons for liberals who jumped down the rabbit hole

0

Phew! That was quite a bromance between two of India’s most admired Shehzadas. But you know, at the end of the day, UP ko anti-Romeo squad pasand hai.

The result from Uttar Pradesh had not been in doubt at least since March 3. That’s when Amit Shah, instead of ducking questions and hedging his bets, began to openly dare the media to make the UP elections a referendum not only on demonetization, but on the performance of the Modi government itself.

Untitled

Then, the exit polls came to light, followed by Akhilesh Yadav’s clearly defeatist comments and Mayawati’s absurd charges of EVM tampering. The election results were written in large letters on the faces of the BJP’s two main opponents. Nevertheless, it was amusing to see some alleged journalists fanning the flames of hope until the bitter end. I shall not name them of course. Stories about “Jat anger” and “BSP surge” and “desperate Modi in Varanasi” being already past their sell by date, one can only assume that these Extra Terrestrial (ET) reporters were working for tips.

In the end, it came down to a nail biting contest for the 4th position in Uttar Pradesh between the RLD, the Congress and two small BJP allies : the Apna Dal and the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party (SBSP). This, despite  Honorable Priyanka Gandhiji  who did “more than just physical campaigning”.

Untitled

Such a tremendous blow to a feminist icon so close on the heels of International Women’s Day is one symptom of a society still neck-deep in patriarchy.

Untitled

Another symptom of patriarchy is the fact that I had to fish out this enlightened article from the Google Web cache here. Because much like the Congress disappearing from the map of India, the original article has disappeared from the website of The Indian Express.

Anyway, the contest for 4th place got hotter when it seemed for a while that Mayawati was also throwing her hat into the ring. But just in case you are feeling a bit sorry for the BSP, please don’t. If you can find it in your heart, better feel sorry for those suckers who had to pay several crores. That too probably in notes of Rs 100 (or less) at the peak of notebandi.

There is a lesson here for everyone and I’ll start with the lesson for the BJP and its supporters (or at least its online sympathizers). Stop worrying about a tiny regional party that I do not care to name over here. No matter whether the Congress is unconscious, in the ICU or high on mood altering substances, they will continue to be the BJP’s principal challenger for at least a decade and likely more. Stop falling for the media trick of sending the BJP to chase a tiny mosquito through the jungle while it is being stalked for prey by the expert carnivores in the wild.

The bigger lessons, of course, are for the losers in this election. The reason Akhilesh Yadav boarded the media train to nowhere is because he drew exactly the wrong lessons from Modi’s career. Akhilesh Yadav saw that Modi had a fantastic PR campaign in 2014. He convinced himself that only if he could get one of those for himself, he would win as well.

But what Akhilesh didn’t realize is that he was only looking at the tip of the iceberg. He did not realize that Modi’s showmanship was buttressed by 12 years of working hard at the nuts and bolts in Gujarat. Akhilesh made the same mistake when he expected a repeat of Bihar 2015 in Uttar Pradesh. He saw that Nitish had great arithmetic and the PR skills of Prashant Kishore. What he didn’t see was that Nitish had spent 10 years pulling Bihar out of the trash the hard way.

Akhilesh Yadav was like the beaming kid who gets his photograph taken with his new bat that has a sticker of Sachin Tendulkar. No hairstyle, no tone of voice and no sticker can make a kid into Sachin Tendulkar. It takes talent, luck and more hard work than you can even imagine.

Of course, Akhilesh’s retinue of flattering patrakars were happy to tell him that the Yadav Shehzada was on his way to making history. He was paying them to enhance his illusion. Frankly, Akhilesh would have been better off listening to his veteran dad and battle hardened uncle.

The best thing about this election is that Mayawati’s ponzi scheme with caste / religious groups has finally come to an end. First Dalits, then Brahmins and now Muslims … her modus operandi of pretending to be advocate of one group in each election, then collecting her winnings and moving on had to end somewhere. She had a good run though and our society has only itself to blame for that.

By the way, the exact point where I knew that BJP had won Uttar Pradesh was when the Lutyens consensus shifted to a “BSP surge” from the narrative of an Akhilesh wave. You see, BSP is like a “safe space” where snowflake liberals go when they get “triggered” by the bitterness of reality. This is because Mayawati’s vision of India as a chaos of numerous social factions, all at perennial war with each other, holds a primal fascination for the Indian liberal. You know, the type that romances JNU. The liberals tried to insult voter intelligence by spreading the rumor that Jats in Western UP were wasting their votes on a tiny vote katwa party with no hope of crossing 20 seats. It didn’t work. When their machinations failed in the Yadav heartland, the liberals changed horses midway and gravitated towards their “safe space” in the BSP tent. No wonder then that the “idea of India” fell between two stools.

The final lesson in this election is for the pollsters, especially the elite ones at CSDS-Lokniti. How did they manage to dig themselves into a hole like this?

Untitled

I do not for a moment doubt the sincerity and veracity of this next claim:

Untitled

And yet they missed a historic wave in Uttar Pradesh. I can bet it’s because they let their own pet theory of the “vocal BJP voter” interfere with their conclusions. When you mix faith with science, the result is always havoc. Perhaps next time CSDS-Lokniti should be loyal to their own data rather than their own prejudices from the 90s. Come out of the Yogendra Yadav frame of mind.  But them, you can’t teach an old Commie new tricks.

Did polarization of Hindu votes take place in Uttar Pradesh?

I was invited to Zee News for discussing assembly election results and there I had the opportunity to talk to Arif Mohammad Khan, who once was a state minister and an active politician, famous for being the Muslim face who quit Congress when Rajiv Gandhi, then enjoying a mammoth majority in Lok Sabha, took steps to overturn the Shah Bano judgment to please Muslim fundamentalists.

As trends appeared to settle down and it looked like BJP was all set to win Uttar Pradesh (and it has swept the elections like the 2014 Lok Sabha elections as I write), some people started talking about kabristan-shamshan and “polarization”.

Arif Mohammad Khan
Arif Mohammad Khan had joined BJP in 2004, but left the party in 2007 as he felt he was being ignored. He has not been active in politics since then.

Mr. Khan too agreed that some “communal” polarization helped BJP in Uttar Pradesh, but he put the blame squarely on the “secular” parties for triggering this polarization.

He had an interesting argument. He said that Hindus can’t be polarized out of thin air i.e. one can’t expect Hindu votes to consolidate due to some religious slogans or due to some religious campaigns on its own. He said that Hindu polarization can happen, and does happen, only in reaction to Muslim polarization.

To support his argument, he pointed out that if Hindus could be polarized just on religious lines, parties like Jan Sangh should have done rather well in elections in newly independent India, when memories of partition were fresh. But nothing of that sort happened, as Muslims who stayed back in India were not a “vote bank” yet in Hindu eyes.

He argues that the Hindu polarization started happening only after the Shah Bano case – i.e. as a reaction to what was seen as a policy of appeasement and vote bank politics. And that grew to take shape of Ram Janmbhoomi movement eventually.

In the same regard, he referred to the AK Antony report – prepared by the Congress party to analyze the causes of 2014 Lok Sabha defeat – where it was pointed out that Congress’ secularism was seen as “Anti Hindu”. Even on air during discussion, he suggested, rather beseeched, the Congress representatives to go back and read that report and reflect.

In December 2015, I had written about this Antony report, and what I thought was Congress’ takeaway from it. I had argued that Congress thought that perhaps it was better to “guilt trip” the Hindus (through campaigns like “rising intolerance”) rather than take any step that corrects this impression of its secularism being “Anti Hindu”.

As per Arif Mohammad Khan, the moment Congress and Samajwadi Party came together, it was a signal of Muslim vote consolidation – for there is nothing else common between the supporters of the two parties except Muslim votes – and this in turn caused Hindu consolidation.

Now I may tend to agree with this observation due to confirmation bias, but perhaps there is much merit to it.

The first thing that came to my mind is that if Congress and Samajwadi Party coming together could signal Muslim consolidation, why did the same not happen in Bihar where everyone came together against the BJP?

Maybe because in Bihar coming together of RJD-JD(U)-Congress was seen as caste consolidation rather than communal consolidation. The reservation controversy triggered by some statements by RSS leaders too made sure that in Bihar, it remained about caste rather than religion. Even though BJP did try to raise the cow slaughter issue in the last leg of elections, the polarization couldn’t be as successful, as it was not in reaction to any perceived Muslim polarization?

Nonetheless, it doesn’t look like Congress is going to heed to Arif Mohammad Khan’s advice of taking Antony’s report seriously, because their “rising intolerance” strategy appeared to give them victory in Bihar.

Even though they have lost Uttar Pradesh, don’t think they will even remotely link it to what Mr. Khan said. And maybe that will continue to be a good news for the BJP.

Goa Election Results: The low-down and what can be expected

0

Uttar Pradesh and adjoining Uttarakhand saw a BJP or rather Modi Tsunami. Manipur too is looking ripe for picking by the BJP. But in Goa, the BJP deflated from a commanding 21 (20 is the half way mark), to a lowly 13. In Punjab, the BJP was a much smaller player since SAD was the bigger partner, and in that sense, Goa has broken a nationwide trend of a BJP upsurge.

It was a multi-cornered contest in Goa, the “Right” space being fought for by BJP, former partner MGP, and RSS faction led GSM. The “Left” space was being fought for by Congress, NCP and its splinters like GFP, GVP etc. Add to this, the enthusiastic AAP. In an earlier post predicting the Goa elections in January 2017, I had elicited two possibilities: a split in the anti-BJP votes, leading to BJP coming close to the majority mark OR a consolidation of the anti-BJP votes, leading to a fight between BJP and Congress for the single largest party. The second scenario has played out, and Congress with 17 has its nose ahead.

Where BJP lost its way

For the first time, a sitting Chief Minister lost his seat in Goa, that too by a huge margin. Besides him, 4 senior two-term MLAs and Ministers also lost their seats, some by big margins. On the other hand, both Christian Ministers retained their seats, all Christian MLAs (6 including aforesaid 2 ministers) retained their seats, and BJP added one more Christian MLA, thus having more Christian MLAs (7) than Hindu MLAs right now. Also, most of the MLAs who have won from BJP, are “younger” or “newer” faces, with most of the old guard losing. The messages are clear:

1. Voters rejected the arrogance & non-performance of the sitting ministers. Inspite of giving a stable Government which has arguably undertaken maximum development works along with most welfare schemes, these senior ministers failed to win, while their younger counterparts, with no ministries, managed to go through. This shows that the fault lies at the individual level.

2. The Minorities which had backed BJP in 2012 have moved away. This disenchantment was inspite of tremendous appeasement politics of BJP in Goa, which even led to a split in the RSS in Goa. The main reason for this is the polarising image of PM Modi, and Parrikar’s closeness to Modi.

3. A seat by seat analysis shows that in most places where BJP has lost, the split in the saffron forces (BJP-MGP-GSM) hasn’t had much impact. Beyond 3 to 4 seats, this factor hasn’t played out. Thus, it doesnt alone explain the fall from 21 to 13, despite importing 2 sure winners from the Congress.

4. BJP had sensed the imminent defeat of CM Parsekar and had hence probably shied away from declaring him as the CM candidate. The BJP even tried to put Parrikar’s name in the mix, to pull votes. The Defence Minister himself campaigned extensively in many parts of Goa, trying to undo some of the damage. Clearly, the voters have not forgiven the sins of his ministers, just because of his soothing balm.

A Congress Resurgence?

To the plain eye, the rise of the Congress is miraculous. It had won 9 seats in 2012. Out of these BJP poached 2 candidates, and 1 was thrown out by the Congress itself, leaving it with 6 MLAs. Over the last 5 years, the Congress had ceded the space of the “opposition” to smaller regional satraps/independents. Yet, they now managed to reach 17. Is the Congress as a party seeing a revival?

In Goa, the Congress is mostly defined by regional satraps, some of whom cannot see eye to eye even with each other. Thus, to say the “Congress” has won, would be overstating the impact of “Congress” the party. Fact is 4 people who jumped ship from Congress to BJP also won on the BJP ticket, 3 who left Congress for smaller parties also won their respective seats. These people won, without the Congress tag, thus showing that it was their individual strength, which had a large part to play. The 17 seats of the Congress are thus  largely due to the presence of strong regional leaders, and the natural swing away from the BJP.

AAP impact?

AAP had projected itself as being in the pole position to usurp the anti-BJP space. Banners of 35% vote-share were plastered all over Goa. They had begun referring to their CM Candidate as the “next CM”. In the end, AAP ended up with 6% vote-share, not a single seat, and the “next CM of Goa”, Elvis Gomes, ended up a lowly fourth in his own constituency. To say that AAP’s performance was underwhelming would be an understatement.

Quite clearly, the anti-BJP vote, especially that of the Christians, did not move much towards AAP, probably because they sensed that AAP would act more as a vote-cutter, than a party which could actually win. This in turn helped Congress get to their tally of 17. The drubbing of the national image of AAP also did no favours to AAP Goa.

The rest: King makers

MGP got 3 seats, same number as it had last time. GFP won 3 seats, up from the lone seat its founder member had won as an independent. NCP won one seat. And the rest went to 1 BJP backed independent, 1 Congress backed independent, and another slightly BJP inclined independent.

Both the BJP (13) or the Congress (17) need the support of all or any of the above to form a Government. This is how the players are inclined:

1. MGP: Was in the Government with Congress till 2012, and then with BJP for 5 years till 2017. It can swing both sides so there is no “ideological” challenge for them. Latest statements indicate that MGP would like to ally with the BJP, but this could quickly change with a sweet deal from Congress.

A twist in the tale: The MGP was for long a party controlled by its 2 MLA brothers: The Dhavlikars. Now, one of them has lost, and for the first time after many years, the MGP has 2 MLAs who are not part of the controlling family. One of these 2 MLAs, is notorious for his party hopping ways, having been in both the BJP and the Congress. He is even rumoured to have said that he s willing to take another MLA and split from the MGP, merging into the BJP. Will that play out? The BJP would love to avoid Dhavlikar, who is know for his ways of extracting a high price for his support.

2. GFP: All MLAs are ex-congressmen. The party was formed on the model of a left-of-centre version of Shiv Sena or MNS, i.e. fiercely protecting Goan identity. The GFP was to ally with the Congress, but ego issues with the Congress state chief meant that some last-minute back-stabbing led them to going their own ways. GFP still remembers this recent double-crossing by the Congress.  On the other hand, the GFP mentor has made a mark for himself by his strident anti-BJP and anti-Parrikar position, eating up the opposition space in the state assembly. However, in the past week (probably owing to exit polls), GFP had slightly softened its stand towards BJP. As of now, they indicate that they are open to talks to both BJP and Congress.

The stumbling blocks for GFP would be these: Going with BJP would not suit its ideology. But going with Congress would mean forgiving a deceiver. Worse, Goa Congress Chief and Former CM Luizinho Faleiro is eyeing the CM’s post, and he and the GFP mentor Sardesai are on extremely poor terms. Going with the Congress would mean either GFP takes a back-seat, or Congress goes for another CM face, which would again throw up an internal fight.

3. NCP: NCP as a party is non-existent and is essentially a one man show run by the lone MLA Churchill Alemao, who too can swing both ways if needed. It is more likely he will go with Congress though.

4. The Independents can also be considered to be equally willing to ally with either the BJP or the Congress.

BJP has not given up

Even though the mandate has clearly rejected BJP, BJP is still keeping its options open. Amit Shah mentioned in a press conference that the BJP would form the Government in Goa. At the state level, Parrikar has made it clear that since BJP still enjoys the highest voter-share, BJP has won the popular voter, and will try to provide a “stable” Government, by talking to all MLAs and parties.

With the Centre on its side, a possibly pliable Governor, and an internally divided Congress, the BJP may somehow cobble up 21 MLAs. But such a Government, may not be “morally” acceptable since the verdict is clearly an anti-BJP vote. This experiment, if it happens, could lead to political harakiri for the BJP, unless this hotch-potch Government manages to perform exceedingly well.

The way forward

Ideally, the BJP should let Congress go ahead with forming the Government. The verdict clearly shows the Congress as the winner, and the BJP must be gracious in defeat. The Congress has its own internal squabbles for the CM’s post and has icy relations with potential allies. Such a wobbly Government may not last long and may rekindle the desire among voters to see the stability which BJP had provided them with earlier.

Further, the 2019 Lok Sabha elections are just 2 years away, and the BJP could try to get mid-term polls then, hoping to sail through with the national mood, along with the possible disenchantment of the voters with a shaky Congress led Government. For now, the BJP must accept that in large parts, the BJP itself has defeated the BJP.

Reactions: Mayawati cries EVM tampering as BJP even won in Muslim majority areas

0

BSP supremo Mayawati whose party is performing poorly in UP seems to be very angry with the verdict. Today when she called a press conference, people expected that she would issue a statement conceding her party’s defeat, but surprisingly her press conference actually turned out to be a stage to create sensationalism and drama. She hurled allegations like EVM tampering and claimed that EVM tempering is the reason why BJP has won most votes in Muslim majority constituencies.


Besides questioning the integrity of India’s electoral process, she stereotyped the entire Muslim community into one which is always expected to vote in a set way. To avoid the so called ‘voter fraud’ she demanded that Ballot papers be brought back in the electoral process.

She even created elaborate conspiracy theories to substantiate her claims:


Understandably people reacted to Mayawati’s unsportsmanlike comments:


As it turns out she has more demands:


Even journalists panned her for the statements:


Is this the reason she is so nervous?

Social Media reacts to BJP’s mamoth surge, AAP’s demise and more

0

Trends for 2017 Assembly elections are live now. In Uttar Pradesh, BJP looks all set to perform better than the wildest expectations, with it hovering above the 300 mark. In Uttarakhand too, BJP looks like forming the government with a 2/3 rd majority. In Punjab, Congress is bursting the AAP bubble with Kejriwal’s party coming a distant second with 25 seats as compared to the Congress’s 75. Goa and Manipur look too close to be called and might be heading towards a hung parliament.

Reactions started pouring early in the morning. The prime focus was on BJP’s surge and AAP’s demise, the party which according to latest figures is yet to open account in Goa. Here are a few reactions which we managed to compile:

The BJP’s UP performance with respect to all the previous elections it has contested:


Turns out, the BJP’s appeal transcended all communities:


Now speculations have started who would be BJP’s CM Candidate


People also made fun of Rahul Gandhi’s entrepreneurship comments:


The alliance in UP which clearly did not work


There were a lot of reactions to AAP’s below par performance:


 


Some pulled out old tweets of Kejriwal which would be a bit embarrassing in today’s context


A reaction to Congress’s victory:


Some reactions for the states which didn’t get a lot of focus:


Some in the opposition gave an astute reaction:


Even AAP’s Ashutosh gave a good reaction, though the context looks a bit misplaced for him:


Even Modi’s usual critics critics conceded:


While we are publishing this article, we are still seeing many interesting reactions. We will update it once the results are declared.