Monday, December 23, 2024
Home Blog Page 7018

3 reasons why journalists like Praveen Swami attacked Indian narrative on Pak boat incident

0

OpIndia.com has already explained why the report by The Indian Express reporter Praveen Swami sounded like a hit-job against the Coast Guard in particular and the Indian security agencies in general.

The obvious question is why Swami, and other journalists who are sharing his highly speculative article like gospel truth, would do that?

Our team believes that it has to be one of these three reasons, or maybe combinations of these reasons:

1. There is a “Deep Throat” in the Indian government: Although Praveen Swami’s article is full of loopholes and it aims to counter some claims that were never made by the government in first place, it still quotes “sources”. So who are these “sources”?

If asked, Praveen Swami will either block you on Twitter or give a standard reply that a ‘journalist is not obliged to reveal his sources’. Indeed, a journalist may choose not to reveal his sources for various reasons, but he can’t just make up things when the national security is involved.

If we indeed believe that Swami has got some “sources” in the government or in the defense machinery, it means there is a whistleblower in the system who thinks that India is the aggressor vis a vis Pakistan.

It is a very serious charge. But we will still say that Praveen Swami doesn’t need to reveal who this whistleblower is. But at least say that there is one. Name him something like “Deep Throat”.

Mr. Swami, this is not the first time you have questioned Indian security agencies. Earlier also you had published reports that painted the Indian Army as aggressors. It is a serious charge. It means that our nation is not as pious as we believe.

However, Mr. Swami, we are not going to believe you just because you claim some “source” told you. And no, we are also not going to believe those who think this “source” is living across the border. But Mr. Swami, at least invent a name for this “source”, if you are not inventing reports.

2. Revenge attack for denying access: It is a well known fact that “access journalism” has received a major setback ever since Narendra Modi government took charge. Access journalism is where a reporter receives special treatment and “exclusive” information from government authorities, and later the same is published in newspapers as information coming through “sources”.

(a journalist also invents sources, but that’s another issue and we will let that go right now)

The Modi government is increasingly denying journalists such access. There have been many occasions when journalists have got information through Twitter feeds i.e. at the same time when any common man of the country got. This drying up of access has hurt the ego of many journalists who feel that their “power”, which is due to information asymmetry, is being threatened by the new government.

To get even with the government, the journalist has to flex muscle and show his or her “power”. And he or she can do it by planting speculative stories that hurts the image of the government.

This particular case could be one example of such revenge attack with a message to the government – “start giving us importance or we will malign your image and weaken people’s faith in you.”

3. Political dislike transforming into dislike for the establishment: Let’s accept it. Narendra Modi is indeed a divisive figure. He induces extreme emotions. People either love him or hate him.

With the mainstream media mostly dominated by people identifying themselves as left-liberal, most of them hate Modi. Now with Modi being the Prime Minister, this hate has overwhelmed them so much that now they have started hating the Indian establishment itself.

In such a scenario, a journalist starts disliking, distrusting, and hating everything about the Indian establishment – defense and external relations included. The enemy of enemy becomes a friend. And thus in this case, Pakistan becomes a “friendly state” while India becomes an “aggressor” for them – assumptions that pushed them to question the official narrative without waiting for details to emerge. In fact, our journalists raised questions before Pakistan did!

Please note that India is seeing such thing for the first time. Even the Modi supporters hated Sonia Gandhi a lot, but their dislike for Congress had not transformed into dislike for the establishment. When Praveen Swami had published reports questioning Indian Army’s narrative, many Modi supporters had chosen to believe the army and the UPA government over Swami’s “sources”.

So which of these do you think is the reason? Let us know by commenting below.

Dear Ravish Kumar, right is not winning narrative, it has just started speaking up

0

It is no surprise these days that many journalists or reporters whine about the nature of responses they get on social media. However, when one of the leading voices goes a step further by imploring one section of people to respond, it does raise many questions. Ravish’s article (or narration) is another instance of misinformation propagated by our media. Let me take him head on.

Ravish starts by saying that he was made to believe that the Left was far more superior in communication than the Right. Who could have told him that? Of course my guess would be his comrades – as he started his career in a Left Wing media organization. Early 90s hardly was a communication masterclass by the Right, as they did not control the narrative during the Ramjanmbhoomi movement. This would have cemented Ravish’s views on Right’s ineffectiveness in communication. He effectively boxed himself in that cocoon and started looking everything else as the other side. Remember, he is supposed to be a journalist.

Ravish mentions the alacrity with which RSS embraced technology. Staying in Germany for sometime now, I see many initiatives by the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS). HSS is one organization or community which facilitates overseas Indians to be in touch with fellow overseas Indians and Indian culture. Technology has played its part, but awakened citizens would also want people to hear their views loud and clear. Ravish also slips in an interesting point – “They (Right) would not let a single idea slip without contention”. This reveals more the true nature of the Indian Left intelligentsia. They would have hoped and prayed for the Right to remain dormant like they did for an entire decade and the Left could continue bullying their ideas on India. They were, after all, creating their own ‘idea of India’.

Ravish also comes across more as an egotist than a reporter or journalist. He accepts that his or Left’s arguments are effectively demolished by the Right on social media. However, it does hurt him that it isn’t someone from the leadership stable of RSS who does that, but ‘aam aadmi’s. This takes away any pleasure he may have had continuing his agenda of tarnishing RSS. Also, it does take him by surprise that people are no longer taking his preachings lying down. I would guess that the mainstream media will learn that more Indians understand the differences between the Left and Right, only after 2019.

Ravish then moves on to another hilarious part: that RSS supporters apparently view things in binary. For starters, I am sure he does not see his own shows where he has 6-8 small boxes with people from each party giving a for or against views. I wonder how many times, he has asked for a nuanced view from a guest. Moreover, this is the same journalist , who went around UP prior to the general elections, asking everyone his caste. A journalist who sees any policy or any initiative through the caste lens asks for nuance.

Ravish also comes across as someone who hasn’t understood social media yet. He mentions about the apparent “synchronized attacks” of his tweets. He should well know that he doesn’t own the space. People would express their opinions on his tweet and move on to the next one. To think people are waiting for these Left journalists’ tweets to pounce on them, is giving too much importance to themselves. For every tweet from you that needs a befitting response, there are other more critical patients who need counseling. (Hint: think about any of your Left colleagues)

Ravish also feels so sorry for not being able to debate “Aadarsh Gram Yojana” and smart cities concept initiated by the Modi government. He laments that the conversion row has taken prominence. Well, this is a textbook case of the Left hypocrisy. Both the aforementioned programs were announced on 15 August by the Prime Minister from the ramparts of Red Fort. PM candidate Modi had also mentioned about smart cities in many of his campaign rallies. The conversion issues started from late November/early December. If Ravish wished, he had atleast 3 full months to debate on these programs. It’s anybody’s guess how many debates he would have moderated in his show debating nuances of these programs.

Ravish insinuates that most of the recent debates are making people nervous. Well for starters, Ravish hasn’t been paying close attention to Assembly election results. Also to say that people didn’t have an alternative to the Corrupt Congress than BJP/Modi, he hasn’t looked at the ballot papers too. He would have found many candidates vying for seats. In his shows, he continues to deny credit to Modi government for reigning in inflation or improving India’s brand abroad. Am sure he hasn’t heard of Napolean’s quote: “I know he is a great General, but is he lucky?”. Whatever external favorable factors, I would rather have a leader who is a lucky charm for India than the one who quietly takes India to the abyss. Ravish would surely disagree. I guess it is too much to ask for someone who has blinkers on.

Notice how only mentions the BJP, RSS or Right supporters to make his points. Not once does he mention the eulogies given by the Congress or AAP supporters on social media. Oh well! I almost forgot…!

What do Indian journalists know that the Coast Guard doesn’t?

0

Edit: For a detailed response to Praveen Swami’s piece of the Coast Guard and the Pakistani Boat, read this

First a few facts. Facts which are undeniable, no matter which narrative you choose, the one published by the Coast Guard via its press release, or the one which is being spread by some Journalists:

1. A Pakistani boat was intercepted by the Indian Coast Guard based on Intelligence inputs on 31st December 2014.

2. The boat caught fire and sunk in the Arabian Sea, approximately 365 kilometer South-West of Probandar, Gujarat.

3. The incident took place around the new year’s eve, and it came to light after a government press release issued yesterday i.e. on 2nd January 2015.

Now we first turn to the Coast Guards version, as per their official Press Release. The release says, based on the input that a boat was planning some “Illicit activity”, they first located the Pakistani boat by air, and then sent a Coast Guard Ship to intercept it. The Coast Guard asked the boat to stop, but the boat chose to speed away. This led to a hot pursuit chase. The boat had 4 men on board, who eventually hid themselves in the lower deck and set the boat on fire, which resulted in a major explosion. The boat eventually sank in the wee hours of 1st January.

Now, let’s be clear on a few things. Neither the Coast Guard nor anyone in the government claimed that this boat was an attempt at terror attack yesterday (today, BJP President Amit Shah claimed that it could be a “possible” attempt, but he doesn’t represent the government. But most importantly, Shah said it “today”. We are talking what happened yesterday).

Despite the government or the Coast Guard not putting any “terror” motive to the boat, hours after the press release was put out, Indian media went berserk. While some in the media chose to glorify the Coast Guard for averting a 26/11 scenario, some journalists started imputing motives to Coast Guards.

The press release had made it clear that the Coast Guard and intelligence agencies were indulged in finding more details, and thus they were not making any certain claims. But when did our journalists love “details”? They were quick to throw insinuations based only on the press release.

This journalist from India Today declared that Coast Guard had indulged in “fake encounter”:


This journalist from NDTV put a question mark on the press release just because of the phrase:


//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And the most disappointing and shocking spin came from Praveen Swami of The Indian Express, who wrote an article on the same evening as if time was running out and heavens will fall if he didn’t come up with his half baked conclusions and theories.

Swami, almost behaving like Subramanian Swamy, declared that there were “mounting doubts” over “terror claim”. Read his article here that he wrote last night. The inaccuracies start from the headline of the report itself.

Swami’s headline reads: “Doubts mount over India’s claims of destroying ‘terror boat’ from Pakistan”. Did India ever claim to “destroy” a boat? Did they ever claim that the boat was a “Terror Boat”? The press release nowhere says the Coast Guard “destroyed” a boat, neither is the word “terror” ever mentioned. It just clearly says “Illicit activities” and that the boat had explosives. We wonder who gave this information to Mr Swami that “India claims to destroy a terror boat”.

In the first line of this article, Swami again reiterates that “the Coast Guard destroyed a boat”, and there is a link to an earlier article on The Indian Express, to sort of back this claim. The title of this earlier article says ” Pakistani boat blows up”. In the first para it says “its four occupants blew it up”.

STILL, Mr Swami, in his post, goes on to say that the Indian Coast Guard “Destroyed a boat”. Dear Mr Swami, where did you infer this from? Did you have any live feed to this incident? How can you say that a boat was “destroyed” by the Indian Coast Guard, thus disputing the official version that it blew itself up, WITHOUT providing a shred of evidence?

There is no harm in having a different view as compared to the official version. But if you have another theory, and you are going to publish it via Mainstream Media, you better have facts or proofs to back your claims, not just “sources” or conjecture. We think Mr Swami and his friends have a lot of answering to do, but who will ask the questions?

And it was BJP’s turn to U-Turn

Early last year, current Defence Minister, then Goa CM, and star campaigner of BJP had said that AAP was what BJP used to be. He was speaking in a different context, but now it seems, BJP is what AAP used to be called: A U-Turn Party. Ever since BJP has come to power, there have been several U-Turns which it has taken. We list some of the prominent ones:

1. The Henderson Brooks report
When in opposition, BJP came out full throttle asking for the entire Henderson Brooks report to be declassified and made public. This was because it was the believed that this report blamed Nehru for India’s defeat in the 1962 War.

Once BJP came to power though it began singing a different tune. It ruled out making the above document public saying that “it would not be in national interest”. New found love for Nehru?

2. Talks with Pakistan
Before they came to power, BJP was suggesting the UPA Government should suspend talks with Pakistan until, Dawood and Hafiz Saeed were handed over to India. This stand might have helped them to build up anti-Pak rhetoric, but it wasnt practical.

And this was proved when PM Modi, in a sort of U Turn, invited Pakistan PM Nawaaz Sharif to his swearing in ceremony. We could argue that this is not “talks with Pakistan” but it was certainly a softening and change in stance.

3. Land Swap Deal with Bangladesh
As an opposition party, BJP had opposed the deal to swap some land with Bangladesh to resolve border disputes. Assam BJP Vice President had gone on record to say “The agreement will not do any good for the state”

However, once BJP came to power, PM Modi, in his 2 day visit to Assam endorsed this deal saying “there will be no compromise on Assam’s security”

4. Hike in FDI cap in Insurance
In 2013, like a good opposition party would, BJP opposed the proposed hiking of FDI cap in Insurance to 49%. They agreed with other provisions but this was a “sore point”

Eventually when they came to power, BJP was fully in favour of this 49% cap in FDI, and in fact pushed the bill via an ordinance after it faced opposition in the Rajya Sabha

5. Diesel Price Deregulation
In January 2013 when the UPA Government had announced its plane to deregulate diesel in a phasewise manner, BJP had come out against this decision. Current Home Minister Rajnath Singh, had then said “This is an insensitive government. Deregulation of diesel prices will lead to hike in its price”.

But come October 2014, Diesel prices were deregulated by BJP, as per the schedule announced earlier. This maybe a progressive step but it certainly is a change in policy as far BJP’s own stand is concerned.

6. Political Parties under RTI
Back in June 2013, while Congress was opposed to Political Parties being covered under the RTI, BJP had said it didnt mind sharing more details, provided it was applied to all parties alike.

But once they came to power, Minister of State for Personnel and Training Jitendra Singh, gave a written reply in Rajya Sabha saying bringing a Political Party under RTI, would “hamper its smooth internal working”.

7. Aadhar Card
In the heat of campaigning for Lok Sabha Elections, BJP had taken a stand that Aadhar card was not in national interests. Ananth Kumar, who contested against Nandan Nilekani said they would scrap Aadhar card, and initiate criminal proceedings on the those responsible for it.

But within a few months, Aadhar card scheme was back on track, albeit with a revamp on the cards, thanks to a clear go ahead by PM Narendra Modi, thus ending months of speculation about its future.

(The links mentioned above are curated from a post on Quora which replied to the question “What are the worst U-turns by BJP after forming the Government?” )

Muslim family that converted to Hinduism stops puja after getting threats

A Muslim family of 17 members, which converted to Hinduism last week, has stopped following Hindu rituals after they received threats from anti-social elements.

This incident of a Muslim family converting to Hinduism is different from the much talked about Agra Gharwapasi event, which stalled parliament for days and led to various TV news debates earlier.

The latest incident involving family of one Rahmat, took place on December 25 in Davli village under Malpura police station as reported by Amar Ujala.

Another Gharwapasi in Agra
The family briefly followed Hindu rituals before they started receiving threats (photo courtesy)

Rahmat’s family had started doing puja-paath (worship as per Hindu rituals) and had installed statues of Hindu gods at their residence on the same day.

However, they soon started getting threats, following which police was deployed in the village. Local authorities too visited the families, and ever since then, the family is not speaking to anyone.

It should be noted that on December 26, an Urdu newspaper named Roznama Urdu Times, had published an article that argued that any Muslim who leaves the religion of Islam and accepts another religion could be killed.

The article argued that killing of such a person was sanctioned in Quran and was approved by Prophet Mohammad too. The article can be read here.

It can’t be coincidence that the Rahmat family started getting threats after this article was published. And now they are too scared to speak up about the whole incident.

But instead of tracking and punishing those who issued threats to the family, the Uttar Pradesh police and authorities appear busy tutoring Rahmat and his family members to disown the conversion.

Currently the family members are not speaking to anyone, but we will not be surprised if they suddenly start saying that they were “forced” to change their religion. After all who would like to take risk when an article in newspaper says the family is fit to be killed?

And as always, the mainstream media, especially the leading English TV news channels of India, are not reporting either this incident of threat to the family or the hateful article published in the Urdu newspaper.

Terrorist caught wearing skullcap, What should Indian media do now?

0

News channel Headlines Today reported today that two suspected terrorist, believed to have been involved in Burdwan blasts, were caught in Noida on 19th December. They claim one of the accused is a Bangladeshi national, while the other is from Uttar Pradesh. They were apprehended in a joint effort Uttar Pradesh Anti-terrorist squad, West Bengal Anti Terrorist squad, and IB. Screen grabs of the terrorists are as below:

orig

As you can see these suspected Terrorists are wearing skullcaps. We have already discussed the fact that sadly, Muslims identity is being linked to skullcaps. So will it be in the interest of “Secularism” to broadcast pictures of these suspected terrorists with their skull caps on? Should Media do something about this?

We at OpIndia.com have a suggestion: Why not photoshop these images so as to remove the skull cap and replace it with some other secular headgear. In fact, we have done their job for them, have a look:

1. Suspected Terrorists wearing caps worn by RSS Sickular Sanghis
rss

2. Suspected Terrorists wearing caps worn by Anarchist AAPtards
aap

3. Suspected Terrorists wearing caps worn by Corrupt CSK players
csk

We are sure, the above pics will end the Communal Stereotyping of Muslims in this world dominated by Right Wing Hindutva lunatics who are spreading their false propaganda

Top 10 lies spread by the Indian media in 2014

2014 saw some of the biggest lies being spread by our Mainstream media. Reporting standards crashed to all time lows, not that they were very high anytime. But now, since Social media had become so active, there was nothing to hide behind. We bring you the top 10 Hitjobs/Brainfades/Goof-Ups/Supari-Journalism of our Mainstream Media in 2014:

1. All Media Houses: BJP will bring back black money within 100 days.

I don’t need to post any link to the story here, everybody knows this oft-repeated tale. Apparently, Rajnath Singh, at some rally, promised to bring back Black money in 100 days. Well it took a Twitter user @KartikeyaTanna to bring out the truth here.

He pulled out the video of the rally, in which Rajnath Singh clearly said “100 din ke andar karyavahee prarambh kar denge” i.e. an enquiry will be started into the Black Money case within 100 days of coming to power. Not sure what sort of Journalistic degree is required to twist “will start and enquiry” to “will bring back money”.

2. Navbharat Times: 3 lakh bogus voters found in Modi’s Varanasi

Navbharat times reported in November, 6 months after the Lok Sabha elections, that the Election Commission had detected 3,11,057 bogus voters and it was estimated that the total bogus voters number could reach 6,47,085. I donot know how they arrived at this exact estimate though. Even Paragon of Truth Arvind Kejriwal tweeted this report out:

kj

The “Truth” was out when RK Pandey, additional Chief Electoral Officer of State Election Commission of Uttar Pradesh gave out a clarification that “they are just repeated names, not repeated voters”. Was this just a case of poor comprehension skills of a reporter?

3. The Business Standard: Modi mantra: Lean Cabinet, not so lean PMO

This news article tried to make a point that although PM Modi talks about “lean cabinet” etc, his PMO employs more staff than even his predecessor. This report was based on an RTI reply from the Government apparently. But it “wrongly interpreted” the figures in the RTI reply and put out an erroneous report.

The fact was, the current PMO’s staff strength had actually come down to 385, from 411 employed by the earlier PMO. The PMO itself came out with a clarification stating this, seeing the misreporting and resultant outrage. One wonders whether the Business Standard could have just bothered to ask the PMO whether their “interpretation” was correct, before posting this piece.

4. Times of India/Doordarshan: ‘Narendra Modi said Priyanka was like his daughter, DD censored it’

This is the earliest report of this I can find. Times of India claimed that in his interview to Doordarshan, Modi had said “Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was like his daughter” and that DD later on edited this part out. This report was probably based on the rather oddly edited interview, which was telecast by Doordarshan. This led to a war of words between Priyanka and Modi.

Once again, Modi had to step in and clear this by releasing the full video of the interview. As it turns out, no such statement was ever made. A case of making up statements from half-cooked info, where Doordarshan for once, maybe more at fault than Times of India.

5. Times of India: Govt wants schools to observe ‘good governance day’ on Christmas

This is a fairly recent controversy and should be fresh in everybody’s mind. You can read about it here. In this case too, due to a false report, the HRD ministry had to come out with a clarification, and there too it mentioned that “No Clarification was sought by the reporter for the Secretary, School Education before going to press”. Is it so hard to ask the subject before posting any news about it?

6. Times of India: IIT Delhi director quits over demand for Sachin’s academy, Swamy’s dues

IIT-D’s Director resigned 2 years prior to his term getting over. Times of India, from its sources determined that this was because of 2 reasons: 1. Pressure from the government to allocate land for Sachin Tendulkar’s cricket academy 2. Subramanian Swamy’s salary dues. While the 2nd reason is still under debate, Sachin came out strongly against the first point:

B561mJFCYAE6qNH

This forced Times of India to retract, since such a harsh censuring from India’s greatest sportsperson was clearly something they couldn’t handle. Once again, its clear from Sachin’s post, that Times of India did not bother to confirm the facts with Sachin, before sullying his name. This seems like an epidemic now.

7. Reuters India: India slashes health budget, already one of the world’s lowest

In this story, Reuters India claimed, and I quote, “The government has ordered a cut of nearly 20 percent in its 2014/15 healthcare budget due to fiscal strains, putting at risk key disease control initiatives in a country whose public spending on health is already among the lowest in the world”. The truth again, would be apparent with anyone even mildly familiar with how Budgets work

Every December, Governments have to “Revise Budgetary Estimates” in line with the money they were able to spend till date. In the current scenario, since the Government realised that the they would not be able to spend all the allocated money, it cut its estimates by 20%. The estimate before this adjustment, was in fact 5% more than what the previous Government had allocated in FY 2013-14. This makes its clear that it is not the intent that is lacking, but rather the Government is not in a position to spend this money, due to multiple reasons. But Reuters chose to spin this as if the Government isn’t bothered about Healthcare

8. The Hindu: Ramdev claims cure for Ebola

This piece claimed Baba Ramdev has found a cure for Ebola. It said “Yoga guru Baba Ramdev has put out an advertisement offering a health pack for preventing Ebola virus“. Till then (now for that matter) Baba Ramdev had never claimed to have any such product. Then why was Hindu doing such free publicity for him?

It was based on the ads placed on a site called http://www.ramdevmedicine.com/, which by its own admission has nothing to do with Baba Ramdev. In fact this disclaimer on the front page makes it clear. Wonder if the concerned journalist did not read this or just wanted a story.

rmd

9. The Indian Express: Ghar wapsi: Damage control? Amitabh Bachchan ‘secular’ ad

Right at the end of the year, to be precise, on 31st December 2014, The Indian Express told us this: Amitabh Bachchan has been roped in by BJP to feature in a “Secular Ad” which is the “Brainchild of Modi”, to act as a damage control against misadventures like Ghar Waapsi. The Ad, the story claims, to be released before Republic Day, would feature “Bachchan flying a kite and talking about India’s diversity and culture ”

As of now, Big B has intervened on Twitter and out out this tweet, saying no such offer has been made to him.
Untitled

We wonder who are the sources of The Indian Express, who were privy to such intricate details as to what Amitabh Bachchan would have been doing in the Ad, while Big B himself claims he hasnt been approached!

10. Times of India: RBI to blame for slowdown in manufacturing: Arun Jaitley

You just cant keep Times of India out of the picture. To end the year on a “high”, Times of India claimed that Arun Jaitley said that “RBI’s insistence on keeping high interest rates as the singular factor responsible for the slowdown in the manufacturing sector“. But, if Times of India publishes something, then there almost always has to be a rebuttal

By 12.30pm next day, Arun Jaitley took to Facebook to set the record straight. He clarified that there was not a single sentence reference (not even a word) in his entire speech on either the Reserve Bank or its Governor. He also shared the video of his speech to let readers decide. Another instance of Imaginative Journalism. Sigh!

Editors Note: Some of our readers brought it to our notice that the erstwhile Sr no. 9 in the above post, (  Modi in Rambo Act, saves 15000) actually refers to a news report from the year 2013. Since we are chronicling reports by MSM during the calendar year 2014, this post was out of place. We have now replaced this with a new entry. The inadvertent error is regretted, however, the earlier entry was also a “lie”. This earlier entry is reproduced below:

9. Times of India: Modi in Rambo Act, saves 15000

This figment of imagination story, would put even the most hardcore bhakt to shame. Times of India claimed Modi “managed to bring home some 15,000 stranded Gujarati pilgrims” from Uttarakhand. Of course, anybody with the slightest common sense would realise this is an impossible feat, considering all the logistics, the terrain and the floods in Uttarakhand.

Obviously there was outrage and ridicule on Social Media, which forced Times of India to apologise. As it emerged, what could have actually happened is that Modi Government’s efforts could have helped an estimated 15000 people, in the form of “food, shelter, medicines and transport to reach their homes”. So much for “rescuing 15000 people”.

2014, the year ‘liberals’ lost their marbles

0

The fundamental trick used by insurance companies to advertise their products is to sell lots of fear by wrapping it in random scary predictions of future. Fear and victimization are very strong tools. It is very easy to convince anyone that other people are conspiring to pull them down. It works like narcotics. When the influenced victim wants to consume more and more conspiracy theories, the agents start increasing the dosages.

After 2014 election results, the self-assumed secular-liberal journalists of India had not much to celebrate. People discarded their old banal inclusive concerns and voted for development.

2014 was a bad year for journalists who baked their stories on the flames of secularism. 2014 was a bad year for media faces who made their fortune by glamorizing the victimhood of a few poor non-Hindu individuals during elections. 2014 was a bad year for social figures who manipulated selective bigot stories to generalize a bigger community.

The sensation created by Modi before 2014 results was expected to fade with time for two reasons – a) people had enough politics on their plate, so they were expected to detox it in later part of the year. b) The promises made during elections don’t often match the reality. Some overhyped delusions were expected to break and disappoint people.

However, more than waiting for the Modi wave to make impact, people were also waiting to track the behavioral pattern of those secular-liberal journalists, who faced a severe moral and ideological defeat in May, 2014.

And as expected, these people didn’t fail to disappoint. The miserable lot hibernated for a few days, but then returned with a much more malicious venom to circulate that in focused target groups.

Like insurance agents, these people have desperately started convincing minorities about their unsafe future. This ridiculous post in Scroll.in generalizes a few random events and derives absurd premise of social development.

The post, like many other similar attempts, appears like just another extremely desperate effort to grab attention and terrorize the “minority”. The posts reads:

Churches have been mysteriously burnt, adivasis have been beaten up and others made to participate in Hindu “reconversion” ceremonies, Muslim men have been falsely accused and put in jail for “love jihad”, anti-Muslim riots have taken place in Gujarat: the list is endless. Modi did not so much as condemn any of these.

If you do a very basic google search, you will find that all these issues (conversions, riots, attacks) were prevalent in the previous government regimes too. Then these liberal-secular journalists chose to neglect such incidences as public mishap instead of demonizing it to such extents.

When I read the headline of this post (see the image below), I see scars of many divisive losers who are trying hard hide the wounds they received in 2014.

Screenshot of Scroll.in
A headline from one of the websites that has become the new Tehelka

Hope they get well soon, so that next year, on this day, I write an article titled: 2015, the year liberals became truly liberal.

AAP could win Delhi elections. 2015 not bringing Achchhe Din for BJP?

The organizational focus on Delhi assembly elections was evident when the Aam Aadmi Party declared its candidates even before the Election Commission of India declared the polling dates. They were looking for first mover advantage. And it seems they have secured that.

Many families residing in various parts of Delhi have confirmed that they have been approached by AAP workers at least twice or thrice in the last few weeks, while the BJP was yet to communicate to them.

OpIndia.com has found out that the enthusiasm and dedication among AAP workers and supporters for the Delhi elections is currently far more stronger and intense than among the BJP cadres or Congress supporters.

This was indirectly accepted by BJP President Amit Shah too when he asked BJP workers to overcome laziness and indulge in door-to-door campaign for the Delhi assembly elections.

Kejriwal and Modi
Although this banner was soon removed from the official website of the Aam Aadmi Party, the message is being bought by the Delhi residents.

Amit Shah was forced to concede this reality as AAP has launched a high level and high decibel campaign with pro-Kejriwal and pro-AAP posters put in various corners of the cities, apart from door-to-door campaign.

“This huge difference in communication is almost comparable to what we saw during the general elections,” Santosh Kumar, a resident of Mayur Vihar said, “We could see Modi everywhere and Congress was to be seen nowhere during Lok Sabha elections. Similarly now we see Kejriwal everywhere, and BJP nowhere when assembly elections are approaching.”

AAP is also racing ahead in its communication on new media with its supporters very active on social media websites, apart from the party using tools like automated phone calls.

While BJP supporters agree that AAP is more active and more visible at this stage, they claim that once Prime Minister Narendra Modi starts campaigning, the equations will change.

However, political analysts believe that AAP has already worked on a message to checkmate the “Modi wave”. The party is not directly attacking Modi, but they are attacking the local BJP leaders during their campaign.

And this strategy appears to be working. Many residents, whom OpIndia.com talked to, believe that an AAP government in Delhi will be able to extract more concessions from the centre than a BJP government led by some local BJP leader.

“A BJP government in Delhi will follow directions from the center, while an AAP government in the state will fight for the benefits of local people,” Vivek a resident of Preet Vihar told this reporter. Vivek claims that he voted for BJP in the general elections.

So it appears that the slogan of “Modi for PM, Kejriwal for CM”, which was dropped by AAP after social media embarrassment, is working on ground.

It looks like 2015 may not bring “achchhe din” for the BJP.

Who is reducing Muslims to mere skullcaps? Communals or Seculars?

0

When Narendra Modi refused to wear a skullcap in September 2011, it raised many eyebrows and invited many deductive theories. Most of the outraging individuals and organizations were those who don’t miss to waive the flag of secularism in such situations.

Surprisingly, these people were also the same people who stand for freedom of choice and find it utterly suppressive when girls/women are prescribed dress codes. However, they didn’t wait a minute to suggest a dress code for Modi.

What these people ended up doing is reducing Muslims to a skullcap. They totally ignored the fact that Modi did accept a green shawl that had Islamic texts written on it. For them, skullcap signified Muslims.

It didn’t stop here. Their skull-cap deductive theory moved to another level when Modi was seen wearing donning headgears, turbans, or tribal Dumluks. Modi, in an interview, said that he can’t wear skullcap to appease people. Even though some of the Muslim clerics defended Modi’s choice, the secular brigade kept criticizing Modi and kept reducing Muslims to mere skullcaps.

Again, they totally ignored the fact that Modi, in almost all of his election rallies, kept on telling people that Hindu or Muslims were not enemies of each other, but the common enemy of both Hindus and Muslims was poverty and corruption.

This secular-liberal obsession with religious attire was reflected even in Media, which is controlled by left-liberal narrative. Media started counting skullcaps and burqa in political rallies. Conspiracy theories and politics were drawn from these data. They didn’t realize that by doing so, they were stereotyping Muslims as skullcap wearing and burqa wearing.

Anti-terror mock drill
The mock drill at Surat in Gujarat that kept the secular-liberal brigade busy today

This obsession with attire and linking it to Modi has again come to fore today when secular-liberal crowd is making an issue of Gujarat police organizing an anti-terror drill, where a person wearing skullcap was playing the role of a terrorists. While this is something the government could have avoided, once again by outraging against this incident, people are reducing the Muslim community to a skullcap.

Please note that a mock drill is a fictional representation. It is almost like a movie. And thus such protests is akin to what fundamentalists Muslims had objected to when the Tamil movie Vishwaroopam was released.

Yes, we can’t equate a film producer with police force (although the police claims that they use all kinds of attire, and media chose to highlight only when it was turn of skullcap). While police force could avoid taking steps that may stereotype a community, liberals are doing everything to strengthen that skullcap stereotype.

It is to be noted that in 2012, under the governance of UPA, anti-hijacking mock drill a similar mock drill was conducted at the Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport, where persons playing the role of terrorists were wearing skullcaps. A small section of religious leaders among Muslims had chose to protest it, but the secular-liberal crowd didn’t protest. Perhaps they understood that this will reduce Muslims to mere skullcaps.

But what happens to them when Modi could even remotely be linked to such an incident? They may think that by outraging on such issues they are making sure that Modi is reduced to anti-Muslim bigot, but in reality they are reducing Muslims to skullcaps and themselves to hypocrites.