Monday, December 23, 2024
Home Blog Page 7020

Did news channels fabricate live data on election counting day to push up TRPs?

0

Viewers have often wondered why various news channels show different data for live election results on a counting day.

Earlier it was thought that this could be due to channels using different “sources” to gather data, but it seems that this could be a complete fraud.

ABP News vs Times Now
Are news channels resorting to committing scams just to get ahead and attract TRPs?

This issue was raided by Times Now’s Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami during the live coverage of counting results for Jharkhand and Jammu & Kashmir assembly elections.

Arnab claimed that other news channels were “fudging” data to show that they were ahead of Times Now and the fastest in bringing out news, and thus cheating the viewers.

He questioned how could other channels show trends for more seats than for which information was available from official sources e.g. the Election Commission website or reliable sources e.g. data analysis company like Nielsen.

This is the question common viewers have always asked and wondered, but this is the first time a mainstream popular journalist has posted it.

Arnab concluded that the news channels were projecting limited data on a wider number of seats to fool viewers into believing that they had “faster sources” and thus viewers should watch only Times Now. He called their data “manufactured”:


If the TV channels are really fabricating data and using statistical projections to show as if they have information on a larger number of assembly seats, it is very unethical. It can’t be justified by claiming some data analysis.

Live results are no opinion polls where a news channel can project data and based studio debates on those. It is playing with facts and real information. It is highly unscrupulous and amounts to misleading the common man.

TV news channels don’t fall under the purview of Press Council of India so most probably they will go unpunished. However, this fact needs to be highlighted and people should know how low media has fallen in their senseless and sensationalist chase of TRPs.

You know how bad it is when a sensationalist TRP seeking journalist like Arnab Goswami comes out to be the most principled one.

Calling PK anti-Hindu is stupid; Hindus don’t need to turn so touchy!

Many people, especially on social media, have been calling to boycott the Bollywood movie PK, calling it “Anti-Hindu”.

PK the movie
No glory in fighting meaningless battles

These people argue that the movie mocks only Hindu religion and supports “Love Jihad”, thus it deserves to be boycotted.

While it is a democratic right of an Indian citizen to express his views or call for a boycott of a movie – after all call for a boycott is far better than call for beheadings just because you don’t agree with a worldview – Hindus need to choose their battles carefully.

Protesting against a Bollywood movie is the last thing one may do when the Hindu community is up against so many challenges – biggest of which is media narrative monopolized by people who are allergic to Hinduism.

One could argue that movies are also part of media and thus this protest is also a tool to fight that monopoly. That is a fair argument, but it doesn’t cut ice with PK.

Let us look at some facts related to this issue:

1. PK is NOT an anti-Hindu movie, but it is an anti-religion movie. Yes, most of the movie deals with Hindu themes, but it ALSO touches upon conversions by Christian missionaries and terrorism. The scene being argued to insult Lord Shiva is not insulting Shiva but it’s a funny physical comedy involving a character who worked in a drama company and was wearing Shiva costume at that time.

2. Muslim fundamentalists threaten to kill people for the insult of religion. This threat causes many artists to not touch Islamic themes. But it doesn’t mean that Hindus too start becoming like Muslim fundamentalists! There is nothing to learn from them. The Muslim fundamentalists have only weakened Islam and caused people like Tasleema Nasreen to feel disgusted and leave religion. Do Hindus want to follow the same path and push people out of religion?

3. Just because Aamir Khan is a Muslim, it doesn’t become logical to impute a motive for what he is doing. It makes one appear like a religious bigot. Furthermore, a movie depends on a Director’s worldview. PK is a Raju Hirani movie, not an Aamir Khan movie.

4. More than Hindu themes, PK mocks godmen and babas. By protesting against PK, we end up owning the godmen and babas and their deeds. Do we want Hinduism to be known through godmen and babas or through the spiritualism and philosophical knowledge Hinduism possesses? Why should we feel bad if a godman is being mocked? The most recent baba in news – Rampal – used to preach against worshipping Hindu gods. All godmen are not pro-Hindu!

5. The Love Jihad angle is an exaggeration. Yes, PK is guilty of political correctness and shows that a Pakistani Muslim man can love an Indian Hindu girl without religion being an impediment – as rare an event as an alien visiting earth. But that doesn’t mean Love Jihad is being summarily denied. We need to highlight more Love Jihad cases so that it becomes part of the mainstream discourse. Instead of outraging, Hindus should be learning the art and telling their own stories through movies and other works of art.

6. And finally, Hinduism doesn’t censor art or philosophy. We have Kamasutra as well as Brahamcharya. We have allowed atheistic and hedonistic philosophies to work under the parent Hindu fold. Just like OMG: Oh My God was also an anti-religion movie but was consistent with the Hindu philosophy, PK too can be interpreted to consistent with our faith and beliefs.

Therefore it’s a futile battle. The mind space and resources should be devoted to doing other constructive work. PK is no threat or insult to Hinduism.

By protesting against PK, Hindus are making themselves appear like those stupid Muslims who protest against everything.

Internet Hindus come together to help Pakistani Hindus

Popular TV newsreader Sagarika Ghose had coined the term “Internet Hindus” as a pejorative – a term to insult those people active on the internet, especially on social media, and who were proud of their religious identity as Hindus.

But last week these Internet Hindus did what Sagarika Ghose could never do – do something in the real world rather than pontificating in the virtual world (internet) or screaming in the electronic world (TV news).

A group of such Internet Hindus decided to help a group of Pakistani Hindus who have been battling cold weather and cold attitude of Indian authorities in the national capital.

These Hindus, who were persecuted in Pakistan by Islamists, had enough of it in Pakistan and decided to be in India for a new life. Many of them came long ago and had been struggling to make their ends meet.

Numbering hundreds, these Pakistani Hindus are currently staying in a makeshift camp in an area known as Majnu Ka Tila in Delhi.

This eerily reminds of the refugee camps in Delhi that were set for Kashmiri Pandits who were driven out of their homeland by Islamists.

And obviously, when our governments failed the Kashmiri Pandits, they would hardly take care of Pakistani Hindus. As a result, these Hindus have been living in abject conditions for months. A neighbouring Gurudwara was the only entity that came to help – once again proving how Sikhs have been protecting Hindus.

But the Gurudwara could only provide langars, while these families, which include around 250 children, needed much more. And there was no help from the authorities.

While it would have been easy for likes of Sagarika Ghose to preach why the government doesn’t do anything for them, many top journalists didn’t even pay this lip service to these Pakistani Hindus.

But the Internet Hindus went beyond lip service.

It started with many people sharing information on Twitter and Facebook about these Pakistani Hindus, and soon Internet Hindus decided to act.

Last week, these Pakistani Hindus received help in shape of blankets, notebooks, socks, clothes, etc. – all donated by Internet Hindus.

Those leading the activities were Tajindar Singh Bagga of Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena and Twitter users like @Keisar_ and @Damru_.

Pakistani Hindus
Pakistani Hindus sharing some memorable moments with those who came out to help them (Photo source)

These people, driven entirely by compassion for their fellow brothers and sisters, have been reporting developments about their help to Pakistani Hindus, and they have interesting and heart-warming stories to share.

One Pakistani Hindu lady offered these Good Samaritans to join for lunch, which they did. In fact, they asked for more rotis and the lady was only happy to oblige!

The idea was to not make them feel like beggars who were being given free materials but to make them feel as someone equal.

“Why I support #PakHindus is because they are honest and are seriously looking for a source of income. They hate doles. They feel shy.” tweeted @Keisar_ confirming the above outlook.

These Good Samaritans have confirmed that after helping with immediate requirements to fight chilly winters in Delhi, their next step is to help them get some jobs and become part of the Indian society. A group of lawyers have also gone to help them to help them with visa and citizenship requirements.

Surely a moment of pride for Internet Hindus, who have proved themselves to be better than TV Liberals.

This is why Times of India is pro-Congress, Jain brothers owe their wealth to Gandhis

0

It is not new for the Times of India to do hit jobs against people who are against Congress. From “Rambo Modi” story to the latest “No holiday on Christmas” one, Times Group has helped Congress more than Rahul Gandhi’s leadership has.

But ever wondered why the Times Group is pro-Congress?

No, it is not due to ideology. While the bulk of Indian media is left-leaning and thus anti-BJP, the reason behind Times Group being pro-Congress is because the family that owns the media conglomerate feels obliged and indebted towards the Nehru-Gandhi family.

The Jains, who own the Times Group, are returning a big favour that was given to them by Indira Gandhi during the Emergency period, and before that, the extended Sahu-Jain family had received a favour by Jawaharlal Nehru after independence.

While Indira gave them the power and wealth they currently enjoy, without which they would have been ordinary businessmen, Nehru too tried to save them, though he was not so brazen as his daughter Indira.

The Times of India
Free in the real sense?

The story goes back to the days when the Times of India was owned by Ramkrishna Dalmia, who is also related to the Sahu-Jain family.

Dalmia had acquired Times Group from its British owners just after independence, but in the process, he had misused his position as Chairman of an insurance company. This irregularity was ignored by the then government led by Jawaharlal Nehru.

However, Nehru’s son-in-law and Indira Gandhi’s husband Feroze Gandhi, who was a man of his principles, raised the issue in the parliament and insisted on an inquiry.

It resulted in the case going to court where Ramkrishna Dalmia was found guilty of financial impropriety. He was sent to Tihar Jail for two years.

Despite the proof of this fraud, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru didn’t impose any heavy penalty on the group and allowed the ownership of Times Group to be transferred from Ramkrishna Dalmia to Sahu Shanti Prasad Jain, who was the son-in-law of Dalmia family and grandfather of the current Jain brothers.

But the biggest help came more than a decade after.

Sahu Shanti Prasad Jain, the new owner of the Times Group, was found guilty of selling subsidized newsprint obtained from the government in the black market in the 1960s. This was illegal and a breach of trust. Not only this resulted in Jain going to jail, but the ownership was taken over by the government of India.

Suddenly, the powerful Jains were left without controlling power on their media business!

The newspaper remained with the government for almost a decade. Jains had lost all hopes of running the business like their private concern, which it was before Jain was found guilty of black marketing and violation of government trust.

But a miracle happened during Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi in 1976.

Indira Gandhi, who is notorious for nationalizing banks and putting state control over businesses, suddenly found respect for private property and returned the ownership of Times Group to Sahu Shanti Prasad Jain’s son Ashok Jain.

Now put yourself in the shoes of the Jain family. Will you not be indebted?

And they were indebted. And they started paying back this debt with immediate effect.

During Emergency, The Times of India was termed as “The Times of Indira”, where editorials in praise of Sanjay Gandhi, who was ruthless during Emergency, were published.

Later Ashok Jain removed most of the senior journalists who were critical of Nehru-Gandhi family as well as those journalists who were nationalists.

And the tradition seems to be continuing to this day. The media group also enjoys palatial buildings in Lutyens Delhi that were allotted by Congress governments and is used virtually as private bungalow by the Jain family.

It’s human nature. You have to return the favour in some form, and the Times Group is doing that.

BJP to give tickets to party loyalists popular on social media

0

NEW DELHI: If reports are true, it seems that BJP central leadership is finally waking up to the mood on social media.

As was reported by OpIndia.com earlier, many BJP supporters had started getting disillusioned and disappointed with the party as they felt that their opinions were not being heard.

BJP symbol
Many urban areas in Delhi could be influenced with opinions on social media

Now the party appears to have realized that they need to actively involve their supporters on social media.

According to a report published by Hindi newspaper Amar Ujala, central leadership of BJP has asked its state unit in Delhi to give tickets to those persons who are active and popular on social media.

Although it’s not yet clear if the party is planning to choose a totally new and fresh face amongst its social media support base or it’s just asking ticket hopefuls to be active on social media, it’s clear that the party is now keeping social media in its electoral equations.

It will be a game-changer if Delhi unit of BJP actually give ticket to someone who’s popular and influential on social media, apart from being active on ground too. This could placate angry and disappointed supporters, who would think that they have got one of their own to raise their issues.

Earlier, many supporters of BJP had trended #BaggaVsAK49 and demanded Tajinder Bagga of Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena to be given ticket to fight against Arvind Kejriwal. Bagga is one of the popular BJP supporting Twitter user who has also done ground work.

There are other contenders too, but before that BJP will have to officially confirm this news and invite its online supporters to apply for tickets in the upcoming assembly elections in Delhi.

ISIS supporting Indian Muslim @ShamiWitness had predicted Islamist attack on Australia

0

NEW DELHI: There are reports that one of those taken hostage by Islamist terrorists at a café in Sidney could be Indian. However, there is another Indian connection to this unfortunate terror attack in Australia.

Pro-ISIS twitter account @ShamiWitness, which was being run by Mehdi Masroor Biswas, the West Bengal born Indian Muslim youth working in a software company in Bangalore, had predicted that Australia will soon see radicalized Muslims taking revenge against the Australian government.

OpIndia.com has accessed the following set of tweets by @ShamiWitness published around three months back, where he warned the Australian government against “terrorizing their Muslim citizens”:


It should be noted that @ShamiWitness used to post tweets very discreetly and he used to avoid mentioning direct threat of violence and terror attacks as it could get his Twitter account suspended, but in these tweets, he is clearly warning that “Australia will have to pay” for its “anti-Muslim” acts.

Tweets
Anti-Australia tweets by @ShamiWitness

OpIndia.com readers might feel that @ShamiWitness is talking about some nightclub raid in which common citizens were arrested, however, it refers to a raid on suspected ISIS supporters in a Sydney nightclub on the same day.

The day @ShamiWitness tweeted these set of tweets, Australia police had detained more than 15 people who were suspected to be planning a terror attack in Sydney.

And it seems they succeeded today. Sydney police will have to explain this.

Apart from Australia, this “Indian connection” should worry India too.

The way India is getting on the ISIS map, the next target of ISIS supporters could be India. Indian and Australia should work together on this front and share intelligence.

There are reports about many pro-Islamist Twitter accounts being run from Australia that indulge in anti-India tweets. This should be taken seriously as they could turn out to be similar threats to our security.

Australian agencies should monitor such anti-Indian Twitter accounts while Indian agencies should be monitoring accounts like @ShamiWitness that indulge in anti-Australia tweets.

Former editor of The Hindu believes Pakistan has a ‘Right to Retaliate’

0

Siddharth Varadarajan, the former editor of the left-leaning and family-owned newspaper The Hindu, seems to believe that Pakistan has a right to retaliate and take revenge, and it’s the Indians, who are guilty of provoking them into doing unruly things.

Mr Varadrajan, who was asked to leave The Hindu in October last year, betrayed this belief on Twitter when he replied to Shekhar Gupta, former editor of The Indian Express.

Middle finger by Pakistani hockey players after Champions Trophy victory over India
One of the obscene gestures by Pakistani hockey players before they become even more aggressive and obscene, removing clothes and swearing at the Indian spectators.

Shekhar Gupta had tweeted condemning Pakistani hockey players for their unruly and obscene behaviour on the field after winning the semi-final match against India during Champions Trophy.

It should be noted that everyone, including the Pakistani coach, had condemned the Pakistani players for their behaviour. It was deemed a serious breach of discipline and World Hockey suspended two players for the shameful act.

But Siddharth Varadarajan jumped to defend the Pakistani players by objecting to the tweet of Shekhar Gupta. He justified the shameful behaviour by claiming that Pakistani players were earlier “provoked” by the Indian unruly crowd.


Please note that this argument is almost similar to what rapists or bigots put forward – that they were “provoked” and thus committed the crime.

It is ironical that the same set of people like Varadarajan preach tolerance to everyone, but jump to defend Pakistanis and “fellow travellers” when they behave like intolerant bullies.

Earlier, Rajdeep Sardesai’s attack on an NRI was also justified by the same people on the ground that Rajdeep was “provoked” by the crowd before he abused and physically assaulted an NRI.

However, Mr Varadrajan seems to believe that Pakistan has some special privileges regarding this “right to retaliate”. And he has a history to it.

As editor of The Hindu, Mr Varadrajan had got the newspaper to publish a report that virtually justified beheadings of Indian soldiers by Pakistani Army.

The report, to which the Defense Ministry had then objected, had a similar tone to what got reflected in Varadarajan’s tweet. It gave examples of how the Indian army had “provoked” the Pakistani army before Pakistan decided to retaliate by beheading some Indian soldiers.

In wake of this, it is hardly surprising that Varadarajan decided to justify the act of Pakistani hockey players. After all, this is nothing compared to justifying the aggression by the Pakistani army.

While Mr Varadrajan has full rights to believe what he says and prefer Pakistan over India because he is not even an Indian citizen (he is a US citizen), OpIndia.com would expect a bit more objectivity and fairness from him in India-Pakistan matters.

AAP infiltrated by Khalistani separatists? Why is Arvind Kejriwal silent?

0

When a senior leader of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Prashant Bhushan spoke in support of Kashmiri separatists, party supremo Kejriwal was quick to term it as Bhushan’s “personal views”, but he has maintained a strategic silence on the issue of party leaders supporting Khalistani separatists.

Khalistan movement refers to a hardline Sikh demand for a separate country for Sikhs. This demand has never found popular support among common Sikhs as they feel that their interests are well protected within India. However, this movement has always found support from Pakistan.

Khalistan movement was at peak during Indira Gandhi regime with likes of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale leading an armed struggle. But it slowly fizzled out thanks to nationalist Sikhs in Army and politics, who could save India from another partition.

But the movement still finds some support among some areas in Punjab. Earlier this year, pro-Khalistani outfits had declared support to AAP during the Lok Sabha elections.

And it worked. The only seats AAP could win anywhere in the country were in Punjab.

But questions should be asked if AAP is playing a dangerous game by going soft on Khalistani separatists for electoral gains?

Although AAP chief Kejriwal has never made a categorical statement about the relationship between pro-Khalistani outfits and AAP, he could argue that he can’t stop anyone from supporting him.

Just like Congress supported AAP during Delhi government formation in December 2013 without AAP asking for it openly, Kejriwal could claim that pro-Khalistani outfits supported AAP in a similar manner.

But now Arvind Kejriwal can’t afford to remain silent on this issue.


A photograph released by Tajinder Singh Bagga of Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena (see the tweet above) shows Jarnail Singh, an AAP leader who was a candidate from West Delhi in the 2014 general elections, addressing a rally of Khalistan supporters.

As one can clearly see, the rally has posters demanding a separate Sikh homeland of Khalistan, and thus it is asking for the division of India. An unconstitutional and dangerous demand.

The rally took place on 5 June 2011 in London, as confirmed by Bagga to OpIndia.com and it raises serious issues about the relationship between pro-Khalistan movement and AAP.

Will AAP remain silent for electoral gains even if it means that the unity and sovereignty of the country is weakened?

Khalistani movement has been supported by Pakistan, which also supports Kashmiri separatist movement. Isn’t AAP playing into the hands of Pakistan by going soft on such issues?

In fact, it raises serious questions if Pakistan could be funding some of these activities. One is forced to link it with the fact that AAP doesn’t show Pakistan as a country in its donations list.

Check out this official online form for donation to AAP. It shows all countries in the drop-down list except Pakistan. It doesn’t mean that people from Pakistan can’t donate to AAP (nowhere on the website it asks those living in Pakistan to stay away).

It means that people residing in Pakistan will have to choose some other country while making the donation, which means that the donations from Pakistan will be a non-transparent process. This comes from a party that asks for transparency in all walks of public life. Why is AAP afraid of disclosing donations received from Indians living in Pakistan?

AAP should come clean on these issues that hint at the party going soft on Pakistan backed groups such as Kashmiri separatists by Prashant Bhushan and Khalistani separatists by Jarnail Singh.

In fact, this is not only going soft on Khalistanis but now it’s about sharing the stage with Khalistanis after this exposé by Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena.

An AAP leader is seen making demands to break up the country, and the party chief Arvind Kejriwal must speak up now.

Is #ShamiWitness incident a deliberate attempt to put India on ISIS priority map?

0

While the liberal crowd in India is busy bailing out Mehdi Masroor Biswas, the Bangalore based youth who operated @ShamiWitness, one of the most influential Twitter account pushing ISIS propaganda, one needs to analyze if this incident could be part of a bigger conspiracy.

Let’s not forget that this has happened a few days after another Indian Muslim youth from Kalyan in Maharashtra, who joined ISIS to fight “infidel forces”, was brought back to India and arrested.

ISIS in Kashmir
ISIS supporters in Kashmir

In both cases, the disclosure by the youths that they were working for ISIS has been voluntary.

The Kalyan based youth returned of his own, apparently being unhappy at not being given chance to fight in the battlefield, and the Bangalore based youth admitted to running the Twitter account while talking to a British news channel.

Please note that Mehdi could have simply refused to talk to the British channel, and then taken further precautions to go fully anonymous. But he decided to disclose his virtual identity and activities, fully knowing that this will create a furore in India and could land him in serious trouble.

He also knew that the liberal crowd in India will bail him out, so there was hope that disclosure may not hurt him much, but how does it exactly benefit him?

After all, there is no fun being arrested and spending some weeks in jail, even if you are confident that a liberal India media and Human Rights activist will make sure you are not punished.

We believe that this could be a well thought of a plan to put India on the priority map of ISIS.

ISIS is growing in strength and there is a real possibility that they will be recognized as a legitimate government in areas they control. Just like the US has finally agreed to talk to Taliban in Afghanistan, US could soon offer this comprise formula to ISIS – you control the territory but don’t advance in more areas.

The areas controlled by ISIS are oil rich, and they could fund activities outside their areas once they settle into governance.

It’s obvious that ISIS would try to fund supportive movements in and around the Middle East. India is too far away from them.

However, Kashmiri separatists and Pakistani intelligence agencies have been trying to involve ISIS into Kashmir.

We have already seen some youths waving ISIS flags in Kashmir, but this has not been enough. ISIS doesn’t see India as a natural enemy yet. For them, Iran is a bigger and close-to-home enemy. Islamists in India and Pakistan want to change that.

With @ShamiWitness Twitter account, followed by many ISIS fighters and supporters, disclosed as being operated by an Indian Muslim, the ISIS support system is expected to take a closer look at India, and Kashmir could come on their priority map – a benefit Mehdi Masroor Biswas, or his bosses, could be looking at.

Al Qaida has already announced an Indian arm, and now with ISIS focusing on India, it could be music to Pakistani and Kashmiri separatist ears.

Is that the plan?

Shahi Imam publicly calls for Love Jihad, Indian media doesn’t report it

0

While condemning the recent religious conversion of Muslims in Agra by a Hindu group, Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid ended up admitting what has been being denied by the Muslim leaders and liberal commentators recently.

Syed Ahmed Bukhari, the Shahi Imam, called on Muslims to fight such religious conversions through “Love Jihad” i.e. marrying Hindu women and converting them to Islam.

Shahi Imam
Shahi Imam has accepted something with outspoken honesty, which others have been dishonestly denying.

His call for Love Jihad, with the objective to increase population and strength of Muslims in India, came during the Friday prayers earlier this week, as reported by the website New Age Islam.

There is no reason to doubt the veracity of the website as it is run by a Muslim who himself is committed to propagate Islam.

Shahi Imam’s call for Love Jihad was greeted by slogans of “Allahu Akbar” by thousands of Muslims inside the mosque and outside it, the website reports.

While Shahi Imam’s uttering is on expected lines given the kind of statements he has been issuing ever since BJP announced Narendra Modi as its Prime Ministerial candidate, what is intriguing is the silence of the Indian media on this issue.

The India media, which doesn’t lose a minute in highlighting and amplifying any “controversial” statement by any random self-appointed Hindu leader with virtually no following, chose to ignore Shahi Imam’s speech delivered to a large crowd.

Is there a concerted attempt by the media to make sure that the unsuspecting public starts believing that fundamentalists Muslims don’t believe in “Love Jihad”, and that it is a myth propagated by likes of Yogi Adityanath?

One wishes that the Indian media was as honest and outspoken as Shahi Imam, who proved that the concept of Love Jihad was a reality and not any figment of imagination by some political groups looking for electoral benefits in Uttar Pradesh.