Ayodhya dispute

The bench today reprimanded Nirmohi Akhara for its unpreparedness in the case and for not being able to produce relevant evidence

Nirmohi Akhara presented its arguments on the first day of daily hearing of Ayodhya case in Supreme Court

On March 8, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had referred the long-standing Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute for mediation.

On March 8, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court had referred the long-standing Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute for mediation. The mediation panel is chaired by former Supreme Court judge Justice FMI Kalifulla, along with spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and senior Advocate Sriram Panchu.

Ravi Shankar Prasad has once again batted for expediting the Ram Janmabhoomi case.

The three-member mediation panel sought an extension of time to reach an amicable solution.

Sadhvi Pragya acknowledged playing an instrumental role in razing the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992 and admitted that she will now help build the Ram Mandir at the disputed place.

It would be ignorant and offensive to deny that the dispute revolves around faith and dignity of faith for all the parties involved matter equally.

Rejecting the plea, CJI Ranjan Gogoi upheld the Allahabad high courts order of Rs 5 lakh fine on the petitioner

Iqbal Ansari praised PM Modi and Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi for carrying out the development work in Ayodhya.