delhi anti-hindu riots

Delhi Court has found sufficient grounds to proceed against Sharjeel Imam for offences in the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1949 (UAPA) and sedition

Violence that hit the national capital in 2020 was a brutal reminder of India and its tryst with those who wish to annihilate Hindus and balkanise the nation.

It would not be a stretch of logic to say that the conviction of Dinesh Yadav appears to be a gross miscarriage of justice.

Delhi court frames charges against 10 accused in the Delhi anti-Hindu riots, observing that their objective was to create fear among Hindus

The court praised the courage shown by Delhi Police head constable Deepak Dahiya for resolutely standing his ground and doing his duty despite an imminent threat to his life.

A Delhi court observed that mobile data of some of the accused in the Delhi riots case cannot be permitted to be shared with the co-accused as it contained pornographic content and personal videos 'that may infringe their privacy'.

What does not really come as a surprise is the fact that this is not the first time The Quint has whitewashed either a terrorist or a criminal.

The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Suresh saying that there was no concrete evidence of his involvement in the anti-Hindu Delhi riots and witness statements were contradictory.

On 15th June, the Delhi High Court granted bail to Jamia Milia Islamia student leader Asif Iqbal Tanha, far-left ‘activists’ Devangana Kalita and Natasha Narwal in the Anti-Hindu Delhi riots case.

Rajdeep Sardesai and others have been using the death of her father to stir sympathy for UAPA accused Natasha Narwal, claiming that her arrest was wrongful.