places of worship

In the Places of Worship Act case, by prioritising temporary calm over resolution, the judiciary has set a bad precedent

As the fate of this Act relies on the judgment of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice KV Viswanathan, let’s take a look at the career trajectory of these judges.

The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered that no further suits can be registered in the country against places of worship till further orders from it

Supreme Court of India is set to hear a batch of petitions on December 12, challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions in the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.

In the petition, Congress leaders called for directions by the apex court, ordering the state governments and lower courts to refrain from enforcing survey orders that, according to them, risk disrupting “communal harmony” and cited provisions of the Places of Worship Act of 1991.

Not only Arfa Khanum Sherwani but the entire left-liberal ecosystem has long been thumping its chest and claiming that Muslims gave ‘Qurbani’ of Babri ‘mosque’ for the sake of ‘peace’ in the country is the same as them peddling the lie that Muslims chose to stay back in India after partition.

A Muslim migrant identified as Mamadou Balde vandalised the Mizuoka Hachiman shrine in Japan

The Places of Worship Act was passed by the Congress-led govt of PV Narasimha Rao in 1991 when the illegal Babri Mosque was still standing on top of Ram Janmabhoomi

The places of worship act is challenged by various lawyers in the Supreme Court. The court will hear all the petitions and interventions together.

Talking about 'conjoined past' of Hindus and Muslims in India, Chetan Bhagat suggested Mosque+Temple hybrid structures called 'Mosples'