Pseudo-secularism

On July 31, a Jalabhishek Yatra by Hindus in Haryana's Nuh was brutally attacked by local Meo Muslims. Though the mainstream media and their 'secular liberal' voices tried their best to pass it as 'clashes during a rally', social media videos and eye witness statements soon proved that it was a well-coordinated, planned attack.

Abhisar Sharma claimed that the two Indian ministers did not react to Blinken's remarks there by validating US claims. However, Sharma's claims were premature as Dr Jaishankar soon gave a 'befitting reply'.

The assertion of the dharmic identity has proved 'provocative' to the secular geniuses, as their 'secularism' enfolded not separating the state and the religion, but rather claiming the state and destroying the religion.

However, apparently, the fault lies with the Hindus, because how dare they take out a procession and play songs for their festivals? For India's 'secular liberals', Hindus should be always accommodating, docile, subversive and never dare to exist in what they deem as 'Muslim areas'.

Shiv Sena has asked Congress to throw away the 'hijab' of fake secularism and counter the BJP's narrative in an effective manner.

The media, which should ideally have been reporting the truth on how a Muslim mob burnt Hindus to death, was far more bothered about being politically correct and whitewashing the crime, some even going forward to blame the victims for their own murders.

Roshni Ali's plea in Calcutta High Court had led to blanket ban on firecrackers in West Bengal. The order was set aside by Supreme Court later.

After facing backlash on social media, Elle India deleted the controversial article that had ranted against Hindus.

Rifat Jawaid was miffed that in 'new India', appeasement in the form of covering up Hindu deities for Namaz is not encouraged.

Radicals and fanatics are chopping off limbs, torching vehicles over allegations of 'blasphemy' but Hindus are branded terrorists because they did not like FabIndia ad.