Ram Janmabhoomi

Rajeev Dhavan, the advocate representing the Muslim side in Ram Janmabhoomi case, spoke of the Quran and also contended in the apex court why the Hindu side was not being questioned by the Supreme Court

Prohibitory orders under section 144 have been imposed across Ayodhya district

With Ram Janmabhoomi verdict expected in November, schools and campuses in the vicinity are being identified so that the additional forces can be accommodated.

The hearing in the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case has entered its 30th day today.

KN Govindacharya has requested the court that if live video streaming was not possible, at least an audio recording of the hearing should be available for the public.

Why can't Ram’s birthplace have rights like a juristic person, SC asks Muslim parties in Ayodhya case

CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked senior Advocate Dhavan on whether he accepts that if the Hindus carried out prayers in the outer courtyard in the 'chabutra', it would mean there would be a deity.

Advocate MC Dhingra stated before the bench that the disputed Mosque site was a Shia property and the Shia board is ready to give their share of the land to Hindus.

The typical 'modern' Indian mind still seeks validation on benchmarks set by the erstwhile colonial master, which it has internalized so deep within its consciousness that it has come to accept them as not just the normal but also the ideal.

The CJI clarifies that the counsels can take as much time as they want to put forth their submissions