Wikipedia

While Wikipedia claims that everyone is free to edit, the truth is that there are only a handful of people who have the ultimate say in what content is added and what isn’t.

The government pointed out that a select editorial group has control and also questioned why Wikipedia should not be treated as a publisher, a demand OpIndia raised recently.

According to Pirate Wires, the Wikipedia editors avoided detection by working on articles in small groups and aiding one another in case of pushback from editors not associated with 'Tech for Palestine'.

Delhi High Court on Wednesday ordered Wikipedia to take down a page on the ongoing defamation case filed by ANI against the online encyclopaedia

When OpIndia's readers tried to share the link of dossier on Wikipedia on their Facebook accounts, the social media platform promptly removed the link and warned users against sharing it. Facebook has effectively banned OpIndia's dossier on Wikipedia.

OpIndia research on Wikipedia focuses on its left bias and how it pays editors and funds dubious anti-India orgs

ANI had filed a contempt plea in Delhi High Court against Wikipedia charging non compliance of the order.

Editors of the Wikipedia page on Godhra train burning gives more importance to ‘opinions of scholars’ over court verdicts

Wikipedia's prejudice and penchant for left-leaning narratives are well-documented and undeniable, providing a glimpse into the platform's disdain for facts and a singular propensity for peddling propaganda.

Appearing on behalf of ANI, Advocate Sidhant Kumar submitted, "They have closed my (ANI's) page for editing by anyone and can only be edited through their representatives." He argued that Wikipedia is allowing only selective edits on their page.